Biden On Trump: ‘We Gotta Lock Him Up’

During a Tuesday visit to a Democrat Party campaign office in Concord, New Hampshire, Sleepy Joe Biden told Americans, “We gotta lock him up,” when referring to GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.

The recently replaced Democrat candidate claimed Trump would send the government to “shoot” and “kill” his political opposition, adding, “I know this sounds bizarre. If I said this five years ago, you’d lock me up. We gotta lock him up!”

After the crowd loudly cheered on the notion of arresting Trump, Biden realized his mistake and added, “Politically, lock him up.”

The wild assertion that Trump would have his political enemies shot by armed forces comes as dozens of other prominent Democrats have pushed a similar narrative over the past few months.

Democrat Party strategist James Carville on Monday told MSNBC viewers Trump has publicly stated he will “use the military to arrest political enemies” and wants “to get rid of the Constitution.”

The Trump quote being misinterpreted came from a Fox News interview over the weekend where Maria Bartiromo asked if he’s worried about foreign nations causing a disruption in the U.S. if he’s elected.

He responded, saying “in terms of election day,” illegal immigrants rioting or sleeper cells being activated are less likely scenarios than far-left citizens who previously freaked out when he took office being activated by their Deep State controllers.

Speaking about the “radical left lunatics,” Trump explained, “I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within. Not even the people who have come in and are destroying our country… I don’t think they’re the problem in terms of election day, I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary National Guard, or if really necessary by the military because they can’t let that happen.”

Keep reading

Kamala Says Her ‘Team of Experts’ is Prepared if Trump Declares Victory Early, as Election Tabulation Could Drag On for Days, if Not Weeks

Once again, Election Night might not give Americans the answers they’re waiting for, as Democrats seem to be paving the way for weeks of ballot counting.

Kamala Harris seems ready to exploit this uncertainty, warning that her “teams of experts” are preparing for a scenario where President Donald Trump declares victory early, well before every last mail-in ballot is counted.

In Pennsylvania, Secretary of State Al Schmidt has essentially admitted that his state is woefully unprepared. According to Schmidt, Pennsylvania will once again take days, if not weeks, to count ballots due to outdated laws preventing officials from processing mail-in ballots until Election Day itself.

Meanwhile, in Georgia, the controversial Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is extending the timeline, announcing that overseas ballots won’t be fully collected until three days after the election.

Arizona is now calling for “patience” that could stretch for nearly two weeks, according to election officials in Maricopa County, Phoenix.

If this all sounds familiar, it’s because it’s a replay of 2020—just with more delays, more excuses, and more opportunities for questionable late-night ballot dumps.

In an NBC interview, Harris sounded the alarm, saying she’s prepared for the possibility that Trump will declare victory before all the votes are counted.

Hallie Jackson: We are sitting here two weeks away from election night. Last election, the former President came out on election night and declared victory before all the votes were counted. What is your plan if he does that again in two weeks?

Kamala Harris: Well, let me say this. We’ve got two weeks to go, and I’m very much grounded in the present in terms of the task at hand. We will deal with election night and the days after as they come, and we have the resources, the expertise, and the focus on that as well.

Hallie Jackson: So your team is ready to go? Is that what you’re saying? Are you thinking about that as a possibility?

Kamala Harris: Of course. This is a person, Donald Trump, who tried to undo a free and fair election, who still denies the will of the people, who incited a violent mob to attack the United States Capitol, and 140 law enforcement officers were attacked. Some were killed. This is a serious matter. The American people are, at this point, two weeks out, being presented with a very, very serious decision about what will be the future of our country.

And it includes whether we are a country that values a president who respects their duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States,” she said. “Donald Trump has said he would terminate the Constitution of the United States. The American people are being presented with a choice here about whether we want a president who understands that America must stand strong as a leader around the globe or an individual in Donald Trump who openly admires dictators.

Keep reading

‘Witches’ Trying to Cast Spells on Trump Upset He Has ‘Some Kind of Protection Around Him’

Hexes cast against Donald Trump don’t appear to be effective possibly due to a circle of protection around him, “witches” complained on a Reddit forum.

According to a post highlighted by X user @Reddit_lies, a screenshot from Reddit’s “r/WitchesVsPatriarchy” forum shows one “witch” recommended possible ways to circumvent Trump’s spiritual protective armor.

“Would today be a good day for a freezer spell?” the user asked.

“Some other witches have mentioned that doing spells directly against tRrump are not as effective as we might hope as he seems to have some kind of protection around him,” states the screenshot, which says it was published 90 days ago.

The post continued: “A freezer spell against Project 2025 would likely be useful, but I wouldn’t give the cheeto any more attention right now (He hates to be ignored, right? lol).”

According to X’s AI bot Grok, a “freezer spell” is “a type of spell intended to stop, freeze, or slow down certain energies, situations, or behaviors.”

“Typically, you would write the name of the person or the situation you want to freeze on a piece of paper,” Grok describes, adding, “Some practitioners might use a photograph or a personal item associated with the target,” which are then put in a Ziplock bag and placed in a literal freezer.

The Reddit user went on to say additionally casting protection spells over the Democrats wouldn’t be a bad idea.

“A lot of people are taking the opportunity to do protection and uplifting kinds of spells to help Kamala & the Democrats, rather than attacking the other side. An awesome spell that can be repeated many times is the Blue Wave Spell,” the user says linking to a Substack describing how to conduct the spell.

For his part, Trump has credited the “hand of God” with saving his life during an assassination attempt in Butler, Pa., on July 13.

Keep reading

On the Constant, Unrelenting and Unhinged Anti-Trump Propaganda of the German Media

Pollsters periodically ask Germans which American presidential candidate they would support, were they in a position to vote. Last July, 79% said they would vote for Kamala Harris; only 13% would vote for Donald Trump. The numbers are typical: Barack Obama claimed 71% support in a similar poll from 2008 and Hillary Clinton enjoyed 82% support in 2016. Right now, Green voters split 99% for Harris, Social Democrat voters 92%, nominally centre-right CDU/CSU voters 89%, market-liberal FDP voters 85%, and voters for the old-school leftist Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht party 52%. Across the entire German political landscape, only Alternative für Deutschland voters would support Trump by a thin majority of 51%. Even here, one-in-four are undecided, and the remaining one-in-four would vote for Harris.

You might be tempted to argue that differing national interests explain this, but I don’t think that argument works. It’s far from obvious that a Harris administration would further the interests of the German people. The war in Ukraine and the associated bombing of Nord Stream, for example, were both enthusiastically supported by Joe Biden specifically, and they proved catastrophic for the Federal Republic. What is really going on here is much subtler: Many Germans know English, but consuming foreign-language material is a pain and relatively few have any direct contact with Trump’s debates, his speeches or sympathetic English-language reporting. We learn about American presidential campaigns primarily through our media, and Germany has a vast state-adjacent media industrial complex in much the same way that the United States has a vast state-adjacent military industrial complex.

Keep reading

Kamala Almost Stumbles Into ‘Deplorables’ Moment During Michigan Campaign Event

Kamala Harris almost stumbled into a ‘deplorables’ moment during her campaign event in Michigan, before awkwardly catching herself at the last moment.

Harris appeared alongside Liz Cheney during a town hall event in Royal Oak, Michigan.

“The notion over the last several years coming from Trump and those who follow him,” said Harris.

She immediately clarified by asserting, “Meaning people like who he’s running with, not his voters, just others, erm…,” sounding incredibly uncomfortable.

By referring to “those who follow him,” Harris was almost certainly referring to Trump supporters and not people like JD Vance, since Vance is Trump’s running mate, he’s not ‘following’ him.

During last week’s grilling by Brett Baier, the Fox News host asked Harris whether she thought Trump supporters were “stupid”.

“Oh, God. I would never say that about the American people. And, in fact, if you listen to Donald Trump, if you watch any of his rallies, he’s the one who tends to demean and belittle and diminish the American people,” she responded.

Keep reading

’60 Minutes’ Claims Trump Lied About Deceptively Edited Kamala Harris Interview

CBS’ 60 Minutes finally issued a statement on Sunday, claiming Donald Trump’s accusation that the show deceptively edited its interview with Kamala Harris earlier this month is “false” two weeks after the segment aired.

“Former President Donald Trump is accusing 60 Minutes of deceitful editing of our Oct. 7 interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. That is false,” the press release stated.

The statement went on to admit they edited Harris’ answer to a question about Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, but argued the alteration was not deceptive.

60 Minutes gave an excerpt of our interview to Face the Nation that used a longer section of her answer than that on 60 Minutes,” the CBS program wrote. “Same question. Same answer. But a different portion of the response. When we edit any interview, whether a politician, an athlete, or movie star, we strive to be clear, accurate and on point. The portion of her answer on 60 Minutes was more succinct, which allows time for other subjects in a wide ranging 21-minute-long segment.”

Proving the mainstream media show’s message is political in nature, the statement went on to attack GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.

60 Minutes added, “Remember, Mr. Trump pulled out of his interview with 60 Minutes and the vice president participated. Our long-standing invitation to former President Trump remains open. If he would like to discuss the issues facing the nation and the Harris interview, we would be happy to have him on 60 Minutes.”

The network can claim it didn’t try to manipulate the footage to make Harris’ answer more palatable, but readers can come to their own conclusions when comparing the longer answer aired on Face the Nation to the response aired by 60 Minutes.

Keep reading

No, Trump Did Not Endorse a Military Assault on People ‘Simply Because They Oppose His Candidacy’

“Never before has a presidential nominee—let alone a former president—openly suggested turning the military on American citizens simply because they oppose his candidacy,” New York Times reporters Lisa Lerer and Michael Gold say in a “news analysis” published on Tuesday. They are referring to former President Donald Trump’s comments in a Fox News interview with Maria Bartiromo on Sunday. Yet nowhere in that interview did Trump suggest that “the military” should be deployed against American citizens “simply because they oppose his candidacy.”

Bartiromo asked Trump whether he was “expecting chaos on Election Day” if “you win.” Elaborating on that possibility, she mentioned “outside agitators,” “50,000 Chinese nationals in this country,” “people on the terrorist watch list,” and “13,000 murderers”—alluding to the former president’s false claim about “convicted illegal alien murderers” who supposedly “are now on the loose.”

Keep reading

Voters in Pennsylvania Receive Threatening Letters Warning ‘There Will Be Consequences’ For Supporting Trump

Pennsylvania residents with Trump signs in their yard are reportedly receiving disturbing letters warning them that “there will be consequences” for supporting former President Donald Trump.

“We know where you live, you are in the data base,” the anonymous author states in the letter, first obtained by The Post Millennial. “In the dead of a cold winters night, this year, or next and beyond, there is no knowing what will happen. Your property, your family may be impacted, your cat may get shot. And more.”

The threatening message was written on a “Trump 2024” letterhead, and began with “a quick note of thanks for being engaged in the election and for your participation in the process.”

The author then says he is “writing with a concern about the level of political violence in the country during this election year as well as the threats to our democracy and freedoms,” and asks recipients  to “take a close look at the truth, facts and the future for a better America where we can all live in harmony together.”

From there, the letter devolves into an anti-Trump screed not terribly different in style from the campaign rhetoric of most Democrats, including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

“Your candidate is a felon, rapist, desecrator, an immoral flawed man,” the letter states. “He is a major reason violence [i]s up, remember January 6th and Charlottesville? By supporting him, you are declaring your public support for a disregard of the law, civil discourse and unity. You are indicating your hatred for minorities, immigrants, foreigners, women, education, the rights of your fellow citizens, the rights of women to make decisions over their own healthcare needs.”

The unhinged author even dinged Trump for disliking Harris-supporting pop star Taylor Swift, insisting she “has contributed nothing but joy to the world.”

The letter writer then issued an chilling “reminder that your visible support comes with a price and at a cost,” and “There will be consequences,” before threatening recipients that their property, families, and even cats could be impacted by their vote for Trump.

“Your vote for this guy is seen as treading on my rights. You tread on me at your peril, motherf-cker. We look forward to visiting in the future,” the message concluded. It was signed” “Sincerely,  Patriotic citizen and a true  American.”

Keep reading

Obama Pushes Lies About Trump’s Mental State After Covering Up Biden’s Actual Dementia for Years

Obama is campaigning for Kamala Harris in Arizona and of course, he is lying.

Obama has the nerve to suggest that there’s something wrong with Trump’s mind after he actively covered up Joe Biden’s very real dementia for years. Obama was campaigning with Joe Biden right before the left decided he had to be replaced. He knew how bad Joe was.

And remember, this is the party that claims to care very deeply about disinformation.

From Mediaite:

Obama then pointed to a recent town hall Trump held, where he ended up swaying back and forth on stage as music played for 40 minutes.

“Let me explain because I’ve done a lot of town hall meetings,” Obama continued. “The point of a town hall meeting is to take questions. He just decided, you know what, I’m gonna stop taking questions and then he’s swaying to ‘Ave Maria’ and ‘Y.M.C.A.’ for about half an hour. Folks are standing there, not sure what’s happening. Can you imagine if I did that? Can you imagine if Ruben did that?”

After making a crack about how their playlists would be better, Obama pulled the grandpa card on Trump.

“He called himself ‘the father IVF,’” he added. “I do not know what that means. You do not either. He said January 6th was ‘a day of love’… You would be worried if your grandpa was acting like this. No, no. I’m not joking. You would, right? You’d call up your cousins and you’d say, ‘Have you noticed?’”

Keep reading

Newsweek Misleads Millions With Trump-Nazi Story, Sparking Swift MAGA Backlash

A recent boat parade in Florida supporting President Donald Trump took an unexpected turn when a vessel flying Nazi flags appeared among the flotilla. 

The incident, which quickly went viral on social media, has sparked debate about the true identity of the flag-bearers and the response from other parade participants.

The event, which took place off the coast of Florida, was initially reported by Newsweek with a headline suggesting that Nazi symbols were openly displayed at the Trump boat parade. 

“Swastika Flags Flown During Trump Boat Parade in Florida,” the headline read.

This framing led to widespread sharing of images and videos on social media platforms, with many users quick to draw connections between the Trump supporters and Nazi ideology.

Keep reading