Tag: 2024 elections

Officials in Edina City, Minnesota Faces Backlash After ‘County Courier Vehicle’ with Boxes of Ballots Left Unattended, Hatchback Conspicuously Open in Parking Lot

Trust in the election process took a serious hit after a disturbing photo surfaced on social media showing a vehicle, packed with absentee ballots, left wide open and unattended in a public parking lot outside Edina City Hall.

The official X account of Senate District 50 Republicans in Minnesota, representing citizens of Edina and Bloomington, shared the alarming image, sparking outrage among local residents and election watchdogs.

The incriminating photo shows boxes of ballots tied with blue and red straps sitting inside an unlocked vehicle with its hatchback fully open.

SD50MNGOP called out the incident, posting, “Do these ballots look secure to you? Photo outside Edina City Hall.”

“Witness watched as the driver left the vehicle to go inside to get more boxes, leaving the vehicle open and unattended,” SD50MNGOP added.

Keep reading

Voters in Pennsylvania Receive Threatening Letters Warning ‘There Will Be Consequences’ For Supporting Trump

Pennsylvania residents with Trump signs in their yard are reportedly receiving disturbing letters warning them that “there will be consequences” for supporting former President Donald Trump.

“We know where you live, you are in the data base,” the anonymous author states in the letter, first obtained by The Post Millennial. “In the dead of a cold winters night, this year, or next and beyond, there is no knowing what will happen. Your property, your family may be impacted, your cat may get shot. And more.”

The threatening message was written on a “Trump 2024” letterhead, and began with “a quick note of thanks for being engaged in the election and for your participation in the process.”

The author then says he is “writing with a concern about the level of political violence in the country during this election year as well as the threats to our democracy and freedoms,” and asks recipients  to “take a close look at the truth, facts and the future for a better America where we can all live in harmony together.”

From there, the letter devolves into an anti-Trump screed not terribly different in style from the campaign rhetoric of most Democrats, including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

“Your candidate is a felon, rapist, desecrator, an immoral flawed man,” the letter states. “He is a major reason violence [i]s up, remember January 6th and Charlottesville? By supporting him, you are declaring your public support for a disregard of the law, civil discourse and unity. You are indicating your hatred for minorities, immigrants, foreigners, women, education, the rights of your fellow citizens, the rights of women to make decisions over their own healthcare needs.”

The unhinged author even dinged Trump for disliking Harris-supporting pop star Taylor Swift, insisting she “has contributed nothing but joy to the world.”

The letter writer then issued an chilling “reminder that your visible support comes with a price and at a cost,” and “There will be consequences,” before threatening recipients that their property, families, and even cats could be impacted by their vote for Trump.

“Your vote for this guy is seen as treading on my rights. You tread on me at your peril, motherf-cker. We look forward to visiting in the future,” the message concluded. It was signed” “Sincerely,  Patriotic citizen and a true  American.”

Keep reading

Harris Endorsed Transgender Operations For Prisoners In Bret Baier’s Fox News Interview

Vice President Kamala Harris told Fox News host Bret Baier she would “follow the law” when asked about her support for prisoner “sex change” surgeries. According to the law under the Biden-Harris administration, trans-identifying prisoners could be entitled to taxpayer dollars for the procedures.

On Wednesday, Baier presented Harris with an ad from former President Donald Trump’s campaign airing the then-California senator’s endorsement of trans surgeries for prison inmates. During a sit-down interview with the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) in 2019, Harris spoke about her time as attorney general when she “made sure that they changed the policy in the state of California so that every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access to the medical care that they desired and need,” including requested surgery.

Keep reading

Obama Pushes Lies About Trump’s Mental State After Covering Up Biden’s Actual Dementia for Years

Obama is campaigning for Kamala Harris in Arizona and of course, he is lying.

Obama has the nerve to suggest that there’s something wrong with Trump’s mind after he actively covered up Joe Biden’s very real dementia for years. Obama was campaigning with Joe Biden right before the left decided he had to be replaced. He knew how bad Joe was.

And remember, this is the party that claims to care very deeply about disinformation.

From Mediaite:

Obama then pointed to a recent town hall Trump held, where he ended up swaying back and forth on stage as music played for 40 minutes.

“Let me explain because I’ve done a lot of town hall meetings,” Obama continued. “The point of a town hall meeting is to take questions. He just decided, you know what, I’m gonna stop taking questions and then he’s swaying to ‘Ave Maria’ and ‘Y.M.C.A.’ for about half an hour. Folks are standing there, not sure what’s happening. Can you imagine if I did that? Can you imagine if Ruben did that?”

After making a crack about how their playlists would be better, Obama pulled the grandpa card on Trump.

“He called himself ‘the father IVF,’” he added. “I do not know what that means. You do not either. He said January 6th was ‘a day of love’… You would be worried if your grandpa was acting like this. No, no. I’m not joking. You would, right? You’d call up your cousins and you’d say, ‘Have you noticed?’”

Keep reading

Kamala Harris Comes Up with New Answer When Asked What Policies She Would Have Done Differently Than Joe Biden

Kamala Harris couldn’t even answer a few softball questions from NBC’s Peter Alexander after she delivered remarks in Grand Rapids, Michigan on Friday.

Peter Alexander asked Kamala Harris if there is one policy she would have done differently over the past 3.5 years than Joe Biden.

The last time Kamala Harris was asked this question, she totally bombed and said she would do nothing different.

So she came up with a new answer.

This time, Kamala Harris said, ‘Vice presidents are not critical of their presidents.’

“President Biden said every president has to cut their own path. What is one policy you would have done differently over these last three and a half years than President Biden?” NBC’s Peter Alexander asked Kamala Harris.

“To be very candid with you, even including Mike Pence, vice presidents are not critical of their presidents. I think that really, in terms of the tradition of it and also just going forward, it does not make for a productive and important relationship,” Harris said.

“He has not given you the green light to carve your own path with those comments?” Peter Alexander asked Harris.

Harris responded, “Going forward, there’s no question, and I bring my own experiences and my own life experiences.”

Keep reading

“This Is Illegal”: British Labour Party Sending Staff To Campaign For Kamala In Swing States

The Head of Operations of the leftist British Labour Party, which is now in government after 14 years of being the opposition, declared in a LinkedIn post that she is organising a party of 100 staff members to be sent to swing states in the US to campaign for Kamala Harris, prompting charges of election interference.

Sofia Patel proudly announced her plan, advertising that she has 10 spots left with free accommodation for any rabid British TDS sufferers who want to stick their nose into the US election.

Patel has since deleted the post as it became apparent exactly what was going on here.

X owner Elon Musk chimed in to note that the Patel’s proposed plan is simply illegal.

Keep reading

CBS Hit With FCC Complaint Charging “Significant And Intentional News Distortion” Over Edited Kamala Interview 

CBS News has been formally issued with an FCC complaint regarding its surreptitious editing of Kamala Harris’ 60 Minutes interview.

The complaint charges that the network engaged in “significant and intentional news distortion.”

Edited and unedited portions of the interview were shared side by side as it became clear CBS was attempting to make Harris appear less incompetent.

Fox News reports that The Center for American Rights argues that the discrepancies “amount to deliberate news distortion — a violation of FCC rules governing broadcasters’ public interest obligations.”

The complaint seeks to force CBS to release an unedited transcript of the interview to set the record straight.

Keep reading

Federal Judge Sides with Biden-Harris DOJ, Blocks Attempt to Remove Ineligible Voters from Rolls Ahead of Election

A federal judge on Wednesday halted an Alabama effort to purge voter registration rolls of people who should not be able to vote in the state.

The Justice Department sued Alabama to stop Secretary of State Wes Allen from what he said were “strategic efforts” to “remove noncitizens registered to vote,” according to NBC.

Under the program, Allen sought to remove 3,251 voters and said they would be referred to the state attorney general’s office for possible prosecution.

U.S. District Court Judge Anna Manasco, who had been nominated by former President Donald Trump in 2020, said the program had to stop due to the timing.

“For decades, federal law has given states a hard deadline to complete systematic purges of ineligible persons from voter rolls: no later than ninety days before a federal election,” Manasco wrote. NBC referred to the rule as a “quiet period.”

“This year, Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen (1) blew the deadline when he announced a purge program to begin eighty-four days before the 2024 General Election, (2) later admitted that his purge list included thousands of United States citizens (in addition to far fewer noncitizens, who are ineligible to vote), and (3) in any event, referred everyone on the purge list to the Alabama Attorney General for criminal investigation,” Manasco wrote.

Manasco ordered the state to contact those who were targeted by the program to let them know they are able to vote this year.

The order said that Allen is not barred from removing voters who would be ineligble for other reasons — such as criminal offenses or death.

If Allen learns an individual on the rolls is not an American citizen by means other than the program to remove them en masse, he can remove such a person, the order said.

The injunction to stop Allen from removing voters only lasts until the day after the Nov. 5 election.

“Because this litigation is still ongoing, I am limited in my ability to comment,” Allen said in a statement, according to The Washington Post.

“Earlier today, the federal court issued a preliminary injunction order. I will comply with the order of the federal court.

Keep reading

The International Censorship Regime Goes on the Offensive Ahead of 2024 U.S. Election

Online censorship, which tends to rank among my three main beats, is a subject I haven’t touched on in a while but has predictably become more relevant as we draw closer to November 5th. The focus of late has naturally been on an election year brimming with many whimsical happenings, from Trump narrowly avoiding the mass trauma of having his brains blown out in front of thousands of onlookers in Butler Pa., to the anointing of Kamala Harris as the democrat party’s heir apparent, to the escalations in both the Middle East and the ongoing U.S./Russia proxy war in Ukraine.

Despite the obvious importance of these issues, I truly believe the most pressing concern facing the Western world is the multifaceted attack on free expression, particularly in the digital realm.

We’ve all probably heard the idiom that “Freedom of Speech is the First Amendment because it’s the most important”. I never fully appreciated this sentiment, but in the past eight years—after being de-platformed and demonetized on several occasions—I’ve learned the hard way how truly accurate that statement is.

Keep reading

Kamala Harris and Her Socialism with 1930s-German Characteristics

Presidential candidate, Kamala Harris, responding to accusations that she is a Marxist and has been concealing much of her economic agenda from the public, gave a speech at the Economic Club of Pittsburgh on September 25 attempting to reassure voters that her earlier proposals for price controls, debt cancellations, and consumer subsidies, as well as her new proposals are not a Bolshevik assault on capitalism, but are intended to create an “opportunity economy” for the benefit of the American middle class. She affirmed “Look, I’m a capitalist, I believe in a free and fair market” and went on to specify three “pillars” of how she intends to confer the blessings of “opportunity” on market actors. 

Harris spelled out a basic principle underlying her proposals as:

I believe an active partnership between government and the private sector is one of the most effective ways to fully unlock economic opportunity. And that is what I will do when I am president, I will target the major barriers to opportunity and remove them. We will identify common sense solutions to help Americans buy a home, start a business and build wealth, and we will adopt them.

In other words, she is promising that a Harris regime would not overtly seize the means of production from their current owners as Communist revolutionaries would, but instead would force those owners to accept the Harris administration as their active “partner” in making decisions about production. Evidently, she conceives of “opportunity,” not as something that capitalists are naturally incentivized to pursue by seeking profits and avoiding losses in the context of peacefully-acquired ownership rights and voluntary market exchanges, but rather as something that has to be incentivized by compulsory obedience to bureaucratic orders emanating from a central planning office under her allegedly beneficent leadership.

Keep reading