Tag: democrats

Tim Walz Claims Dick Cheney’s Endorsement Is The Same As Taylor Swift’s

During an appearance on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, Tim Walz attempted to defend Kamala Harris’ endorsement by Dick and Liz Cheney, claiming that it is just the same thing as Taylor Swift endorsing her.

“The Cheney thing. Do we really have to do that?” Stewart asked in an exasperated voice, clearly referring to the fact that Dick Cheney has bizarrely gone from being despised by the left as a profiteering warmonger authoritarian to suddenly being painted as some sort of respected wise figure.

Walz initially stumbled around trying to think of a response, but then suggested “it goes broader than that.”

Then came the kicker.

“Bernie Sanders, Dick Cheney, Taylor Swift…” Walz stated before Stewart interjected.

Keep reading

Twenty-Three Questions… One Answer

What the hell is going on with our country?

How can Democrats pretend that Biden is actually fit to be president?

How do they claim they “want to save democracy” when their candidate wasn’t chosen by a single voter?

Why won’t Kamela do debates, press conferences, or interviews?

How can they fund her campaign with almost no donations from the general public?

How can the polls say she is ahead when journalists can’t find more than a handful of supporters at any restaurant in town?

Why do 100,000 people stand in line for hours to attend a Trump rally while Kamilla can’t get more than a few paid busloads to show up?

Why would they pick Tim Walz, the absolute worst governor in the country, to be her vice-presidential candidate?

How come Dems always win close elections?

Why do “machine errors” and “ballot problems” only occur in Republican counties?

Why have the Democrats tried to weaken every election safeguard?

Why don’t they want ballot drop boxes monitored?

Why did they weaken signature verification on absentee ballots?

Why won’t they clean voter rolls of dead people or delete duplicate registrations?

Why do they mail ballots to undeliverable addresses, such as vacant lots, apartments without apartment numbers, or PO Boxes?

Why do they fight laws to keep non-citizens from voting?

Why do they advocate “universal mail-in voting” when every other country that tried it went back to hand counting of paper ballots?

How can they ignore the December poll that says 20% of Americans admit they filled out more than one absentee ballot or completed one for someone else in 2020?

Why do over 60% of Americans feel that “cheating could mar the results of the upcoming 2024 Presidential Election?”

Why won’t they allow anyone to look at the software inside our electronic voting systems?

Why do they jail people who blow the whistle on election fraud?

How could nursing homes achieve a 100% voter turnout rate?

Finally, why do Democrats have such horrible candidates?

One Answer.

Democrats cheat. They have perfected “The Art of the Steal.”

Keep reading

Democrats in tight Senate races run ads touting their work with Trump

Ads have been released that show four Democratic Senate candidates in battleground states either working with former President Donald Trump or agreeing with his messaging as the November election is less than a month away.

Campaign ads for Rep. Elissa Slotkin in Michigan, Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio, Sen. Bob Casey in Pennsylvania, and Sen. Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin focus on the Democratic candidates’ alliance with Trump or his policies, implying that aligning with the former president may benefit their campaigns more than siding with Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris.

While Trump is behind Harris by 1.4 points nationally according to the RealClearPolitics polling average, he leads the vice president in every battleground state.

Slotkin, who is running for Senate, released an ad in which she criticized electric vehicle mandates and promoted manufacturing EVs in the U.S.

“I live on a dirt road, nowhere near a charging station, so I don’t own an electric car,” Slotkin said. “No one should tell us what to buy, and no one is gonna mandate anything. But here’s the thing: If there’s gonna be a new generation of vehicles, I want that new generation built right here in Michigan, not China.”

However, Slotkin voted against the GOP-led bill last month that would have blocked the Environmental Protection Agency’s new emissions standards requiring up to two-thirds of new cars sold to be EVs by 2032.

In Ohio, an ad produced by a PAC for Brown noted that “he wrote a bill that Donald Trump signed to crack down on drugs at the border.”

Meanwhile, a clip of a Casey ad described how the senator “sided with Trump to end NAFTA and put tariffs on China to stop them from cheating.”

In Baldwin’s ad, it says, “Tammy Baldwin got President Trump to sign her Made in America bill. Then she got President Biden to make it permanent.”

The Trump campaign criticized the Democrats’ ads, distancing them from the GOP presidential nominee.

Keep reading

Kamala Harris Comes Up with New Answer When Asked What Policies She Would Have Done Differently Than Joe Biden

Kamala Harris couldn’t even answer a few softball questions from NBC’s Peter Alexander after she delivered remarks in Grand Rapids, Michigan on Friday.

Peter Alexander asked Kamala Harris if there is one policy she would have done differently over the past 3.5 years than Joe Biden.

The last time Kamala Harris was asked this question, she totally bombed and said she would do nothing different.

So she came up with a new answer.

This time, Kamala Harris said, ‘Vice presidents are not critical of their presidents.’

“President Biden said every president has to cut their own path. What is one policy you would have done differently over these last three and a half years than President Biden?” NBC’s Peter Alexander asked Kamala Harris.

“To be very candid with you, even including Mike Pence, vice presidents are not critical of their presidents. I think that really, in terms of the tradition of it and also just going forward, it does not make for a productive and important relationship,” Harris said.

“He has not given you the green light to carve your own path with those comments?” Peter Alexander asked Harris.

Harris responded, “Going forward, there’s no question, and I bring my own experiences and my own life experiences.”

Keep reading

Kamala Harris ‘dear friends’ with Democrat who wanted child porn possession declared a non-felony: report

Presidential candidate and Vice President Kamala Harris is allegedly close to a Democrat who has tried to make possession of child pornography a non-felony, the Daily Caller reported Thursday. That fellow Democrat is Mark Leno, a politician who served in the California State Senate until November 2016 and was known to Harris as a “dear friend.”

Leno wrote legislation that would have allowed pedophiles to possess up to 99 “items” of child porn without being charged with a felony, former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy said in 2006. A compact disc containing 1,000 pornographic images would have been deemed ONE item, the Caller noted, citing analysis from McCarthy.

When the legislation was proposed, McCarthy was sitting as the California Assembly Republican leader and said Bill 50 as it was first conceived would have provided pedophiles with some legal room to satiate their desire to view child porn without being arrested and charged with a felony. 

Leno’s legislation was not embraced even by his fellow Democrats. The Caller noted that Democratic political analyst Pat Caddell told the Los Angeles Daily News: “What the Democrats did on AB 50 was insane, insane—100 exemptions for child porn? They had to figure out this was not good? If this seeps into voters’ minds, my God.’”

The mainstream media also balked, with the Los Angeles Daily News insisting: “Early on, AB 50 was filled with loopholes that would make your skin crawl. For instance, Leno provided an ‘exemption’ from felony charges if a suspect was caught with less than 100 pieces of child pornography. In a creepy all-time low, Assembly Democrats voted for Leno’s plan to go soft on child porn.”

Leno and Harris have remained close for over two decades as social media posts and archived news stories attest. He may have shared an election night dinner in 2003 with Harris.

Keep reading

Will Politicians Toxify Freedom Forever?

The official theme song of the Kamala Harris presidential campaign is “Freedom” by Beyonce. But a more accurate theme would be the Rolling Stones classic, Under my Thumb. Vice President Harris is seeking the presidency as the greatest champion of freedom in modern times. But Kamala-style freedom will only unleash the government, not private citizens.

The original Bill of Rights created a row of bulwarks for citizens to prevent government oppression. In the era of the American Revolution, it was a common saying: “The Restraint of Government is the True Liberty and Freedom of the People.” But Harris and her running mate, Governor Tim Walz, are offering a “freedom,” seemingly inspired by Yugoslavian communist dictator Tito: “The more powerful the State, the more freedom.”

Harris begins by tacitly presuming that politicians must forcibly save humanity. Harris seeks to vastly expand government intervention to supposedly give people true freedom in daily life. Harris’s “freedom” presumes government is irrevocably benevolent—unless you are a bad person who deserves punishment or subjugation or overtaxing. But the definition of “bad” can be endlessly expanded to include anyone who howls about being fleeced, locked down, or muzzled.

Harris-Walz Freedom requires maximum government interference in daily life. Harris called for a merciless crackdown on misinformation, including punishing social media companies that fail to kowtow to Washington. Walz is emphatic that there is no freedom of speech for “misinformation”—a vague notion which can include any statement disapproved by officialdom. When did America’s most distrusted occupation—politicians—become entitled to define truth and to forcibly suppress and punish what they label “misinformation”?

Under the Harris-Walz standard, Americans will only have the freedom to say anything that the government approves. Walz endorsed a 1919 Supreme Court case that upheld imprisoning anyone who criticized military conscription during World War One. The Biden administration was condemned by federal judges for suppressing millions of comments and jokes by Americans about Covid mandates and shutdowns. But according to liberals, that wasn’t censorship because only reactionaries or deplorables complained about pandemic policies. Plus, Fauci is still a saint. 

Mindy Kaling, an actress and emcee for the third night of the Democratic National Convention, invoked “the freedom to work one job and afford your rent.” The Biden administration floated proposals for nationwide rent control and Harris is championing proposals to stop “price gouging.” To achieve true freedom, bureaucrats would commandeer veto power over any contract dealing with housing or food. And when federal price controls caused devastating shortages, that would simply prove that politicians need even more power over daily life. 
At the Democratic National Convention, a Harris campaign video pledged that she would deliver “freedom from extremism.” But that would provide a blank check to suppress any ideas of which politicians disapprove. Newsweek reported last year that the FBI created “a new category of extremists that it seeks to track and counter: Donald Trump’s army of MAGA followers.” To permit politicians to define extremism is to let them preemptively vilify their most dangerous critics. Two years ago, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre asserted, “When you are not with what majority of Americans are, then you know, that is extreme. That is an extreme way of thinking.” This is a definition of extremism that could put the federal crosshairs on most people who visit this website.

Keep reading

Court in Fulton County rules Georgia officials can’t delay, refuse to certify election results

Local election officials in Georgia cannot delay or refuse to officially certify election results, according to a judge in Georgia ruled on Monday.

“Election superintendents in Georgia have a mandatory fixed obligation to certify election results,” wrote Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney in the ruling. “Consequently, no election superintendent (or member of a board of elections and registration) may refuse to certify or abstain from certifying election results under any circumstance.”

McBurney wrote that the U.S. Constitution does not allow an election official to decline to certify the results.

“If election superintendents were, as Plaintiff urges, free to play investigator, prosecutor, jury, and judge and so – because of a unilateral determination of error or fraud – refuse to certify election results, Georgia voters would be silenced,” he wrote. “Our Constitution and our Election Code do not allow for that to happen.”

Julie Adams, a Republican member of the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections, brought the case forward. She argued that her role in certifying the election results is discretionary and not mandatory. 

Keep reading

Creepy Video Of Harris Robotically Reading The Same Script Goes Viral

A video montage of Kamala Harris giving the same speech over and over again at several rallies has gone viral.

Repeating the same speech isn’t out of the ordinary, indeed Donald Trump sometimes uses the same speech for rallies being held on the same day.

The most creepy thing about the video is the fact that Harris uses the exact same mannerisms and movements.

KamalaBot 2000, engage.

Commentator Benny Johnson posted the clip, noting “This is horrifying. It’s all fake. If you fall for this — you’re an idiot.”

Keep reading

How Joe Biden’s fury at being ‘overthrown’ by Kamala Harris now threatens to derail his VP’s campaign

Lingering anger from Joe Biden‘s staffers at him dropping out of the race after a relentless campaign from Democrats to oust him has led to tension with Kamala Harris‘ campaign team, a bombshell report reveals.

Biden, 81, has appeared to undercut Harris at least four times in recent weeks during the critical final stages of the 2024 race that could be one of the closest in history.

He made a surprise White House briefing room appearance during one of her rallies and praised Ron DeSantis‘ response to the hurricanes that devastated his state, while she accused him of playing politics. 

Now a new report from Axios with quotes from 10 anonymous insiders says  resentment from bruised Biden aides has led to friction.

While Biden’s inner circle is throwing its weight behind Harris to beat Donald Trump in November, staffers are still wounded by how their boss was unceremoniously pushed off of the Democratic ticket.

Harris aides claim that the Biden team is deliberately not working with them as a result. 

Keep reading

RNC Scores Major Victory in Lawsuit Exposing Detroit’s Blatant Discrimination — Only 52 Republicans Hired Compared to Over 2,300 Democrats as Poll Workers

In a major win for election integrity, the Republican National Committee (RNC), the Michigan GOP, and Wayne County Republican leaders have successfully challenged the City of Detroit’s blatant disregard for state election laws.

This victory marks a crucial step toward ensuring fairness and transparency in Michigan’s electoral process, which was threatened by the city’s deliberate failure to hire a sufficient number of Republican poll workers.

The lawsuit, brought in August by the RNC, Michigan GOP, and Wayne County Republicans, exposed Detroit’s refusal to comply with Michigan law, which mandates a balanced hiring of election inspectors from both major political parties.

Instead, the city overwhelmingly favored Democratic poll workers, hiring an astonishing seven times more Democrats than Republicans. Out of 675 Republican nominees, only 52 were hired, compared to over 2,300 Democrats.

Keep reading