Scott Galloway’s Unhinged Tirade Against Elon Musk Takes A Very Dark Turn…

Marketing professor and anti-MAGA podcaster Scott Galloway launched an unhinged attack on Elon Musk, branding the billionaire a “traitor to the West” before invoking the infamous Rosenberg espionage case, which ended with the execution of two Americans during the Cold War.

Galloway spewed the incendiary comments during a discussion with former technology journalist Kara Swisher about Silicon Valley’s growing influence, arguing that the United States’ obsession with billionaire innovators has created a dangerous double standard.

However, what began as a familiar critique of Silicon Valley’s billionaire class quickly took a darker turn. Galloway compared Musk to aviation pioneer Charles Lindbergh, whose sympathies toward Nazi Germany before America’s entry into World War II remain a controversial chapter in U.S. history. Galloway then invoked Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, the American couple executed in 1953 after being convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage for the Soviet Union.

“We lined up the Rosenbergs against a wall,” Galloway said, before insisting Musk should be held to the same standards as other traitors.

Galloway stopped short of explicitly calling for Musk’s execution, but bringing up two spies who were put to death while calling him a traitor was a striking comparison.

Here are Galloway’s remarks in full:

Okay, so I’ll go fail first. I think the idolatry of innovators has gotten so out of control. I was talking to the secretary before this. If you go up and down the West Coast, you’re going to see literally companies. The West Coast is littered with multi-trillion dollar companies, and you get to the Canadian border, it stops. You get to the Mexican border, it stops. And yet these individuals are quick to credit their grit and their character for their success and blame the government for their failures.

And what is so disappointing, that’s not my fail, because if you tell a 30-year-old male who’s Jesus Christ, he’s inclined to believe you. The fail is that we have begun believing through this ridiculous, unhealthy, and dangerous idolatry of innovators that they get to live by an entirely different standard. Elon Musk is a traitor to the West.

[crowd applause]

In the 30s, we had this incredible hero, Charles Lindbergh, an innovator, and he felt that we should be on the side of Germany. And a lot of people felt that way. We had spent tremendous capital, a lot of loss of young men in World War I, and we thought, you can understand, we don’t want to go back, right? And his view was we should partner with Germany and Hitler.

What if, and this could have very easily happened, he was a hero. What if he’d raised the capital to buy Boeing? He probably could have done it. And then when we lent B-17s to run bombing runs over Germany to the RAF, what if he had figured out a guidance for a flight system and then mid-1940, before we were involved in the war, decided to throttle back those guidance systems and the blitzkrieg in London got worse, and more homes and more civilians were destroyed and killed respectively. What would we have done to Charles Lindbergh?

But it’s uncomfortable and weird because we’ve decided someone who’s a trillionaire, makes a great EV and can land a rocket on scissors is held to a different standard. We lined up the Rosenbergs against a wall. This is a traitor to the West, and you should be held to the same standards as every other traitor in the West.

The Rosenbergs were convicted in 1951 of conspiring to commit espionage for the Soviet Union and executed at New York’s Sing Sing prison two years later. Their case remains one of the most controversial espionage prosecutions in American history, particularly because of the severity of the punishment.

Galloway’s remarks come amid an increasingly hostile climate surrounding Musk, with the billionaire facing criticism over his political activities and his role in the Trump administration.

Keep reading

Carney takes a swipe at Musk and Starlink, while his government writes seven speech and surveillance bills

In an interview with POLITICO in Montreal on Thursday, following the Canada-EU summit, Carney said: “If you’re connected to a satellite system that a billionaire, almost trillionaire, decides to turn off at one moment or not, that’s not a good idea either.” He did not name Elon Musk or Starlink. The interviewer raised Musk, Starlink and Ukraine, and Carney answered, “Yeah.” He added that Canada would never tie its defences to Musk’s system, “nor would we, given the track record.” POLITICO called the remark the “subtweet of the day.”

The track record includes Musk switching Starlink on for Ukraine in the first days of the war, when Russian missiles were knocking out other communications and the Ukrainian army risked fighting blind. The remark appeared aimed at the Liberal base and at Democrats in Washington who have made Musk a political villain. Had Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre sneered at a named businessman in the same terms, the CBC reaction would likely have been far harsher.

Carney’s broader point, that one powerful actor able to cut people off is dangerous, is a fair one. It also describes his own legislative agenda. At least seven government bills either govern what Canadians can say online or expand state surveillance. Four deal with speech and three with surveillance, and some are already law.

Bill C-9, the Combatting Hate Act, received royal assent June 18 and took effect July 18. It creates new offences for displaying certain symbols, adds a stand-alone hate crime offence, writes a legal definition of “hatred” into the Criminal Code and repeals the defence for people expressing, in good faith, an opinion on a religious subject or text. The Department of Justice states that “the law repeals this specific defence,” while maintaining the change does not criminalize religious expression. The government has not explained why a defence it says changes nothing needed to go.

Bill C-34, the Safe Social Media Act, was introduced June 10 and remains before Parliament. It would create a Digital Safety Commission of Canada with three to five cabinet-appointed commissioners empowered to issue orders, investigate, inspect and fine. The government’s fact sheet sets penalties of up to three per cent of global gross revenue or $10 million, whichever is higher, a scale that would fall hardest on the largest platforms, including Musk’s X. Alongside material that is already illegal, such as child abuse imagery and intimate images shared without consent, platforms would have to police “content that foments hatred,” a standard interpreted by commissioners the Liberal cabinet appoints. The framework closely resembles Justin Trudeau’s Online Harms Act under a new name.

Bill C-25, the Strong and Free Elections Act, received royal assent June 18. It makes it a crime to knowingly spread false or misleading information about elections or voting with intent to disrupt an election or affect its results, and bans deepfakes of candidates and election officials made to mislead. Opinion and satire are exempt, but officials working for a government that is itself on the ballot will decide what was false, what a speaker knew and what he intended. The government says the rules now reach activity outside Canada, an odd position for a Prime Minister troubled by one man’s satellites crossing borders.

Bill C-16, the Protecting Victims Act, became law the same day. Most of it targets child predators and sextortion, but it also rewrites criminal harassment. According to the Department of Justice, the prosecutor once had to show the victim feared for their safety. Now it is enough that “a reasonable person in the victim’s circumstances would fear for their safety,” including through “modern technology.” Rebel News reporters have been labelled harassers by Liberal politicians for asking questions in public, and the lower bar gives that label new legal weight.

Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, passed the House of Commons in June and is now before the Senate. It lets police demand information on “reasonable grounds to suspect,” allows the public safety minister to order providers to build in technical access for police, which critics call a backdoor, and permits metadata to be kept for up to six months.

Bill C-8, the cyber security act, received royal assent June 15. It lets the minister and cabinet issue orders to telecom companies, with secrecy orders attached, including cutting off service to an individual where “strictly necessary.” Conservative amendments on the public safety committee requiring prior judicial authorization passed, but the Speaker ruled them out of order and they were removed, so judges review such orders only after the fact.

Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act, was among Carney’s first major bills and drew enough backlash over its surveillance powers that the Liberals split it. The border measures moved into Bill C-12 and passed, while C-2 stalled. Its lawful access powers returned as C-22.

Musk cannot jail anyone, levy fines worth three per cent of global revenue, secretly order a phone company to cut off a customer or strip a religious defence from a hate speech trial. The Government of Canada can now do, or soon will be able to do, each of those things. Carney’s remark leaves open who in this country really has a finger on the off switch: the billionaire with the satellites, or the Prime Minister who spent the past year writing the laws to use one.

Keep reading

Democrat Rep. Jim Hines Threatens Elon Musk, Says Democrats Have War Gamed Fantasy Violent Election Day Chaos Caused by Musk Manipulating Algorithms That Causes Armed Citizens to Attack Polling Places

Democrats have war-gamed potential Election Day chaos that includes armed groups attacking polling places after being manipulated by Elon Musk, according to Rep. Jim Himes (D-CT) in remarks to the left-wing news site MeidasTouch published Friday.

Himes threatened X social media site owner Musk, saying, “I’m looking at you here, Elon Musk…We’re watching very closely.”

Himes speculated that Musk could manipulate algorithms to spread rumors about illegal aliens voting that would provoke armed groups to attack polling places, giving President Donald Trump the opportunity to bring in federal law enforcement.

Himes, who has served in Congress since 2009, is the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Himes said the group that ran the war game included Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Rep. Joe Morelle (D-NY), lawyers, and nonprofit groups.

Himes noted Musk has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to support Republicans this election and owns X. Himes said Musk or others could spread false rumors or manipulate algorithms to stir up chaos and violence.

Transcript:

Jamie and I, again with Joe Morelle and others, and lawyers and as he said nonprofits, we’ve, we’ve, we’ve wargamed a lot of these scenarios and one of these scenarios, and I’m looking at you here Elon Musk because you know, he in particular has been a massive financial player in this election. Hundreds of millions of dollars of his own fortune has gone into supporting Republican candidates. And of course he controls a major social media platform uh, X, what used to be Twitter.

And one of the scenarios we gamed out is that one of these lords of, uh, of technology decides in the middle of the day to start propagating misinformation to, and again there’s a thousand scenarios here none of which are particularly happy to contemplate, but one of them is that Elon Musk and I don’t mean to, you know, say he’s the one who’s going to do this, but he certainly has the power to alter those algor, algorithms or to tell a story that is false, you know, to say that reports in Michigan are that massive numbers of the undocumented are voting in the election. And in that moment, this is an opportunity to manipulate people. And if a whole bunch of guys with guns in Michigan see a bunch of social media posts that suggest falsely that, you know, the undocumented are, are, are voting in Detroit, the you know, what’s to stop them from jumping into trucks armed and showing up at polling places?

Now local police are overwhelmed and you know, heaven forbid there’s some sort of violence and the local police are overwhelmed. What do you think the president’s going to do? Well, he’s going to send in federal uh, law enforcement.

So, um again, um I, I, I don’t want to suggest that that is absolutely the scenario that is going to happen, but you can’t be too suspicious or prepared. And so, you know, we have been in contact with um, uh, these many leaders who do not have the benefit of the doubt these days to say, you know, we’re watching very closely. There are, more importantly, there are lawyers who are watching very uh, closely about whether you take any steps that are either aggressive against uh, the proper functioning of our democracy or negligent.”

Keep reading

Democrats Are Using the Soviet Playbook – Publicly Call for Nationalizing Private Businesses to Punish Elon Musk for Supporting Trump – Musk Responds with Fire

Little man syndrome.

Four foot ten inch Robert Reich called for Democrats to steal Elon Musk’s businesses and nationalize them on Sunday.

Reich is taking a page directly from Joseph Stalin and all of the communists since then.

Former labor secretary Robert Reich on Sunday called for Democrats to “defund” Elon Musk and take control of his companies.

Robert Reich: “We’ve got to defund Musk. And when I say defund Musk, you know, 75% of his wealth is dependent on taxpayers who are buying Starlink systems for the Department of Defense. Defund Musk. I mean this. If we have a Democratic administration, and the Democrats ought to be starting this, not just with oversight hearings, but also starting laying the groundwork for nationalizing Starlink and SpaceX.

Nationalize it. It should be a public corporation.

We should not ever have that kind of power in one person’s hands, one private person’s hands. I mean, Musk is buying, trying to buy the senator from Texas. I mean, why would we, why should we allow this? Seriously.

Well, we shouldn’t. And then this week people started talking about, oh, Musk is going to be held accountable. And he said Live by the sword, die by the sword. That was his— that was in X on, uh, on one of his— yeah.

Yeah, on Twitter, on X. And he said that. And he also said, anyone who picks a fight with me, you’re going down. And he was talking about the Dems. And it’s not a fight. It is accountability. I mean, it is holding him accountable is what people are talking about. And so he’s getting ahead of it, threatening, threatening, threatening, threatening with his money, with his power, with his reach. with his connections.

Well, he knows that if the Democrats take over the House and possibly the Senate, one of the things they are going to be doing is focusing on Elon Musk.

I mean, he’s really going to be targeted, and he knows it. And he’s going to be using his 360 million followers or 260 million followers on X to kind of give him a buttress against that. And he’s going to use litigation. And he’s— I mean, this is— When I say this is Exhibit A in terms of the billionaire takeover of America, this is the oligarchic problem. This is— Musk represents the power of oligarchy in America over democracy. And it’s something like what happened in the first Gilded Age when we had the robber barons. I mean, he is the equivalent of the robber barons of the first Gilded Age, but he’s much, much— he’s even worse. Bigger, even more corrupt in terms of trying to bribe his way into politics. And he also ends USAID. I mean—

Keep reading

Elon Musk Claims Ukraine Is a Money Laundering Scheme for US Politicians

Elon Musk Claims Ukraine Is a Money Laundering Scheme for US Politicians.

In early 2025, after President Trump took over, Ukraine’s Zelensky claimed that he was unable to locate $100 billion Ukraine received from the US.

UKRAINE: What if 58% of the U.S. taxpayer dollars sent to Zelensky never even reached Ukraine? Where did it go? Did the CIA skim a cut? Did Ukrainian officials and generals pocket their share? Did The Big Guy get his usual slice? If Zelensky’s claim is true—that he only received $75 billion of the $177+ billion Washington sent—what happens next? Do we shrug and move on, or do we finally demand answers and accountability?

This is no surprise.

When FTX’s CEO Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) was arrested after the cryptocurrency trading vehicle FTX went bankrupt, we reported that FTX was used as a money laundering vehicle in Ukraine.  Next thing that happened the DOJ threw SBF in jail and ignored any relationship between FTX and money laundering.

Keep reading

Elon Musk Responds – Zelensky Bragged About Breaking Starlink Rules on X by Using It to Bomb Russia – Then Melts Down When It’s Shut Down

It is pretty clear at this point that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy can not be trusted.

Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky lashed out at Elon Musk and the US, after the Starlink service was interrupted in Ukraine earlier this month.

Starlink, which is controlled by Musk’s SpaceX, was being used by Zelensky to bomb Russia.

According to The London Economic, Zelensky wrote Musk saying it was a “big mistake” when Starlink was interrupted in Ukraine that will lead to “a lot of losses.”

Zelensky continued: “People will die if attacks continue and if Starlink will not work.”

On Saturday, Elon Musk responded to Zelensky on X social media:

“Using Starlink, a civilian commercial service, for offensive drone strikes to kill people has never been allowed, nor should it be.

“Starshield,” a different system, is controlled by the US government. What they decide to do is up to them.

Ukraine military violated Starlink terms of service and used it for offensive drone strikes to kill people. That loophole was closed last week.

Starlink remains critical to the defense of Ukraine, as it is the only system that cannot be jammed or blown up, at least for now. Were Starlink to be turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately. This is NOT a threat, it is simply a statement of fact.

Starlink was also crucial to preventing Russia from overrunning Ukraine in the early days of the war, as all other means of communication were destroyed or jammed by Russia.

SpaceX has done more to defend Ukraine than any private company on Earth BY FAR.

That said, I have nothing but UTTER CONTEMPT for the virtue-signaling evil warmongers who push for endless slaughter and offer no realistic solution to the conflict. May you burn in hell.

Keep reading

Rosie O’Donnell Claims Elon Musk Could Use Satellites to Rig Midterm Elections in Bizarre TikTok Rant

Deranged comedienne Rosie O’Donnell has suggested that Elon Musk could use his Starlink satellites to manipulate the upcoming midterm elections.

In a video posted to TikTok, O’Donnell expressed hope that a sufficiently large turnout would prevent Republicans from interfering with the election results.

“When this is over — hopefully on November 4th when people show up en masse and they cannot rig the election or use Elon Musk’s satellites to alter the election because the turnout will be so large — hopefully then we will be able to see a tremendous decline in the MAGA cult,” she declared.

O’Donnell offered no evidence for her unusual claims.

Similar allegations spread among anti-Trump activists following the 2024 presidential election, with some suggesting that Musk’s Starlink satellite network had been used to manipulate voting machines.

Keep reading

Elon Musk Announces Plan to Give Every Child in America One Share of SpaceX Stock in 2027

Elon Musk just dropped a bombshell that will put a real ownership stake in the hands of tens of millions of American kids.

On Monday, the SpaceX and Tesla CEO posted on X: “Next year, I will give one of my SpaceX shares to every kid in America. This will be the first of many.”

The announcement comes roughly four months after SpaceX went public on the Nasdaq under the ticker $SPCX in one of the largest IPOs in history.

Shares recently traded near $146, and with roughly 72–73 million children under 18 in the United States, the gift is valued in the neighborhood of $10.5 billion based on recent prices.

Musk did not spell out the exact mechanism, eligibility rules, or timeline beyond “next year,” but the scale is unmistakable. He is transferring ownership from his own holdings directly to the next generation.

This builds on earlier action from SpaceX itself. Earlier this year, SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell and her husband personally gifted one SpaceX share each to more than two million American children ages 11–17 in lower-income areas (with extra emphasis near their central Texas home) through the Trump Accounts program. That pledge was valued at roughly $325 million at the time.

Keep reading

Musk donates $276M to GOP in massive midterms push, marking largest political donation in U.S. history

Elon Musk, the CEO of SpaceX and the wealthiest person in the world, has reportedly contributed $276 million to Republican political groups since July, according to a spokesperson.

America PAC is a political action committee founded by Musk in 2024 to support Republican candidates and conservative ballot initiatives. Powered by hundreds of millions of dollars in personal funding from Musk, the organization focuses primarily on large-scale voter canvassing and targeted digital media campaigns.

Ahead of the midterms, Musk is the largest known donor, contributing $158 million to the Senate Leadership Fund this summer. The donation ranks among the largest political contributions in United States history, as first reported by The New York Times and later confirmed by Andrew Romeo, a spokesperson for Musk’s super PAC.

After pouring more than $76 million into America PAC this summer, Musk saw those funds directed into a sprawling canvassing program targeting hard-to-reach Republican voters.

  • $20 million to the Congressional Leadership Fund, the main super PAC for House Republicans
  • $10 million to Lone Star Liberty PAC, a group supporting Texas GOP Senate hopeful Ken Paxton (R-Texas.)
  • $10 million to the Republican Governors Association
  • $2 million to the Republican Attorneys General Association

The massive spending marks a sharp reversal from last May, when Musk said he planned to scale back his political contributions, stating, “I think I’ve done enough.”

The Tesla CEO’s substantial financial contributions exemplify his support for President Donald Trump and Republican candidates in the midterms. His super PAC has also confirmed plans to remain active in the 2028 presidential race, positioning Musk to continue playing a major role in Republican politics.

Musk’s massive donation follows President Trump awarding the National Medal of Science to Musk and other tech executives on Thursday.

Keep reading

US Official Threatens: We Can Overthrow ‘Any Country We Want’

The US ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfoyle, threatened to overthrow the government in Athens if it didn’t follow orders from Washington.

Referring to the contemporary collapse of Romania’s government, Guilfoyle told a Greek minister, “We can do that to any country we want. We can do that here”.

The US ambassador reportedly said this at a dinner in Athens this March, which was attended by multiple US and Greek officials, according to the Washington Post.

Guilfoyle’s remarks recalled a notorious comment from the world’s richest oligarch, Elon Musk.

In 2019, the US government backed a coup against Bolivia’s democratically elected socialist president, Evo Morales.

Musk strongly supported the putsch. On Twitter, a critic responded to the oligarch and accused the US government of “organizing a coup against Evo Morales in Bolivia so you could obtain the lithium there”.

Musk replied, “We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it”.

Keep reading