Democrat Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey is defending the Department of Children and Families after Catholic parents accused the state of seizing their teenage daughter because they would not refer to her as a boy.
Healey told reporters the removal had nothing to do with gender, but the family’s lawyer says that is not true.
Joseph and Arlene Kutzko of Southborough say they have not spoken to their daughter, Sophie, since late 2024.
The child was 15 when DCF took her, and she is now 17.
The couple claims that Algonquin Regional High School began using a male name and pronouns for their daughter without telling them.
They have said that a school counselor reported the family after they refused, on Catholic and scientific grounds, to treat the girl as a boy.
“They exposed our daughter to teachings on LGBTQ and topics that conflict with our Catholic beliefs about human dignity, creation as male and female in Catholic teaching,” Joseph Kutzko said on the Lighthouse Faith podcast.
Massachusetts law allows schools to use a student’s chosen name and pronouns without notifying parents, a practice that has survived federal court challenges in other cases.
The parents say DCF has housed Sophie in a boys’ dormitory, put her on birth control and psychiatric drugs, and kept her from Sunday Mass.
A permanent restraining order bars the parents and an older brother from contact.
Attorney Vernadette Broyles of the Child and Parental Rights Campaign says the state is now seeking court permission to give the girl high-dose testosterone. A judge temporarily blocked that treatment. The next hearing is October 29.
Healey was asked about the case after an event in Boston this week.
“Let me be clear about the facts in that matter,” she said, according to a Boston Herald report. “First of all, DCF did not remove the child because of a health issue or a gender-affirming care issue. DCF removed the child after there were criminal charges filed against the parents, including the father. As you know, DCF is responsible for the care and well-being of kids, and that’s what happened in this instance.”
Healey added that the matter is “currently a subject of criminal prosecution right now against the parents,” then declined further comment while insisting the child “was not removed because of a gender-affirming care issue.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.