What I’ve noticed is an epidemic of friends needing hip replacements. In their 60’s to late 70’s. Like way more than should be in my circle. When I was growing up I don’t remember any of my elderly relatives needing a hip replacement. The other thing is severe neurological issues. BOTH of my neighbours. Dear people with everything from “autoimmune disease” to vertigo to POTS. No idea why. And I have had two or three good friends say they are frightened that they can’t remember things the way they used to. Age 52 to 70. I assure them that we all have memory slips but secretly I am afraid for them. Two relatives developed heart issues in the past 4 years. And have you noticed how many phone “hold” messages that need to say “We will not tolerate rude or disrespectful language with client services” or something along that line. When did we need that? And what could it be doing to the minds of our children? Among my teen acquaintances, a heartbreaking increase of flus and colds necessitating weeks off throughout the year. One teen had difficulty reading music in the weeks following her second or third shot, and couldn’t play the trumpet because the air pressure gave her crushing headaches for months. Oh and I forgot – her younger sister (age 11) suddenly developed juvenile diabetes. The specialist who diagnosed her said they are noticing an increase in new onset diabetes and suspect one of the causes the vaccine.
Tag: vaccines
FDA Ousts Another Top Official: Who’s Behind the Shakeup — and Why?
Tracy Beth Høeg, M.D., Ph.D., an epidemiologist and sports physician who supported studying — and reducing — the recommended childhood vaccination schedule, was fired by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Høeg was acting director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER).
In a post on X last Friday, Høeg wrote that she “learned so much” and is leaving the FDA “with no regrets.”
And in an interview with MD Reports published shortly after her firing, Høeg said she first learned about the agency’s plans to fire her earlier in the week, through media reports.
On May 15, two unnamed FDA officials offered her the choice to resign or be fired. When she refused to resign, she was fired on the spot.
“I said I didn’t want to resign,” Høeg told MD Reports. “I said I’m not signing a letter of resignation if it’s not my choice.”
During her time at the FDA, Høeg was involved in several research initiatives broadly tied to the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) agenda. According to The New York Times, this included work on an “intense investigation” last year that linked the COVID-19 vaccines to “at least” 10 child deaths.
Høeg also authored a report recommending that the number of diseases covered by the recommended childhood vaccination schedule be reduced from 17 to 11.
In January, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. implemented these recommendations. However, in March, a federal court issued a stay pausing adoption of the new schedule.
According to The Associated Press, Høeg was most recently involved in the FDA’s review of a petition to add new warnings to antidepressants about risks to pregnant women, “including fetal abnormalities that could lead to autism and other disorders.”
UK data shows vaccinated died more during COVID waves. Whoops!
Dr. Daniel Ninio started a Grok thread to discredit my work.
So I continued the conversation and asked Grok for the data and methods showing the COVID shots have saved “millions” of lives.
It first suggested the CDC data. I pointed out that the CDC data doesn’t allow us to measure the harm/benefit. Grok agreed.
It also suggested the UK data. So I had ChatGPT analyze the UK data and it showed the vaccinated died more during COVID waves than the unvaccinated.
So Grok said it’s because of selection bias.
Whoa! A selection bias that turns a supposed >5X COVID mortality advantage to a 45% disadvantage in just a few months?!?!? Color me skeptical. I asked Grok for the methodology and Grok agreed that there was none. All hand-waving.
In a 2021 trough-to-wave comparison, age-standardised all-cause mortality rose by 17.6% in the ever-vaccinated status group versus 12.1% in the unvaccinated group, a roughly 45% larger wave-period increase among the ever-vaccinated. That directional pattern is inconsistent with a simple strongly protective all-cause interpretation.
In other words, the data isn’t fitting the narrative at all.
This is probably why the UK office of national statistics refuses to release the record level data at any finer granularity than the very crude buckets they release now.
An Open Letter to my doctor: I shall not be making an appointment to have a vaccination
Dear Doctor,
Every few days I receive an email, a text, a telephone call or a letter from you, or some other part of the National Health Service, inviting me to have a covid-19 vaccination and, possibly, one or more of the other fashionable vaccinations (such as the vaccine against shingles, the one for the flu and the one for the respiratory syncytial virus) which you seem to believe will be of benefit to me and will, indeed, enhance my health and reduce my chances of dying prematurely.
The letters and calls I receive usually point out that I will benefit from these vaccinations because I am a “vulnerable” person. I don’t know how you know this because I haven’t seen a doctor or a nurse for some years. No one has offered to give me a check-up, to take my blood pressure or, indeed, to check that I am still alive. All anyone wants to do is to inject me with toxic substances.
Since the vaccination you push hardest is the covid vaccination, I’d like to take a close look at this product and the scam which, in March 2020 I called the covid hoax, the biggest confidence trick in history.
Many lies have been told about covid and the covid vaccine but the basic facts are quite simple. The number of people who died of covid in 2020 is almost exactly the same as the number who died of flu in 2019. Flu, not surprisingly, disappeared almost completely in 2020. Statistically, it is clear that covid-19 was the 2020 flu – well-marketed to terrify and to excuse the introduction of lockdowns, masks and, most absurd of all, the rule that people had to keep six feet away from one another.
The PCR test, which was used to diagnose covid, wasn’t designed for that purpose and had only a 14% accuracy rate. An astonishing 86% of the people diagnosed as having covid didn’t have it at all. Despite this, anyone who had a positive covid test and died was listed as a covid death – even if they had been run over by a bus or hit on the head by a madman with an axe.
There were no excess deaths in 2020. It was only in 2021, after the covid-19 vaccine had been introduced, that people started dying in greater numbers. The official statistics show quite clearly that it was the covid-19 vaccine which was the killer – not the covid infection (or, as I prefer to call it, the remarketed annual flu.) The covid-19 vaccines have caused more fatal adverse events than any other vaccine, according to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (aka VAERS). If you haven’t seen the VAERS figures, I do hope you’ll find a minute or two to look at them.
Dr. Michael Nehls, the author of an excellent book entitled ‘The Indoctrinated Brain’, published in 2023, reports that in 2021 alone, there were more than 75 times as many reports of death from the mRNA injection programme as compared to the average for all vaccinations worldwide in the previous 30 years. The covid-19 vaccine was killing thousands right from the start but doctors, unaware or uncaring or both, were pocketing huge sums of money to inject anyone who would keep still long enough. The fees for injecting patients with this toxic substance were much higher than the usual vaccination fees – presumably to stop doctors asking too many questions.
It is worth noting, of course, that everything that happened in 2020 happened in just about every country in the world. Governments everywhere were in lockstep and were following the same absurd rules.
Quite early on, the authorities (including the NHS in the UK) admitted that the vaccine didn’t do what it was initially said to do. It did not, for example, stop people getting covid and it didn’t stop people spreading the infection if they got it. So, I wonder if you’ve asked yourself why you are still promoting a vaccine which even the NHS admits seems both worthless and dangerous.
There were some fairly airy fairy claims that it might help reduce the severity of an infection, but I’ve never seen any evidence for that. Have you? It seems to me as if that might simply be an excuse to keep giving the vaccine to as many people as possible.
‘Callous and Careless’: AAP Pushes Doctors to Vaccinate Hospitalized Children
As federal health agencies revisit childhood vaccine schedules and emphasize shared clinical decision-making, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is encouraging hospitals to use pediatric admissions as a “unique opportunity” to vaccinate more children.
A series of AAP publications released in March and April promotes offering routine, catch-up and seasonal vaccines during children’s hospital stays and around surgeries and medical procedures.
But some physicians and vaccine safety advocates say the approach raises medical and ethical concerns, particularly for children already sick enough to require hospitalization.
A March 9 article in AAP News described “perioperative or periprocedural vaccination” as “a novel way to vaccinate children who are in a hospital environment for other reasons.”
Another March report in Hospital Pediatrics stated that “pediatric inpatient hospital admissions are opportunities for catch-up vaccination.”
The push comes as the AAP and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have diverged on some vaccine recommendations, creating what an April AAP Publications report called “a more complex landscape for parental vaccine decision-making.”
Landmark Peer-Reviewed Study Finds Vaccination Is a Major Risk Factor for Autism
For decades, scientists have debated what drives the relentless rise in autism. Some have claimed it’s simply due to “increased screening” while others insist vaccines play no role whatsoever. Thousands of studies have explored genetic, environmental, and perinatal factors—but very few have ever evaluated vaccine and non-vaccine determinants together within a unified analytical framework.
Now, our peer-reviewed study titled Determinants of Autism Spectrum Disorder, officially published in the Journal of Independent Medicine, provides one of the most comprehensive syntheses on the possible causes of autism to date.
Most importantly, by systematically evaluating all known autism risk factors side by side, we found that combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination represents a significant modifiable risk factor for autism within a broader multifactorial framework. We found 79% of studies evaluating vaccines or their components (107 of 136) reported evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link. The evidence converged across epidemiologic, clinical, mechanistic, toxicologic, and neuropathologic domains.
This publication represents a major breakthrough through the longstanding censorship imposed by the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex on the issue of vaccination and autism. It also marks Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s major return to the peer-reviewed scientific literature after enduring decades of coordinated attacks from the vaccine cartel.
By systematically integrating more than 300 studies across epidemiologic, clinical, mechanistic, toxicologic, molecular, and neurodevelopmental domains, our analysis identified a broad range of interacting ASD risk factors beyond vaccination, including advanced parental age, premature delivery, genetic susceptibility, sibling recurrence, maternal immune activation, in utero drug exposure, environmental toxicants, metabolic dysfunction, pesticide exposure, gut-brain axis disruption, and mitochondrial abnormalities. However, no single non-vaccine factor sufficiently explains the unprecedented rise in autism prevalence observed over recent decades.
The Autism Question Medicine Refuses to Answer
RFK Jr. told Tucker Carlson the CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% INCREASE in autism risk from hepatitis B vaccination.
The researchers were shocked.
So they covered it up.
How?
“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are TOO YOUNG TO BE DIAGNOSED [with autism],” Kennedy explained.
Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.
Then, telling everyone it’s “safe.”
If health authorities are willing to keep a signal this alarming hidden from you, what else are they not telling you about vaccines?
Is it possible that your child’s allergies or chronic immune issues didn’t appear organically, but were triggered by vaccination instead?
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal in COVID ‘Misinformation’ Case, but Doctors Say They Still Won
The U.S. Supreme Court this week declined to hear a key medical free speech case involving basketball hall-of-famer John Stockton and several doctors who alleged that the Washington Medical Commission’s (WMC) COVID-19 “misinformation” policies violated their First Amendment free speech rights.
The court declined, without comment, to review Stockton v. Brown — but only after the WMC lifted the disciplinary charges it had filed against two of the doctors in the case.
Plaintiffs included Drs. Richard Eggleston and Thomas T. Siler, who were sanctioned by the WMC for their pandemic-related speech, and Dr. Daniel Moynihan, who alleged the WMC’s threats “chilled” his speech on pandemic-related topics.
Stockton, co-host of “The Ultimate Assist Podcast,” and Children’s Health Defense (CHD) were also plaintiffs. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown and WMC Executive Director Kyle S. Karinen, a lawyer, were the defendants.
In May 2024, a federal court dismissed the lawsuit, finding that the First Amendment doesn’t protect physicians’ public speech because it is part of medical conduct.
In November 2024 and again in January 2025, the Supreme Court rejected emergency requests for a stay.
In September 2025, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal but did not consider the First Amendment questions in the case. The plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court.
Attorney Rick Jaffe, who represented the plaintiffs, called the Supreme Court’s choice not to hear the case “outrageous.”
But Jaffe said the unreported part of the story is what happened the month before, when the WMC withdrew its statement of charges against Eggleston and Siler, which he called a victory.
“Withdrawal of those charges was the main practical goal of the state litigation concerning these doctors and this federal case … once the Commission rescinded the charges, that was the win,” Jaffe said.
91% of Flu Vaccine Recipients Shed Chimeric Lab-Made Vaccine Virus, Raising Transmission Concerns: NIH-Funded Journal ‘Clinical Infectious Diseases’ Study
A newly published, U.S. government-funded, peer-reviewed study has confirmed that a live attenuated influenza vaccine caused detectable post-vaccination viral shedding in more than 91% of adult recipients, raising major questions about whether vaccinated individuals function as carriers and spreaders of vaccine-derived influenza pathogens after immunization.
The findings, published Thursday in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, claim that the purported virus inside the vaccine actively replicated inside recipients after administration and was subsequently shed from the nose in the overwhelming majority of participants.
Researchers from George Washington University evaluated 283 healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who received the intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), FluMist, during the 2023–2024 and 2024–2025 flu seasons.
The new paper explicitly states:
“LAIV replication begins within 24 hours and declines over the first week…”
Researchers further explained that the virus in the vaccine:
“replicates in the upper respiratory tract, mimicking a natural infection…”
In plain English, the vaccine virus reproduces inside recipients and is expelled back out through the nose afterward.
Researchers collected nasal swabs on day 1, days 2–4, and days 5–7 after vaccination and measured influenza A and B RNA using RT-PCR testing.
If the COVID vaccine benefit was so large, why can’t we detect it in the Czech record level data?
Executive summary
In a fixed-cohort analysis anchored to ISO week 2021-24 (baseline window 2021-24 to 2021-40), vaccinated all-cause mortality rose from 23.297 to 31.190 deaths per 100,000 person-weeks (RR 1.3388, +33.9%), while unvaccinated mortality rose from 13.017 to 17.625 (RR 1.3541, +35.4%). The unvaccinated-to-vaccinated ratio of rate ratios was 1.011 (95% interval 0.985 to 1.039), with male (1.003) and female (1.021) values also close to parity. The two groups did not have equal baseline risk: in many birth-year bands, unvaccinated baseline ACM rates were more than twice vaccinated rates. Nonetheless, the wave-period rise, expressed relative to each cohort’s own baseline, remained near parity, so a stable vaccinated all-cause mortality advantage is not observed in this fixed-cohort specification. This is an observational comparison and should not be interpreted as a causal effect estimate.
In other words, it didn’t work.
My open offer
If you think my analysis methodology of the Czech data using ACM differential cohort mortality during COVID v non-COVID is wrong, then please post the correct method and what it shows. The Czech data has been publicly available for nearly 2 years. If I’m wrong, why hasn’t anyone posted the proper analysis of the data showing a benefit?
I even applied the method used in Palinkas to the Czech data and the results were virtually identical to the method I used.
- Pálinkás used regression-adjusted epidemic-vs-nonepidemic HR ratios.
- We used fixed cohorts, person-weeks, and all-cause wave/baseline mortality ratio
So two completely different methods, same result. No discernable benefit.
Hellbound and Down 
You must be logged in to post a comment.