Tag: vaccines

C19 HAS TAUGHT US DOCTORS DON’T UNDERSTAND HOW MEDICINES ARE MADE

If doctors did know how medicines are made, the SARS-CoV-2 injections would never have found their way into people’s arms.

Doctors would have shouted “Nine-months to develop and make an injection? Pull the other one, matey!”

In the world of medicines, the doctor is equivalent to the pilot of an aircraft, where passenger lives are in their hands. So it is with treating disease—patient lives are in doctors’ hands.

Could you imagine a pilot allowing his aircraft to take off, knowing it had been developed and made at least ten-times faster that ever before?

The manufacturer would need to explain in great detail what it had done differently to achieve such a miraculous outcome. Questions would be:

  • How were all the component parts designed and sourced so quicky?
  • How were manufacturing and supply contracts negotiated and signed-off so quickly?
  • How much testing were the wings, engines and other safety-critical components subjected to?
  • There are lots more, feel free to insert your own questions here…

The other thing, of course, is that the physical condition of the aircraft would undoubtedly give the game away. A wonky wing maybe, the odd bump in the fuselage, wires poking out from the cockpit?

A deathtrap for all to see…

Keep reading

Following Japan, Europe Set to Approve Exotic New Self-Amplifying RNA ‘Vaccine’ Technology That May ‘Vaccinate’ Others Via Shedding

On Thursday the European Union’s medicine committee recommended marketing authorization of a novel exotic technology referred to as ‘self-amplifying RNA vaccines’ or ‘replicon vaccines’. Called Kostaive, it is reportedly for ‘protection’ against Covid. In October Japan became the first country on earth to begin injecting their population with the new shot.

“On 12 December 2024, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) adopted a positive opinion, recommending the granting of a marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Kostaive, a vaccine intended for the prevention of COVID-19 in adults,” the European Medicines Agency said Thursday.

Unlike the notorious mRNA gene therapy injections used to ‘combat’ Covid, which make the vaccinated individual’s body produce an antigen (the spike protein in the case of the Covid shots) the new saRNA vaccines go a step further, making the body replicate the replication mechanism itself. Traditional (real) vaccines contain the antigen, which is intended to illicit an immune response in the body, unlike mRNA vaccines which make the body itself produce the antigen, which is then intended to illicit an immune response. Traditional vaccines also contain neurotoxins such as aluminum as an adjuvant (to agitate the immune system into action) and mercury as a preservative.

“Kostaive will be available as a powder for dispersion for injection. Kostaive is a RNA-based COVID-19 vaccine (ATC code: J07BN01). It contains a self-amplifying mRNA that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Self-amplifying means that the mRNA also carries instructions to make a protein called replicase. Once administered into a muscle, the replicase protein makes more copies of the mRNA, which the cell can use to make more spike protein. Vaccination with Kostaive induces the production of neutralising antibodies and a cellular immune response targeting the spike protein, which helps protect people against COVID-19,” the European Medicines Agency said Thursday.

The new shot triggers side effects 90 percent of the time.

“During the clinical trials for Kostaive, five deaths were reported among participants in the phase 3b study. Across study phases 1, 2, and 3a combined, 90 percent of injected participants experienced adverse events, with 74.5 percent reporting systemic reactions and 15.2 percent requiring medical attention after the first dose. Notably, many of the study authors are full-time employees of Arcturus Therapeutics, raising concerns about bias in their conclusions,” Lifesite News said Tuesday.

The new technology has been labeled as intrinsically dangerous and even as a bioweapon by some, sparking fears of the vaccine itself spreading to the non-vaccinated population, a step far beyond vaccine shedding.

“The man-made genes in the replicon vaccines, if introduced into humans, are likely to spread not only to other humans but also to other species,” The Expose said in September.

The novel vaccine technology is said to spread like a virus, vaccinating even those who refuse to take their shots.

“So this was a way to have a vaccine that spreads like a virus,” talkshow host Mike Adams said in a May 5, 2021 podcast. “And the research on this has been going on for over three decades.”

Keep reading

How They Faked a Pandemic

In examining how the global response to COVID-19 unfolded, one cannot overlook the pivotal role of PCR testing. The very tool used to justify lockdowns, mandates, and “vaccines” was fundamentally flawed. Even the test’s inventor, Kary Mullis, warned that it was never meant to diagnose infectious diseases. Instead, it was weaponized to generate fear and compliance, creating what some call a “pandemic of PCR tests,” not an actual pandemic of disease.

PCR tests work by amplifying genetic material, doubling it with each cycle. With enough cycles—beyond the recommended 27—they can detect virtually anything. During the COVID-19 response, countries like Canada ran up to 43 cycles, yielding an overwhelming number of false positives. According to data from Germany’s Robert Koch Institute, these tests produced up to 86% false positives, leading to the illusion of widespread infection.

If we strip away the hysteria and false positives, the picture becomes clear: COVID-19 never approached the lethality or spread required to justify the measures taken. Respiratory infection peaks during 2019 and 2023 ranked higher in severity than the worst peaks attributed to COVID-19. What we faced was not a pandemic of disease but a carefully orchestrated narrative designed to justify unprecedented measures.

Keep reading

They’re Trialing Self-Amplifying RNA-LNP-Based Products

On November 11, 2024, an article was published online in Business Wire pertaining to the launch of a clinical trial NCT06602531 intended to test “Safety and Immunogenicity Study of Self-Amplifying RNA Pandemic Influenza Vaccine in Adults.” 

Question: Why is the word “Pandemic” in the title? 

The article provides information on the ARCT-2304 product which is a “sa-mRNA vaccine candidate formulated within a lipid nanoparticle (LNP).”

So. Many. Questions. For example, beyond the use of the word pandemic in the study title, why is this product being called a vaccine? Why is a new version of a product riddled with unresolved compendial standard issues being trialed?

ARCT-2304 is a gene-therapy-based prodrug that uses self-amplifying RNA technology (specifically, the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) gene, which allows it to replicate autonomously) that originates from an Alphavirus. Just so you know, this makes these products genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) and this is because of the fact that the coding template is a modified Alphavirus genome with the virus sub-genomic bits spiked out and the foreign flu genes ‘spiked in.’ The genetic material is capable of reproduction. The following slide shows how they did this for the Covid-19 version (KOSTAIVE® (ARCT-154) Monovalent: JN.1). 

Keep reading

VICTORY: Dr William Bay wins doctors’ right to criticise covid gene-vaccines

Friday marked the biggest victory yet for doctors against political persecution after the Queensland Supreme Court issued a scorching judgement against Australia’s medical regulators on Friday.

Queensland GP William Anicha Bay celebrated outside court after successfully overturning a politically motivated medical ban put on him for protesting against the covid gene-vaccines on safety grounds.

The Court did not enter into any debate about the safety of the controversial products but ruled only on whether the regulators’ decision or conduct was free from error.

The Medical Board of Australia suspended Dr Bay’s registration on August 17, 2022, less than three weeks after he accosted the Australian Medical Association (AMA) National Conference and asked the delegates to stop forcing the jabs on people in response to an infection where “there is only a 0.27 percent fatality rate”.

Dr Bay apologised for interrupting proceedings before saying the covid “vaccines” were killing people.

Keep reading

There is no scientific definition of vaccine in US biological product law.

Reader question:

Is there a formal definition of vaccine in law?

My reply:

There is no scientific definition of vaccine in statute or regulation.

That’s why I urged Kirk Moore to ask DOJ to provide proof that what they supplied to his office was a vaccine.

DOJ can’t provide that proof, because the proof doesn’t exist.

Congress added the term ‘vaccine’ to the biological products law in 1970 for the first time but did not define the term or direct the executive agencies to adopt or promulgate scientific definitions in regulations.

There is a financial definition of ‘vaccine’ and a definition based on the design intention, adopted by Congress in 1987.

1987/12/22 – Congress and President Reagan passed Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, PL 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330, including Sec. 9201, Manufacturers Excise Tax on Certain Vaccines, to establish an excise tax on vaccines ordered and purchased by US government and manufactured by private companies, to fund the Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund established in 1986.

This act is the only act through which Congress has ever defined the term ‘vaccine,’ defining ‘vaccine’ as “any vaccine (A) which is listed in the table contained in [26 USC 4131(b)(1)], and (B) which is manufactured or produced in the United States or which entered into the United States for consumption, use or warehousing.”

Congress in 1987 defined vaccine in the form that now appears at 26 USC 4132a(2) — “any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases” — but has never defined the term “vaccine” in physical, chemical or pharmacological terms, and neither has the HHS-FDA.

See Dean v. HHS, No. 16–1245V, 2018 WL 3104388, at * 9 (Fed. Cl. Spec. Mstr. May 29, 2018), cited in 86 FR 6249, HHS Final Rule, National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Revisions to the Vaccine Injury Table, “(defining ‘‘vaccine’’ as ‘‘any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases’’) (quoting 26 U.S.C. 4132(a)(2)).”

The lack of scientific definition for vaccine was reinforced/corroborated in 2011 by the US Supreme Court in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth, when the majority opinion stated at p. 13:

“Design defects…do not merit a single mention in the [1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act] or the FDA’s regulations. Indeed, the FDA has never even spelled out in regulations the criteria it uses to decide whether a vaccine is safe and effective for its intended use.”

Justice Scalia did not write, but it is also true, that FDA has never spelled out in regulations the criteria it uses to identify a product as a vaccine.

Keep reading

Will Congress Thwart RFK Jr.’s Data Audit and Recall of the COVID-19 Shots?

Congress’s December 4, 2024, Coronavirus Pandemic Report has inspired hope for justice in prosecuting US federal agencies and individuals who engaged in egregious acts of willful injury against Americans and global citizens (i.e. Dr. Anthony Fauci), while frequently citing 18 U.S.C 1001 (that it’s a crime to lie to Congress).

The Congressional report also ignited controversy amongst many members of the medical freedom movement. The major point of controversy comes from one bullet point on page-2 of Chairman Brad Wenstrup’s opening letter for the 557-page Subcommittee report.

“Operation Warp Speed was a tremendous success and a model to build upon in the future. The vaccines, which are now probably better characterized as therapeutics, undoubtedly saved millions of lives by diminishing likelihood of severe disease and death.”

This statement, combined with Trump’s and RFK Jr.’s recent Mar-a-lago meeting with the CEO’s of Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and PhRMA, are causing many health freedom leaders to contemplate if every current and even future government official of our federal, legislative and judicial branches under Trump is inevitably a “deep state operative.” Some medical freedom influencers continue to assert that we are simply watching more “good cop, bad cop theatre.”

A key question naysayers raise is, “Why would House Representative Wenstrup make a key point in the Coronavirus Pandemic Report be, ‘The COVID-19 vaccines undoubtedly saved millions of lives,’ unless everyone involved in the government, including Congress, were deep state operatives?”

Because Naysayers and Their Followers Only Read the 1st Two Pages of the 557-Page Report

Keep reading

President Trump Named TIME Magazine Person of the Year, They Refuse to Use His Iconic Image, and Slap Him with a Fake Fact-Check

President Donald Trump was named TIME Magazine Person of the Year on Thursday morning.

TIME Magazine refused to use the iconic image of President Trump facing the assassin’s bullet.

That would be obvious and too honest for the TIME staff.

TIME also couldn’t help themselves and fake fact-checked President Trump on the link between vaccines and Autism.

TIME says without hesitation that there is no link. They got this from Big Pharma.
Millions of Americans today would disagree.

Keep reading

Pfizer Accused of Hiding Deaths in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials, Including ‘Subject 11141050’ in Kansas, Team Research Alleges

A team of researchers analyzing Pfizer’s clinical trial data has accused the pharmaceutical giant of concealing deaths during its COVID-19 vaccine trials.

Among the allegations is the failure to disclose the death of a Kansas participant who was part of the BNT162b2 vaccine trial. The death reportedly occurred 41 days after the participant received their second vaccine dose.

The accusations stem from a detailed report led by Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, an anesthetist and perioperative physician, and a member of the DailyClout research team.

The team alleges that Pfizer’s reporting practices during the critical juncture leading to the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the vaccine were flawed, with significant delays in documenting serious adverse events, including deaths.

“The Polack paper disclosed six deaths — two in the BNT162b2 arm, and four in the Placebo arm. In the journal article and the EUA approval documentation[9], the six deaths covered the period of July 27, 2020, through November 14, 2020,” Dr. Kunadhasan wrote in a letter sent to Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, who filed a lawsuit against Pfizer.

“This letter will demonstrate that Pfizer-BioNTech possessed records showing that eight deaths, four in the BNT162b2 arm and four in the Placebo arm, should have been disclosed by Pfizer to the FDA.  In addition, the two undisclosed deaths presented a cardiac event signal in the clinical trial’s BNT162b2 recipients. One of the undisclosed deaths in the vaccinated arm of the trial occurred in Kansas,” she added.

Subject 11141050, a 63-year-old Kansas woman, participated in Pfizer’s clinical trial at a research site in Newton, Kansas.

Despite her pre-existing conditions, including hypertension and depression, she met the trial’s inclusion criteria and received her second vaccine dose on September 8, 2020. She passed away on October 19, 2020, with the cause of death determined to be sudden cardiac arrest.

Keep reading

Revealed: The Hidden Pfizer Report That Shows Heart Conditions in the Vaccinated Getting Worse Over Time

I told you here about Pfizer’s abstract of its Interim Report 5, showing at least 23-40% higher risk of some heart-related conditions in the vaccinated, but that the MHRA, the U.K. medicines regulator, was withholding publication of the full report. As I said at the time : “In summary, if, as I suspect, MHRA is worried by the results in Pfizer’s ‘Interim Report 5’ then no wonder it is sitting on it.”

Well, MHRA is still sitting on the report but I’ve managed to obtain a copy. It looks like I was right – the detailed results in the full report are even more worrying than the Hazard Ratios in the abstract which I reported last time.

To recap: this is a report of a Post Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine. National regulators routinely require pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct PASS studies as a condition of authorisation of most new medicines. The regulators provide data to the manufacturer covering millions of patients registered in national healthcare systems. The manufacturer then conducts analysis, matched for things like age and sex, to determine whether the medicine has increased the risk of specified health conditions.

Let’s dive straight in. Below are some heart-related cumulative incidence graphs from Pfizer’s full ‘Interim Report 5’. You will immediately notice that the incidence for each type of condition is significantly greater in the Covid vaccinated (bad) – but we already knew that from the Hazard Ratios in the abstract. What’s worse is that the curves diverge over time, i.e., the relative incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated increases over the time period of the data in the report (December 8th 2020 – March 21st 2022). I wonder what happened subsequently.

Keep reading