Blog

Germany’s Conspiracy Theory Hotline

Germany has become increasingly tyrannical in its fight to combat dissenters who do not believe in abandoning nationalism for Brussels. Not only does the German government want to banish political parties who dissent from its narrative, but it has implemented a hotline where citizens may report others who spread “disinformation” and “conspiracy theories.”

The Violence Prevention Network, the Amadeu Antonio Foundation, and the Center for Applied Deradicalization Research launched  “Advice Compass on Conspiracy Thinking” (Beratungskompass Verschwörungsdenken) in 2024 as part of the “LivingDemocracy!” project. “Conspiracy theories are accompanied by lies and disinformation. They are deliberately spread to divide our society and destroy trust in independent science, free media, and democratic institutions. Conspiracy theories can lead to extremist ideologies and drive perpetrators to commit crimes and acts of violence. Antisemitic conspiracy theories are particularly often spread,” Federal Interior Minister Nancy Faeser said.

The government’s own website discusses how important it was to silence “disinformation” during the COVID-19 pandemic. The government is urging citizens to be on the lookout for anyone spreading conspiracies surrounding the war in Ukraine

Their website warns the public to look for “people in the immediate environment. Such as family, friends, or school” as they may reveal their independent thinking to the people closest to them. “Open dialogue on equal terms often seems impossible because the other person is not receptive to arguments,” the government states, warning citizens that they should report these free thinkers to authorities who are trained to combat extremism.

Keep reading

Treasury Secretary Bessent: “The Chinese Told Us Once Joe Biden Came into Office They Just Ignored Their Obligations”

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent spoke with reporters on Monday following trade talks this past weekend with Chinese officials in Geneva, Switzerland.

As The Gateway Pundit reported on Sunday, Bessent announced that they struck a deal during their eight-hour meetings.

China and the United States have agreed to reduce tariffs by May 14, with China retaining a 10% tariff on American goods while the US retains a 10% reciprocal tariff on Chinese goods. Additionally, China has agreed to help the US “take aggressive actions to stem the flow of fentanyl and other precursors from China to illicit drug producers in North America.”

On Monday morning Secretary Bessent spoke with reporters about the trade talks with China. Bessent told them that China blew off their trade obligations when Joe Biden entered office.

They knew he was weak.

Keep reading

The covid mRNA “vaccines” are a bioweapon and a tool for depopulation

A full-fledged effort to depopulate the planet is underway. It would appear that the human population is being truncated. Shortening lifespans on one end and reducing birth rates on the other.

The mRNA nanoparticle injections [also known as covid vaccines] are associated with neurological disorders, autoimmune diseases, heart problems, strokes, cancers, metabolic disorders and a host of other diseases and disorders, including death. One need not be a scientist or medical doctor to figure out that by giving people chronic diseases and illnesses, you are shortening their life spans.

A recent study was published showing a shocking 37% decrease in life span after covid injections. If this data is extrapolated over the course of a life span, that would mean an approximate 29-year reduction in life span. This means that children receiving the mRNA bioweapon injections will be lucky to live into their 50s.

Conversely, studies also show a dramatic drop in successful conception rates among vaccinated women compared to unvaccinated women. The study looked at 1.3 million Czech women aged 18–39. Those who received the covid bioweapon injection had a 33% decrease in pregnancies compared to those not injected with the covid bioweapon.

I guess Pfizer, Moderna and company fixed the Social Security problem.

There is plenty of data out there regarding the biodistribution of the spike protein damaging organs, including getting into the testis and ovaries. This and the reverse transcription pose a significant risk to the human genome itself, according to the Florida Department of Health. There is no way to predict the potential mutations that could occur over multiple generations.

Will future generations struggle with multiple health issues, and will our species be plagued with chronic diseases? Will future generations experience massive issues with sterility? Will test tube birth be the only form of birth in the future?

Essentially, the Transhumanists are depopulating us while experimenting on us so they can figure out a way to merge with technology and live forever.

Keep reading

Border Patrol Agent Reports Witnessing UFOs in Arizona

Government officials have reported seeing a wide range of UAP along Arizona’s border with Mexico. In an interview that aired on May 10, News Nation’s Ross Coulthart sat down with whistleblower Bob Thompson to discuss these sightings and their implications for national security.

“I’ve seen orbs, I’ve seen strange lights that were bright and hovering… A lot of stuff at night,” Thompson stated. As a US Border Patrol agent, he has access to highly sensitive equipment including infrared sensors and night-vision goggles. “[These UAP] were not showing visible forms of propulsion, even with goggles,” he said.

Thompson shared that once, while sitting in a vehicle with his supervisor, he saw two strange objects suddenly appear in the night sky. His sightings mirror other ones reported by both military and commercial pilots, many of whom have raised concerns about potential collisions.

“Could it be something the military is testing? It’s a distinct possibility,” Thompson admitted, acknowledging that his area of patrol is close to top-secret government sites, such as the Barry M. Goldwater Air Force Range. There have also been instances of Mexican cartels using drones to transport drugs into the US. However, Thompson claimed the objects he’s seen do not resemble drones. According to him, the crafts “were cigar-shaped and triangles.”

Keep reading

Florida Lawmakers Again Failed To Regulate Hemp Products This Session

A year ago, members of Florida’s hemp industry were lobbying Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) to veto a bill regulating hemp-derived THC products that many claimed if signed into law would be a devastating blow to their livelihoods.

Their mission was accomplished when he did in fact veto the proposal last June.

That won’t be required this year; the Legislature failed to pass anything on hemp before unofficially ending the legislative session on Friday night (although they are expected to return to Tallahassee later this month to deal exclusively with budget-related matters).

The central problem appeared to be the substantive differences between the Senate bill sponsored by Polk County Republican Colleen Burton (SB 438) and the House version (HB 7027) sponsored by Panhandle Republican Michelle Salzman.

The two measures would have capped the potency of hemp-derived THC products, placed advertising restrictions, and required hemp to be tested by a certified medical cannabis laboratory. But there were some big differences: The Senate bill (like its 2024 version) called for the outright ban of synthetic cannabinoids like Delta-8 and said that the newly popular hemp-infused drinks could only be sold through a retailer holding a liquor license.

Salzman’s bill in the House did not ban Delta-8. Neither did it call for retailers to have a liquor license, but it did include a 15 percent excise tax on all hemp purchases. Jonathan Miller, general counsel for the U.S. Hemp Roundtable, said the House bill was better for his industry than the Senate’s version, and said he appreciated the work that Rep. Salzman devoted to trying to find the right balance.

“In its final form, we said that it wasn’t perfect, but it was a significant improvement on the Senate bill and so in the end nothing passing was better than the Senate bill passing,” Miller said. He’s “hopeful,” he said, that between now and next year’s legislative session “people will realize that the House version is the model to start working from and hopefully produce something that really both protects farmers and consumers at the same time.”

Keep reading

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Epstein Files Likely Destroyed, Claims Israel and UK Still Hold Remaining Evidence — Believes ‘He Didn’t Kill Himself’

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) drops a bombshell about the Epstein files during an interview with far-left blowhard Cenk Uygur on his show The Young Turks.

Greene raised serious questions about the fate of the elusive Jeffrey Epstein files and the decades-long cover-up protecting the powerful elite.

Greene didn’t mince words when asked about the Epstein case — asserting that the vast majority of the evidence has likely been destroyed and suggesting that foreign governments like Israel and the United Kingdom may be sitting on crucial information.

Cenk Uygur: Okay, so, one more thing here, along these lines — Epstein files. How disappointed are you that they have not come out yet? And do you have a theory as to why they haven’t?

Rep. MTG: Yeah, I’m glad you asked me about that. You know what I’ve been saying for quite a few years now — I guarantee you, most of that information has already been destroyed. I can’t imagine that it still exists. And I would like—of course, we want to see all the information—but I just think it’s been destroyed. That’s my own personal opinion. But I think there are other foreign countries that probably have information on that as well, and it would be nice if they would release the information that they have.

Cenk Uygur: Oh, that’s interesting. Which foreign countries do you think might have information about that?

Rep. MTG: I would guess some of our greatest allies. Israel probably has information there. I would not be surprised at all if they did. The UK, I bet, would have information. I’m not sure who else, but I would suspect those countries.

Cenk Uygur: Are you disappointed that the Trump administration has not put it out yet?

Rep. MTG: I’m disappointed that many administrations haven’t put it out. The Biden administration should have put it out. I think a lot of people should have put it out. But again, I’ll go back to this: I—I have a hard time believing that it all still is there.

Cenk Uygur: Yeah. Any theories on what happened?

Rep. MTG: I have no idea. I couldn’t even tell you. Do I think he committed suicide? Nope. I don’t think so. But again, that’s just my opinion.

Keep reading

Is Biden’s Family Deliberately Screwing With Democrats?

Democrats are reportedly extremely unhappy with the fact that Joe Biden’s family and his handlers are wheeling him out for interviews knowing full well that he’s completely out of it and that practically anything he says has the potential to harm their already dismal standing.

As we highlighted this past week, Biden slurred and stumbled his way through an interview with the BBC wherein he claimed that he still believes he would have won the election had he stayed in the race.

In a further disastrous appearance on The View he claimed that Kamala Harris lost because most voters are racist and sexist.

He also had to be helped out by his carer Dr Jill when he was asked to comment on his obvious cognitive decline, because he couldn’t muster a coherent sentence.

Now it’s being reported that Democrats are fuming behind the scenes, and they just want Biden to fade away.

Keep reading

No One Is Above the Law: When Will Tom Homan and ICE Arrest and Deport Ilhan Omar for Marrying Her Brother and Committing Immigration Fraud?

According to her limited bio on the far-left Wikipedia, Ilhan Omar divorced her second husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, in 2011.

Ilhan’s second husband, Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, is her brother.

The two were legally married on February 12, 2009, and divorced in 2011.

Democrat Ilhan Omar married her biological brother.

Power Line reported on this scandal years ago:

A reader has written us to point out that the Somali website Somalispot posted information last week suggesting Omar’s involvement in marriage and immigration fraud. The post notes that Omar married Ahmed Hirsi in 2002. Hirsi is the father of Omar’s three children. Omar is depicted with Hirsi and their children on Omar’s campaign website here.

The post further notes that Omar married her brother Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009, implying that the latter marriage assisted his entry into the United States. Her brother was a British citizen. “As soon as Ilhan Omar married him,” the post continues, “He started university at her [a]lma mater North Dakota State University where he graduated in 2012. Shortly thereafter, he moved to Minneapolis where he was living in a public housing complex and was later evicted. He then returned to the United Kingdom where he now lives.”

Ilhan Omar was elected to be a state representative for District 60B on November 8, 2016, and took her oath on the Quran.

Keep reading

Hugely Influential Covid Vaccine Study Claiming the Jabs Saved Millions of Lives Torn to Shreds in Medical Journal

The hugely influential study on COVID-19 vaccines, Watson et al., which was used by experts throughout the pandemic to show that the jabs saved tens of millions of lives in one year, has been thoroughly debunked, by yours truly (a misinformation researcher now primarily focused on COVID-19, not least because of being fired for refusing the jab and winning subsequent legal cases), with the critique finally published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. This is the first of a three-part metacritique of six influential studies on the COVID-19 vaccines, with similar problems identified throughout. The same criticisms would apply to many more studies.

  • I start by noting that this study (and these studies in general) have received very little scrutiny. One wonders why the Universe left this vitally important task to me, a sole former pharmacist and misinformation researcher/philosopher who was more interested in issues like the meaning of existence, with no funding, and struggling at life since being (and continuing to be) persecuted for refusing the jab. Perhaps understandable if you consider who is paying most of the medical researchers out there (and we will get to that), but still baffling when considering the amount of talent on ‘our contrarian side’, the side filled with experts who bucked the trend on the pandemic and pretty much got everything right. A little serendipity involved, too, as I partly did this because US Senator Ron Johnson pretty much asked me to.
  • On to the study. Firstly, Watson et al. “revolves around a model which, by definition, is not truly representative of reality”. Remember, people, the map is not the territory. And models are beholden to the GIGO principle: garbage in, garbage out. And when it comes to these studies like Watson et al., there’s a lot of garbage to sift through.
  • Then I note that their vaccine efficacy/effectiveness estimates are dodgy, bringing in ‘JECP4’, the published research I did alongside BMJ senior editor (and one of my intellectual heroes) Peter Doshi. They have been exaggerating efficacy/effectiveness (and safety) in a really big way by doing things like ignoring incidents in the ‘partially vaccinated’, or even counting them as happening in the ‘unvaccinated’. Collectively, Doshi’s team and I mathematically demonstrated: “Such methodology can make a completely ineffective vaccine appear 48% effective, or even around 65% effective, if cases in the ‘partially vaccinated’ are ascribed to the ‘unvaccinated’. In fact, even a negatively effective vaccine can, in this way, be made to appear moderately effective.”
  • It is unclear how the authors “determined the effectiveness of the vaccines in preventing death”. If they “utilised the original clinical trials of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, along with recently published reanalyses, they would have noted no statistically significant decrease in COVID-19 deaths among the vaccinated groups, a statistically significant increase in serious adverse events of special interest, and a non-statistically significant increase in total deaths”.
  • Another big problem is static vaccine effectiveness estimates, with the researchers assuming that the vaccine happily continues being as effective as ever, for ‘simplicity’, which we now know is complete nonsense. They’re literally spruiking boosters every few months! Remember the GIGO principle. Opt for nice things like ‘simplicity’ in your models, and this is the trash you will get in return.
  • I note that not only do the jabs become ineffective really quickly they even seem to become negatively effective – yeah you heard me, apparently increasing your chance of COVID-19 infection, and even death.
  • They also made big assumptions on infection fatality rates (IFRs). They didn’t even bother to justify (or even perhaps disclose) their preferred figures. If you’re exaggerating COVID-19 deaths, and they do, as they all do, you’re eventually going to be exaggerating the benefits of the jabs. A super important study came out just as this critique was in publishing. Looks like they’ve been (at least) doubling Covid-deaths since Omicron, the old with/from Covid debate.
  • Did the benefits outweigh the risks? Surprisingly, from this hugely influential study, you’d never know. They don’t seem to care about “the deaths and injuries caused by the vaccines”. What’s the point of saving 14 million lives if you’ve killed, say, 28 million? Bit of a missed opportunity, don’t you think? It does appear the jabs do injure and kill people, which was obvious even from the beginning, from their own clinical trials. Perhaps there were more in the Pfizer trial, with (published) questions over potentially fraudulent activity. Later studies show way more side effects, and I’ve argued in a BMJ journal that the myocarditis risk alone outweighs the ‘benefits’ of the jab in young healthy people.
  • They also did things like using ‘estimates’ of all-cause excess mortality because they didn’t actually have the data. And note the assumption that excess mortality is all due to COVID-19, rather than, oh I don’t know… the jabs. They don’t even acknowledge the possibility, even though we know for a fact that the vaccines have killed people – what we can dispute is the number.
  • With unjustified figures, made-up data, omitted data (e.g. China, which has a huge chunk of the world’s population), and even data collected from non-academic sources (like an economics magazine!), the authors actually admit to “wide uncertainty”. Somehow that wasn’t expressed when all the experts, politicians and newsreaders were proclaiming the study’s earth-shattering conclusions.

Keep reading

Reports say corporations retreated from net zero, but critics say ESG policies still enforced

Shortly before President Donald Trump was inaugurated in January, the Net Zero Asset Managers (NZAM) initiative announced it was suspending its activities. The announcement came after the investment firm Blackrock said it was withdrawing, joining an exodus of firms from the group. That month, six of the largest U.S. banks also left a similar group for banks, the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA).

Critics had called NZAM and NZBA “cartels,” and firms were facing Congressional investigations and lawsuits, arguing their activities violated anti-trust laws. By coordinating an effort to harm politically unfavored companies, the lawsuits argued, they were engaging in illegal collusion, accusations the firms say are baseless. 

However, with litigation risks mounting, the firms fled NZAM and NZAB. Blackrock, the world’s largest asset management company with $11.6 trillion in assets under management, said in a statement that its “memberships in some of these organizations have caused confusion regarding BlackRock’s practices and subjected us to legal inquiries from various public officials.” 

Not really the end of ESG

The environment, social and governance (ESG) sustainable investing movement recently appeared to be nearing its end. However, that may not be the case, at least for some companies. The American Energy Institute (AEI), which defends the production of petroleum as a means of reliable and affordable energy, was recently notified its insurance wouldn’t be renewed. 

According to AEI, the Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company reportedly stated the reason for the non-renewal was that the group’s Facebook page indicated that their operations “include trade associations involved in promoting social/political causes related to energy production. This is not an acceptable exposure under the Hartford Small Commercial business segment’s guidelines.” 

“They’re really not changing their behaviors whatsoever. They’re just dropping some alliances and probably saving a few bucks on dues,” Jason Isaac, executive director of the AEI told Just the News. 

Hartford-Boycott-of-American-Energy.pdf

The Hartford didn’t respond to Just the News‘ questions about its decision not to renew AEI’s insurance or what policies the AEI was violating. 

Will Hild, executive director of Consumers’ Research, testified before the Texas Senate Committee on State Affairs last month in a hearing considering anti-ESG legislation. Hild argued that even though banks have left net-zero alliances, they continue to advance policies aimed at getting companies to reduce their emissions. 

Keep reading