Top D.C. Police Officials Face Firing Amid Probe Into Alleged Crime Data Cover-Up

Multiple senior officials in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Police Department are facing termination or discipline as investigations into alleged manipulation of crime statistics intensify.

According to multiple law enforcement sources who spoke with The Washington Post, several high-ranking officers, including two assistant chiefs, have received or are expected to receive disciplinary notices tied to an internal affairs probe into crime data practices.

Assistant Chief LaShay Makal and Second District Commander Tatjana Savoy have been placed on administrative leave.

Both have been linked to the crime statistics investigation, where officials are alleged to have lied or manipulated the city’s crime statistics.

Former Third District Commander Michael Pulliam is also under review.

He was placed on leave in 2025 after allegations that crime classifications in his district were altered. Pulliam has denied wrongdoing but remains subject to possible discipline.

Assistant Chief Andre Wright is facing a separate investigation after allegedly inappropriate text messages were found on his phone. He had already been placed on administrative leave.

The internal probe is focused on whether department supervisors downgraded serious crimes to less severe categories, potentially making crime rates appear lower than they were.

Keep reading

SPLC Indictment Shows Partisan Activists Were Running The FBI Domestic Terror Program

The real Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) scandal isn’t just the indictment. The deeper scandal is that the FBI used a highly partisan activist group as an unelected, unvetted intelligence wing of the federal bureaucracy. For years, the bureau didn’t just consult the SPLC. It folded the group’s ideology into its threat assessments and other work products, then used those products to brand Americans as hateful or flag them as potential domestic violent extremists. 

warned in June 2021 that the Biden administration’s “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism” provided the blueprint for this institutional capture. Specifically, Pillar 1 of the strategy formalized public-private partnerships and relied on “non-governmental analysis” to identify threats. That framework greenlit a backdoor around the Constitution. By treating the SPLC’s partisan analysis as a substitute for sworn evidence, the government laundered ideological narratives into official federal threat assessments. This shadow intelligence partnership was not an accident. 

The FBI’s Richmond memo, better known as the anti-Catholic memo, showed exactly what that pipeline looked like in practice. The FBI used the SPLC’s analysis to define so-called “radical-traditionalist Catholics” by their opposition to abortion, LGBT ideology, and adherence to traditional family values. Sen Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, revealed that one Richmond analyst produced a slide presentation that equated Catholic beliefs in “[c]onservative family values/roles” with ideas “[c]omparable to Islamist ideology.” 

Despite former FBI Director Christopher Wray’s claim that the anti-Catholic memo was the work of “a single field office” with limited distribution, the records tell a different story. Multiple field offices were involved, the memo was distributed to more than 1,000 agents and employees, and congressional investigators uncovered at least 13 more documents using similar SPLC-driven “anti-Catholic terminology.” Ideological narrative laundering became the FBI’s standard practice.

FBI officials themselves recognized the problem. In an internal FBI email exchange, one official asked, “Is anyone really asking for a product like this?” and complained that “[a]pparently we are at the behest of the SPLC.” Another FBI official admitted the FBI’s “overreliance on the SPLC hate designations is … problematic.”

The declassified Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) confirms that the Biden administration didn’t just tolerate outside ideological input from partisan organizations. It established a formal mechanism to solicit “non-governmental” analysis. Under Action 1.1.1c, the plan directs DHS to: “Develop and implement a mechanism for receiving relevant [domestic terrorism]-related analysis and information from non-governmental experts and share that information appropriately and consistently across the U.S. Government.”

Keep reading

Taxpayers Foot STAGGERING £629 MILLION Bill For Foreign Nationals In UK Prisons

UK taxpayers are forking out £629 million a year to house 10,487 foreign national offenders in British prisons — a bill that could pay for 16,500 police officers or 15,000 NHS nurses.

While Labour claims it’s deporting record numbers, an ex-prison governor has torn into the “staggering” cost and the “incredibly slow process” that leaves dangerous foreign criminals draining public resources instead of being sent home. 

This is the direct result of years of open-borders policies that prioritise criminals’ “rights” over British safety.

Reform UK’s Prisons Adviser and former prison governor Vanessa Frake laid it out clearly on GB News. “The cost to this country for foreign national prisoners is staggering,” she said. “It’s a very long, drawn-out process, which kind of goes from three main areas.”

Frake detailed the excuses that keep foreign offenders here: “The problem is a lack of identity documents for these people. Quite often they get rid of their passports, so the Home Office then has to write to the country that they originate from, and that process is very slow.”

“Sometimes the country refuses. And there are of course the ECHR claims. Those under Article 8, right to life, right to family for those who have family in this country and of course, there is administration errors as well,” Frake further explained.

She added that even recent deals fall short. “They’ve just done a deal with Albania to send 200 prisoners back, but that comes with certain conditions, like improving their prison service, giving them electric Volkswagens, etcetera.” 

Keep reading

There is Nothing Social About Your Social Contract: Why Coercion Can Never Create Harmony

From vaporizing schools abroad to shielding elite predators at home, the state relies entirely on violence. True prosperity begins the moment we stop funding our own destruction.

The concept of the “social contract” is perhaps the most successfully marketed lie in modern history, a phantom agreement you never signed that is violently enforced upon you from birth. To understand the sheer, unadulterated ruthlessness of the people who enforce this contract, you only have to look at how they initiate their geopolitical conflicts. On the very first day of the 2026 war with Iran, the United States military launched a “triple-tap” missile strike that vaporized the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school in Minab, slaughtering over 150 innocent civilians—the vast majority of them young girls crushed under a collapsing roof. The state demands a monopoly on violence, extorting your wealth to fund these atrocities, all while promising to act as your ultimate protector.

When you strip away the patriotic pageantry and the political theater, you are left with a massive, parasitic entity that claims the right to mass murder children abroad while aggressively shielding the most heinous predators within its own ranks. Every time the political class initiates physical harm or steals your property to fund their empire, your quality of life is degraded. It is a mathematical certainty of human interaction that coercion breeds suffering, yet the masses are continuously conditioned to cheer for their own subjugation.

To understand the sheer psychosis required to maintain this centralized authority, one only needs to look at the unhinged escalation currently unfolding in the Middle East. Following the initial strikes, the executive branch dropped all pretense of measured diplomacy and openly threatened the complete eradication of millions more innocent lives. Following a dispute over the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, Trump issued a terrifyingly casual ultimatum, warning that “a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again” if his economic demands were not met. This is not foreign policy; it is textbook terrorism broadcast from the world’s most heavily armed podium.

Keep reading

Did you know the US and Israel helped create Iran’s nuclear project? Here’s the story

What’s 3,000 people killed in Iran, 2,020 killed in Lebanon, 23 in Israel, and more than a dozen in Gulf states after the US launched its war against Iran? “A little Middle East work” that’s going “very well,” US President Donald Trump said at the White House last week during a state dinner for King Charles. 

Trump’s ‘little work’, which involved significant casualties in the region without a clearly defined objective at the outset, was later framed as serving the purpose of ensuring that “Americans and their children would not be threatened by a nuclear-armed Iran.”

Will Charles help Donald make sure there’s nothing – and no one – to allow Iran to work on its nuclear project? It seems like the US will try to level Iran to the ground anyway. According to The Atlantic, the Trump administration began considering strikes aimed not simply at Iran’s military capacity, but at the faction inside the regime that Washington believed was preventing a deal.

Trump even reposted a video by Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen calling for an air campaign along those lines. According to Axios, the military prepared options for a “short and powerful” wave of strikes, which General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, briefed the president on.

The timing is politically delicate. Trump has a state visit to China scheduled for mid-May, a trip that has already been postponed once. If strikes are ordered, they could come before the trip, allowing the president to travel after demonstrating strength. Or they could come immediately afterward, once the diplomatic optics are out of the way.

While Trump supplied the performance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio supplied the doctrine. When Trump spoke of military victory, royal agreement, and Iran never being allowed to possess a nuclear weapon, Rubio framed the same position as strategic necessity: Iran’s government cannot be trusted, its future intentions are already known, and any deal that fails to address the nuclear question is unacceptable.

Keep reading

Federal Aviation Employee Arrested After Threatening to Assassinate President Trump – Faces Up to Five Years in Prison

A federal aviation employee (FAA) based in New Hampshire stands accused of threatening to take out President Trump just days after the last assassination attempt, but may not be in jail for too long if convicted.

As ABC News reported, federal authorities busted 35-year-old Dean DelleChiaie of Nashua and charged him with communicating an interstate threat.

This news comes less than two weeks after a lunatic tried to take out Trump and members of the administration at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

It also comes less than one week after a Pennsylvania Democratic Senate candidate was arrested for threatening to kill President Trump and members of Congress.

DelleChiaie, a mechanical engineer with the FAA, reportedly first conducted searches on his work computer to find out ways to kill Trump and used it to target the president. He also used it to conduct other disturbing searches, including the percentage of people who want Trump gone, how to get a firearm into a federal facility, previous assassination attempts on the president, and the phrase “I am going to kill Donald John Trump.”

ABC reports that the Secret Service met with DelleChiaie in February, and he admitted to making these threats. DelleChiaie also told officers he was depressed, in therapy, regularly drank, and used marijuana and other drugs.

Yet, he remained a free man. Not surprisingly, he then escalated.

Keep reading

Ilhan Omar Faces Potential Legal Trouble After Ignoring Fraud Committee Deadline

Rep. Ilhan Omar is facing fresh scrutiny in Minnesota after a state House oversight committee said she has not complied with a document request tied to the sprawling “Feeding Our Future” fraud scandal.

State Rep. Kristin Robbins, chair of the House Fraud Prevention and State Agency Oversight Committee, has been pressing Omar’s office for records and answers related to the congresswoman’s contacts, public messaging and potential connections to individuals linked to the case. Robbins has argued the committee’s deadline has come and gone without the response she says lawmakers requested.

Omar, a Democrat who represents Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District, has been under pressure for weeks after Robbins accused her of “ghosting” the panel and declining to appear at a state hearing.

Robbins and other Republicans say the committee’s interest centers on Omar’s work around pandemic-era federal nutrition policy and how it intersected with the program that prosecutors say was exploited in one of the largest COVID-era fraud schemes in the country.

The Feeding Our Future case has drawn national attention after federal prosecutors alleged that hundreds of millions of dollars meant for child nutrition were siphoned off through fake meal counts, inflated invoices and coordinated paperwork. While Omar has not been charged in the case, Republicans have pointed to what they describe as unanswered questions and communications they want reviewed.

Keep reading

Far-left brewery owner who wished Trump dead running for governor of Wisconsin

The far-left brewery owner who offered free beer to celebrate President Donald Trump’s eventual death announced that he will seek the Democrat nomination for governor of Wisconsin.

As LifeSiteNews covered on April 27,  Minocqua Brewing Company posted to social media that “either a brother or sister in the Resistance needs to work on their marksmanship or he faked another assassination to get a positive news cycle” after the shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, but “we stand at the ready to pour free beer the day it happens … our celebration of life is going to be legendary!”

The post was met with widespread condemnation by Republicans and even some Democrats, which Minocqua Brewing met with defiance, complaining about “Corporate Dems and politically naive Democratic gubernatorial candidates” for “tak(ing) the bait.”

Now, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that the self-proclaimed “progressive beer” company’s owner, Democrat activist and former Assembly candidate Kirk Bangstad, announced his gubernatorial ambitions on Saturday during a live-streamed event, claiming that the Democrat field so far does not impress him.

“I decided I’m not gonna stand for this anymore and I’m going to run for governor of Wisconsin,” he said. “We need somebody strong to run for governor, we need somebody who is battle-tested and can stand up to Trump, and I’ve been called the Trump of the left. Arguably, I am; I’m just a million times smarter, but I have the showmanship aspect.”

“What we haven’t heard so far is that five-alarm fire from any of the candidates running,” Bangstad said. “What’s important to the polls, if you poll every Wisconsinite, is the cost of eggs are high and the cost of gas is high, which is true, but you ain’t going to fix the cost of eggs if you can no longer vote.”

Wisconsin’s current governor, Democrat Tony Evers, announced last year that he would not seek reelection to a third term, leaving the race wide open for both parties. Currently, there are nine official Democrat candidates (not including Bangstad), the most prominent being former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes; and two Republicans, U.S. Rep. Tom Tiffany and medical service technician Andrew Manske (who says he would not advocate banning abortion), plus six independent candidates.

Keep reading

EU Going To War With VPNs In Bid To “Save The Children”

Western European governments and EU bureaucrats are advancing tighter regulations on VPNs as part of a broader push for “online age verification” and their ‘Chat Control’ agenda.  Privacy advocates and digital rights groups warn that Europe is drifting towards a surveillance and censorship regime similar to internet restrictions and firewalls used by Russia and China.

Last week European Commission Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen suggested that Brussels may need to address the use of VPNs to bypass the EU’s upcoming age-verification systems.  Speaking during a press conference on the EU’s new digital age-verification app, Virkkunen acknowledged that users could circumvent the system with VPNs and stated that preventing such circumvention would be among the ‘next steps’ policymakers need to examine.

Her statements were delivered only two weeks after she shared a stage with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who called for a crackdown on web media companies to “protect children” from dangerous content.  The first stage of their agenda is a government created universal age verification app which web companies will be required to integrate.  Von der Leyen asserts that the new restrictions are designed to “defend children’s rights” (how does restricting access protect rights?).

The Orwellian language of the EU is not coincidental.  “Child vulnerability” is a carefully chosen vehicle to manipulate public approval, opening the door to incremental government management of online content and discourse. 

Keep reading

Trump Surgeon General Pick Dr. Saphier Repeatedly Instructed Americans to Take COVID-19 Shot

President Donald Trump’s nominee for U.S. Surgeon General, Dr. Nicole Saphier, spent the COVID-19 pandemic publicly urging Americans—particularly the elderly and medically vulnerable—to receive the COVID-19 shots.

Dr. Saphier is a board-certified radiologist, Director of Breast Imaging at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (Monmouth), Fox News contributor, and author.

She earned her MD from Ross University, completed residency at Maricopa, and a breast/oncologic imaging fellowship at Mayo Clinic.

Federal safety surveillance data show that COVID injections have become one of the most death-reported and injury-reported pharmaceutical products in modern U.S. history.

Now, as she is elevated for one of the highest health offices in the country, critics argue her role in persuading Americans to accept a pharmaceutical intervention linked to unprecedented reported deaths, hospitalizations, and injuries is not simply controversial.

They argue it is professionally and morally disqualifying.

Keep reading