Joe Rogan Horrified as Dr. Mary Talley Bowden Shares Chilling COVID Story

Joe Rogan’s face said what we’re all thinking: how was this allowed to happen?

Hospitals deliberately euthanized COVID patients—a practice Dr. Mary Talley Bowden said was disturbingly common.

Rogan was horrified.

But there were more shockers. Rogan revealed something new about his viral ivermectin post.

And it proves this was never about public health.

Dr. Mary Talley Bowden left Joe Rogan visibly shaken on his own show.

Before her appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience, Dr. Bowden, a Texas-based ENT specialist, rose to prominence in the medical freedom movement by speaking out against vaccine mandates and advocating for early treatment options like ivermectin.

She gained national attention after she was suspended by Houston Methodist Hospital for challenging the prevailing COVID narrative.

Despite the backlash, Dr. Bowden has remained committed to the Hippocratic Oath, successfully treating an impressive total of over 6,000 COVID patients without a single death.

Rogan opened up the conversation with a shocker. TWO former presidents called Spotify after his post mentioning ivermectin went viral.

Yes, the same one where CNN deliberately turned his face green.

Dr. Mary Talley Bowden thought he could have been joking. “Really?” she asked.

“Oh yeah,” Rogan confirmed.

“Oh, yeah.”

This raises a serious question: Why would two former presidents go out of their way to complain to Spotify over a podcaster talking about a drug?

Keep reading

Fauci Must Be Shaken to the Core After Latest Discovery in COVID Investigation: They Found It

FBI Director Kash Patel may have the best piece of evidence yet to prove former COVID czar Dr. Anthony Fauci is responsible for the havoc wreaked during the pandemic.

On Friday, Patel made an appearance on the “Joe Rogan Experience” where he stated the FBI now has Fauci’s personal devices from President Donald Trump’s first term when the pandemic began.

After stating Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Louisiana Republican Sen. John Kennedy have been pursuing the origins of COVID, Patel told host Joe Rogan that several parties along with them always wanted to find information straight from the source.

“They had always been looking for… phones and devices he used while he was Fauci back in Trump one during COVID. And nobody had found it,” Patel said.

“Til two days ago,” he revealed.

Keep reading

Democrats Now Planning to Spend Millions of Dollars Trying to Find ‘Their Own Joe Rogan’

Democrats are increasingly convinced that one of the reasons they lost the 2024 election is because they didn’t have their own Joe Rogan. It never seems to dawn on them that they used to have their own Joe Rogan. His name is Joe Rogan. Rogan has always been a man of the center-left, but he walked away in this cycle because the left basically drove him away.

This is a common theme with Democrats. Years ago, they decided they needed their own Rush Limbaugh, which resulted in the failed Air America network. After losing the 2004 election, they decided they needed their own Drudge Report, which resulted in the creation of the Huffington Post. After they lost Congress in 2010, they decided they needed their own Tea Party, which brought us Occupy Wall Street.

Also, for all of their talk about wanting to get ‘big money’ out of politics, they’re certainly sparing no expense on this plan.

The New York Times reported:

Democrats Throw Money at a Problem: Countering G.O.P. Clout Online

Six months after the Democratic Party’s crushing 2024 defeat, the party’s megadonors are being inundated with overtures to spend tens of millions of dollars to develop an army of left-leaning online influencers.

At donor retreats and in pitch documents seen by The New York Times, liberal strategists are pushing the party’s rich backers to reopen their wallets for a cavalcade of projects to help Democrats, as the cliché now goes, “find the next Joe Rogan.” The proposals, the scope of which has not been previously reported, are meant to energize glum donors and persuade them that they can compete culturally with President Trump — if only they can throw enough money at the problem.

Democrats widely believe they must grow more creative in stoking online enthusiasm for their candidates, particularly in less outwardly political forms of media like sports or lifestyle podcasts…

“It needs to start with a legitimate investment,” said Marissa McBride, a Democratic strategist who leads a donor group called Mind the Gap. But she added, “There has to be something that is happening organically as well.”

The most hilarious part? The name for this initiative is ‘AND Media’ which stands for “Achieve Narrative Dominance.”

Keep reading

Joe Rogan Guest Reveals Facebook’s Secret Experiment That Manipulated 700,000 Users Without Warning

Joe Rogan sat down with Harvard professor and mind control expert Rebecca Lemov, and it didn’t take long for the conversation to dive into one of his favorite topics: government interference in our digital lives.

Rogan opened the conversation by saying, “There are so many different kinds of mind control.”

“One of the things we’ve talked about a lot on this podcast is, that an enormous percentage of what you’re seeing on social media in terms of interactions and debate is not real. It’s not organic,” he explained.

“It’s state-run and state-funded, and it’s whether it’s foreign governments or our government or even corporations, you’re getting inorganic discourse that’s designed to form a narrative and which is a form of mind control,” he added.

Lemov picked up on that point and took it further. Even when people know something is fake, she explained, our brains still react as if it were real.

“Yeah. I mean, I think even on a basic level, people, it’s known and studies have shown that we respond as if it were organic and real,” she said.

“Even when somebody likes a post of yours, the response is the same as, like, in-person interaction,” she added.

It’s not just governments pulling the strings, she warned. The platforms themselves are designed to influence how we feel.

“I think at the root, there is a kind of way that, on an emotional level, it’s not just manipulation of ideas,” she said, “but there’s a kind of emotional engineering that’s built into the platforms and doesn’t even demand, you know, at first, government involvement.”

Keep reading

Elon Musk Dishes About the Darker Side of a Tech Billionaire With Epstein Ties

If you haven’t caught up to why Elon Musk, tech billionaire and the man behind the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), accused a fellow tech founder of all kinds of nefarious business and personal practices, come a little closer and we’ll explain. 

Recently on an appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast, Musk alleged that Reed Hoffman, creator of LinkedIn, was behind bankrolling pre-election lawsuits against Donald Trump, bankrolled astro-turfed protests against Tesla through his big donations to ActBlue, and was involved with  Jeffrey Epstein. 

This is how that part of the interview went. 

During the interview, Rogan and Musk commiserated over the lawfare run against Trump before the election. 

Rogan It’s terrifying that they could do to a guy so brazenly to a guy who was the president for four years.

Musk: That lawsuit was funded by Reid Hoffman, a Dem donor, and also an Epstein client. The plot thickens. 

Rogan: It’s so blatant. It’s so obvious. The SpaceX lawsuit, the Trump stuff, it’s so obvious. 

Musk: Known Epstein clients who are obviously extremely powerful—they’re powerful politically and very wealthy—are Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, and Reed Hoffman. And some others, too. But those three—so, why was Reed Hoffman so intent on destroying Trump? 

Rogan: Do you think it’s because they’re worried about the list coming out?

Musk: Yeah. One of the reasons, yeah. 

Rogan: It’s so frustrating to be a situation where the list isn’t coming out…

Musk: Maybe it’ll come out tomorrow.

Rogan: Well, then why did they release bullsh*t today? 

Musk: I don’t know.

Rogan: Well, what’s the point of handing these people a happy folder to wave around in front of the camera when nothing in it is new? It doesn’t make any sense. It’s not encouraging. 

Musk: Like I said, the tough thing they’ve got is they’ve been made captain of a ship with a hostile crew. So, it’s not like you’ve got magical powers. You’re made captain of a hostile crew, but you still have a hostile crew. They’ve got to bring in people who are helpful rather than obstructionist. 

One case against Trump was obviously a patchwork, some would say fraudulently constructed, judge-shopped effort. Indeed, in the E. Jean Carroll case, the New York state legislative Democrats passed a bespoke, temporary law they called the New York Adult Survivors Act, which momentarily lifted the statute of limitations on sexual assault cases (though decades old), long enough for Hoffman’s bought and paid for defamation Carroll v Trump to be slid into the court process (P. Diddy victims used this opening as well).

Keep reading

CNN Vehemently Rejects Joe Rogan-Fueled Conspiracy Theory That CNN Aired Trump Rally Because They Knew He’d Be Shot

CNN vehemently rejected a conspiracy theory that has taken hold on the Right — which suggests that the network somehow had advance knowledge of the attempt on President Donald Trump’s life.

The theory has been making the rounds following Joe Rogan’s podcast with Elon Musk — which was posted on Friday . In a clip from the podcast being widely circulated, Rogan seemed to suggest that because CNN broadcast the rally, it knew about the assassination attempt beforehand.

“You also know that CNN streamed it live, which I do not believe they did for any other rally — and certainly not for a rally in the middle of nowhere in Pennsylvania. Like, there’s a lot of weird shit.”

Keep reading

Elon Musk Drops Truth Bomb on Washington’s Corrupt Money Machine: “This is Really Going to Get Me Assassinated”

Elon Musk just dropped a bombshell on the Joe Rogan Experience, confirming what many Americans have long suspected—Washington, D.C. is a cesspool of corruption, and the Democrats are the primary beneficiaries.

“I think maybe three-quarters of the graft is Democratic. I think there’s maybe 20–25% that’s Republican,” Musk revealed, exposing how the system is rigged for political elites.

“Most of the graft is going to the Democrats, but they throw some bones to the Republicans too, so then they’re in on it.”

In a shocking but unsurprising exchange, Musk and Rogan discussed the absurd wealth accumulation of members of Congress, who are somehow able to transform their modest $170,000-a-year salaries into multimillion-dollar fortunes.

Musk didn’t hold back, stating, “It’s literally impossible” for these politicians to legally amass such wealth.

The conversation inevitably turned to one of the most notorious examples of Washington corruption: former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and his husband Paul Pelosi.

It can be recalled that Paul Pelosi dumped over $500,000 worth of Visa stock just weeks before the Department of Justice slapped the financial giant with an antitrust lawsuit.

Following the lawsuit’s announcement, Visa’s stock price plummeted by 5.5%, leading to speculation about the timing of Pelosi’s stock sale.

Former President Donald Trump has publicly called for Nancy Pelosi to face prosecution over the transaction, suggesting that the sale was not coincidental.

“Nancy Pelosi sold vast amounts of Visa stock one day before the big lawsuit that we all read about a few days ago,” Trump said. “She should be prosecuted… Nancy Pelosi should be prosecuted for that.” 

This incident is not isolated. The Pelosis have a history of fortuitously timed trades that have consistently outperformed the market, leading to widespread speculation about the use of nonpublic information for personal gain.

For instance, in 2023, their investment portfolio reportedly achieved a 65% return, significantly surpassing the S&P 500’s 24% gain. ​

Moreover, in 2022, Paul Pelosi purchased over $1 million in Nvidia call options just weeks before a congressional vote on substantial subsidies to the chip manufacturing industry, raising further eyebrows about potential conflicts of interest.

In the same year, Paul Pelosi dumped 20,000 shares of Google stock in December—a month before the Department of Justice and Merrick Garland filed their antitrust lawsuit.

Nancy Pelosi has consistently denied any wrongdoing, asserting that she does not own any stocks and has no involvement in her husband’s financial transactions.

Keep reading

Elon Musk Explains the ‘Non-Profit’ Grift That George Soros Has Been Running on the U.S. Government and Taxpayers 

During an episode of the Joe Rogan podcast this weekend, Elon Musk explained how left wing billionaire George Soros has perfected the art of fleecing American taxpayers by using non-profit organizations (NGOs) to advance his progressive agenda.

Musk suggests that once one of these organizations is established, they can then lobby the U.S. government for millions in grants and other forms of aid and that there is little to no accountability.

This is one of the reasons why the left is freaking out about DOGE and the exposure of these grifts. DOGE represents an existential threat to the left’s ability to fund their political machine.

Transcript via Real Clear Politics:

ELON MUSK: It’s a gigantic scam—one of the biggest, maybe the biggest scam ever.

JOE ROGAN: And how many NGOs are there?

ELON MUSK: I think the total number of NGOs is probably in the millions, but in terms of large NGOs—tens of thousands.

It’s actually kind of a hack to the system where someone can get an NGO stood up for a fairly small amount of money. George Soros was really good at this. He’s like a system hacker. He figured out how to hack the system. He’s a genius at arbitrage. I mean, these days, he’s pretty old, but he was a genius at arbitrage.

He figured out that you could leverage a small amount of money to create a nonprofit, then lobby politicians to send a ton of money to that nonprofit. So you can take what might be a $10 million donation to create a nonprofit and leverage that into a billion-dollar NGO.

And “nonprofit” is a weird word. It’s just a non-governmental organization. The government continues to fund it every year, and it’ll have a nice-sounding name like The Institute for Peace or something like that. But really, it’s a graft machine.

JOE ROGAN: And what are the requirements for that money? What do they have to do?

ELON MUSK: Really, no requirements at all.

Keep reading

Joe Rogan Says the Kamala Harris Campaign LIED About Why She Didn’t Appear on His Podcast

You may be shocked to hear this, but it turns out that the Kamala Harris campaign may not have been honest about something.

In a recent book, members of Kamala’s team made a number of claims about why she didn’t appear on the Joe Rogan podcast and they laid nearly all of the blame on Rogan rather than Kamala.

They made a huge mistake in doing this because Rogan has a microphone and a massive audience and he is talking about this now and setting the record straight. Did they really think he would just let this go?

The Hollywood Reporter has the story:

Joe Rogan Says Harris Campaign Lied About Being Misled by Show: “We Have the Receipts”

In Tuesday’s episode of The Joe Rogan Experience, the top-rated podcaster took issue with reports stemming from a new book, Fight: Inside the Wildest Battle for the White House. For the book, authors Jonathan Allen and Ami Parnes spoke to numerous Harris insiders about their efforts to get the candidate on his podcast. Those insiders describe a frustrating experience that included creating a campaign stop in Houston with Beyonce on Oct. 25 just to put Harris in proximity to Austin for a potential appearance on Rogan, only to then be told by the podcaster’s team that the date “was blocked out as a personal day” — which later turned out to be the same day Rogan interviewed Donald Trump.

But Rogan says things happened very differently.

“This whole idea that we fucked her over and we fucked her over for Trump — incorrect, just not true,” Rogan said. “One of the things they said that wasn’t true was that we lied about the day that Trump was coming on, and we just didn’t [say] that Trump was coming on. This is how it worked: Trump was really easy to book. Like, super easy. We offered one day. He said, ‘Yes.’ That was it. It was no, ‘What are we going to talk about? How long is it going to be? Is it going to be edited?’ … It was so easy. So he was already booked.

[The Harris campaign] never committed to doing the show … They said that the reason why they did the Beyoncé event in Houston was so that they could be in Texas to do my show. They never agreed to do the show. None of that’s true. They also said that they sent someone down here to the studio to do a walk-through of the set. That’s not true. These people didn’t have a date. They never agreed to do the show.”

Keep reading

Rogan Torches Zuckerberg To His Face Over COVID Vaccines

While Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is going out of his way to frame himself as having gone through some sort of MAGA awakening, a section of his appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast this past weekend has many believing its all an act.

Zuckerberg spoke at length about regretting bowing to censorship requests from Biden Administration officials, who he claimed would “scream” and “curse” at Meta employees to remove accurate information from its platforms.

As we highlighted last week, Zuckerberg has also ditched so called ‘fact checkers’ in favour of an X-like community notes system, sending the establishment censorship industry into a panic.

Yet, when Zuckerberg’s conversation with Rogan turned to COVID vaccines, he reverted to his old self again.

Zuckerberg claimed that while he disagrees with the methods the Biden regime used to push mass vaccination, it was all for the greater good.

“I think…they (the Biden regime) were doing something. Their goal to get everyone vaccinated was actually a good goal,” he declared.

Rogan wasn’t having it.

“Yeah, it was a good goal if it worked…if it really did prevent people from getting COVID, from infecting others,” Rogan responded, emphasising that “it didn’t, so it wasn’t a good deal.”

Zuckerberg responded, “Still, on balance, I still think it’s good for more people to get the vaccine.”

“I’m not sure in that case how much of it was like a personal political gain that they were going for. I think that they had a kind of goal that they thought was in the interests of the country,” Zuckerberg continued.

Keep reading