DEI Continues: DOJ Discovers Discrimination Against Whites and Asians at Ohio State Medical School Despite Supreme Court Ruling

The Department of Justice announced Wednesday that Ohio State’s medical school was found to have discriminated against white and Asian applicants in violation of federal law.

The DOJ’s Civil Rights Division cited admissions practices for the 2023, 2024, and 2025 incoming classes, saying that the school violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on color or race, according to a news release.

The Justice Department also mentioned the 2023 Supreme Court decision of Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, which effectively banned affirmative action.

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said, “Despite SFFA, OSU Med allows some applicants to bypass its own screening process and skip interviews solely because of the color of their skin.”

“A university’s admissions process, and all its stages, should apply equally to all applicants regardless of race,” she continued. “The use of a separate admissions process based on race is plainly illegal under federal law, and this Department will not allow these appalling practices to continue at OSU Med or any other federally funded higher ed institution.”

The release went on to describe how OSU used a “Holistic Approach” as a workaround to admit so-called “underrepresented minorities.”

In addition, the medical school’s admissions process has an interview stage, but the DOJ discovered that black applicants who are screened and interviewed “are about 2.8 times as likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with equal credentials.”

Keep reading

Google Didn’t Invent This Racial Double Standard, but It Learned It

I stumbled upon a video where a conservative podcaster asked Google about racial preferences in choosing a doctor and received wildly different responses when she asked if it was okay to prefer a white doctor. Rather than take her word for it, I tried it myself to see if I had a similar experience.

I asked Google, “Is it okay to prefer a black doctor?” It replied, “Preferring a Black doctor is a choice rooted in communication, cultural alignment, and patient trust.” Yep, it went there with the capitalization of “black,” too.

Next, I asked, “Is it okay to prefer a Latino doctor?” The reply I received was, “Selecting a doctor who shares your background or speaks your language is a personal choice that many patients make for comfort and communication.”

When I asked, “Is it okay to prefer a white doctor?” I got this response: “Selecting a doctor based on race involves distinct ethical considerations depending on the context. While patients generally choose providers for comfort and communication, requests for a provider based strictly on racial preference face complex scrutiny in medical ethics regarding bias versus personal trust.”

In other words, asking for a minority doctor is understandable, particularly in terms of “cultural alignment” or looking for a doctor who “shares your background or speaks your language.” But ask about a white doctor, and you get a lecture on “ethical considerations” and “bias.”

I asked the same question with religious framing. A Muslim doctor could be a good choice for “communication comfort, shared values, and modesty considerations.” Choosing a Jewish doctor “involves considerations of personal comfort, communication, and shared life experiences.” Likewise, seeking out a Christian doctor “is a personal choice that many patients make to align their healthcare with their shared religious values and worldview.” So the bias isn’t there when it comes to faith.

Keep reading

Why is Ottawa’s anti-racism fund paying $217,200 for an Atlantic ‘inclusive politics’ project?

Canadian Heritage’s anti-racism fund has committed $217,200 to the PEI Coalition for Women’s Leadership for a project called the Atlantic Alliance for Inclusive Politics, under an agreement listed as running from April 6, 2026 to March 30, 2028, according to the federal grants disclosure. The coalition’s interim executive director is Hannah Bell, who sat in the Prince Edward Island legislature as a Green Party member from 2017 to 2023 and ran for the provincial Green leadership in 2025, finishing with 147 votes.

The grant record describes the project only as “Multiculturalism and Anti-Racism Program – CAHAP – Projects”. A July 22, 2026 call for applicants on the coalition’s website says “The Atlantic Alliance for Inclusive Politics is a project to address rising hate, harassment, and the exclusion of marginalized people from political spaces in Atlantic Canada.” The only component advertised so far is a youth advisory council: “A minimum of three members per province”, “One year, with four group online meetings overall”, a “$250 honorarium” each, and “Themes discussed will include experiences and impacts of polarization, hate, and racism.” The page says “This project funded by the Government of Canada.” No Canadian Heritage news release announcing the grant could be found.

Rebel News listed the grant on October 16 among 78 anti-hate projects worth $11 million. The programme’s stated objectives are to “advance anti-racism, foster ethnocultural diversity and inclusion and promote intercultural and interfaith understanding” and to “provide equitable opportunities for equity-deserving populations”; its page does not mention political participation. Nothing on the record ties the project to any party.

The coalition, known until September 2024 as the PEI Coalition for Women in Government, has received federal money before: $246,557 from Status of Women Canada in 2015 for a project on women on provincial agencies and boards, and $360,000 announced by Women and Gender Equality Canada in February 2021 for capacity building and governance.

Marc Miller was Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture, the minister for Canadian Heritage, when the agreement started, appointed by Prime Minister Mark Carney on December 1, 2025. The department’s organizational chart lists Annalisa Bonardi as Acting Director General, Multiculturalism and Anti-Racism.

A group led by a former Green MLA gets $217,200 of anti-racism money for a project on politics whose only advertised piece is a youth council with four online meetings.

Keep reading

In Virginia, Racism and Redlining Are Fueling a Flock Camera Backlash

Local governments in Virginia are under mounting pressure to cancel contracts for surveillance cameras known as automated license plate readers (ALPRs). On October 6, the Henrico County Police Division announced that it would terminate its contract for such cameras after residents shared “legitimate concerns about Flock Safety.” In nearby Richmond, Mayor Danny Avula said on October 13 that the city would cancel its contract with Flock Safety, the most famous purveyor of the cameras, but did not rule out using ALPRs from a different company.

“It is a good first step, but we do need to keep the pressure on the city to not automatically switch to another ALPR vendor,” Richmond Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member Victoria McCullough told Truthout.

DSA activists and residents in Richmond pushing police to ditch the contract have powerful research to point to from elsewhere in the state. In the neighboring Hampton Roads region of Virginia, race and class are the primary predictors of locations where police installed ALPRs, a groundbreaking study found earlier this year.

The study found police were more likely to install ALPRs in majority Black census tracts in each of the nine cities across the Hampton Roads region, an East Coast metroplex with 1.8 million residents and multiple cities, including Norfolk and Virginia Beach. About 80 percent of majority Black neighborhoods contain at least one camera compared to fewer than 40 percent of majority white tracts. ALPR surveillance is also more intense in majority Black neighborhoods, where on average there are four times as many cameras than in white neighborhoods when weighted for population share.

In Virginia Beach, police deployed ALPRs in only five of 76 majority white census tracts (6.6 percent), compared to one of two Black census tracts (50 percent). Black residents of the locality are 7.6 times more likely than white residents to live in a census tract with at least one ALPR. When weighted for the number of cameras deployed in each area, Black drivers in Virginia Beach were roughly eight times more likely than white drivers to be regularly surveilled by Flock-style cameras.

Keep reading

‘It just keeps getting better’: Americans roast Abdul El-Sayed for his research on ‘risks’ of interracial mating

Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the Democrat candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan who has never had a medical practice, is being roasted online now that his own research is unearthed, claiming “risks” for Arab mothers engaged in “interethnic mating.”

El-Sayed the primary author in the 2011 paper titled “Interethnic mating and risk for preterm birth among Arab-American mothers: Evidence from the Arab-American Birth Outcomes Study.”

It examined the negative result of “preterm birth” when people of differing races and ethnicities procreate.

His research focused on Arab mothers having children with non-Arab fathers.

The research alleged: “Genetic factors have been the primary explanation posited for the association between interracial mating (black father, white mother) and risk of adverse birth outcomes. This explanation has built on the well-recognized observation that black race is associated with increased risk for PTB after adjusting for potential medical, psychosocial, and behavioral confounders.”

The study said “interethnic mating was associated with higher risk for PTB and late PTB among Arab-Americans, a growing ethnic group” while indicating “studies about the birth outcomes of Hispanic interethnic couples are needed.”

National Republican Senatorial Committee Communications Director Joanna Rodriguez told the Post Millennial regarding El-Sayed’s research: “It’s ironic that a radical Muslim with documented ties to designated terrorist organizations is scared of interracial mating. Does Abdul El-Sayed stand by his racist fearmongering?”

“No wonder he was so nasty to Usha Vance,” said Will Chamberlain, senior counsel at the Article III Project. “The very concept of brown women marrying white men infuriates him.”

Keep reading

NYC Mayor Mamdani Snubs Yet Another Ethnic Group

Polish Americans across the country hold events and parades to honor Casimir Pulaski, a Polish nobleman and Revolutionary War hero known as the “Father of the American Cavalry.”

But to NYC Mayor Mamdani, a hero of the Revolutionary War is not special enough to warrant distinction.

Mamdani ignored an invitation to attend the Pulaski Day Parade in the city on October 4th. He then tried to cover for the slight by lumping honoring Polish Americans’ contribution to the nation into an upcoming event celebrating the heritage of Eastern Europeans, something many consider a slap in the face because of Poland’s history.

Per The New York Post:

Most Poles identify as Central European and strongly reject any “Eastern European” label — largely because of its historical connection with Soviet communism and the Warsaw Pact.

Adding insult to injury, the socialist mayor then ditched a fresh Gracie Mansion tradition launched by his predecessor Eric Adams — pulling the plug on the annual breakfast reception at Gracie Mansion honoring Polish heritage.

Instead, the Mayor’s Office sent out invites last week for an Eastern European reception on Oct. 22 at Gracie Mansion.

Former Councilman Robert Holden said on X, “Mamdani clearly hates Europeans, especially white New Yorkers. Period. First, he snubbed German-Americans at the Steuben Day Parade.”

“Then Polish-Americans at last week’s Pulaski Day Parade. Now Italian-Americans on Columbus Day..”

“What does that tell you?”

Keep reading

AOC Says Discussing Abdul El-Sayed’s Reported Ties to the Muslim Brotherhood is… RACIST!

Rep Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York recently spoke to a reporter for TMZ in DC – an outlet that is obviously becoming one of her favorites – and explained that talking about Abdul El-Sayed’s alleged family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood is (drumroll please) racist.

To hear AOC explain it, Abdul El-Sayed is a victim here, because his family had some struggles when he was a little boy. Oh and also, if you examine anyone’s life hard enough, won’t you find some questionable connections? She actually tries to make this point.

For the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), this is probably the most important race in this election cycle. They think that if they can drag El-Sayed over the finish line in Michigan, they can do it anywhere in the country. For them, this is an important test case.

From TMZ:

AOC on Abdul El-Sayed – Racist Muslim Brotherhood Claims Are Dirty Politics!!!

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is coming out swinging for Abdul El-Sayed … calling claims linking the Michigan senatorial candidate to the Muslim Brotherhood flat-out racist.

Charlie got AOC on Friday at a Culver’s in Michigan, where she’s been campaigning for El-Sayed … and he asked whether the Muslim Brotherhood controversy was rooted in reality or racism.

AOC didn’t mince words … saying the allegations fall “into racist very clearly” and blasting critics for dragging El-Sayed’s painful family history into politics…

AOC points out El-Sayed’s parents split shortly after he was born, and he grew up without his mother … arguing just about everyone has relatives who’ve made questionable choices, but that doesn’t mean those choices define them.

And AOC isn’t budging on her support … calling El-Sayed “one of the most patriotic people” she’s ever met.

Keep reading

Democrat Senator Accused of Violating Federal Law with Anti-White X Post

Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts has come under attack for a post calling for specific populations to apply for internships.

“I’m hiring motivated and eager interns for the Spring 2027 semester in my Boston office,” Markey posted on X.

“BIPOC, LGBTQ+, working class, veterans, and other underrepresented candidates with Massachusetts ties are encouraged to apply,” he posted.

BIPOC stands for black, indigenous, and people of color.

Many criticized the post.

“Crazy that a United States Senator can openly violate civil rights law on Twitter,” Christopher Rufo wrote on X.

Keep reading

Wisconsin Woman Pretended to be School Teacher So She Could Hurl Racial Slurs at Children, Call Kids Fat, Segregate Students by Race

A Wisconsin woman pretended to be a school teacher so she could abuse white children and segregate the students by race.

Amy Jones, 23, posed as a substitute teacher at Rufus King High School in Milwaukee on September 24.

Jones told investigators she was “bored,” so she went to the high school and told staff that she was a substitute teacher.

Staff at Rufus King High School allowed Jones to substitute teach for the day after eight other teachers called in sick.

Jones admitted to having the ‘birds and the bees” talk with the students in the classroom.

According to the students, Jones screamed at them and abused the white boys in the class. She used “profane language and racial slurs.’

Jones allegedly told the white students that they looked like the type to start school shootings.

The imposter teacher also told the young girls that they looked like hookers.

Jones was arrested and charged with six felony counts and is facing up to 20 years in prison.

WISN reported:

According to Milwaukee County prosecutors, Jones, a former student at the school, entered the building on Sept. 24, told office staff she was a substitute teacher, and was placed in a classroom for the first three periods.

Students reported to a school resource officer that Jones was “using profane language, racial slurs, sexually derogative statements and organizing students by race and gender in class.”

A 16-year-old boy told police, “The teacher was cursing and screaming at the students and that she called a student ‘fat boy,’ asked a student if she wanted to be a stripper or a hooker,” and told two white boys in the class “they were the type of people to start school shootings.”

Students also told police that Jones asked them if they were gay or virgins. At least one student recorded her behavior and shared the video with police.

The school principal told police that eight teachers had called in sick that day, and only seven of those positions were filled. She said she believed Jones “got lucky because there happened to be an unfilled position.”

The principal became aware of the situation during the third period and had Jones escorted from the building.

Keep reading

BBC pays white staff less than ethnic minorities – report 

White employees at the BBC earn less than their ethnic minority colleagues in six of seven salary grades, according to the British broadcaster’s 2025/26 annual report. The figures have raised new questions about the corporation’s drive to promote ethnic minority staff and its possible impact on pay.

According to the BBC’s 2025/26 pay gap report, highlighted by The Telegraph on Wednesday, black, Asian, mixed-race and other ethnic minority employees earn 13.2% more in median hourly pay than white colleagues in the lowest salary band. Even among the broadcaster’s most senior executives, the gap stands at 5.3%.

White employees came out ahead in just one category, where their median hourly pay was 0.6% higher. Across the BBC as a whole, however, white staff still earned 0.7% more, largely because they held a greater share of the highest-paid jobs.

Keep reading