Tag: vaccines

It’s Been 10 Years Since a Whistleblower Exposed the CDC’s Cover-up of the Link Between Vaccines and Autism. The Agency Has Done Nothing.

Ten years after a whistleblower at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) leaked data showing the agency identified a link between the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in African American boys, the agency has done nothing to address the issue.

William Thompson, Ph.D., a CDC senior scientist, on Aug. 27, 2014, issued a statement through his attorney revealing that he and his colleagues at the CDC omitted data from a 2004 article in Pediatrics that “suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism.”

“Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final protocol was not followed,” Thompson wrote.

Since then, the CDC has continued to assert that “studies have shown there is no link between vaccines and ASD,” autism spectrum disorder.

Meanwhile, the agency also reports that autism rates have continued to climb — 1 in 36 children now have autism according to its most recent study.

For the first time since the agency began doing autism prevalence studies in 2000, in 2023 the CDC also reported that autism rates were higher among Black, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander children than among white and biracial children.

Since then, the agency has continued to add more vaccines to its list of recommended childhood immunizations, including the flu, COVID-19 and RSV monoclonal antibody shots.

Keep reading

Biden-Harris Administration Defends Big Tech Censorship Pressure Following Zuckerberg’s Admission

The Biden-Harris White House looks determined to justify and normalize the practice of the government colluding with private companies, in this instance Big Tech, to censor speech.

After Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg on Monday sent a letter to the House Judiciary Committee, admitting that his company came under pressure from the current administration to conduct censorship and that he “believes” that was wrong – the White House doubled down on the controversial, and quite possibly, unconstitutional, policy.

In his letter, Zuckerberg chose to focus on Meta censoring content related to COVID-19, and in response, a White House spokesman revealed the government does not share Zuckerberg’s stance that the policy of pressure was wrong.

“Encouragement” is how that’s phrased. “When confronted with a deadly pandemic, this administration encouraged responsible actions to protect public health and safety,” stated the White House spokesman to media requests.

He further justified the actions described by Zuckerberg as needed because the White House believes private companies, including those from the tech industry, “should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people.”

And with the stage set in this way – the spokesman concluded that these companies are then free to make “independent choices about the information they present.”

But Zuckerberg’s letter to the Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan does a pretty good job of explaining how these “independent choices” get made. Senior figures from the Biden administration, Zuckerberg stated, in 2021 “repeatedly pressured our (Facebook, Instagram) teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire.”

The decision on content removal, and introduction of new rules into platform policies to facilitate censorship, Zuckerberg concedes, was “ultimately ours” –  but made under pressure.

If Meta tried to defy these “suggestions” – the administration showed “a lot of frustration.”

Keep reading

What Does a Fraudulent Vaccine Safety Study Look Like?

New vaccines should be proven safe before they are accepted onto the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) vaccine schedule.

Here is what is actually happening: Vaccine companies are doing studies that claim to demonstrate the safety of new vaccines but are carefully designed and conducted to intentionally hide the toxicity of these vaccines.

To see how this is done, read on.

What does an honest vaccine safety study look like? 

An honest safety study must have a test group that gets the vaccine and a control group that gets a harmless placebo. Injuries and deaths are compared in the two groups.

If the test group has many more adverse events than the placebo control group, the vaccine is not safe.

Most people would be shocked to learn that none of the vaccines on the CDC vaccine schedule have been safety tested in this way.

What does a fraudulent vaccine safety study look like? 

Rule No. 1 for conducting a fraudulent study: Do not have a placebo control group. Here is where the fraud is happening: The “control group” is deliberately given something that is as toxic as the vaccine being tested. It can be an older vaccine or the vaccine ingredients minus the antigen.

The results will show that the injuries and deaths are similar in both groups. That is because they are both receiving toxic ingredients. The new vaccine is then illogically declared safe.

If there is no placebo control group, the toxicity of the vaccine is hidden. This is both clever and diabolical. Can you see it?

Keep reading

HHS Funds AI Tool to ‘Inoculate’ Social Media Users Against HPV Vax ‘Misinformation’

University of Pennsylvania researchers — using U.S. taxpayer dollars — are developing an artificial intelligence (AI) tool designed to “inoculate” social media users against “misinformation” about the HPV vaccine posted on social media, grant documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request revealed.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is funding the $4 million “Inoculate for HPV Vaccine” randomized controlled trial running from April 2022 through March 2027. The National Cancer Institute, part of HHS, is facilitating the funding. Funding for year three was released in April.

The study is headed up by Melanie L. Kornides, associate professor of nursing at the University of Pennsylvania, whose research focuses on increasing vaccine uptake, and also on “strategies to combat misinformation.”

Kornides is joined by a team of digital health communication experts, software and program designers, social media analysts and machine learning systems experts who will help her run the “inoculation” experiment on 2,500 parents of children ages 8-12.

The team is collecting user data from YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram where people talk about HPV and using natural language processing to train an AI tool to identify “HPV misinformation,” or posts that are critical of vaccination — whether or not the information in the post is true or false.

They will then develop and test their “inoculation tool,” exposing subjects in three study arms to different types of messaging meant to make them immune to such misinformation.

A control group will get no particular messaging and two test groups will be exposed either to messaging designed to inoculate viewers against content critical of of HPV vaccines and content critical of anti-vaccine arguments.

The subjects will get “booster” doses of messaging at three and six months after their first inoculation.

If successful, the researchers wrote, this novel approach to combating health “misinformation” can be used in “wide-scale social media campaigns” addressing pandemics, childhood vaccination and other health issues.

Keep reading

Febrile Seizures Identified as Potential Cause of Sudden Unexplained Deaths of Children

A study published in the Feb. 13, 2024 journal Neurology designed to investigate the cause of sudden unexplained death of children, which usually occurs during sleep, found that the deaths of seven toddlers examined in the study were related to convulsions, also known as seizures. This finding suggests that many unexplained sleep-related deaths unexpectedly occurring in infants under age one (sudden infant death or SIDS) and in children over age one (sudden unexplained death in childhood or SUDC) may result from seizures.1

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that there are approximately 3,400 cases of SIDS in infants under one year old every year in the United States with no obvious cause. In 2020, there were 1,389 deaths due to SIDS, 1,062 deaths due to unknown causes, and 905 deaths due to accidental suffocation and strangulation in bed.2

For many decades, researchers have attempted to find an explanation of why SIDS occurs in children and observed that there is a link between SIDS and children with a history of febrile seizures (seizures accompanied by fever). Research in the past suggested that children who died suddenly and unexpectedly were 10 times more likely to have had febrile seizures than children who did not die suddenly and unexpectedly.3 4

According to The Sleep Foundation, febrile seizures are relatively common and 1 in 25 children experience at least one febrile seizure triggered by fever.5

Study Analyzes Home Video Recordings of Child’s Last Sleep Before Death

In the study published in Neurology, the findings were derived from a registry of over 300 SUDC cases that was set up ten years ago by researchers at New York University Grossman School of Medicine. Medical records and video evidence of seven toddlers aged 13 to 27 molnths, who suddenly died in their sleep, were donated by families to the researchers and were analyzed. A team of eight physicians analyzed the home video recordings. The recordings were either time stamped from security systems or commercial crib cameras, while each child was sleeping right before of their death. Six forensic pathologists, a pediatric epileptologist, and a sleep medicine/epileptologist physician reviewed the videos independently.6

Three cases had no significant medical history. Four had common pediatric conditions such preterm birth with recent otitis media (ear infection), chronic otitis media and bilateral myringotomies (surgery to treat chronic ear infections), egg allergy, and febrile seizures. All children had normal development milestones.7

Five of the seven video recordings were continuously running at the time and showed sound and visible motion that indicated an occurrence of a seizure. The remaining two recordings were triggered by sound or motion, but only one suggested that a muscle convulsion (a sign of seizure) had occurred and also only one toddler had a documented previous history of febrile seizures.

The autopsies that were performed revealed no definitive cause of death,  however it is well known that pathological evidence of seizures prior to death is difficult to detect in autopsies.8

Keep reading

Vaccinated And Boosted CT Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz Tests Positive For COVID-19 After Returning From DNC

Connecticut Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz has covid again.

Bysiewicz, who has apparently had at least 4 covid shots by this point, managed to get covid after the DNC superspreader event she attended in Chicago.

Bysiewicz got her first shot of Pfizer’s covid vaccine at Pratt & Whitney’s “runway vaccination clinic” on March 11, 2021, in a publicity stunt.

At that time she said, “the vaccine is safe, effective and easy! When it’s your turn, get your shot. Let’s get this pandemic behind us.”

By December 2021, Bysiewicz was already pushing booster shots: “If you want to keep yourself safe, your friends, family and community safe, this is the way to do it: get vaccinated, get boosted and also if you’re feeling any kind of symptoms, that are flu-like or cold-like, please, please get tested.”

Keep reading

Mark Zuckerberg ‘Regrets’ Censorship of COVID Info & Hunter Biden Laptop Story

Mark Zuckerberg sensationally admitted that the Biden White House pressured Facebook to censor content about COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop story and that he now regrets it.

In a letter to the House of Representatives’ Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg said the social media giant was “repeatedly pressured” by the government to blacklist information after Joe Biden’s inauguration in 2021.

“In 2021, senior officials from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain Covid-19 content, including humour and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree,” wrote the Facebook founder.

Such information included claims that the virus emerged from a Chinese lab, something which subsequently became one of the most likely scenarios, as well as content that questioned the efficacy and safety of the COVID jab.

Keep reading

Virologists Blow-the-Whistle: MPOX is actually Known Side-Effect of COVID Vax

A renowned German doctor has spoken out to warn the public that the monkeypox “outbreak” is a hoax and the “symptoms” are actually side effects of Covid mRNA vaccines.

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg issued the warning in a new whistleblowing interview with the Austrian outlet AUF1.

He explains that reports of a monkeypox “global emergency” from the World Health Organization (WHO) are part of a fearmongering campaign designed to scare the masses.

Wodarg asserts that globalists are seeking to cover up the negative health impact of Covid shots while trying to profit from testing and treating monkeypox.

He asks why other doctors aren’t questioning why people are being diagnosed with monkeypox based on a positive Rostar test.

The Rostar test is an expensive product that pharmaceutical companies are profiting from.

Meanwhile, share prices in companies that produce monkeypox vaccines are soaring following the WHO’s recent emergency declaration.

“They’re scaring us again,” Wodarg said of the globalist medical establishment.

“It’s a business exploiting the effects of the corona shots they pushed on us.

“They’re using corona side-effects to create new schemes and scare us again.”

Alex Jones of Infowars shared a clip of the interview translated from German to English.

Jones says the video was from a German article titled:

“Doctor: Monkeypox is actually shingles, a side effect of the Covid vaccines.”

Keep reading

FDA Approves New COVID Vaccines — for Virus Strains ‘Largely Faded From Circulation’

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna which target the currently dominant Omicron variant KP.2 strain of SARS-CoV-2, the agency announced Thursday.

The new shots are recommended for all people ages 6 months and older. However, according to the FDA, the new vaccines remain under emergency use authorization (EUA) for people between ages 6 months and 11 years.

According to NBC News, the new vaccines could be available within days.

The vaccines were approved even though their clinical trial data have not been released. Manufacturers claim that “testing in animals shows the shots trigger neutralizing antibodies,” The Epoch Times reported.

According to MedPageToday, the new vaccines “are manufactured using a similar process as previous formulas of these vaccines” and “the FDA assessed manufacturing and nonclinical data” in its approval process.

NBC News quoted a Pfizer spokesperson who said the data the company submitted to the FDA indicates a “substantially improved” immune response against the currently circulating COVID-19 variants.

Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said in the FDA’s statement, “Vaccination continues to be the cornerstone of COVID-19 prevention.”

“These updated vaccines meet the agency’s rigorous, scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality,” Marks said.

Keep reading

UK doctors who challenge vaccine safety feel the GMC has helped to put a target on their backs

A group of health professionals have expressed concern to the General Medical Council (“GMC”) about the use of GMC referrals against doctors speaking out about the safety of the covid-19 injections.

They highlighted cases of doctors facing fitness to practise investigations and job losses due to their public expression of safety concerns.  And they urged the GMC to protect whistle-blowers reporting covid-19 vaccine harms.

In response, GMC Chair Professor Carrie MacEwen said that healthcare needs a culture where doctors can feel they can speak out about concerns for patient safety. 

However, in their response to Prof. MacEwen, the group expressed the lack of reassurance among doctors regarding protection when raising patient concerns and raised the online harassment and death threats that doctors receive for raising concerns about the safety of covid injections – which is a concern for patient safety. 

These concerns are often expressed online because doctors are being ignored when they raise them through the official channels.  And, despite a doctor’s right to freedom of expression being upheld in the High Court, the GMC continues to investigate reports referred to them of doctors who express concerns about vaccine safety online.

Prof. MacEwen responded again but failed to adequately address the points raised by the doctors.

“It is hard to dispel the feeling among dissident doctors that there is a target over their heads, with certain hostile actors itching to find any excuse for a GMC referral,” the HART Group said.

Keep reading