Get one today, the election is coming up, HERE!
Vote for Nobody!
Tag: elections
Appeals court rules against Trump admin’s push for stricter mail-in ballot requirements
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston has upheld a preliminary injunction blocking the implementation of a United States Postal Service (USPS) rule that requires stricter measures for voting by mail.
The court sided with the lower court’s decision handed down Thursday, enjoining the USPS rule from being implemented prior to the upcoming November 3rd elections.
“Thus, we see no obvious error in the district court’s conclusion that allowing this Final Rule to be effective for the soon-arriving November 3 election will likely result in the disenfranchisement of millions of voters across the country while providing minimal — if any — gains in combating voter fraud,” the appeals court wrote.
In accordance with President Donald Trump’s Executive Order, “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections,” the USPS finalized a rule, effective August 21st, requiring ballot envelopes to carry unique barcodes and states to submit mail-voter information via a federal portal.
Last week, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued the injunction due to the quick timeline of implementation and questions of constitutionality.
All fifty states allow voting by mail, highlighting the significance of any ruling pertaining to mail-in ballots. According to Talwani:
- 27 states allow mail-in ballots without voters having to provide an “excuse” — Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
- Two states allow all eligible citizens to vote by mail and permit counties to opt into conducting elections by mail–Nebraska and North Dakota.
- 13 states allow vote by mail with justifiable “excuses” — Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia.
The Trump administration has already requested that the U.S. Supreme Court issues a ruling in the case.
Tyrannical EU To Threaten AfD But Could Be Its Downfall
EU technocracy shows its face again – this time it’s aiming at German voters, the AfD in particular.
Brussels is discussing the freezing of EU funding for Saxony-Anhalt where the populist party just won. The €2.95 billion in EU funding for the German federal state for the current 2021-2027 budget period alone amounts to around €500 million per year and approximately 20 percent of the Saxony-Anhalt investment spending in schools, in hospitals, in daycare centers across the country.
Green MEP Daniel Freund is one of the lobbyists from Brussels who wants to strip Saxony-Anhalt of its EU funding because the voters in the German state ‘chose wrong’. He threatens that if the AfD-led government ‘undermines EU fundamental rights or the rule of law’ then the European Commission should take away his money. Freund did not wait for the new government to be sworn in, he attacked the voters in Saxony-Anhalt already before the election results had been confirmed.
It would be nothing new for the EU to use such a measure – as it has done already with Hungary and Poland. Brussels has frozen up to €18 billion of funding for Hungary so far because of alleged rule-of-law violations. Billions more have been withheld from Poland. In both cases, the EU’s financial pressure has had serious consequences for the governments and have contributed to changes of government which the EU regards more favorably.
It is undemocratic and the EU has been attacking Saxony-Anhalt for too long now. The European Superstate is trying to starve the region of vital public services – as is already the case in Hungary and Poland – if the voters there choose a party that is not approved of by the Brussels elite.
Revised Overseas Voter Form FPCA Eliminates Checkbox “I Never Lived In U.S.” – A Blow to Birth Tourism Voters and Non-Citizens
For years, Americans living overseas could use the federal government’s Federal Post Card Application (FPCA) to register to vote and request an absentee ballot.
The old form contained an odd checkbox option that said, “I am a U.S. citizen living outside the country; I have never lived in the United States.”
The new form removes this line and does more.
On August 13th, the Department of War issued an Emergency Revision Request letter to eliminate this line.
It also restructures ID questions. It now asks detailed questions, if they’ve ever been issued a valid Driver’s License or State ID, then prove it? Ever been issued a Social Security card, prove it. And so on.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the changes on Aug. 28th, and the new form became official on September 1st, 2026. The checkboxes now list only overseas citizens who intend to return to the United States, or whose intent to return is uncertain.
The “never lived in the U.S.” checkbox didn’t accurately reflect the laws governing overseas voting. In the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA), a civilian living overseas generally votes through the last place they “domiciled” in the U.S before leaving the country.
The DoW (DoD) called the old provision an “inaccurate eligibility checkbox for citizens who have never lived in the U.S.” and said it needed to be removed so the form would comply with UOCAVA.
Non-military individuals, like birth tourists, who have never resided in the United States are not a class of voters specifically defined by UOCAVA. Therefore, they “may not be able” to use the FPCA/FWAB form.
There have been numerous controversies in States like MI, NC, and PA where FPCA applications had little verification. In a 2022 Pennsylvania hearing, Deputy Secretary for Elections Jonathan Marks said: “There’s no systemic verification.”
Eliminating the checkbox is meant to reduce confusion and prevent people outside UOCAVA’s scope from believing they are eligible to vote.
The distinction between U.S. citizenship and a U.S. voting residence is important. They are not the same thing. A citizen living in another country may have every right of citizenship but still needs a state or voting jurisdiction through which to cast a ballot.
The old form appeared to recognize “never lived in the United States” as a separate category of overseas voter. The new form no longer does. It requires an applicant to provide the U.S. address in the state or territory where the person claims the right to register and vote.
The change does not mean that every citizen who never lived in the United States is barred from voting. States retain some authority over voter qualifications. Some states have laws allowing certain citizens who were born or raised abroad to use a parent’s former voting residence.
Blanch’s DOJ to Investigate Your Private Information Being Given To Election Fraud Groups
Includes YOUR Social Security and Drivers’ License Numbers
The Department of Homeland Security first brought its concerns about this to the Justice Department in September 2025, when Pam Bondi was Attorney General.
More than a year later, Secretary Mullin, who replaced Kristi Noem, wrote to Attorney General Todd Blanche in a letter dated Wednesday, Sept. 2, 2026, that requests DOJ look into the matter. One year later…
What did Bondi do with this information?? But, I digress…
The same fraud machinery that selected a feeble old man, Joe Biden, over a highly capable candidate, is now setting up to seize the US Senate and House in the 2026 midterms.
Maria Bartiromo was handcuffed by Fox for trying to report on it. You will NOT hear this on any news channel.
(Might Maria Bartiromo become the next Press Secretary, replacing Levitt?)
Last Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security referred possible violations of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act to the DOJ. The issue is the transfer of millions of pieces of Americans’ sensitive personal information data, from their drivers’ records, to two hard left-wing groups, the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC) and the Chan Zuckerberg Foundation.
These two groups – ERIC and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) – have notorious involvement with election “irregularities”. I have written, repeatedly, about both, since 2021.
Just to refresh your memory, in 2020, CZI gave $350 million to a group called Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), under the auspices of Covid protection for election officials and voters. All in all, less than 3% of the Zuckerberg millions was found to have been used for Covid-related protection; of course, exact numbers are difficult to figure, as the CZI is a private philanthropy.
CTCL was founded by former Obama acolytes. Anyone surprised?
The CZI money was termed, “Zuck Bucks”, and was accepted by election officials around the country. For example, Alan Hayes, Supervisor of Elections in Lake County, FL, took $106,000 of it. That’s a lot of Covid masks for his staff…
Twenty-eight states have now banned these “Zuck Bucks”, but it is really all for show. The election fraud criminals will pull a different stunt. Like your drivers’ license information…
In all, at least 25 states received payouts from Zuckerberg in 2020. The states remaining, were either considered “sure Left” or “hopeless”, I’d assume.
Hunter Biden says potential presidential run would focus on addiction treatment for Americans
Former President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden said in an interview that he “may have to” run for president in 2028, however he maintained that he had not made up his mind.
On an episode of “The Cats Roundtable” released on Sunday, radio host John Catsimatidis asked Biden, 56, if he had any plans to run for president.
“If I get your endorsement, I may have to,” he told Catsimatidis.
Pressed on the same question earlier, the former president’s son said, “I haven’t made up my mind.”
In the interview, Biden explained that if he were to run, his presidential campaign would focus on addiction treatment and awareness for Americans.
“The things I care most about is the 50 million Americans that are still suffering with their addictions,” Biden remarked.
When asked about his qualifications to run for office, Biden cited the United States Constitution.
“Here is my qualification for becoming president, if you believe in the Constitution of the United States of America that you swear to uphold and protect. I want the next president to commit to one thing: to adhering to the rule of law,” he said.
The remark stands in sharp contrast to Biden’s own legal history, coming just months after his father granted him a full and unconditional pardon in December 2024 — wiping away federal gun and tax convictions before sentencing.
Biden, who has spoken openly about his own addiction and once referred to himself as a “former crackhead,” also faced allegations that he traded on his father’s vice presidency for family enrichment. The scandal erupted after he left a laptop to be repaired at a local shop, where the owner ultimately turned it over to the FBI after discovering the alarming contents.
The device reportedly contained numerous explicit photos and videos documenting drug use and sexual acts, and it later served as evidence in his federal gun and tax trials.
Pointing to potential future leaders during the interview, Biden praised Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear (D-Ky.) and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker (D-Ill.), declaring, “The truth of the matter is that I think we have an incredible bench,” before adding, “I love Gavin Newsom, personally.”
Solicitor General John Sauer Warns Supreme Court — “Once These Ballot Envelopes Enter the Mail Stream, THERE IS NO RETRIEVING THEM”
President Trump’s Solicitor General just put the Supreme Court on the clock. If the justices do not act this week, thousands of unsecured mail-in ballots will already be in the postal system, and there will be no way to pull them back.
In an emergency stay application filed over the weekend in United States Postal Service v. California (No. 26A305), Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the Court the window is slamming shut.
“Ballots have already begun to be mailed in North Carolina, and more States will begin the mailing process as the injunction remains in place—including Alabama on September 9 and at least five States the week of September 13,” Sauer wrote. “Once those ballot envelopes enter the mailstream, there is no retrieving them.”
North Carolina started sending absentee ballots last Friday. Alabama is scheduled to start Wednesday. A cluster of additional states, including several that matter in November, begin the week of September 13.
This Is Why Homeland Security’s Request that DOJ Investigate the ERIC System Is So Damn Important
In January 2022, TGP published a 3-part series about the ERIC non-profit. The Electronic Registration Information Center was supposedly helping 31 states clean their voter rolls. The more data, documents, videos, and transcripts that TGP reviewed, the more ERIC smelled like a cloaked Democrat operation. So we published what we learned about ERIC.
In the weeks and months after our series, the left-wing media conducted an unbelievable campaign to defend ERIC. They, of course, attempted to discredit TGP and intimidate State officials thinking of leaving ERIC.
Eventually, 9 of the 31 member States left the ERIC non-profit for several reasons. Virginia rejoined ERIC in 2026 after a Democrat won the governor’s office. Why was the left-wing media ferociously supporting this tiny non-profit with only 3 employees?
Well, it gave the left access to states’ voter rolls and their coveted MVD/DMV (Motor Vehicle Dept / Dept. of Motor Vehicles) data too! About a year later, Verity Vote confirmed that ERIC data was, in fact, being shared with the left-wing activist group CEIR and David Becker.
The ERIC voter registration non-profit says their “sole mission is assisting states to improve the accuracy of voter rolls and increase access to voter registration.” Most now know the first part is just not true – at all.
ERIC provides five types of reports (lists) to its members. The members must ask ERIC for most of these reports, as frequently as monthly. But ERIC operates like a secret black box – a State makes a report request, and days later their report is ready for download. That election jurisdiction has little idea how these reports were created or if they contain any bias.
“Hurry Up And Die”: Michigan Democrat Joins Other Radicals In Scrubbing Past Social Media Statements
A certain pattern is emerging on the far left. Political figures spend years currying the favor of other extremists with outrageous commentary, proudly proclaiming their commitment to eliminating the Senate, opening the border, and other measures. Then, they delete all of the comments and declare themselves mainstream. The idea is to run in the center but govern from the far left, the so-called Spanberger strategy. The latest example is William Lawrence, who is running for Michigan’s 7th Congressional District. However, Lawrence’s prior self reveals just how radical this movement could prove.
Like many professors, pundits, and politicians on the left, Lawrence has called for sweeping changes in our constitutional system. Lawrence reportedly has demanded a “fundamental overhaul” of the Constitution while calling for the elimination of the Senate, police, prisons, and borders.
He has even denounced the nuclear family as an “isolating, individualistic, violent way of organizing society.”
Notably, he is the latest radical to show that the “Big Tent” party has little room for moderates. While establishment figures like Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries seek to use this mob, radicals have made clear that they will be next. Darializa Avila Chevalier is the latest Democratic Socialist to mock the establishment’s pitch of a Big Tent party: “A big tent doesn’t pay your rent, lower your grocery bill, or take on the corporations bleeding our country dry. Democratic socialism does.”
In Lawrence’s case, he even put this feelings to music, writing a song a few years ago that calls for the death of moderate former Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, declaring, “Our generation says f**k you for everything…Hurry up and die so that we can get started.”
He has also denounced capitalism and the very concept of the nation-state.
Lawrence was previously arrested for resisting police officers while protesting a pipeline.
As discussed earlier, candidates like James Talarico in Texas have scrubbed their social media accounts or dismissed their earlier radical claims, including attacks on capitalism. Supporters view these candidates as already proving their bona fides and understanding that they are just sanitizing their records for voters who want the illusion of a moderate. Accordingly, many applaud figures such as Socialist Democrat Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, dismissing her own extremist statements just a few years ago as “Woke 1.” like some distant childhood stage.
These radical figures are learning that their views are distinctly unpopular with American voters so they are perfecting stealth socialist candidates who can run a type of Spanberger campaign while later pursuing a socialist agenda.
Lawrence’s past positions show little nuance and closely track the platform of the Democratic Socialists of America. Destroying the constitutional system, rejecting the nation-state, eliminating prisons, and other radical positions propelled these candidates through the primaries. The effort to now scrub the records shows the utter contempt that many have for average voters.
Lawrence shows the delusion of establishment figures such as Gavin Newsom that they can use a mob to gain power without being eventually devoured by it. In my book Rage and the Republic: The Unfinished Story of the American Revolution, I discuss the French Revolution and its decline into what the Framers called a mobocracy. What became known as “The Terror” was started not by the working class, but by educated lawyers, journalists, and even aristocrats as part of the Jacobin movement.
These are hardcore revolutionaries with an agenda that would destroy the world’s oldest and most successful democratic system in history. Party leaders facilitate them because they can only think about the next election, not the next generation. Lawrence is a cautionary tale that Benjamin Franklin remains correct, this is our Republic but only if we can keep it.
Maryland Gov. Cheers State Supreme Court Ruling on Redistricting Plan to Remove Sole GOP Congressional District – Rep. Andy Harris Responds
Maryland Governor Wes Moore released a video statement on Saturday, announcing that a ballot initiative to erase the state’s single Republican district was approved by the Maryland Supreme Court and vowing to use the ruling to disenfranchise state Republicans.
Per Politico:
The Maryland Supreme Court on Thursday gave Democrats a victory in the state’s protracted redistricting battle, allowing the Legislature’s proposed amendment on redistricting that party leaders want to clear the way for a 2028 gerrymander to appear before voters in November.
If approved by voters on Election Day, the measure known as Question 3 will prevent future Democratic redraws from being subjected to strict compactness and geographic standards that undid their last attempt at an 8-0 map in 2022.
Following the ruling, Democratic Maryland Governor Wes Moore applauded the ruling, claiming it means “that the power of our democracy belongs in the hands of the people.”
Hellbound and Down 
You must be logged in to post a comment.