Tag: cover ups

Police collect wreckage of ‘octagonal-shaped UFO’ shot down by a US F-16 fighter jet

Newly released documents have revealed that Canadian police collected debris of a UFO that was shot down over Lake Huron last year. 

The object was taken down on February 12, 2023 by a US F-16 fighter jet, marking the third such incident over North America that month.

Witnesses described the object as ‘octagonal’ with strings hanging off it before the jet fired two missiles, striking the UFO that then slowly descended into Canadian waters.

Documents obtained by CTVNews.ca stated that ‘wreckage’ was found on ‘the shoreline of Lake Huron’ weeks after search efforts were suspended. 

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) partnered with the American and Canadian Coast Guard to conduct a brief search following the incident. 

By February 16, it was called off due to ‘deteriorating weather and the low probability of recovery, according to an RCMP statement. 

But the partially redacted emails acquired by CTVNews.ca revealed that the RCMP collected ‘both material and a module’ from the site of the incident roughly three weeks after the object was shot down. 

National security officials have criticized the effort for a ‘lack of transparency.’

Keep reading

Navy Blocks Release of UAP Photos Amid Capitol Hill Hearing on Government Secrecy

The U.S. Navy has formally denied access to 78 “documents” containing photos marked as “unidentified aerial [anomalous] phenomena” (UAP). The denial, issued yesterday in response to a FOIA request filed by The Black Vault in 2022 and given case number DON-NAVY-2022-012661, highlights the Navy’s continued use of national defense and intelligence exemptions to keep UAP data classified. The response arrived less than an hour before a highly anticipated UAP hearing on Capitol Hill, where members of Congress heard testimony about the government’s lack of transparency on the issue.

The hearing, titled “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth,” was led yesterday by Chairwoman Nancy Mace and Congressman Glenn Grothman, heads of various Congressional subcommittees on cybersecurity, government innovation, and national security. This marked the second time Congress has convened specifically on UAP matters, with the hearing aimed at addressing the classified veil surrounding government-held UAP data. The witness panel included Navy Rear Admiral Dr. Tim Gallaudet, former Department of Defense official Luis Elizondo, NASA Associate Administrator Michael Gold, and journalist Michael Shellenberger. Each expressed concerns about the DoD’s ongoing reluctance to disclose UAP information.

The Navy’s response to the FOIA request, ironically timed alongside the Capitol Hill session, raises significant questions about the scope and depth of information kept from public scrutiny.

Keep reading

Startling claims made at UFO hearing in Congress, but lack direct evidence

US government employees have been injured by UFOs and the US government has conducted a secret UFO retrieval program, a former department of defense official told a congressional committee on Wednesday, though the hearing lacked any direct evidence to back up the startling claims.

The hearing on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), which has become the more accepted term for UFO, also heard that the government has a “huge amount” of secret information on UAPs, including “photos, video, photos, other information”. But it also learned, following a query from Colorado congresswoman Lauren Boebert, that there is no evidence of aliens having a secret underwater “base” on this planet.

The hearing came more than a year after the Pentagon was accused of running a secret UFO retrieval program by whistleblower David Grusch, though no physical evidence has also ever emerged to back up these claims.

The lack of concrete proof has been a consistent thorn in the side of those who believe the government is harboring UAPs, with Wednesday’s hearing again focussing on testimony from people who said they were aware of secret government programs, rather than witnesses presenting actual hard evidence.

It followed a blockbuster congressional hearing last year in which Grusch, a former American intelligence official, claimed that the US government conducted a “multi-decade” program which collected and attempted to reverse-engineer, crashed UAPs, as members of Congress investigate allegations the government is hiding knowledge of alien craft and beings from lawmakers.

The two hearings reveal the remarkable extent to which discussions around UAPs – previously mostly the domain of conspiracy theorists and believers in aliens – have now penetrated the US military and the corridors of Congress.

The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), the Department of Defense agency which investigates UAPs, did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but the Pentagon has previously denied the existence of any secret government programs to retrieve alien spacecraft and no evidence of these programs has ever emerged.

A standout moment on Wednesday came when Nancy Mace, the chair of the hearing, questioned Luiz Elizondo, a former department of defense official who this year claimed in a memoir that the US is “in possession of advanced technology made off-world by non-human intelligence”.

“Has the government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs? Yes or no?” Mace asked. Elizondo, who was speaking under oath, said yes.

“Were they designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft? Yes or no?” Mace said. Elizondo said yes.

Mace continued: “In your book, you mentioned government employees who’ve been injured by UAPs placed on leave and receiving government compensation for their injuries. Is that correct?” Elizondo said it was correct.

Keep reading

Will Trump Buckle Again on the JFK Records?

 A fascinating situation has now developed between President-elect Donald Trump and the U.S. national-security establishment with respect to the long-secret JKF-assassination-related records that the CIA has succeeded in keeping secret for more than 60 years. Despite Trump’s campaign vow to release those records, it’s not at all clear how this matter is going to be resolved. I will give my prediction at the end of this article.

There are three major factors at play:

1. During his 2024 campaign, Trump vowed that this time around he is definitely going to order the National Archives to release those 60-year-old secret CIA records. Moreover, as he told Joe Rogan, he is going to do it “immediately.” See “Trump to Rogan: If Elected, I’ll Open Remaining JFK Files ‘Immediately’” by Jefferson Morley.

Let’s place this first factor in a historical context.

The JFK Records Act, which was enacted in 1992, ordered the national-security establishment and all other federal agencies to disclose their JFK-assassination-related records to the public.

However, the law gave federal officials an out. If they claimed that the release of certain records might jeopardize “national security” in various ways, they could keep them secret for another 25 years. Yes, 25 additional years of secrecy, on top of the secrecy from 1963 to the 1990s! Taking advantage of that out, the national-security establishment, especially the CIA, continued keeping thousands of its assassination-related records secret.

That 25-year-period ran out during Trump’s first term as president. At first, Trump declared valiantly that he was going to comply with the law and permit the National Archives to release and disclose the records.

But then just before the deadline arrived, Trump was visited by the CIA, who insisted on continued secrecy of its assassination-related records.

Trump immediately buckled. While allowing some records to be released, he did what the CIA wanted him to do and ordered that thousands of other records continue to be kept secret for another few years.

When the new deadline occurred under President Biden, the CIA convinced Biden to continue the secrecy of the records into perpetuity. Thus, the CIA felt it could now sleep easy, knowing that its long-secret assassination-related records would never see the light of day.

Keep reading

Book banning, cover-ups and censorship: Understanding the “AIDS” crisis

The history behind the “AIDS” crisis is fraught with coverups, deceptive narratives and censorship.

The first cases of “AIDS” reported by the CDC were based on pneumocystis pneumonia infections of previously healthy gay men. This infection is caused by the normally harmless fungus Pneumocystis jirovecii, but the infection became severe in these individuals. Instead of asking why these infections were more severe in these individuals, medical authorities dismissed further inquiry into underlying factors. No attempt was made to investigate these cases through the perception of the terrain theory of disease, which addresses the whole individual and the conditions that breed disease. By only seeing disease through the perception of the germ theory, medical authorities played right into the hands of the pharmaceutical industry and snuffed out scientific progress on the matter.

Controversy behind the emergence of the term AIDS and its sole causative agent, HIV

By September of 1982, the medical establishment coined a new medical condition called AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome). This umbrella term was used as a cover for many different types of infections, malnutrition, the negative effects of immunosuppressant drugs and other personal health decisions that damage the blood. The underlying causes exacerbating immunosuppression could easily be ignored for individuals who struggled with these different infections, because the umbrella term AIDS covered up the underlying causes of their health conditions.

By 1982, medical authorities claimed that AIDS had affected 335 people, killing 136 of them. Remarkably in 1983, scientists discovered human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). By 1984, HIV was attributed as the sole cause of AIDS, and many medical coverups began from here. Because the condition overwhelmingly affected men who practiced homosexuality, the disease was often referred to as gay-related immune deficiency, or GRID.

Since then, billions of dollars in research money has been awarded to scientists who uphold the HIV-AIDS connection. Today, medical authorities continue to postulate that HIV is the sole cause of AIDS, and discussion about the underlying factors of immunosuppression are disregarded as conspiracy theory. One of the first books to be censored was “The Health Scandal” written by Dr. Vernon Coleman in 1988.

Keep reading

Trans Drugs Bad? Block the Study!

Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, one of the nation’s leading advocates for “gender-affirming care” for kids, refuses to release a ten-million-dollar taxpayer-funded study because the results don’t support continued trans-medical intervention. However, full disclosure is necessary for the trans community to make important life decisions.

The nine-year study, bought and paid for by hardworking Americans, essentially revealed that after receiving puberty-blockers, these young children did not improve in the area of mental health.  This is important information because these children most certainly were diagnosed with some mental illness prior to being seen for gender dysphoria (the belief that one’s body is the wrong sex), another psychiatric diagnosis.

Dr. Olson-Kennedy has refused to release the study because she believes that it could be “weaponized” and used as proof that “we shouldn’t use blockers.”  The puberty-blocker “treatments” supposedly delay physical development, so the body feels more like the gender identified with.

What the Olson-Kennedy study revealed was that despite being on puberty-blockers, the kids were no better off with their mental health.  In a nutshell, kids thought they’d be happy if they could be the sex they identified with, but in fact, this was not reflected in the study.  After two years, despite the treatment, there was no significant improvement in the kids’ mental health.

For those of us who follow psychiatric drugging, it is of interest that the research data are being withheld because too often these studies fail to consider the psychiatric drugging that occurred prior to the request for “transition” “treatment.”  In other words, how many of these kids were on psychiatric mind-altering drugs prior to feeling the need to transition?  What psychiatric diagnoses were involved, and what drugs were prescribed prior to the child’s belief that becoming another sex would be more in line with what they identify with?  We may never know if the Olson-Kennedy study even considered psychiatric drug use prior to trans-treatments.  It matters.

It’s no secret that psychiatric drugs can elicit strong adverse reactions, especially in children.  For example, let’s consider Nashville school shooter Audrey Hale.  Hale had been receiving psychiatric “treatment” for twenty of her twenty-eight years, and Hale had been prescribed cocktails of psychiatric drugs.  So what role did the psychiatric drugs play in Hale’s desire to “transition”?  Further, did Hale receive puberty-blockers and psychiatric drugs as a cocktail of “treatment?”  It’s anyone’s guess at this point, as Hale’s extensive mental health records have not been made publicly available.  Do we see a pattern of data-withholding among the trans-medical community?

Keep reading

Fears ‘imminent alien announcement’ could contain truth ‘too terrible to be told’

Ever since an explosive report in 2017 peeled back the curtain on the US Government’s secret UFO research program, talk of alien visitors has steadily transitioned from fringe conspiracy theories to mainstream discussion. Recent developments have only fueled the fire; military experts have sworn before Congress that the Pentagon ran a “multi-decade” initiative aimed at retrieving and deconstructing extraterrestrial wreckage.

Despite mounting evidence and talk of a “non-human technological signature” captured by an Australian space telescope, we remain no closer to an official government acknowledgment of alien encounters. Nick Pope – who used to handle UFO sightings for the UK’s Ministry of Defence – has a chilling hypothesis about this continuous secrecy.

In a private communication with Simon Holland, revealed through a Reddit leak and verified by the Mirror, Pope aired his disturbing thoughts. Simon recently hit headlines around the world by alleging that an Oxford-affiliated satellite project has uncovered proof of extraterrestrial life – a discovery he hinted could align with the US election on November 5.

Keep reading

Are Excess Deaths Being Statistically Covered Up?

Great news! All those reports you’ve heard about people dying—your family, your friends, and the increased obituaries in the papers—apparently, they’re all a figment of your imagination. The UK is even reporting a 14% drop in excess deaths. Isn’t that incredible?

If you aren’t comfortable with some level of skepticism or critical thinking, I’d suggest stopping here. But I can’t help but share my thoughts on what seems like a massive contradiction in the numbers we’re seeing.

Before I delve into the data, let me bring up an interesting story. One of the most vocal figures in the UK regarding excess deaths was Andrew Bridgen, a Member of Parliament. He recently lost his seat, despite having held it since 2010. He saw his vote count drop from 63% to just 3.2%. After the election, many people told him they voted for him—so what happened? It makes you wonder: Was he asking too many difficult questions? Perhaps his stance on excess deaths didn’t sit well with the political class.

Keep reading

Kamala Harris Stutters as She Repeatedly Denies She Was Engaged in a Massive Coverup Around Biden’s Cognitive Decline

Kamala Harris took an entire day off the campaign trail to prepare for this.

Harris sat down for a one-on-one interview with NBC News host Hallie Jackson 14 days before the election.

Hallie Jackson asked Kamala Harris about Joe Biden’s cognitive decline.

Harris repeatedly denied she was engaged in a massive coverup around Biden’s declining mental state and insisted she was honest with the American people.

The Gateway Pundit reported on Joe Biden’s dementia for years while the fake news media covered it up.

In June the fake news media finally admitted Joe Biden is not cognitively sound after he bombed in the debate against President Trump.

The media only admitted Biden was in bad shape because he was losing to Trump and they needed to replace him with someone younger.

Kamala Harris knew about Biden’s dementia but she covered it up because of her sick and twisted quest for power.

“Can you say that you were honest with the American people about what you saw in those moments with President Biden as you were with him again and again repeatedly in that time,” Hallie Jackson said to Kamala Harris.

Kamala Harris stuttered as she struggled to come up with a quick lie.

Hallie Jackson pushed back on Kamala Harris.

“You never saw anything like what happened at the debate night behind closed doors with him?” Hallie Jackson asked Harris.

“It was a bad debate! People have bad debates! He is absolutely…” Harris said.

Hallie Jackson interrupted Harris: “But that’s the reason why you’re here and he’s not running for the top of the ticket.”

Harris responded, “Well you’ll have to ask him the reason why.”

“Well what do you think?” Hallie Jackson asked Harris.

Kamala Harris could not answer the question so she went off on a random tangent.

When Hallie Jackson pressed her again about Biden’s cognitive decline, Kamala Harris lied again.

Keep reading

Macy’s Accused of ‘Destroying’ Records of Man Alleging Diddy ‘Orally Raped’ Him

Macy’s has been named as a defendant in a recently filed lawsuit accusing the department store of “destroying” records about a man being “orally raped” by disgraced music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs in May 2008.

The lawsuit also accuses the music mogul of orally raping a male employee of Ecko — Combs’ rival clothing company — in a Macy’s located in the Herald Square area of Manhattan, according to a report by Business Insider.

Macy’s covered up the 2008 sexual assault in order to protect a multimillion-dollar deal the retail chain had with Combs’ sportswear company Sean John, the lawsuit alleges.

The plaintiff, named in the lawsuit as “John Doe,” alleges that Combs and three of his armed bodyguards entered a Macy’s stockroom, where one or more of the guards struck him “around the base of the neck” with what he believed was a pistol, causing him to fall to his hands and knees.

From there, Combs, who addressed Doe simply as “Ecko,” demanded that the alleged victim perform oral sex on him while one or more of the music mogul’s armed guards threatened to kill the man, the lawsuit claims.

Combs then “orally” raped the plaintiff for around two minutes, he claims.

After the attack, Combs took armfuls of Sean John merchandise from the stockroom and entered the retail floor, where he “began passing out merchandise to an adoring crowd, as if nothing had happened,” the complaint alleges.

The lawsuit goes on to say that Doe reported the incident to Macy’s security on the same day it transpired, but no one in the company took any action.

The plaintiff “believes that the report of the assault was destroyed or otherwise purged from Macy’s records,” the lawsuit states.

“Approximately three weeks later, Terry Lundgren, CEO of Macy’s, pressured Ecko executives to fire plaintiff because Macy’s had just signed a multi-million-dollar deal with Sean John Clothing,” the lawsuit alleges.

The plaintiff was later fired and told by Ecko — which was not named as a defendant in the lawsuit — that he could no longer reside in his company-paid apartment in Manhattan, the complaint claims.

Doe still “fears for his life” to this day, the lawsuit adds.

Keep reading