Tag: ai

Repeat After Media: Data Centers Are Wonderful and Good

If you follow conservative media and Republican politicians, you could be convinced that any opposition to AI data centers is not due to their sprawling footprint, greed for electricity or insatiable need for cooling water. Rather, it’s the result of a Chinese Communist plot.

These data centers are dreadfully unpopular. “Seven in 10 Americans oppose constructing data centers for artificial intelligence in their local area, including nearly half, 48%, who are strongly opposed,” according to Gallup (5/13/26). From YouGov (9/1/26): “About half (51%) of Americans say that the construction of new data centers is a bad thing for the country. Only 20% say it is a good thing.”

The reasons for this opposition is that these centers put enormous strain on the electrical grid, need loads of water for cooling, can be extremely noisy and take up lots of space in communities. “The environmental footprint of data centers already rivals some of the world’s largest countries,” AP (6/3/26) reported.

Much like how some liberals have convinced themselves that MAGA and American nationalism are fueled by Kremlin disinformation, the right-wing line is that communities opposing these giant data centers are motivated not by their own interests or common sense, but some unseen Beijing-manufactured psychosis.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) demanded that the Justice Department “investigate foreign influence efforts targeting the buildout of American AI infrastructure,” as he suspected that a “network of foreign actors, led by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), is attempting to manipulate US policy and public opinion on data centers.”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), in the words of Newsmax (9/2/26), believes “China is helping fuel opposition to artificial intelligence data centers in the United States.” “Beijing has a strategic interest in convincing Americans to slow construction of the infrastructure needed to compete in the global AI race,” the far-right outlet paraphrased.

The Washington Examiner‘s Facebook page (8/30/26) featured a cartoon from A.F. Branco depicting a Chinese data center running a psy-op on Americans who oppose data centers.

The National Interest (9/1/26) said:

Chinese entities have a long history of collaborating with far-left causes, and they have again found common ground in opposing the construction of data centers. They are pushing mutually reinforcing messages that criticize a host of alleged environmental and ethical concerns as reasons to disempower American growth in a critical economic and competitive sector. Officials at the federal, state and local levels should recognize this noxious alliance as they field criticism of data centers.

Keep reading

Top researcher quits: ‘Men building AI think it could kill humanity – and they’re racing to build it anyway’…

Every once in a while, somebody standing inside the machine decides they’ve seen enough and drops a nuke.

AI researcher Jacob Coxon just did exactly that.

Coxon spent the last three years doing pre-training research at two of the biggest AI companies on earth, OpenAI and Anthropic. Then, on Tuesday, out of nowhere, he resigned from Anthropic and publicly accused both companies of racing toward self-improving “superintelligence” while gambling with humanity’s future.

That sounds dramatic, right?

Then you read what he actually wrote… and it’s kinda spooky.

Every once in a while, somebody standing inside the machine decides they’ve seen enough and drops a nuke.

AI researcher Jacob Coxon just did exactly that.

Coxon spent the last three years doing pre-training research at two of the biggest AI companies on earth, OpenAI and Anthropic. Then, on Tuesday, out of nowhere, he resigned from Anthropic and publicly accused both companies of racing toward self-improving “superintelligence” while gambling with humanity’s future.

That sounds dramatic, right?

Then you read what he actually wrote… and it’s kinda spooky.

READ MORE: Amazon plane crash mystery takes a dark turn for Miami Airport…

Coxon says the people building these systems privately fear AI could kill us all by the end of the decade, yet the race continues because nobody wants to be the lab that slows down while somebody else gets there first.

Many people are taking this seriously, because this isn’t some anti-AI blogger with a grudge. This is a legit researcher who worked inside both companies.

And his resignation is already blowing up online.

The most important part is that he’s not saying outsiders are misunderstanding the danger.

He says the people inside these companies understand it perfectly.

Business Insider:

Jacob Coxon announced his resignation from Anthropic on Tuesday, saying he had spent the past three years doing pre-training research at the two AI giants.

“Neither company is acting responsibly,” Coxon wrote on X. “They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.”

Coxon was a member of OpenAI’s technical staff from 2023 until July 2026, when he moved to Anthropic as a researcher. His research at OpenAI included work on GPT-4o.

In Tuesday’s post, Coxon said the two labs have not been transparent about their fears regarding AI.

“The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade. This is not a marketing stunt,” he wrote. “If anything, many executives and senior researchers will couch their phrasing in the press to sound sensible — but I hear the same people express fear privately.”

Coxon is saying there’s a gap between the calm public language coming from AI companies and what some of the people building these systems say privately.

Then he went much further on an X post.

Coxon said the race toward “superintelligence” is a reckless endgame being pushed forward by companies that know exactly how dangerous this could be.

His post is long, but it’s worth reading in full because the argument builds.

Keep reading

Nancy Pelosi Disclosed a Multi-Million Dollar AI Investment Just Weeks Before the Stock Blew Up

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi disclosed a multimillion-dollar investment last month in an artificial intelligence company whose stocks exploded in value soon after.

Pelosi’s husband Paul invested in Bloom Energy, a California-based company that provides fuel-cell technology and power systems aimed at meeting the enormous electricity demands of AI data centers.

According to a financial transaction report Pelosi signed Aug. 21, her household made several Bloom Energy purchases in late July.

The transactions included 10,000 shares purchased July 24, along with 100 call options, according to reporting from the New York Post. Another 5,000 shares and 100 additional call options were purchased July 28.

The disclosed value ranges put the combined transactions at a minimum of roughly $3 million, although the actual amount could have been as much as $12 million, because congressional financial disclosure forms use broad dollar ranges.

The July 24 purchases came after Bloom Energy’s stock had suffered a significant decline.

Then came July 28.

That was the same day Bloom Energy reported extremely strong earnings, with annual revenue growth of 165 percent, according to the Post.

Bloom Energy’s stock subsequently took off.

Then, on Sept. 4, another major development arrived: Bloom Energy was announced as a new addition to the S&P 500.

The company is scheduled to join the benchmark index Sept. 21, alongside Everpure and Illumina.

Bloom Energy shares surged following the announcement, with the stock gaining nearly 40 percent over a five-day period, according to the Post.

By Tuesday, Bloom Energy shares were trading around $282.50, compared with $184.89 on July 24, the day of the first Pelosi household purchase.

That’s a striking move in a matter of weeks.

And it makes the timing of the disclosure noteworthy.

Pelosi’s office has said the former speaker does not own stocks and had no knowledge of or subsequent involvement in the transactions.

The trades were made by her husband and reported through the congressional disclosure system as transactions involving a spouse.

In an article about the transactions, financial writer Rich Duprey of 24/7 Wall Street  dubbed Pelosi “the queen of capital gains.”

“Pelosi’s trading record in Congress has consistently outpaced the S&P 500 and even Warren Buffett over comparable stretches, fueling suspicion that lawmakers with committee-level oversight enjoy an informational edge,” Duprey observed.

The New York Post said Pelosi “has faced heated blowback for her family’s trading activity — racking up a 65% return on her portfolio in 2023 while her venture capitalist husband made $38 million worth of stock trades in the weeks leading up to President Trump’s inauguration.”

Duprey noted that multiple bills to ban stock trading by members of Congress have been introduced, but they’ve all stalled.

The Democratic former House Speaker’s trades have been so notable that in 2023, GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri introduced one such bill that he dubbed the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act – or the PELOSI Act.

Hawley later met with Democrats and agreed to change the name of the bill to the HONEST Act — Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions — which allowed enough Democratic support to advance the bill out of committee in July 2025.

Keep reading

We’re Living In A Tragicomic Parody

We’re blessed/cursed to be living in a very peculiar era in which parodies are taken with the utmost seriousness, an absurdist state of affairs captured by the classic line from the 1959 film North by Northwest: “So horribly sad. How is it I feel like laughing?”

The parodies are now so extreme they are self-parodies that cannot be parodied. How do we parody a world gone mad with parodies? Every attempt to parody “the news” today is trumped by reality.

We’re inhabiting a travesty of a mockery of a sham of smug overlords and obsequious politically correct grifters, left and right, claiming the high moral ground while they pillage with a money-grubbing avarice so blatant that it’s impervious to parody.

Their hypocrisy is so comically obvious that we can no longer tell if it’s comic by design or the grifters are so shallow and superficial that they’re blind to the irony of their self-parody.

At any moment, we might be instructed to wear our underwear on the outside of our clothing, and the Supreme Court would rubber-stamp this parody of serious policy with its usual cowardice, a cowardice that is now so blatant that it’s also beyond parody: the Supreme Court is a parody of a functioning system of justice.

All this will be reported with great seriousness, as if it isn’t a punchline in a joke nobody gets.

The irony of all the euphoric claims about AI is powerful enough to melt thick steel containment doors. The AI euphoria is itself an irony, wrapped around an even deeper irony: there is no way to tell the difference between an AI parody of “intelligence” and what AI presents as “legitimate intelligence.”

A parody of AI hallucinations is impossible, because the reality of AI hallucinations already exceeds any parody. A parody of runaway AI mischief is also impossible, because the reality of AI mischief already exceeds any parody.

Keep reading

Ads Featuring Real Children’s Faces in Sexual AI Videos Persist on Meta’s Platforms

Researchers say more than 250 ads containing AI-generated child sexual abuse material have appeared on Meta’s platforms including Facebook and Instagram since early August, weeks after the company removed dozens of similar ads following reporting from Wired.

Wired reports that the nonprofit Tech Transparency Project says that in early August, Meta deleted roughly 53 ads across Facebook, Instagram and Threads that contained child sexual abuse material, telling the outlet at the time that most of the abusive ads predated the rollout of new AI tools designed to “better detect and block” harmful content. Now, the same watchdog group says ads containing sexual imagery of children are back, some of which are identical to those previously removed.

The problem didn’t stop there. Researchers say Meta has published more than 350 abusive video ads since the end of last year. Many link to so-called “nudification” apps tied to Chinese developers. Unlike the initial batch of 53 ads, the new ones used images of real children, not stock or generic photos.

One ad used an official photograph of a minor from a European royal family, transformed into a video depicting a graphic sex act. Researchers declined to name the royal in order to protect the victim.

“Researchers identified the real-world identities of four minors used in the ads,” according to TTP, whose director is Katie Paul. Three of the four are from the United States. One is a teenager who runs a social media influencer account on a Meta platform. Another is a teen influencer with a public account. The third is a stock photo model, a real person, labeled as “pre-teen” on stock photo websites.

The ads typically open with an innocuous photo of a preteen or teen girl (only one involved a boy), paired with text claiming the image is “not just a photo” and that “there are no restriction” on how it can be used. The videos morph the children’s faces into explicit sexual content, often depicting sex acts. Clicking the ads sends users to download AI face-swapping or video apps from the Apple App Store or Google Play Store. Many carry the tagline: “This is the AI that men actually use.”

Keep reading

OpenAI Acknowledges Another Incident, Says More Transparency Needed for AI ‘Misalignment’

OpenAI has said there was a third incident involving rogue artificial intelligence agents and that it must be more transparent in the future.

In a statement on Sept. 5, OpenAI dubbed what happened a “wiki incident.” It shared few details beyond stating that it involved “misalignment,” or agents acting unreasonably or even wrong when judged by human standards. The company did not respond to a request for more information.

“Historically, we have treated misalignment largely as a research question, which gets communicated in research publications such as systems cards. This year, we’ve started to see misalignment cause new types of real-world impact,” OpenAI said, referring to agents breaching open-source AI community Hugging Face.

Before that incident, OpenAI saw “early signs of agents using the internet in unintended ways” and “considered the wiki incident to be an instance of misalignment” similar to the ones the company had shared, it said.

“Our misalignment disclosure practices need to expand for this new phase of model capabilities,” OpenAI said.

“We and the larger AI community do not yet have a clear standard for how to report misalignment that shows up during training, evaluation, and deployment, including examples that don’t look like traditional security incidents but could provide insight into AI behavior and future risks. We’re working on a framework and will share it in upcoming weeks, and in parallel we’re working with dozens of government regulatory agencies worldwide on these issues.”

The disclosure came one day after outside researchers said they had identified about 18,000 posts from autonomous AI agents that claimed to be from OpenAI and used a public messaging board called DSEwiki to instruct other agents on how to bypass restrictions.

“This allowed them to use the work of others to cheat on their task,” researchers said in a blog post on the incident.

The incident began in May and lasted until June, shortly before OpenAI agents attacked Hugging Face, according to the researchers.

They said they believed the agents were assigned a task to look up items on the web, or read information on the internet without having the ability to write on it.

The agents found a way to access the German wiki board and write information there, the researchers said.

Just one week earlier, researchers with the nonprofit Model Evaluation & Threat Research said they made a surprising discovery while investigating the Hugging Face breach.

About 1,200 agents that were supposed to be isolated from one another found a way to communicate on a message board, exchanging more than 70,000 messages and files in a single week.

Keep reading

Texas Police Used AI to Write Report About Using Flock to Search for Woman Who Had Abortion

The Texas sheriff’s office that used Flock to search more than 80,000 cameras nationwide for a woman who had a self-administered abortion used Axon’s Draft One AI tool to help write a police report about the incident, documents shared with 404 Media show. The tool was used in part to summarize a discussion of “the legal implications of the situation.”

404 Media first reported on the incident in May 2025 in which the Johnson County Sheriff’s Office in Texas searched Flock’s nationwide network for the whereabouts of a woman who self-administered an abortion, highlighting the threat of this AI-powered surveillance system being used to criminalize or track women seeking reproductive healthcare. The use of both Flock and Axon’s Draft One, which uses audio from body camera footage to automatically draft police reports using artificial intelligence, shows how quickly police departments have come to use AI surveillance tools even in critically sensitive cases.

“I acknowledge this report was generated using Draft One by Axon,” a section of the report reads.

The abortion case has since become a flashpoint in the controversy over the use of Flock automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras. Flock’s CEO, Garrett Langley, has repeatedly and erroneously suggested that 404 Media misreported the case and that the search was done only for the woman’s safety because her family was worried about her. 404 Media previously reported that the entire police investigation was done at the behest of the woman’s abusive partner and that police discussed whether they were allowed to charge her with a crime: “It was discussed at the time with the District Attorney’s office and learned the State could not statutorily charge [the woman] for taking the pill to cause the abortion,” a police report previously obtained by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and shared with 404 Media said. Concern from her family is never mentioned in that earlier police report or in the AI-generated police report used to write this article.

The AI-generated incident report was obtained by journalist Cameron Probert of the Tri-City Herald and shared with 404 Media. The report shows there is extensive body camera and audio evidence that would clarify what happened in the case, and that at least one police officer, sergeant Damien Bethel, used Draft One to write his report on the incident. Parts of a police incident report show that Draft One was used to summarize a discussion between police over “the legal implications of the situation” and other investigative aspects of the case. The Johnson County Sheriff’s Department has repeatedly refused to release body camera footage from the case, including in response to 404 Media’s public records requests.

“Deputies discussed the legal implications of the situation, noting that while the girlfriend self-administered the abortion pill, there were no criminal charges applicable under current Texas law,” Bethel’s report states, providing no more details about the specifics of the discussion. “Deputies also considered the possibility of a civil lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company that supplied the pill.”

Bethell’s Draft One report further states, “There is digital multi-media evidence from Body Worn Camera footage of this call for service in the AXON Evidence Library. There is digital multi-media evidence of In-Car Camera footage of this call for service in the AXON Evidence Library or the WatchGuard Evidence Library. There were digital images captured while on the scene.” The Johnson County Sheriff’s Department has thus far refused to release even redacted versions of this evidence that the EFF and 404 Media have separately requested.

Keep reading

Sanders calls for banning artificial superintelligence

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is pushing legislation that would permanently ban the development and deployment of artificial superintelligence while temporarily pausing development of other advanced AI systems until new federal safety rules are established. 

“Nearly every day, there is a frightening new story about how Big Tech companies are losing control of the technology they are developing, with potentially cataclysmic results,” Sanders said. “The leaders of the major AI companies publicly acknowledge that they do not fully understand the technology and that it is escaping their control. It is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.”

The proposal would create a new federal agency to oversee advanced AI and track systems for dangerous capabilities. 

It would also seek international agreements aimed at preventing the development of superintelligence worldwide. 

Keep reading

Welcome To Black Mirror: Pre-Crime AI, Shock Gloves, and Robot Dogs

We live in a world where much of our popular media is, to some extent, an extension of a pervasive propaganda apparatus rife with subliminal messages and predictive programming, inundating the populace with subconscious sensory overload effective for sedating the citizenry all too keen to live vicariously through the stories of fictional heroes fighting tyranny and oppression while doing nothing to emulate those actions in the real world.

All the while, the real world is beginning to resemble more and more of a fictional dystopia; Orwell’s 1984, Hunger Games, Black Mirror, take your pick.

It’s no secret that the second Trump administration is working to build what can only be described as a fascist police state upon the foundations of decades of Constitutional erosion, and encroachment of police militarization on everyday life built up by previous administrations both Republican and Democrat alike.

And as technology continues to advance, accelerating in tandem with the implementation of technocracy, the tools of this tyranny only become more sinister.

Previously, The Free Thought Project has reported extensively on the numerous abuses and Gestapo tactics of agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security and it’s more militant subordinates such as ICE running rampant through America’s streets.

Our continuing series on ICE abuses has already thoroughly documented the unprecedented wave of violence committed by ICE officers throughout the country, ranging from mass detentions of American citizens without due process, to rampant physical abuse, inhumane treatment within detention centers, and on occasion summary executions of dissenters in the streets.

Despite the immense pushback, the state sanctioned terrorist organization and the despotic regime behind it is only doubling down on its heavy handed tactics of repression.

As we have reported previously, the efforts taken by the Trump administration to erect an all encompassing mass surveillance panopticon are expanding by leaps and bounds. This includes but is not limited to: the integration of artificial intelligence pre-crime algorithms used to flag citizens as potential threats before they commit any wrongdoing; autonomous police surveillance drones; facial recognition technology which has a history of inaccurate identifications; the implementation of flock cameras nationwide with its own growing epidemic of misidentification and false arrest; and a slew of domestic spying operations targeting political dissidents.

All of this is compounded with the rising implementation of even more secretive Axon cameras, while the administration works to build the standing army for a domestic occupation by normalizing the presence of US troops on American streets.

Even more recently, The Free Thought Project has reported that the latest tool of forced compliance in the arsenal of Immigration and Customs Enforcement comes in the form of electric shock gloves, using electrocution as yet another form of violence to keep the unruly citizenry in line.

Keep reading