On December 4, 2025, a federal grand jury in Virginia declined to indict Letitia James a second time in her mortgage-fraud case.
This marks the second time prosecutors have failed to move charges against her forward in recent weeks.
James celebrated on Twitter/X with staggering hypocrisy, declaring “As I’ve said from the start, these charges are baseless. It’s time for the weaponization of our justice system to stop.”
The case dates back to an October 9, 2025 indictment, which charged James with bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution.
Prosecutors alleged that when she purchased a home in Norfolk, Virginia, in 2020, she misrepresented the property’s status, claiming it would be a “second home” rather than a rental, thereby qualifying for more favorable mortgage terms she was not entitled to.
However, on November 24, 2025, a Clinton-appointed federal judge, Cameron McGowan Currie, dismissed the indictment.
She claimed that the interim U.S. attorney who brought the charges, Lindsey Halligan, was found to have been unlawfully appointed and thus lacked authority to prosecute.
Undeterred, the Justice Department re-presented the case to a new grand jury just 10 days later. But the second grand jury declined to indict.
Sources familiar with the proceedings told reporters that while this constitutes a setback for prosecutors, the door is not shut, that another grand jury or a different prosecutorial strategy remains possible.
This sequence underscores the difficulty in prosecuting Democrat officials for wrongdoing.
You must be logged in to post a comment.