Everything this nation once stood for is being turned on its head.
We are being asked — no, told — to believe that the greatest threat to America today is not government overreach, endless war, corruption, surveillance, or the steady erosion of constitutional rights.
No, the real threat, it seems, is speech.
Dangerous speech. Hateful speech. Critical speech. Speech that dares to challenge power.
In the wake of the reported assassination attempt on President Trump, the Trump administration has wasted no time advancing a dangerous narrative: that criticism of the president — especially criticism labeling him authoritarian or fascist — is not just wrong, but responsible for violence.
The implication is as chilling as it is unconstitutional: if you criticize the government too harshly, you may be to blame for what happens next.
Taken to its logical conclusion, the government’s argument is this: criticism fuels anger, and anger leads to violence against the Trump administration.
Which means the solution, in the government’s eyes, is simple: silence the criticism — but only when it is leveled at the Trump administration.
When White House officials suggest that calling a president a fascist may constitute libel or slander, they are not merely defending reputations — they are laying the groundwork for criminalizing dissent.
This is how it begins.
This is how republics become regimes.
First, criticism is labeled dangerous. Then it is labeled harmful. Then it is labeled illegal. And before long, it is gone.
Beware of those who want to monitor, muzzle, catalogue and censor speech — especially when the justification is “safety.” Because every time the government claims it must limit freedom to protect the public, what it is really doing is expanding its own power.
The irony is almost too glaring to ignore.
By the standards now being floated by those in power, America’s founders themselves would be considered extremists.
Seditionists. Radicals. Domestic threats.
You must be logged in to post a comment.