19 Arrested as Riots Break Out in Spain over Right-Wing Influencer Campus Appearance

Riots broke out once again in Spain on Monday evening in the northern city of Bilbao as far-left activists staged protests to pressure the cancellation of an appearance by a right-wing influencer.

The autonomous Ertzaintza Police force of the Basque Country in northern Spain said that they arrested 19 people in Bilbao as a group of radical activists and students set cars on fire, looted shops and destroyed street furniture.

The protest, according to public broadcaster RTVE, was promoted by leftist groups like the Socialist Youth of the Basque Country and other so-called “anti-fascist” groups opposed to a planned appearance by Spanish conservative commentator Vito Quiles at the University of Deusto.

The call managed to see around 2,000 mostly students attend the afternoon demonstration, the Socialist Youth declaring that “Vito Quiles is NOT welcome” at their campus and that they would “not allow their hatred and intolerance to make their way among the youth.”

Among the 19 arrested were seven minors, according to the broadcaster, in addition to three 18-year-olds and a 19-year-old.

Quiles, who is known for his confrontational journalism and campus speaking tours, claimed that the head of the Ertzaina police had warned him of a “very high” risk of an incident, claiming that members of the ETA (Basque Homeland and Liberty) separatist terror group had helped organise the protests against his appearance.

“Given that there are former ETA members, street terrorists, and other criminals leading the protests, the talk is cancelled,” Quiles said. “Freedom of expression is sacred but no more important than protecting the integrity of all the good young people who attend these events and do not deserve to be exposed to violent situations because of a bunch of scum.”

Keep reading

Stunning Sharyl Attkisson Report: Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, FOX, NY Post Being Shut Out on Yahoo, MSN and other Major Online News Platforms

Award winning journalist Sharyl Attkisson is host of “Full Measure,” which focuses on investigative and accountability reporting. Her show is shown on channels around the country on Sunday morning.

Sharyl is one of the few courageous and honest reporters in American who is willing to give you ALL of the news and just not liberal commentary that floods our airwaves day in and day out.

On Sunday, Sharyl Attkisson ran a segment on Full Measure on how conservative news is being blocked by online platforms like Yahoo and MSN.

This study shows how Breitbart, The Gateway Pundit, FOX News, New York Post, are completely shut out on their news pages.

This is likely criminal behavior.

We all know if they started publishing our reports along with other conservative outlets the fake news would be exposed. So they won’t.

On Sunday Sharyl spoke with David Bozell, the President of the Media Research Center to discuss the results of his platform’s recent study on media bias.

Here is a partial transcript:

David Bozell: I can’t remember the last story that Newsweek ever broke, and there it sits as a top 20 news website in America based solely and almost exclusively on the fact that in the last 6 months that we’ve been doing this, they have been linked to by MSN 524 times.

But more frustrating than the liberal media ecosystem just getting this uplift, there is a total blockade of this emerging conservative media ecosystem. New York Post, goose egg. Breitbart, goose egg. Gateway Pundit, goose egg. The conservative ecosystem is being shut out. The liberal ecosystem is being broadcast to hundreds of millions of people a month. Using the point of entry. Apple News is preloaded on your iPhone, on everyone’s iPhone. Google News is preloaded on your Android. MSN is preloaded on every desktop.

Sharyl Attkisson: According to the research, out of 487 top stories last February on Google News, only 11, or 2.2%, were right-leaning. 314, or 64.5%, were left-leaning. As for Apple News last January, of 620 top stories, there were zero right-leaning stories and 440 left-leaning. Articles on popular websites like Fox News and the New York Post were never promoted. A broader Big Four analysis showed the apps promoted 92% left-leaning outlets and only 17% of right-leaning ones. Have you been able to reach anybody at Apple Google, MSN to ask them questions about how they’re distributing the news?

David Bozell: I sent a letter to Tim Cook at Apple before he— he’s just recently stepped down, but offering to help. It was private correspondence, so I’ll keep it there. But I did. I did. The research is sound. The research has not been disputed. So, but, but that’s been the—

Sharyl Attkisson: Did you get any kind of positive response?

David Bozell: No, no response. Unfortunately.

Sharyl Attkisson: Do you sense this, what you’re describing, is an organized and propagandized effort, or just the way people feel and they’ve been given free rein to express opinions in the news?

David Bozell: I think it’s organized in the sense that it’s universal. Maybe not so much organized, it’s universal. Go get Trump. He cannot succeed. Conservatism The shrinking of government cannot succeed. Making America wealthy again cannot succeed. Protecting the American taxpayer cannot succeed. Exposing fraud cannot succeed. How organized is it? I like to think that the conservative movement has more, better, more fun conspiracy meetings than the liberals do, but certainly there’s gazillions of dollars being funded.

Keep reading

Hillary Clinton Slams Matthew McConaughey Over “Really Unfortunate” Calls to Support Independent Candidates

Failed Presidential Candidate and former First Lady Hillary Clinton appeared on a liberal podcast yesterday, where she slammed actor Matthew McConaughey over recent comments he made, innocently reminding people that they have the right to vote for whoever they want this election cycle.

McConaughey posted a social media video this week, reminding people that they don’t need to vote just Republican or Democrat this November, arguing that “Independents belong in the fight,” while noting, “I’m not telling you who to vote for.”

“They’ve been telling us for years that an independent vote is a wasted vote. Well, a great question for our times is: has that unwasted vote been working out for you?” he said.

“I’m telling you to look at your ballot, study up, see if they represent you, what you believe in, check if they can be that voice of reason in the middle for you, and if they can, treat them like a potential winner because they can be.”

Kara Swisher played the clip and asked Hillary Clinton for her thoughts on her “High Stakes” podcast yesterday.

It was basically a thought crime for Clinton, who suggested that it was irresponsible for McConaughey to use his platform in such a way, “two weeks before a midterm.”

Keep reading

‘Those f**kers gotta go’: Leftists obsess over causing the deaths of … Republicans’ kids!

Democrats and other leftists have engaged in rhetoric endorsing violence for years now.

The result has been multiple assassination attempts on President Donald Trump, and an urging that people should be aiming pistols at Vice President JD Vance.

That ideology of death now has expanded to target other Republicans and even “their children.”

That’s according to the Cougar Chronicle, in Utah, which obtained a recording of a discussion among members of a group People of Provo Against ICE.

The report confirmed they are “fantasizing about murdering their opposition along with their children.”

The report explained that POPAI conversation participants also discussed allowing conservatives to be re-integrated, through “reeducation.”

“Venna Anne, a woman within POPAI leadership, was discussing her dreams in life. When someone told her ‘You just can’t get away from capitalism,’ she responded with ‘No, unless we kill everybody.’ Ashton Hirschi, also in POPAI leadership, told her that they only needed to kill ‘some’ people, initially settling on ‘500.’ Venna said that ‘You also have to kill their children and their [line of succession],'” the report documented.

And, “Ashton conceded the point and said ‘We need to get the politicians.’ When asked if ICE could integrate back into society, Ashton said ‘If you’re talking about politicians or billionaires? No. Those f**kers gotta go. Period and point blank.’ On ‘counter-revolutionaries or MAGA people,’ Ashton said that ‘There’s a possibility for reintegration [into society]. It would have to come through reeducation.'”

A previous audio obtained by the Cougar Chronicle, the publication explained, showed “SDS UVU leader Collin Grannis’s intentions of making it ‘as uncomfortable as possible for people to get in’ to TPUSA’s Charlie Kirk memorial event, was posted to X.”

POPAI’s messaging also allegedly has included “Shoot Trump” stickers.

“On October 15, an article identifying David Chappell, Democratic candidate for Utah House District 62, as a member of POPAI was published,” the report said. “As of the time of writing, Chappell has refused to disavow POPAI… ‘

Keep reading

Radical Liberal Justice Elena Kagan Attacks Supreme Court’s Conservative Majority, Claims Their Rulings Are ‘Destructive to Democracy’ as Midterm Elections Loom

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, one of the Court’s three liberals, took a swipe at her conservative colleagues on Tuesday, accusing the 6-3 majority of undermining American democracy and fueling political polarization by declining to police partisan gerrymandering.

Speaking Tuesday at the Catholic University of America’s law school in Washington, D.C., Kagan blasted conservative-backed rulings on congressional redistricting, voting rights, and campaign finance laws, arguing that the decisions have allowed political parties to manipulate election maps for partisan advantage.

According to Reuters, Kagan claimed the conservative majority had enabled what she described as a race to the bottom in congressional redistricting.

Keep reading

45% Of College Students Justify Violence To Stop ‘Hate Speech’: Survey

A new survey finds that nearly half of undergraduate students support censorship, shout-downs, and physical violence to suppress what they consider “hate speech” or offensive ideas.

Fox News reports that the 2026 National Undergraduate Student Survey, released this month by the Buckley Institute, shows that 45 percent of undergraduate students surveyed believe physical violence can be justified to stop so-called hate speech. That number is up 6 points from 2025 and ties the all-time record set in 2023.

The survey, which polled 803 full-time undergraduate students at four-year public and private colleges across the United States, revealed several record-high metrics concerning free expression on campus, according to Yahoo.

Other takeaways from the survey were that 46 percent of students support shout downs and 40 percent believe that offensive speech should be subject to criminal prosecution.

Some 42 percent of respondents said that political comments they disagree with can be harmful to their mental health, up 4 points from last year; the highest reading in the 5 years this question has been monitored.

The findings prompted Cornerstone University President Dr. Gerson Moreno-Riaño to warn that higher education has “lost its way.”

Moreno-Riaño told Fox News Digital:

American colleges and universities for a long time now have really ceased to form students morally and are teaching resentment, teaching grievance politics, teaching violent entitlement. So, when graduates leave these universities, they leave with that. They’re not leaving with a moral formation of their hearts, their minds, their lives. They’re leaving with resentment.

Moreno-Riaño also cautioned that many colleges and universities are preparing “socialists and Marxists” who want entitlement and to “destroy the system” rather than “build it, make it, refine it and improve it.”

The Cornerstone University president also stressed that American higher education “has to shift,” saying it needs to “take moral formation seriously and not be grounded in entitlement and grievance culture.”

The Buckley Institute survey was conducted online between Sept. 5 and Sept. 14 by Inquire LLC and included 803 full-time undergraduate students under age 25 attending four-year public or private colleges and universities.

Keep reading

The Democrat Party Platform Is Throwing Conservatives In Prison And Slotkin Just Said It Out Loud

en. Elissa Slotkin laid out Democrats’ plans for another round of lawfare against President Donald Trump’s administration in a public interview last week, saying the prosecutions would be a “deterrence message” to scare young conservatives away from politics.

Speaking to students at the University of Chicago, Slotkin said, “The people around Donald Trump … have no immunity the way the president does. … So you go after the people who do his bidding.”

“I want to look at these signature cases and not just focus on the president, but on the people who enabled him,” Slotkin continued. “I want young people coming out of school to say, ‘Should I go work for the Trump administration? Like that sounds fun. I might get an opportunity.’ I want them to be like, ‘Lord, that might be buying myself a ton of problems that I don’t want, and so let me avoid participating in that.’ I want that deterrence message.”

Slotkin then doubled down in a post on X days later: “America must be a place where the rule of law still matters. Those laws should apply to everyone equally. If you have aided in the corrupt use of U.S. taxpayer dollars to benefit the President or his family, or you have violated the law in order to carry out guidance from the President, you should be held accountable.”

“And given how rampant that corruption appears to the average American, people looking to work for his Administration should realize that while the Supreme Court has granted the President immunity, it has not done the same for those who do illegal things at his behest,” her post continued.

The warning followed a September speech Slotkin gave in which she had already identified targets for her lawfare, saying “the goal here is to have a list of ‘signature cases’ that go after some of the most obvious and harmful abuses of taxpayer dollars.” The list of targets includes former DHS secretary Kristi Noem, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, and U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro. Slotkin herself describes these efforts as “retribution.”

She’s not the only Democrat calling for jailing their opposition.

Democrat Senate candidate Angie Nixon said last week that her Republican opponent, former attorney general of Florida Ashley Moody, should be “locked up and punished in jail.”

When asked whether those comments sounded “like a desire to weaponize the justice system,” Nixon told the CBS Face the Nation audience that “it’s not a desire to weaponize the justice system. It’s designed to actually hold corrupt politicians accountable for what they’re doing.”

These recent Democrat promises to continue lawfare are merely the latest in a long series. Last year House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said: “The one thing that should be clear — to all of these Republican extremists and sycophants and the people who are either actively involved in corruption, violating the law, engaged in extrajudicial activity — is that the statute of limitations for any crimes being committed now is five years. It will extend well beyond the end of the Trump administration.”

But the Democrat Party has gone far beyond threatening lawfare. Democrats spent the lead-up to the 2024 election trying to throw President Donald Trump in jail and successfully jailing some of his allies.

New York Attorney General Letitia James — who campaigned on using lawfare to target Trump and called him an “illegitimate president” — accused Trump of inflating his personal wealth to get more favorable loan terms in a case in which there were no victims. A court ultimately found the judgment against Trump to be unconstitutional. The case was so political that even anti-Trump CNN political commentator Jonah Goldberg called the “prosecution … a mistake” and “very political.”

Keep reading

“I Don’t Give a F*ck Who You Are!” El-Sayed Staffer Tries to Assault James O’Keefe and Has to be Restrained in Wild Confrontation

James O’Keefe was almost physically assaulted when he confronted the Abdul El-Sayed campaign staffer who revealed El-Sayed is taking illegal foreign donations.

The O’Keefe Media Group on Monday released an undercover video of a campaign official for Michigan Democrat Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed admitting that El-Sayed knowingly receives illegal donations from overseas.

Foreign nationals are prohibited from making campaign contributions.

“You know, he [Abdul El Sayed] has people from overseas that donate to him,” Abdul Beckwith, Regional Field Organizer for Abdul El-Sayed’s campaign, said.

When asked whether overseas donations were prohibited, Beckwith responded, “No, it is not allowed,” before describing a hypothetical arrangement in which overseas money passes through a family member.

Beckwith said, “And then people overseas give money to him. And then he gives money to you. It’s that type of thing.”

He then added, “Everybody does it!”

Keep reading

SPLC largely drove debanking of conservative groups, Treasury report shows

Arecent report from the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC) in the Treasury Department shows that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) was a driving force behind the debanking of conservative groups prior to its indictment.

The SPLC is a left-wing anti-racism advocacy group that has faced scrutiny from conservatives for years over its alleged bias against them and penchant for labeling mainstream political figures on the right as “extremists.”

The group has also faced withering criticism from the left, such as Ken Silverstein, who followed its expelled founder Morris Dees for years for Harper’s and The New Yorker.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has charged the SPLC with allegedly defrauding donors by paying exorbitant sums to members of extremist groups, both to act as informants and to recruit and expand their operations.

The SPLC has denied wrongdoing in the case, and said in a statement that “The charges against the SPLC are provably wrong; they are based on inaccurate facts and a misapplication of law. Our informant program was successful in accomplishing its purposes: Threats and attacks were prevented, criminal activity was stopped, and information was gathered to dismantle the efforts of hate and extremist groups.”

The OCC report, released last week, detailed the efforts of financial applications, banks, and other institutions to deny service to conservative organizations, particularly highlighting the SPLC’s role. Many of the groups the report documented had been labeled as hate groups by the organization. Driving much of the effort were broad reputational risk policies that the OCC generally swept up many mainstream conservative groups.

Keep reading

The European Union Wants To Punish People for Their Speech—Without Even a Trial

The European Union claims that “the fundamental right to freedom of expression” only applies to journalists “acting in good faith,” and that authorities do not have to give due process before freezing people’s bank accounts, as these sanctions are “temporary and are not criminal in nature,” according to a legal letter shared by a sanctioned journalist.

Last year, the European Union blacklisted 21 people for allegedly spreading Russian propaganda, banning them from doing business in Europe. One of them, Hüseyin Doğru, was falsely listed as a Turkish citizen living in Istanbul. In fact, Doğru is a German journalist in Berlin, making him the first European citizen on European soil to be sanctioned this way.

It was like being sentenced to “civil death,” Doğru told American journalist Chris Hedges. He was banned from holding a job in Europe or having a European bank account, and authorities have restricted Doğru to a €506 ($567) per month allowance from his own money. “The sanctions are designed for people outside of Europe, so they don’t really know how that should function with me, because I’m a European citizen and I’m living in Europe,” Doğru told Hedges.

Last month, the civil libertarian Wau Holland Foundation hired lawyers to contest the sanctions against Doğru. And earlier this month, the Council of the European Union sent a response letter, which Doğru shared on social media, promising to escalate the case to the E.U. General Court. Although the council conceded to Doğru that he is not a Turkish citizen living in Turkey, it still insisted on the authority to punish him for his speech.

The council quoted a 2022 court case between the Russian news outlet RT and several European countries: “The protection of the right of the media and, more particularly, of journalists to impart information on issues of general interest is subject to the proviso that they are acting in good faith and on an accurate factual basis and provide ‘reliable and precise’ information in accordance with the ethics of journalism.”

Doğru’s lawyers insisted that he should be treated as innocent until proven guilty. But the council responded that sanctions fall short of a criminal punishment, so any complaint about a “violation of the presumption of innocence is therefore unfounded.” In other words, because he is not accused of a crime, Doğru has fewer rights than a criminal suspect.

“People need to understand sanctions are an extrajudicial measure. They’re extrajudicial. There’s no court. There is no hearing, no evidence, there is no sentence by the court, nothing,” Doğru told Hedges. “When you’re sanctioned, you are not informed….The day when I was sanctioned, me and my wife, my wife was pregnant back then, we went to the pharmacy to buy medicine for her, and her cards did not work.”

The original blacklisting decision accuses Doğru of supporting “actions by the Government of the Russian Federation which undermine or threaten stability and security in the Union” by spreading “false information on politically controversial subjects with the intent of creating ethnic, political and religious discord amongst its predominantly German target audience.”

Doğru and his wife, British journalist Lizzie Phelan, previously worked at the Russian-funded publication Redfish. A few months after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, he split off to create a new website called red.media, insisting to The Left Berlin that “we are not Russian. We are not Kremlin. red.media is not funded by Russia or any other state.” In the same interview, Doğru called Russia an “imperialist” regime.

But in September 2024, a Biden administration “fact sheet” on Russian propaganda offhandedly mentioned red.media, citing a hit piece on Doğru by the German newspaper Tagesspiegel. Doğru told Hedges that the U.S. fact sheet created a circular logic in German media: “They said red.media is Russian because [U.S. Secretary of State Antony] Blinken said so. But what they never said is that Blinken is referring to your articles where you never say it like that. You say there is a suspicion, it might be so.”

Keep reading