Tag: science

Scientists say we need to HALVE Earth’s population to just 4 billion to save the planet

Over the last 100 years, the world’s population has ballooned from less than two billion to 8.3 billion people.

However, researchers say our planet cannot sustain this explosive growth for much longer.

Now, in a proposal that will remind movie fans of Thanos’ plot in Avengers: Infinity War, scientists argue that the population needs to be ‘eased’ down to four billion by 2200.

However, rather than the instant destruction envisioned in that blockbuster hit, the scientists say that this could be managed as a gradual decline.

The researchers believe that most of the change could be brought about simply by providing women in low–income countries with family planning services.

If the global population could be reduced in the next 200 years, this could help ease humanity’s burden on the environment and ensure there are enough resources to go round.

In their paper, published in the journal Sustainable Development, the researchers write: ‘Easing to a smaller and sustainable population would not deprive additional billions of life but instead ensure that when they do arrive conditions will be good.’

The researchers argue that global population growth presents the world with an impossible problem.

They point out that the total impact humans have on the planet is equal to everyone’s individual contribution multiplied by the number of people on Earth.

With ‘per capita’ impact in terms of resource consumption and waste production showing no signs of falling, the only way to prevent humanity’s impact from rising is to lower the population.

The researchers analysed the connection between Earth’s population and various indicators of sustainability.

Keep reading

Fauci’s most heinous crime: advancing fake science in pursuit of societal ruin

Sen Rand Paul (R-KY) has released 1,141 pages of Anthony Fauci’s private covid era diaries, and on Wednesday he will haul the man before the Senate Homeland Security Committee under subpoena. Sen Paul should be applauded for his heroic persistence in holding Fauci accountable, and he has spent the past few days discussing the distinction between what the longtime government bureaucrat wrote privately and what he told the public. That is indeed a true scandal.

Yet it’s not the lab-leak question and the real, widespread confusion surrounding those early days of hysteria that is the scandal here. What we lived through was a seasonal respiratory outbreak converted by an unaccountable bureaucracy and a compliant press into the largest episode of mass hysteria in modern American history. The pathogen was not a significant part of the covid story. The panic and hysteria that resulted in civilizational disruption is.

Agree with my premise or not, but on top of that, Fauci’s “mitigation” record is still indefensible, and Fauci has already admitted it under oath.

In January 2024, in a closed-door transcribed interview with the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Fauci was asked where the six-foot rule came from. His answer, released in full that May: “I don’t recall. It sort of just appeared. I don’t recall, like, a discussion of whether it should be 5 or 6 or whatever.” Asked whether he had seen any studies supporting six feet, he said he was not aware of any, and that such a study would be very difficult to do. He called it an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data, or even on data that could be gathered. Asked whether he recalled reviewing any studies on masking young children, he could not.

Now remember what six feet actually did.

Keep reading

Russian Scientists Search for ‘Cosmic Matter’ Near Site of Tunguska Blast

Scientists in Russia are studying sediment from a Siberian lake in the hope of finding ‘cosmic matter’ which will confirm that the Tunguska explosion was caused by a meteor entering Earth’s atmosphere. While this hypothesis for the mysterious 1908 event, which saw an enormous blast flatten 80 million trees over an area of 830 square miles, has already been largely accepted by the scientific community, it remains unproven. Over the years, some rogue researchers have put forward alternative possibilities for what could have been behind the incident, including the fantastic suggestion that Nikola Tesla was somehow to blame for the event.

Now a new expedition reportedly featuring experts from four scientific organizations in Russia looks to put an end to the speculation. “The mystery of the Tunguska Catastrophe worries both the scientists and the public,” said Dr. Arthur Meidus, one of the researchers working on the project, “many of us still hope to unravel the scenario of 1908 disaster.” The focus of the study centers around sediment found at the depths of a remote lake located approximately 25 miles from what is believed to have been the epicenter of the blast. “Spring-autumn wastewaters and the Lakura River brought traces of the Tunguska catastrophe to this lake,” Meidus explained.

By determining which layer of sediment can be connected to the time frame of the Tunguska blast, the researchers hope to examine this material using what are described as “modern methods of microanalysis” using advanced scientific techniques. If the explosion were truly caused by a meteor entering the Earth’s atmosphere, they say, then the study should find “microparticles of extraterrestrial origin” in the sand extracted from the lake. Such a discovery, the research team contends, would finally close the case once and for all. One can only hope that this attempt at solving a decades-old Russian mystery goes better than the reopened Dyatlov Pass investigation from last year that we’re still waiting to be resolved.

Keep reading

CSIS warned feds about scientist’s China connection for 21 years

CSIS briefed Natural Resources Canada about Dennis Lu not once, not twice, but three times between 2000 and 2021. For two decades, Canada’s spy agency flagged concerns about a senior scientist collaborating with Chinese counterparts on government energy research. And yet, nothing happened.

Then, in June 2023, Lu traveled to China just before his retirement. While there, he allegedly forwarded nearly 2,000 emails from his government account to his personal account.

When he returned to Canada and found his access had been blocked, a manager ordered it reinstated to process his retirement. Weeks later, Lu allegedly copied more than 2,600 documents from a departmental shared server. 

He has since been charged with breach of trust and unauthorized use of federal computers.

Sheila Gunn Reid and Tamara Lich broke down the case on Wednesday’s Buffalo Roundtable, drawing on reporting by Sam Cooper of The Bureau.

An Ontario Superior Court judge has now ordered CSIS and the Privy Council Office to disclose sensitive records in the prosecution — a significant departure, Sheila noted, from the Liberals’ track record of stonewalling on China-related security files.

“For the first time, a judge is ordering the records turned over,” Sheila said. “Which is completely in contrast to what happened with the Winnipeg lab.”

The Winnipeg connection loomed large over the conversation.

Sheila recalled that Chinese scientists at the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg had transferred virus samples to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a military-linked biolab the U.S. government has identified as the likely source of COVID-19. 

When Parliament ordered those documents disclosed, the Trudeau government refused. Trudeau prorogued Parliament over it. “The Conservatives tried to make a complaint to the RCMP,” Sheila said, “who were not all that interested.”

Both hosts drew what Sheila called a conspiracy theory “rooted in fact” — that the Canadian government’s persistent deference to Beijing, in spite of repeated foreign interference scandals, may stem from the Chinese government knowing exactly what came out of that Winnipeg lab, and the Liberals knowing they know.

“Wouldn’t it be a bad look,” Sheila said, “to have allowed what might have been a precursor to COVID-19 to come out of a lab in Winnipeg, end up back in Wuhan, and then be unleashed upon the world?”

Tamara noted the prosecution also lands squarely in the middle of Mark Carney’s sweeping re-engagement with China, in which both nations have pledged that Canada will become a major exporter of energy to the Chinese market.

“Canada has a China problem,” she said. “A foreign interference problem with the Chinese.”

Keep reading

When Published Research Comes Under Fire: Homeopathy Studies Become Battleground in Debate Over Scientific Retractions

What happens when peer-reviewed research produces findings that challenge prevailing scientific assumptions?

The question has surfaced across medicine for decades, from disputes over vaccine safety and nutrition research to debates over cancer treatment. Increasingly, it has also emerged in one of healthcare’s most polarizing fields: homeopathy.

Supporters argue that homeopathy has been unfairly dismissed despite hundreds of published studies examining its effects.

Critics counter that its core principles conflict with established scientific understanding and that studies reporting positive results often fail to withstand rigorous scientific scrutiny.

Behind the public debate lies a deeper question about scientific studies: When published studies are disputed, where is the line between legitimate correction and efforts to remove findings from the scientific record?

‘Retraction is not an appropriate remedy’

That query sits at the center of two high-profile retractions involving homeopathy researchers Dr. Menachem Oberbaum of Israel and Austrian physician Dr. Michael Frass.

Both helped engineer studies that were peer-reviewed, published in respected medical journals and later withdrawn after challenges to their methodology and conclusions.

Oberbaum led a randomized controlled trial published in the European Journal of Pediatrics that examined health outcomes among children during their first 24 months of life.

The study compared homeopathic and conventional treatment approaches and reported fewer illness episodes, fewer sick days, fewer respiratory illnesses and reduced antibiotic use among children receiving homeopathic care while retaining access to conventional medicine.

The findings suggested measurable benefits from a treatment many scientists regard as biologically implausible.

The journal later retracted the paper, citing concerns that the study lacked blinding and placebo controls, conditions editors said increased the risk of bias.

Oberbaum sharply criticized the decision.

“This retraction is, in our view, an example of an academic process that failed to meet even minimal ethical standards,” he told The Defender.

Co-author Dr. Raj Manchanda, chief medical officer at Nehru Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital in New Delhi, India, argued that the concerns raised against the study should have been addressed through scientific debate rather than retraction. He said the researchers were not informed that a post-publication review process had begun and were given a limited opportunity to respond before the journal withdrew the paper.

Manchanda also disputed the journal’s rationale. He said placebo treatment would have been ethically problematic in children younger than 2 years old and argued that open-label designs are widely accepted when blinding is impractical.

“The methodological issues cited in the retraction were known during peer review,” he said. “Retraction is not an appropriate remedy.”

Keep reading

She Took Two KEY Items: New Details Raise Doubts Over Los Alamos Lab Assistant’s Death

Fresh reporting reveals that Melissa Casias, administrative assistant at the Los Alamos nuclear lab, left home with everyday possessions that suggest she intended to survive — not end her life — raising new questions in the widening pattern of mysterious deaths among nuclear and UFO-linked personnel.

Some have suggested that Casias committed suicide, yet new details about her final moments show that before walking out the door of her Ranchos de Taos home on June 26, 2025, Casias took her toothbrush and thyroid medication with her.

Los Angeles Magazine contributor Lauren Conlin, who has followed the case closely, told NewsNation that these are “things that might indicate you’re planning to stay alive.”

She also returned home to drop off both her work and personal phones — which were later found wiped clean of all data. Her skeletal remains were discovered nearly a year later next to a handgun her family has stated did not belong to her. No bullet was recovered despite reports of a gunshot wound to the head.

Investigator Morgan Wright put it plainly: “You don’t get slumped up on a tree… Most of the time, in every crime scene I’ve worked on, there are skeletonized remains, and there’s no connective tissue left. Everything’s on the ground in pieces.”

Keep reading

Scientists Revisiting the ‘Faraday Effect’ Have Uncovered a Surprising Magnetic Interaction Between Light and Matter

Light’s magnetic field influences matter, according to new findings by Israeli researchers, challenging long-held assumptions that light only illuminates matter and prompting a rethink of how the Faraday Effect works.

Some of today’s most cutting-edge technologies—currently mostly laboratory concepts such as spintronics and quantum devices—could benefit from this revised understanding, as the new work reexamines one of physics’ most fundamental interactions.

First discovered by Michael Faraday in 1845, the Faraday Effect describes what has long been viewed as an interaction solely between light’s electric field and matter. Observations of the effect reveal that light’s polarization rotates as it passes through a material exposed to a steady magnetic field. Traditionally, researchers believed only the electric field of light contributed to this rotation. Now, new work suggests that light’s magnetic field is also a significant player.

A new study provides theoretical evidence that the oscillating magnetic field of light directly contributes to the Faraday Effect. Dr. Amir Capua and Benjamin Assouline of the Institute of Electrical Engineering and Applied Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem led the research, published in Nature Scientific Reports.

Keep reading

Czech Scientists Create Blood Plasma from Hemp Seeds

A protein hidden inside hemp seeds could one day save lives.

Researchers in the Czech Republic are developing a groundbreaking blood plasma substitute made from edestin, a naturally occurring protein found in hemp seeds. While the project is still in the preclinical stage, the concept has already attracted international attention because it could potentially address one of healthcare’s biggest challenges: the global shortage of blood plasma.

For cannabis advocates, it’s yet another reminder that the plant’s value extends far beyond cannabinoids like THC and CBD.

What Exactly Is Blood Plasma?

Blood plasma is the pale-yellow liquid that makes up around 55% of human blood. It transports proteins, nutrients, hormones, and other vital substances throughout the body.

Hospitals rely heavily on plasma during:

  • Severe blood loss
  • Major surgeries
  • Burn treatments
  • Trauma care
  • Various medical conditions require plasma proteins

The problem? Plasma can only be obtained from human donors, leading to persistent supply shortages worldwide. Estimates suggest that demand significantly exceeds available supply in many regions.

The Hemp Connection

The Czech project centers around edestin, a storage protein naturally found in hemp seeds.

Scientists believe edestin possesses several characteristics that make it an interesting candidate for a plasma substitute. The protein’s structure appears highly compatible with mammalian biology, prompting researchers to investigate whether it could mimic some functions traditionally performed by human plasma proteins.

The concept is not entirely new. Czech researchers have been studying the medical potential of hemp-derived edestin for decades, and a patent covering its use as a blood plasma substitute was granted in 2008.

Why This Could Be a Big Deal

If researchers can successfully develop a safe and effective plasma substitute from hemp, the advantages could be enormous.

Unlike donated human plasma, a hemp-derived alternative could potentially be:

  • Produced on a large scale
  • Less dependent on donor availability
  • Easier to store and transport
  • More accessible in developing countries
  • Free from many supply-chain limitations associated with human donations

The Czech startup behind the initiative, Plasma for People, believes the technology could eventually provide a low-cost, plant-based solution for emergency medicine and healthcare systems worldwide.

Keep reading

Meet The Left-Wing Organization Influencing Federal Judges On Science Litigation

he Federal Judicial Center (FJC) has had its fair share of controversies throughout the past year.

The taxpayer-funded agency was caught stuffing citations to left-wing climate activists into its most recent Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, which offers guidance to federal judges on science-related cases. Subsequent Federalist investigations also revealed the radical left-wing partisanship of the authors tasked with writing manual’s climate and forensics sections.

The FJC is intended to serve as the unbiased educational and research arm of the judiciary. Although it doesn’t have any “policy-making or enforcement authority,” these findings have raised concerns about its objectivity and central role in providing “accurate, objective information and education” to judges across America’s federal court system.

But the deeper The Federalist digs into the FJC, the further removed the agency seems to be from its stated mission.

A new inquiry into the FJC unearthed that the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) — a left-wing advocacy group masquerading as an objective science organization — influenced the FJC’s aforementioned science manual. In line with The Federalist’s prior reporting, this investigation also uncovered that several of the AAAS fellows who worked on the manual have a history of supporting left-wing ideology.

Origins and Leadership

Before fleshing out the AAAS’s influence on the judiciary and FJC, it’s worth exploring the group’s left-wing background.

According to the Capital Research Center (CRC), the AAAS’s origins can be traced back to the mid-19th century, when it was created to “unify all scientific fields across the United States” and “rais[e] further resources for scientific inquiry.” The group later shifted its focus in the decades that followed from solely pursuing research funding to “general policy lobbying.”

During this step into activism, the AAAS “began to tilt towards socialism and the Soviet Union” in the late 1930s, according to CRC. The nonprofit watchdog noted the left-wing science group’s annual president at the time, Walter Bradford Cannon, “expressed his sympathies for socialism as a model of the scientific economy and society of the future, a position many of his fellow ‘science-activists’ in the AAAS shared.”

The AAAS has carried its partisan agenda forward by increasing its involvement in left-wing “‘science-activism,’ ideological activism performed in the guise of promoting science.” The group was notably involved in the 2017 “March for Science” that protested the first Trump administration’s pro-energy policies.

This left-wing activism is perhaps unsurprising when considering the partisanship displayed by the AAAS’s leadership. The group’s current CEO, Sudip Parikh, has regularly criticized the Trump administration and its policy agenda, including the president’s 2020 move to withdraw America from the World Health Organization over its mishandling of Covid. He also attacked a 2022 Supreme Court decision (West Virginia v. EPA) limiting the EPA’s regulatory authority over “greenhouse gas emissions.”

Parikh’s predecessor, former Rep. Rush D. Holt, Jr., D-N.J., appears to be cut from the same cloth. According to CRC, he criticized President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Accords and “signed the AAAS as a supporter of an open letter” urging the president to revoke his travel ban during his tenure as CEO.

The AAAS is also bankrolled by numerous left-wing organizations and has inked contracts with the federal government, according to CRC. Its funders have reportedly included the left-wing John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, and others.

Keep reading

Scientists angered as Anthropic AI shuts them out

Scientists have accused Anthropic of cutting them off from its latest AI technology in case they use it to create a bioweapon.

The US tech giant this week released its new Fable chatbot, built using the same technology as the company’s most advanced Mythos model, which was previously deemed too dangerous to release.

Anthropic says Fable has guardrails to prevent it being abused by criminals or bad actors for nefarious tasks such as hacking or creating bioweapons.

However, scientists are claiming that Fable is refusing to engage with their queries because of their profession.

Prof Derya Unutmaz, a biologist at the non-profit Jackson Institute, claimed he was effectively barred from interacting with Anthropic’s Fable AI even for mundane questions.

“I can’t even say ‘hello’ to Fable 5 except in incognito mode because it knows I am a biomedical researcher,” he said.

In another post, he wrote: “How the hell is this prompt a cybersecurity or biological risk! Almost every prompt I’ve tried gives me the same error.

“I can’t even say the word ‘cancer’ to Fable 5.”

James Schnable, a plant geneticist at the University of Nebraska, wrote in a post on X: “As far as I can tell, Anthropic just decided to blacklist every biologist in their customer base.”

Keep reading