Tag: vaccine injury

mRNA Vaccines Linked to Catastrophic Ovarian Damage

A groundbreaking study reveals that mRNA vaccines trigger irreversible destruction of women’s primordial follicles — the finite ‘egg reserve’ that dictates fertility and menopause timing.

Karaman et al. (2024) found that rats injected with human-equivalent mRNA COVID-19 doses suffered:

  • more than 60% loss of primordial follicles (*p* < 0.001) — the non-renewable foundation of female fertility
  • plummeting Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) — a key marker of ovarian reserve
  • a surge in follicle apoptosis (cell death) via elevated TGF-β1, VEGF, and caspase-3.

If this translates to humans, the implications are dire. Think early menopause, infertility, and a generational fertility crash.

There are human data reflecting this trend: Alvergne et al. (2022) reported disrupted menstrual cycles in 42% of vaccinated women, with some experiencing prolonged irregularities. However, more research is needed.

Keep reading

Study linking vaccines to SIDS deleted

If a scientific paper offers a counter-narrative conclusion, should it be deleted from the record?

Science publisher Elsevier says yes, if the topic is vaccines, because allowing doctors and parents to read it would pose a risk to public health.

This raises the question: Is censorship of science really the best way to ensure public health and safety?

The paper under scrutiny is a peer-reviewed analysis of three decades of vaccine adverse event reporting data which found that 75 percent of sudden infant deaths occurred within seven days of a vaccination, a statistically significant finding.

Author Neil Z. Miller reviewed the medical literature linking SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) to vaccines and proposed several pathogenic mechanisms, concluding that, “While the findings in this paper are not proof of an association between infant vaccines and infant deaths, they are highly suggestive of a causal relationship.”

The main finding from the paper, titled ‘Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature,’ is represented in the below image, which was widely shared on social media since its publication in the journal Toxicology Reports, in June 2021.

Keep reading

Secret Trial of Pfizer RSV Vaccine Killed Two Infants in the 1960s — Their Families Just Sued the U.S. Government

The families of two Black infants who died during a 1960s experimental RSV vaccine trial have filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S., alleging government researchers enrolled the babies in a dangerous medical experiment without their parents’ knowledge or consent, The New York Times reported.

The lawsuit, filed May 22 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, alleges the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other researchers, in 1965 and 1966, subjected dozens of infants — most or all of them from low-income Black families — to testing of Pfizer’s Lot 100 experimental vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV.

Two infants, Victor Marcellus King and Ross Otto Hambrick, later died after developing vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease (VAERD), a severe respiratory illness caused by the vaccine.

VAERD occurs when a vaccinated child who never had RSV is exposed to the virus and develops a more severe case of RSV than they would have if they hadn’t received the vaccine.

The suit was filed by Sharlette Hambrick and Darius King, acting as representatives of the estates of their deceased brothers. They allege federal researchers failed to obtain informed consent from the children’s parents, withheld critical information about prior vaccine failures, and continued the study despite mounting evidence that the vaccine was causing severe reactions in participants.

The complaint also alleges that the tissue samples from the babies who died were later used to develop the RSV vaccines and monoclonal antibody shots that have been approved in the last several years — providing a financial boon for drugmakers.

“Medical research in the United States has a long, troubled racial history,” the complaint states, comparing the alleged conduct to other notorious examples of unethical experimentation involving Black Americans, including the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the exploitation of Henrietta Lacks.

The infants’ families were unaware the babies had been subjected to the experiment until a reporter from Undark magazine contacted them while investigating the story in 2023.

The reporter found the babies’ names in a doctor’s government-issued laboratory notebook and other paperwork from the clinical trial, the Times reported.

Parents not told infants were being enrolled in trial for experimental vaccine

Keep reading

Inside The FDA’s “Cover-Up” Of Child Deaths Linked To Covid Vaccines

In September 2025, then-US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr Marty Makary publicly acknowledged that the agency was investigating reports of child deaths following Covid-19 vaccination.

“We do know at the FDA…that there had been children who have died from the COVID vaccine,” Makary said during a CNN interview.

By that stage, however, a fierce internal dispute had already emerged inside the FDA over what investigators believed the evidence showed – and whether the public should ever see the full findings.

“It really did feel like there was some sort of cover-up going on about the Covid-19 vaccines,” said one individual familiar with the discussions.

MD Reports spoke with several current/former agency officials, advisers, and individuals briefed on the discussions, all of whom requested anonymity because they were not authorised to publicly discuss internal FDA deliberations.

At the centre of the controversy was an internal FDA review led by Dr Tracy Beth Høeg, a physician-scientist who was working as a senior scientist inside the FDA’s vaccine division at the time.

FDA officials examined roughly 96 paediatric death reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the government database used to detect potential vaccine-related adverse events.

The review included medical records, autopsy reports, pathology findings, and follow-up investigations conducted by agency staff.

About 25 deaths following Covid vaccination were ultimately considered serious enough for high-level internal discussion inside the agency.

The findings were expected to be presented at a September 2025 meeting of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP), the federal panel that shapes US vaccine recommendations.

But before that could happen, details of the review leaked to the New York Times and the Washington Post.

Høeg quickly became the focus of intense media scrutiny and criticism from vaccine advocates and unnamed FDA officials who argued she was relying too heavily on VAERS reports and overstating preliminary findings.

People familiar with the fallout said some FDA staff strongly objected to Høeg’s methods and conclusions and allegedly sought to undermine her credibility by leaking details of the review.

The leak effectively ended plans for a public ACIP discussion and deepened divisions within the FDA over how the findings should be handled.

Some officials believed the findings warranted stronger warnings and greater transparency. Others feared public acknowledgement of vaccine-linked child deaths would damage confidence in the Covid vaccines.

“We know that there are these deaths that are due to the vaccine,” said one source, referring to myocarditis cases and published reports from countries including Korea and Israel.

The controversy intensified after then-FDA vaccine chief Dr Vinay Prasad ordered additional investigation into the deaths identified in Høeg’s review.

Months later, another leak brought the issue back into public view.

In November 2025, an internal memo circulated by Prasad became public. In it, Prasad acknowledged that “at least 10” children had died “after and because of receiving Covid-19 vaccination.”

He described the findings as “a profound revelation.”

“COVID-19 vaccines did result in the death of children,” Prasad wrote. “Dr. Hoeg was correct in her assessment.”

The memo triggered another round of backlash from media outlets and vaccine advocates, many of whom accused Prasad of overstating the evidence before the agency’s analysis had been finalised.

Inside Medicine reported on a Dec 5 memo about a subsequent FDA analysis using a World Health Organization causality framework, which classified zero deaths as “certain,” two as “probable/likely,” and five as “possible.”

But individuals involved in the discussions said pressure steadily mounted inside the agency to “downgrade” the findings with each successive review.

“It seemed like there was a lot of pressure to keep decreasing the number of deaths,” said one source.

Keep reading

New website unmasks the VAERS safety data exposed by Senator Johnson

There are only two things you need to know about the documents released by Senator Johnson relating to the VAERS safety signals:

  1. The safety signals were real and serious
  2. The people at the FDA and CDC ignored them

You have to realize that on all these emails, they ALL knew it would be subject to FOIA. So they can’t write “she’s right, but we need to silence her.” They all are aware that the conversations are being recorded.

There is now a new website that organizes all the data.

This took just 4 days to create by one person, Marjorie Roswell. It is absolutely amazing.

Keep reading

‘Everybody was complicit in it’: Top U.S. senator sounds alarm on ‘most egregious’ government scandal in his lifetime

The chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee is calling the cover-up of the adverse impacts of the COVID shots “the most egregious government scandal in my lifetime.”

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., recently released a report titled: “Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals,” and will hold a hearing on Biden officials’ failure to detect problems with the shots.

Appearing on “Sunday Morning Futures” with Jackie DeAngelis on the Fox News Channel, Johnson lashed out at Dr. Peter Marks, the former top vaccine regulator at the Food and Drug Administration, saying the physician purposely concealed information in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS.

“He was shown 25 adverse events where there were safety signals including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, different types of strokes, and he hid it,” Johnson said. “They are lying about it to this day. They continue to use the old algorithm.”

“Hundreds of thousands of people that experienced adverse events, the tens of thousands that died, reported on VAERS associated with this vaccine, these people ought to have a cause to action against those government officials that hid what the American people had a right to know. But they lied bald-faced to the American public.

Keep reading

As many as 2M Americans were seriously disabled by the COVID vaccine

I recently did two surveys (your family and your medical practice if you work in a medical practice).

The full live results can be viewed here: family and medical practice. The Notes column is available as well. Only the emails were removed for privacy reasons. The records count at the time of this article were 2908 and 107.

I had Claude Opus 4.7 co-work evaluate the survey solicitations, the survey questions, the survey results, the notes column, my reader base and gave it unrestricted use of publicly available data (CDC, Insurance industry, FRED data, etc) to reconcile everything. This allowed Claude to give me a more objective answer because my reader base is not representative (e.g., half of the respondents had no vaccinated family members) and because my reader base are more likely to attribute disability and deaths to the vaccine.

The key results:

  • As many as 1M Americans killed by the COVID vaccine
  • As many as 1.5M working-age Americans disabled for 6 months or more
  • Silence from health authorities worldwide on this issue. Not a single national public-health authority, anywhere in the world, has produced an estimate of the type constructed in this article — a comprehensive, all-cause, all-ages, attributable-deaths-plus-disabilities total for the COVID-19 vaccines.

Keep reading

Every unvaccinated child is evidence of a crime

The vaccine narrative has been deliberately engineered to obscure reality. Manipulated data, corrupted science and silencing dissent are all part of a larger medical architecture designed to create chronic illness while maintaining plausible deniability.

However, unvaccinated children thrive. They are the living proof that the chronic disease epidemic isn’t genetic, it isn’t mysterious, it isn’t inevitable. Instead, it’s iatrogenic. It is caused by the very medical interventions claimed to prevent it – vaccines.

The First Betrayal

The midwife’s words hang in the delivery room air like a casual afterthought: “We’ll just give baby the vitamin K shot now.” Just a vitamin. Nothing more than what you’d find in your morning orange juice. The language itself is the first deception – calling a synthetic blood-clotting agent manufactured by Pfizer’s subsidiary Hospira a “vitamin” transforms an industrial pharmaceutical intervention into something as wholesome as sunshine.

In those first raw hours after birth, when parents are overwhelmed by the miracle of new life, the medical system strikes with practised precision. The entire infrastructure – from the delivery nurse to the paediatrician, from the hospital protocols to the documentation systems – has been calibrated for this moment. Every medical professional in that room has been trained, not in the science of whether a newborn needs synthetic phytonadione, but in the art of securing compliance. They’ve learned to frame it as routine, to present it as universal, to make refusal seem like dangerous eccentricity.

Murphy’s father, one of the few who came prepared, discovered what awaits those who dare say no. After his daughter was delivered using vacuum extraction five times – creating a visible blood-filled sac on her head – the red-shirted paediatrician entered within three minutes. Not to examine the baby. Not to celebrate the birth. But to begin the assault. When Murphy’s father cited the Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit study showing only six deaths from vitamin K deficiency bleeding in five million babies over 25 years, with none occurring in hospital births where vitamin K was refused, the doctor didn’t engage with the data. Instead, he turned to the mother: “Do you feel differently?”

The pattern revealed itself through escalation. First, the doctor. Then the nurse lecturing about irresponsibility. Then the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (“NICU”) admission – not for medical necessity, but for “monitoring” a baby whose parents had refused the injection. Then the failed attempts to insert cannulas, the repeated heel pricks for blood tests. Strange behaviour for medical professionals who claim the baby cannot clot blood properly. If she truly couldn’t clot, why were they so eager to make her bleed?

The ingredients tell their own story. In one millilitre of this “vitamin,” there are 70 milligrams of polyoxyl 35 castor oil – a known irritant that causes skin, eye and respiratory irritation according to the NIH’s own safety data. There are 37.5 milligrams of dextrose monohydrate and 9 milligrams of benzyl alcohol, which the manufacturer admits has “no evidence” it doesn’t cause toxicity – not because they’ve proven it safe, but because they’ve never looked. The actual vitamin K? Just 2 milligrams. The “inactive” ingredients outweigh the “active” one by a factor of 39.5 to 1.

This elaborate performance isn’t about preventing bleeding. Natural vitamin K levels are low at birth because they’re meant to be low. Evolution didn’t make a mistake that Pfizer needs to correct. The rise to normal levels happens naturally over eight days – which is why Jewish and Muslim traditions wait until day eight for circumcision. The entire vitamin K narrative exists to solve a problem created by another unnecessary intervention: immediate circumcision for the 80.5% of American baby boys whose foreskins will be harvested and sold to cosmetic companies.

Sixty per cent of babies develop jaundice after receiving their vitamin K shot. The medical establishment calls this “idiopathic” – of unknown origin – while the product insert plainly states that synthetic vitamin K causes jaundice and hyperbilirubinemia. They inject the cause, observe the effect, and declare it a mystery.

The Control Group Survey found that exposure to just the vitamin K shot alone, without any vaccines, increased a child’s risk of developing at least one chronic condition from 2.64% to 11.73% – a 344% increase. When combined with maternal vaccines during pregnancy, that risk jumps to 30%. Yet parents are told it’s “just a vitamin,” as harmless as a prenatal supplement.

The genius of starting with vitamin K is that it establishes the precedent. Once parents have agreed to that first injection, once they’ve surrendered their newborn’s bodily sovereignty in those vulnerable first hours, the pattern is set. The baby has been enrolled in the system. The medical records will forever show “vitamin K administered,” marking this child as one who receives injections. The psychological barrier has been broken. If you said yes to the first one, why would you say no to the rest?

Those who refuse face the full weight of institutional pressure. Police have knocked on doors in Illinois because parents declined the vitamin K shot. Child Protective Services has been weaponised as a threat. Parents are told their babies will die, that they’re irresponsible, that they’re endangering their child. All for refusing an injection that even the manufacturer admits hasn’t been studied for carcinogenic or mutagenic effects, or for its impact on fertility.

The first hours after birth are a carefully orchestrated vulnerability. Parents are exhausted, emotional, overwhelmed. They’re in an unfamiliar environment, surrounded by medical authority. They’ve just been through one of life’s most intense experiences. And in that moment of maximum vulnerability, when they should be bonding with their newborn, the system demands its first tribute.

This is where the battle for your child’s health is won or lost. Not at the two-month vaccines. Not at the measles, mumps, and rubella (“MMR”) vaccine. But in those first moments when someone in scrubs approaches with a syringe and says it’s “just a vitamin.” Because once you’ve said yes to injecting your hours-old baby with synthetic chemicals that have never been tested for cancer, mutation or fertility effects, you’ve already agreed that strangers in white coats have more authority over your child’s body than you do.

The parents who successfully refuse have done their homework months in advance. They’ve printed the safety data sheets. They’ve read the product inserts. They’ve studied the actual rates of vitamin K deficiency bleeding. They’ve prepared their responses to each wave of pressure. They know they’re not preventing an epidemic of bleeding babies – they’re refusing to participate in a ritual of submission that marks their child as property of the medical system from the moment of birth.

Keep reading

Still more first- and secondhand accounts of the ongoing “vaccine” massacre in the United States

What I’ve noticed is an epidemic of friends needing hip replacements. In their 60’s to late 70’s. Like way more than should be in my circle. When I was growing up I don’t remember any of my elderly relatives needing a hip replacement. The other thing is severe neurological issues. BOTH of my neighbours. Dear people with everything from “autoimmune disease” to vertigo to POTS. No idea why. And I have had two or three good friends say they are frightened that they can’t remember things the way they used to. Age 52 to 70. I assure them that we all have memory slips but secretly I am afraid for them. Two relatives developed heart issues in the past 4 years. And have you noticed how many phone “hold” messages that need to say “We will not tolerate rude or disrespectful language with client services” or something along that line. When did we need that? And what could it be doing to the minds of our children? Among my teen acquaintances, a heartbreaking increase of flus and colds necessitating weeks off throughout the year. One teen had difficulty reading music in the weeks following her second or third shot, and couldn’t play the trumpet because the air pressure gave her crushing headaches for months. Oh and I forgot – her younger sister (age 11) suddenly developed juvenile diabetes. The specialist who diagnosed her said they are noticing an increase in new onset diabetes and suspect one of the causes the vaccine.

Keep reading

UK data shows vaccinated died more during COVID waves. Whoops!

Dr. Daniel Ninio started a Grok thread to discredit my work.

So I continued the conversation and asked Grok for the data and methods showing the COVID shots have saved “millions” of lives.

It first suggested the CDC data. I pointed out that the CDC data doesn’t allow us to measure the harm/benefit. Grok agreed.

It also suggested the UK data. So I had ChatGPT analyze the UK data and it showed the vaccinated died more during COVID waves than the unvaccinated.

So Grok said it’s because of selection bias.

Whoa! A selection bias that turns a supposed >5X COVID mortality advantage to a 45% disadvantage in just a few months?!?!? Color me skeptical. I asked Grok for the methodology and Grok agreed that there was none. All hand-waving.

In a 2021 trough-to-wave comparison, age-standardised all-cause mortality rose by 17.6% in the ever-vaccinated status group versus 12.1% in the unvaccinated group, a roughly 45% larger wave-period increase among the ever-vaccinated. That directional pattern is inconsistent with a simple strongly protective all-cause interpretation.

In other words, the data isn’t fitting the narrative at all.

This is probably why the UK office of national statistics refuses to release the record level data at any finer granularity than the very crude buckets they release now.

Keep reading