Tag: 2024 elections

Biden Regime Officially Recognizes Gonzalez Victor as the Legitimate Winner of the Recently Concluded Venezuela Election Due to Election Fraud

Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced Thursday that the Biden regime officially recognizes Edmundo González Urrutia as the legitimate winner of Venezuela’s July 28 presidential election.

This statement comes after widespread allegations of electoral fraud and manipulation by the Maduro regime.

In a statement, Blinken commended the Venezuelan people for their resilience and participation in an election marred by significant challenges.

“At least 12 million Venezuelans peacefully went to the polls and exercised one of the most powerful rights given to people in any democracy: the right to vote,” he said.

However, he condemned the National Electoral Council (CNE), which is widely viewed as a tool of Nicolás Maduro’s government, for its handling of the election results.

“The CNE’s rapid declaration of Nicolás Maduro as the winner came with no supporting evidence,” Blinken said.

He highlighted that despite calls from both Venezuelans and the international community, the CNE has failed to publish crucial data, including disaggregated vote tallies and official precinct-level results.

Blinken condemned Maduro’s threats against opposition leaders, including Edmundo González and María Corina Machado. He called for their protection and the immediate release of all individuals arrested for peacefully participating in the electoral process.

Keep reading

Senator Marshall Officially Launches Investigation Against Google for Alleged Election Interference — Accused of Rigging Search Results to Prioritize Left-Wing Propaganda

Kansas Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) has announced an investigation into Google, accusing the woke tech giant of manipulating search results to suppress information regarding the recent assassination attempt on President Trump.

Over the weekend, users across various platforms reported that searches for terms related to the July 13 assassination attempt on Trump yielded no relevant autocomplete suggestions.

Instead, the algorithm appeared to prioritize historical incidents involving other political figures, such as Presidents Harry Truman and Ronald Reagan, along with unrelated events like the shooting of musician Bob Marley.

“This raises serious questions about Google’s intentions,” Senator Marshall tweeted. “Why is Google suppressing the search about the Trump assassination attempt? These are all screenshots from this morning. Has there been a dramatic increase in Truman biographers in the last two weeks?”

Keep reading

With Intent To Deceive

These fake voter guides are being sent to voters in six Florida counties, to date. They list the candidates who are supposedly endorsed by Trump and DeSantis, and they are advocating for candidates who are NOT real MAGA supporters.

Those who ARE legitimately MAGA, have been attacked by the legal team of the RPOF, as you remember, and disallowed from membership and even meeting attendance at the county RECS. Is that why April Culbreth, above, has closed the Manatee REC until after the primary, August 20th? Too many MAGA people wanted to help?

The guides come from “ MAGA PC”, with an address of Venice, FL, NOT the real MAGA PAC in Alexandria VA. Search MAGA PC, and you are led to a “MEGA PC” desktop app. Nothing “MAGA PC” is found. The address in Venice belongs to State Sen. Joe Grueters’ accounting firm. Why would any high-ranking member of the RPOF send a widely distributed list of people to vote for, which contains the disclaimer that it has nothing to do with the RPOF?? And, why are none of these real MAGA candidates?

These voter “guides” are being sent to voters in Manatee, Hillsborough, St. Lucie, Brevard, Lake, and Sarasota Counties. So far. They contain full lists of the people whom the RPOF – NOT Donald Trump. – wants elected. Guaranteed.

BUT, WHAT OF THE INNOCENT VOTER who receives this in the mail?? They glance at a picture of Trump, see the word, “MAGA”, and start marking their ballot, without noticing the subtle deception on the guides.

Keep reading

Jack Posobiec Unearths Alleged Coverup by One of Harris’s VP Pick Frontrunners

Jack Posobiec has unearthed an old controversy involving then-Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, one of Kamala Harris’s likely VP picks.

Posobiec shared with his followers on X that a woman was “stabbed 20 times” back in 2011, “including twice while dead.” 

“[The] coroner ruled it a homicide, then changed it to suicide,” Posobiec added. 

“This week, the PA Supreme Court announced it will investigate why Attorney General Josh Shapiro upheld the lie,” Posobiec continued, noting more information was “to come.”

His post has sparked outrage against Shapiro, with countless X users digging into the case more.

Fox News reported back in 2022 on the mysterious death of Ellen Greenberg, a 27-year-old Philadelphia teacher, after new evidence casted doubt on the official suicide ruling. 

The case, which has perplexed investigators for over a decade, is now under renewed scrutiny as experts and the PA Supreme Court challenges the initial findings.

Keep reading

Kamala Harris’ solution to climate change is to alter the food pyramid and force Americans to eat less meat

At a CNN Climate Town Hall on Sept. 4, 2019, then-Sen. Kamala Harris wanted the government to create “incentives” for Americans to eat less meat, even agreeing to change the food pyramid. According to her, this could curb the effects of climate change.

The event was part of the 2020 Democratic presidential primaries. Before she dropped out of the race, a voter asked if she supported changing the nation’s dietary guidelines to reduce the consumption of red meat – because, according to the woman, climate change is linked to the “overproduction of red meat.”

Harris answered: “I think the point that you’re raising in a broader context, which is that, as a nation, we actually have to have a real priority at the highest level of government around what we eat and in terms of healthy eating because we have a problem in America.”

“So the answer is yes,” she continued. “I will also say this: The balance that we have to strike here, frankly, is about what government can and should do around creating incentives, and then banning certain behaviors.”

During the same gathering, she admitted to having cheeseburgers from time to time. “But there also has to be what we do in terms of creating incentives that we will eat in a healthy way, that we will encourage moderation, and that we will be educated about the effect of our eating habits on our environment. We have to do a much better job at that, and the government has to do a much better job at that,” she said.

Meanwhile, the administration of President Joe Biden has been pushing ways to combat climate change by reducing carbon dioxide emissions, switching to electric vehicles and allegedly even eating meat substitutes such as bugs rather than consuming red meat.

“Joe Biden’s climate plan includes cutting 90 percent of red meat from our diets by 2030,” Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) tweeted in 2021. “They want to limit us to about four pounds a year. Why doesn’t Joe stay out of my kitchen?” But Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack denied it back then.

“There is no effort designed to limit people’s intake of beef coming out of President Biden’s White House or USDA,” Vilsack said as reported by Politico. “Sometimes in the political world, games get played and issues are injected into the conversation knowing full well that there’s no factual basis.”

Keep reading

Watchdog website PURGES report labeling Kamala Harris the “most liberal senator” of 2019

GovTrack.us, a website that tracks the passage of bills through Congress and the voting records of legislators, recently confirmed that it had removed a 2019 report that tagged then-Sen. Kamala Harris as that year’s “most liberal” U.S. senator sometime within the last two weeks.

The organization that provides “thorough documentation of U.S. congressional voting” labeled Harris as the “most liberal compared to all senators that year,” outranking even progressive stalwarts like Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Bernie Sanders (I-VT).

The self-described “government transparency website” now displays a “Page Not Found” error prompt whenever the link is accessed. Moreover, the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine illustrates that the webpage was yanked down sometime this month, the same month that Harris gained enough delegates to become the Democratic Party’s Presidential nominee after President Joe Biden’s announcement on July 21 of stepping down and endorsing Harris.

According to GovTrack founder Joshua Tauberer, the webpage removal was a consequence of the group’s policy shift enacted “several years ago” to end its single-year ratings of lawmakers to only do ratings based on Congressional sessions, which are two years. He did not disclose the exact date of the webpage removal.

“We determined that the limited data available in a single year was not sufficient to create a reliable portrait of the activity of legislators, particularly given the ebbs and flows of the legislative calendar, and therefore did not serve as a useful tool to our users and the American public,” Tauberer said. “We subsequently took down the previously published single-calendar-year statistics for the same reason.”

Tauberer told Fox News Digital that the organization was still publishing report cards based on two-year congressional sessions and pointed to Harris’ existing 2020 web page, which ranked her ideology as the “most politically left compared to Senate Democrats” for the 116th Congress. She was ranked the second most liberal in all the Senate behind Sanders.

Back in 2020, GovTrack reportedly said that the ranking was not reliable. “I think the short answer is that both things can be true: She can both be sponsoring/co-sponsoring left-leaning legislation, something with typically little risk, while also being pragmatic when push comes to shove on risky and impactful decisions,” Tauberer added at the time.

Keep reading

Newly uncovered damning video footage of Kamala Harris could be the end of her 2024 campaign

Could this be the final nail in Kamala’s 2024 coffin? Newly uncovered footage of Kamala Harris has surfaced, and it’s as damning as it gets. She’s caught on camera supporting the highly unpopular “Defund the Police” movement, which the left tried to launch unsuccessfully after the deadly and destructive George Floyd riots. It was so unpopular with Americans that, much like the “border czar” disaster, they tried to pretend it never happened—but it did, and we’ve got the video to prove it.

(Article republished from Revolver.news)

Soon all of America will know the price people have and will pay for ?@KamalaHarris dangerous ideas pic.twitter.com/6Jc3fZSuBK

— Chris LaCivita (@LaCivitaC) July 27, 2024

And speaking of the “border czar” disaster…

Revolver:

By now, you’re likely well aware that we’re dealing with a regime-run propaganda machine. It’s almost impossible not to see that the US media acts as a weapon for the Deep State, doing their bidding at every turn. Yet, there are moments when the propaganda is so glaringly obvious and damaging that it has to be called out. This situation involving Kamala Harris, the “border czar,” is one of those instances. It’s quite a spectacle and perfectly illustrates just how far the media will go to bolster the wildly unpopular vice president.

Journalists were calling Kamala the border czar until like five minutes ago. Don’t let the media gaslight you. pic.twitter.com/oveoFcBn4G

— Bill D’Agostino (@Banned_Bill) July 24, 2024

But the hits keep coming for ol’ Kamala. Not only does she rubber-stamp her approval of the dangerous “Defund the Police” movement, but she also claims that “more safety with more cops is wrong” and suggests it’s time to “upend” the entire system. The timing couldn’t be worse. This comes at a time when violent crime is skyrocketing. We just witnessed an anti-Trump, left-wing extremist attempt to assassinate President Trump and murder one of his innocent supporters on live TV. Not to mention all the violent crime that’s destroying liberal-run cities. Americans want safety; they’re tired of watching the bad guys call the shots while cops are demonized and mocked.

Keep reading

Newsom Threatens Laws Against Deepfakes After Kamala Harris Parody Video Goes Viral

In a clash between Gov. Gavin Newsom and tech magnate Elon Musk, the California governor promoted his intention to endorse a law targeting what he calls the misuse of AI in political advertising.

This decision escalates the ongoing dispute between the two influential figures. Newsom criticized a parody video shared by Musk, which seemed to showcase a campaign ad for Vice President Kamala Harris with a synthetic voiceover, by posting, “Manipulating a voice in an ‘ad’ like this one should be illegal. I’ll be signing a bill in a matter of weeks to make sure it is.”

Musk retorted sharply on social media, emphasizing the legality of parody in the United States.

Keep reading

Election 2024: Arizona and Michigan Train Clerks To Report AI Deepfakes To Law Enforcement

The AI (and specifically, deepfakes) panic is playing a prominent role in this US election campaign, with the states of Arizona and Michigan introducing a scheme to train election clerks in identifying content branded as such.

Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes and Michigan and Minnesota counterparts Jocelyn Benson and Steve Simon, all three Democrats, are among those pushing an initiative called the Artificial Intelligence Task Force, launched by the NewDEAL Forum.

NewDEAL Forum is a Washington-based NGO whose board is populated by Democrat-associated figures, and which states it set out to “defend democracy” by developing tools and methods to help election officials and voters not only identify but also flag “malicious AI-generated activity” like deepfakes and “misinformation.”

Arizona and Michigan are considered to be swing states and there this effort is happening in the form of tabletop exercises that teach participants how to inform law enforcement and first responders about flagged content.

That’s not the only recently launched “project:” there’s liberal voting rights and media Democracy Docket platform, which is quoting Jocelyn Benson as saying that Michigan now has a law making “knowingly distributing materially-deceptive deep fakes” a felony.

But this applies only if this activity is seen as intending to harm a candidate’s reputation or chance at success, the Michigan secretary of state explained. However, it wasn’t immediately clear how transparent and precise the rules around determining the intent behind a deep fake are.

If applied arbitrarily, such legislation could catch a lot of things in its net – like satire and parody.

And it’s not an insignificant distinction when talking about AI, and deepfakes for that matter, since both have been around for a while, the latter notably in the entertainment industry.

Keep reading

Elon Musk’s ‘Election Interference’

A “White Dudes for Harris” Zoom call reportedly raised $4 million in donations for Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign. After the call, the @dudes4Harris account on X was briefly suspended.

Is this election interference?

If we remain in reality, the answer is of course not.

Even if X CEO Elon Musk ordered the account suspended because of its politics, there would be no (legal) wrongdoing here. X is a private platform, and it doesn’t have any obligation to be politically neutral. Explicitly suppressing pro-Harris content would be a bad business model, surely, but it would not be illegal. Musk and the platform formerly known as Twitter have no obligation to equally air conservative and progressive views or give equal treatment to Republican and Democratic candidates.

But there’s no evidence that X was deliberately trying to thwart Harris organizers. The dudes4Harris account—which has no direct affiliation to the Harris campaign—was suspended after it promoted and held its Zoom call and was back the next day. That’s a pretty bad plan if the goal was to stop its influence or fundraising. And there are all sorts of legitimate reasons why X may have suspended the account.

The account’s suspension is “not that surprising,” writes Techdirt Editor in Chief Mike Masnick (who, it should be noted, is intensely critical of X policies and Musk himself on many issues). “Shouldn’t an account suddenly amassing a ton of followers with no clear official connection to the campaign and pushing people to donate maybe ring some internal alarm bells on any trust and safety team? It wouldn’t be a surprise if it tripped some guardwires and was locked and/or suspended briefly while the account was reviewed. That’s how this stuff works.”

If we step out of reality into the partisan hysteria zone, however, then the account’s temporary suspension was clearly an attempt by Musk to sway the 2024 election.

Keep reading