New York Times accidentally proves Deep State is a 100% REAL evil supervillain…

Way before people started calling it the “Deep State,” Washington had a built-in system that never changed no matter who won the White House. It is the permanent bureaucracy, entrenched military brass, intelligence chiefs, and federal powers that outlast presidents and shape outcomes.

And according to newly unsealed testimony, Richard Nixon didn’t just believe that machine existed. He walked straight into this buzz saw and was shredded.

The New York Times just published a very interesting piece divulging that while Nixon was drowning in Watergate hell, there was something else happening behind the scenes… something way more explosive and dangerous. It was a wartime espionage operation run by senior military officials inside the Pentagon. This was the actual Deep State running an operation against the President of The United States.

The Joint Chiefs had a mole inside the White House, stealing classified docs and handing them over to senior military commanders.

This is the New York Times admitting that entrenched bureaucratic forces (Deep State) respond aggressively when they feel threatened.

Moorer-Radford exposed a hidden feature of the American political system that endures: When excluded from their spheres of interest, entrenched bureaucratic forces will, almost as a biological reflex, respond aggressively.

Just look at all the people spying. It’s a literal free-for-all.

The NYT piece explains:

Declassified documents and scholarship published since 1974 have established that the F.B.I., under its director, J. Edgar Hoover, spied on Mitchell, the attorney general, and that the C.I.A. detailed its personnel to various units associated with Nixon, including the Watergate burglary team and “components intimately associated with the office of the president,” as the agency admitted in 1975.

Think about this… the Joint Chiefs is spying, the FBI is spying, and the CIA is embedded. And all of this is connected to a sitting US president.

And Nixon knew exactly what was happening, but he decided not to expose it.

Why?

Because blowing it wide open would’ve ripped the military apart smack in the middle of the Cold War.

So Nixon swallowed it.

Watergate became the headline, and the spy operation disappeared into a black hole somewhere, stamped classified, and forgotten.

That was 1971.

Keep reading

The Clawdbot Catastrophe: How AI Hype Unleashed a Digital Apocalypse in Weeks

Introduction: The Seductive Promise of AI Convenience

In the span of just seventy-two hours in January 2026, an open-source AI assistant named Clawdbot (later rebranded as Moltbot) went viral, amassing over 60,000 stars on GitHub. It was hailed as a revolutionary ‘personal Jarvis,’ promising ultimate efficiency by automating work and personal tasks. The tool’s allure was simple: it could operate your system, control browsers, send messages, and execute workflows on your behalf [1]. The public, desperate to offload labor, embraced it en masse, driven by the tantalizing prospect of convenience.

This mass adoption highlighted a core, dangerous flaw: to function, Clawdbot required administrative access to everything—your operating system, applications, and data. Users willingly handed over the keys to their digital kingdoms. As security researcher Nathan Hamiel warned, the architecture was fundamentally insecure, allowing attackers to hide malicious prompts in plain sight [2]. The Clawdbot phenomenon perfectly illustrates a critical worldview failure: the promise of convenience consistently overrides caution and the principle of self-reliance. It proves that when centralized, trust-based systems offer a shortcut, people will abandon their digital sovereignty, trading security for the illusion of ease.

The Anatomy of a Catastrophe: Security Evaporates

The technical breakdown was swift and devastating. Researchers quickly identified critical vulnerabilities: thousands of instances were deployed with open ports, disabled authentication, and reverse proxy flaws, leaving control panels exposed to the public internet [3]. These misconfigurations earned the software staggering CVE scores of 9.4 to 9.6 [4]. The most egregious flaw was plaintext credential storage. Clawdbot, by design, needed to store API keys, OAuth tokens, and login details to perform its tasks. It kept these in unencrypted form, creating a treasure trove for information-stealing malware [5].

Simultaneously, the system was vulnerable to prompt injection attacks. As noted by security experts, a malicious actor could embed instructions in an email or document that, when processed by Clawdbot, would trigger remote takeover commands [2]. This turned a simple email into a powerful remote control tool. The catastrophe underscores a fundamental truth: centralized, trust-based systems inevitably fail. They create single points of failure that bad actors exploit with ease. This episode vindicates the need for decentralized, user-controlled security models where individuals, not remote agents, hold the keys to their own data and systems.

The Supply Chain Poisoning: Malware Poses as ‘Skills’

The disaster quickly metastasized through the tool’s ecosystem. Clawdbot featured a central repository called ClawHub, where users could install ‘skills’—add-ons to extend functionality. This became the vector for a massive supply chain attack. Researchers from OpenSourceMalware identified 341 malicious skills disguised as legitimate tools like crypto trading assistants or productivity boosters [6]. These fake skills were mass-installed across vulnerable systems, exploiting the trust users placed in the official repository.

The payloads were diverse and destructive. Some were cryptocurrency wallet drainers, designed to siphon funds. Others were credential harvesters or system backdoors, providing persistent remote access [7]. This exploitation mirrors a broader societal pattern: uncritical trust in unvetted ‘official’ repositories is akin to blind trust in corrupt institutions. Whether it’s a centralized app store, a government health agency pushing untested pharmaceuticals, or a tech platform censoring dissent, the dynamic is the same. Centralized points of distribution become tools for poisoning the population, whether with digital malware or medical misinformation.

Keep reading

Here’s Where Prosecutors Should Look For More Evidence Of Somali Daycare Fraud

Alot has been made of the Nick Shirley videos claiming to “prove” that dozens of companies owned and allegedly operated by Somalis as daycare centers were involved in defrauding the federal government out of hundreds of millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars. And although these videos show numerous daycare facilities with boarded-up windows, broken doors, untreated snow-covered sidewalks and parking lots, no operating phone numbers, no playground equipment, and most importantly zero children at them during regular working hours, this circumstantial evidence only lays the groundwork for identifying hundreds of potential fraudsters. 

The corporate media, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, and other leaders on the American left have dismissed Shirley’s videos as unsubstantiated propaganda and/or “racist,” but in fact prosecuting those involved with these sham daycare centers should be relatively easy, using an assortment of readily available financial records.

Bank Records

It is undisputed that Somali daycare centers received millions of federal dollars either directly or through various state-sponsored programs funded by federal grants. And since either Minnesota or the federal government made ACH or other electronic payments directly to these businesses, they already know which business bank accounts to pursue. 

By now, the Department of Justice should have issued federal criminal subpoenas for records related to all these accounts. And since banks are typically required to respond to criminal subpoenas within 1 to 2 weeks, the feds already should have lists of which business entities were paid, their business type (C-Corp, S-Corp, LLC, general partnership, etc.), their employer identification number, and lists of authorized account signers. With this data and the accompanying monthly bank statements, tracing disbursements from these business accounts will be the next phase of any investigation.

Of course, if large transfers were made to other bank accounts, the DOJ should repeat the subpoena process until all disbursements are found. If these efforts uncover large cash withdrawals from these accounts, this would indicate large-scale fraud, since legitimate businesses operating in present-day America pay almost all operating expenses electronically or by bank ACH — never by cash. If these centers used paper checks, information regarding who was paid and how much would be readily discernable from copies of cancelled checks.

Employer Tax Filings: Forms W-2, 941, and 1099

In order to have billed the government millions for childcare, all these daycare facilities had to have employees or contractors, because Minnesota mandates strict adult supervisor/child ratios. 

Under these rules, the maximum ratio for infants per adult is 4:1, for toddlers it’s 7:1, and for preschoolers it’s 10:1. Consequently, a center would need 77 full-time attendees, active for 12 consecutive months, to achieve a $1 million annual bill rate, based on the average daycare cost ($1,094 per month) per a 2024 study by Child Care Aware of America. And under Minnesota staffing regulations, the center would need eight to eleven full-time adult employees to achieve $1 million of annual revenue. 

We can do similar calculations for if the center caters exclusively to infants, which are billed at a higher rate.   

We can also pull employer tax filings for the duration these businesses were receiving funds from the government. Under federal employment law, any business with a W-2 employee must file Form 941 quarterly. This tax form lists all employee names, their Social Security numbers, the total Social Security and Medicare wages paid to each employee, the total number of employees paid, and the amount(s) of federal income and FICA taxes withheld during each reporting period. And if these centers failed to file Form 941, hefty IRS fines would be due. 

But, if these centers willfully failed to file these employer forms, the failure to file becomes a criminal misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 ($100,000 for a corporation) and up to one year in jail per violation. And if the business entity failed to file these forms to conceal a larger fraud, noncompliance becomes a felony tax evasion case. In such cases, penalties escalate to a $100,000 fine ($500,000 for a corporation) and five years in prison per count.

In addition to the employer filings, each employee must receive a W-2 form annually. Moreover, the willful failure to provide said form to an employee could result in an additional fine of up to $630 per occurrence, without a cap. And if these daycare centers used contract labor, they would be required to file Form 1099 annually for each contractor who received more than $600. Again, if these centers operated using contract labor and willfully failed to issue W-9s, they would also be fined up to $630 per missing form, without limit. All of this data should be subpoenaed as well.

If these daycare centers were legitimate, they must have employees. And we would now have two data sources to prove if employees existed. First, payroll data showing payments either directly to employees or through a payroll processing agency, both easily identifiable from disbursements on the monthly bank statements. Second, the federal tax filings showing who was paid what and what FICA taxes were withheld. 

If there were no employees, fraud occurred. If there were employees, did the proper federal tax filings occur? If not, even a mediocre federal prosecutor fresh out of law school should have little problem achieving a tax fraud conviction.

Keep reading

Republicans Introduce OMAR Act to Deal With Corruption in Congress

Republican members of Congress introduced legislation at the end of last month meant to target colleagues suspected of using campaign funds for personal and familial benefit.

The bill is known as the Oversight for Members And Relatives Act — also known as the OMAR Act — and was filed by Reps. Tom Tiffany and Tony Wied, both Republicans from Wisconsin.

The OMAR Act would prevent campaign funds from benefiting spouses of lawmakers and require that candidates disclose any payments made to immediate family.

Blaze Media, which broke the news of the bill, noted that Rep. Ilhan Omar, a Democrat from Minnesota, reportedly shelled out $2.8 million to a political consulting firm owned by her husband during the 2019-2020 campaign season.

That payment was almost 70 percent of her disbursement for the quarter.

“Public office should never be used to pad a family’s bank account,” Tiffany told Blaze Media.

“For years, members of both parties have blurred ethical lines by paying their spouses with campaign funds and labeling it ‘campaign work.’”

The OMAR Act would meanwhile end the practice and return “integrity to a system that’s been abused for far too long.”

Wied added to Blaze Media that “members of Congress are sent to Washington to represent the interests of their constituents — not to line their spouses’ pockets with campaign funds.”

“We’ve seen far too many egregious examples of politicians exploiting loopholes for personal gain, and the American people are sick of it,” he continued.

“I’m proud to stand with Rep. Tiffany to introduce the OMAR Act and put a stop to these shady practices once and for all.”

Omar has provoked controversy for her net worth surging while in office — a development related to her husband’s private-sector work, according to a report from Fox News.

eStCru LLC, a winery in California, surged from between $15,000 and $50,000 in 2023 to between $1 million and $5 million in 2024.

Keep reading

China calls on banks to limit exposure to US debt – Bloomberg

China has urged its banks to curb their exposure to US government debt, citing market volatility and growing financial and geopolitical risks, Bloomberg has reported citing people familiar with the matter.

Over the past decade, China has steadily trimmed its US Treasury holdings, a shift that has seen it overtaken by Japan and the UK as the largest foreign holders of American debt. Since peaking at around $1.3 trillion in 2013, its holdings have fallen roughly by half to about $650–700 billion, reaching levels not seen since 2008.

Beijing has advised China’s major financial institutions to limit new purchases of US government bonds and reduce positions where exposure is high, according to sources who spoke to the outlet on Monday. The guidance reportedly does not apply to Beijingss’s official state holdings.

According to the report, which cited China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Chinese banks held about $298 billion in dollar-denominated bonds as of September. It is unclear how much of that total consisted of US Treasuries.

The guidance, reportedly intended to diversify market risk, came ahead of last week’s phone call between Chinese President Xi Jinping and his US counterpart, Donald Trump. In October, the two leaders agreed to a one-year trade truce, under which tariffs and export controls on each other’s goods would be lowered.

Keep reading

Pesticide Industry Infiltrates MAHA to Derail Reforms

During the 2024 presidential campaign, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. endorsed Donald Trump’s bid to return to the White House as the best chance to deliver his long-promised health revolution.

In the final weeks of the race, the former environmental attorney urged voters to back Trump in order to advance a reform agenda aimed at eliminating harmful substances from America’s agriculture and food supply, particularly the herbicides and insecticides sprayed on most fruits and vegetables.

“Don’t you want healthy children, and don’t you want the chemicals out of our food, and don’t you want the regulatory agencies to be free from corporate corruption?” Kennedy thundered at an October 2024 rally in Glendale, Arizona. Moments later, Trump promised to empower his ally to investigate the “toxins in our environment and pesticides in our food.”

“We’re going to ban the worst agricultural chemicals” and “remove conflicts of interest” from top farm and food safety agencies, Kennedy pledged days later.

Those promises have since fallen by the wayside.

The administration has reapproved the cancer-causing weedkiller dicamba, deleted references to pesticides from its “Make America Healthy Again” action plan, and delayed enforcement of limits on so-called “forever chemicals” in drinking water. There has been no meaningful action on controversial pesticides Kennedy previously warned about, including neonicotinoid insecticides and glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup—which he once called “one of the likely culprits in America’s chronic disease epidemic.”

Meanwhile, representatives of pesticide and chemical companies have flooded into key regulatory roles. Former lobbyists Douglas TroutmanNancy BeckLynn Ann DeklevaScott HutchinsKelsey Barnes and Kyle Kunkler now occupy senior positions overseeing agriculture and environmental policy.

What happened?

Keep reading

Top barrister Mark Dennis accused of possessing child abuse material is found dead

A prominent criminal barrister who was allegedly caught with child abuse material has reportedly been found dead.

Mark Dennis SC, 65, stepped off a flight from South-East Asia at Sydney Airport in January and was stopped by Australian Border Force officers, who pored through his phone, tablet, laptop, and a USB.

They allegedly found child abuse material and sexualised conversations with and about minors, and he was subsequently charged with possessing, distributing and importing child abuse material. 

On Monday after 7.30pm, police were called to his Inner West home where the barrister’s body was found, The Daily Telegraph reports.

The Daily Mail has contacted NSW Police for comment. 

Australian Border Force officials intercepted Dennis at the airport in January and searched his luggage following ‘intelligence led screening’.

‘The matter was reported to the AFP for further investigation,’ the Australian Federal Police said in a statement on Wednesday.

‘AFP members attended and on further examination of the device, identified alleged child abuse material and sexualised conversations with and about minors.’

Keep reading

It’s Not Just Pakistan – Foreigners from Around the World Who Are Not US Citizens Can Register to Vote in US Elections

As The Gateway Pundit reported on Friday, the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s office in California help a news conference 2023 on illegal voting in their California community.

The San Joaquin Sheriff’s Office found 41 sealed, completed, mail-in ballots in the home of Lodi City Council member Shakir Khan. There were a total of 71 voter registrations tied to his address, phone, or email.

Khan targeted members of the local Pakistani immigrant community (including elderly individuals unfamiliar with U.S. voting processes), pressuring them, forging signatures, filling out ballots, and submitting fraudulent registrations.

The San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Captain told reporters at the time that voting records revealed people outside of the country, in Pakistan, were allowed to vote in the California elections.

The Sheriff’s  Captain revealed this during a press conference in September 2025.

Sheriff’s Captain: “The way the voting system is structured, we see quite a few flaws. You’re able to register and cast a vote if you don’t live in the country as evidence of his brother in Pakistan.

I think we have some evidence of two or three other people out of the country that are voted? Is that correct? Yeah, approximately two or three other people out of the country, as well as people residing outside of the district.

The online voter registration system, it seems to be an honor system. Anybody can put information in there to register to vote. All you have to do is click a box and say that you’re not lying, and then you’ll get an email from the Secretary of State or something in the mail saying, Thank you for registering to vote. And there you are. Once you’re on the voter rolls, anytime an election comes around, guess what? You get mailed a ballot, right? You get mailed something to vote. So we found that a little bit problematic.

Keep reading

Buried in DOJ Files: Epstein Was a Fixer for Rothschild Banking Dynasty

By the summer of 2016, Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t just a well-heeled fixture working the back rooms in the corridors of power—he was a screaming red flag, a multiple convicted sex offender whose dodgy 2008 plea deal for procuring underage girls had already damaged his brand across elite political and financial circles. But not all elite circles. In fact, he was still a go-to partner for the very highest echelons of global power. While digging deeper into the voluminous Epstein Files, a stunning email emerged— to one of Europe’s most formidable bankers, Ariane de Rothschild, the steely head of the Edmond de Rothschild Group. Jeffrey was laying out fiduciary advice as if he were her personal oracle. This correspondence wasn’t the sterile back-and-forth of distant professionals. Rather, it was more like old confidants navigating a epic storm together.

On July 20, 2016, Epstein fired off a link to an article about the erupting 1MDB scandal in Malaysia, where billions had been siphoned from the sovereign wealth fund into a vortex of luxury yachts, Hollywood films, and shadowy international bank accounts. He didn’t just share the news—he provided her with a link to a New York Times article about the 1MDB scandal, before dispensing advice, warning her how American prosecutors might scrutinise her every move in relation to this massive scandal.

Ariane, typing from Luxembourg amid a tense board meeting with lawyers, shot back with raw urgency: “If I don’t go, I die. What do DOJ guys prefer?”(EFTA02456252). It was the cry of a woman cornered, turning not to her army of high-priced attorneys but to a man whose own history reeked of exploitation and evasion.

Keep reading

Trump Reportedly Gives ‘Green Light’ to New UAP Investigations

President Trump has allegedly instructed the Department of Defense to allow outside access to several of the nation’s most secretive military sites. Missouri Congressman Eric Burlison, a member of the House Oversight Committee, is seeking physical evidence of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) following whistleblower testimony regarding non-human craft.

During an interview on the Aliens Last Night podcast, Burlison claimed the White House has backed his request to visit Area 51, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Naval Air Station Patuxent River, and AUTEC in the Bahamas. He also mentioned a massive and classified object located outside the US that is allegedly housed within a large structure. Burlison stated that he intends to verify claims of archived records, unusual materials, and biological remains.

While the Pentagon officially denies possessing extraterrestrial technology, Burlison asserts that the administration is now prioritizing transparency. This push for access follows accounts from whistleblowers such as David Grusch, which Burlison cites as the catalyst for his investigation. Though rumors circulate regarding a formal disclosure announcement on July 8, 2026—around the anniversary of the Roswell incident—official confirmation is pending.

Keep reading