Tag: democrats

The Left Never Learns: ‘Constitutional Attorney’ Is First to Call for Trump’s Impeachment (Again)

John Bonifaz is the kind of guy who could have answered a casting call for “lunatic leftist who will attempt to resurrect the left’s failed strategies against Trump on his first day back in office.” He says he is the “Co-Founder and President of Free Speech For People,” as well as a “constitutional attorney,” all of which sounds impressive enough if you’re the type who gets impressed by that sort of thing, but which in reality simply confirms that what we have here is someone who has abjectly failed to read the room. He has not realized that the fact that Trump has been impeached twice and has just become president again should tell him that his approach won’t work. Bonifaz also demonstrates that the left hasn’t thought of anything new to do. Its response to Trump 2.0 will be more of the same.

At 12:55 p.m. Eastern Time, not long after Donald Trump took the oath of office as the 47th president of the United States, Bonifaz made his momentous announcement: “BREAKING: We have just launched a new campaign calling for an impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump for offenses he has already committed upon taking the oath. You can access the grounds for this call at http://impeachtrumpagain.org. Join us in this fight for our democracy. @FSFP.” This will, of course, get absolutely nowhere, but it’s nonetheless a glimpse into the hamster-wheel of the left, endlessly repeating the same tired stuff against Trump even though it never gets them anywhere. 

Keep reading

Dem Megadonor Reid Hoffman Scrubbed From Pentagon Board Website Ahead of Trump Inauguration

Democratic megadonor Reid Hoffman appears to have quietly left a premier Pentagon advisory board after the election of Donald Trump, raising questions about whether he quit the organization on his own or was forced off because of his work to keep Trump out of the White House.

Hoffman joined the Defense Innovation Board, chaired by former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, in October 2022. The group provides advice to the Pentagon on how to implement new technologies into the military and work more efficiently with private companies.

Hoffman, the cofounder of LinkedIn, was listed as a board member until at least Nov. 27, according to archived versions of its website, but is no longer listed there. If Hoffman was forced off the board, it would be the latest example of a federal agency cleaning house ahead of Trump’s second term. Trump has said he will not allow Democrats or Republicans afflicted with what he called “Trump Derangement Syndrome” to work in federal agencies. In December, the FBI quietly shut its Diversity and Inclusion office.

Hoffman’s position on the board caused outcry from Republicans over his ties to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his funding for controversial political projects to help Democrats. And in July, Hoffman came under fire after he said he hoped his political tactics would make Donald Trump an “actual martyr.” Days later, a gunman attempted to assassinate Trump at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania.

The National Legal and Policy Center, a conservative legal group, called for Hoffman to “be dismissed” from the board because of what it called Hoffman’s “irresponsible and dangerous remarks” about Trump.

The Defense Innovation Board noted that request at its July 17 board meeting, according to board records. Bloomberg discussed the attempted assassination, though he did not speak about Hoffman’s remarks or acknowledge the National Legal and Policy Center complaint, according to a transcript of the meeting.

The Pentagon, the Innovation board, and members of the board did not respond to requests for comment about Hoffman’s departure.

“I think Reid Hoffman saw the writing on the wall and resigned from the board, on which he should not have been on in the first place,” said Paul Kamenar, counsel for the National Legal and Policy Center.

Keep reading

Elizabeth Warren and Other Democrats Sent Threatening Letters to People Who Donated to Trump’s Inauguration

Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats are now sending threatening letters to people and companies that donated to Trump’s inauguration.

This is from the same party that has spent the last eight years calling Trump a fascist.

You may also recall that they have no problem with contributions like this when they are made to to Democrats, just Trump.

Hot Air reported:

Democrats Now Threatening People Who Donated to Trump’s Inauguration

Democrats are the political equivalent of mafia bosses who basically run protection rackets.

“Nice company you have there. Shame if something happened to it.”

We saw a lot of this behavior over the past few years. One of the techniques used to bully social media companies into censorship was the use of open (and private) threats to use antitrust laws to break up Meta, Twitter, Google and all the tech companies if they did not comply with demands to suppress the speech of conservatives and, frankly, anybody including dissenting Democrats.

Elizabeth Warren and Michael Bennett are trying the same thing by going after people and companies that contributed to the Trump inaugural.

These contributions are standard practice. Obama took millions of dollars from donors, including the companies Warren and Bennet are targeting. So did Joe Biden, even though all the inaugural hoopla was very muted due to insane COVID policies.

Keep reading

‘Occupy Democrats’ Urges Followers to Wear Black on Monday for ‘National Day of Mourning’ Over Trump Inauguration

The popular social media account “Occupy Democrats” has urged its followers to wear black on Monday for a “National Day of Mourning” during the Trump inauguration.

While many groups have tried to organize protests for the inauguration, this weekend’s demonstrations have fallen far short of what they were after his first election.

While thousands joined the “People’s March” on Saturday, a rebrand of the “Women’s March,” it was nothing like the estimated 500,000 that joined for the 2017 inauguration.

Still, Occupy Democrats is doing its best to grift off of rallying their followers to whine about the election results.

“Don’t forget to wear all black on January 20th. National Day of Mourning,” a post on the page read.

Keep reading

The DEMOCRAT DIE-OFF is coming thanks to mass COVID-19 vaccination

In chapter two of “Ghost World: 2022-2032,” author Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, warns of a mass die-off linked to the distribution of deadly Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines – injections that were disproportionately given to urban, Democratic strongholds. This mass depopulation could reshape the electoral map of the United States in the coming decade.

This trend, Adams argues, could lead to a significant decline in Democratic voter turnout, particularly in blue cities and states, while raising questions about the future of American governance and the role of corporate and pharmaceutical interests in shaping public policy.

Adams suggests that the die-off is concentrated in areas with high vaccination rates, which tend to overlap with Democratic-leaning populations. He posits that this demographic shift could create a gap in voter turnout for Democrats, potentially altering the outcomes of key elections.

To counterbalance this, Adams speculates that record levels of illegal immigration may be part of a deliberate strategy to replace deceased Democratic voters. However, he contends that the scale of the die-off due to COVID-19 vaccination will likely outpace the number of new arrivals, leaving Democrats at a disadvantage.

Keep reading

TIME Magazine Suggests Leftists Form ‘Crying Groups’ On Inauguration Day

TIME magazine has published an article offering advice to leftists who might not be able to cope on Inauguration Day Monday, suggesting that they hold group crying sessions and go ‘forest bathing.’

The publication, which begrudgingly named President Trump as its man of the year, produced a guide on what to do to avoid “spiralling” as Trump is sworn in, and its unintentionally hilarious.

The piece asks “Why so much distress after months of processing the outcome of this divisive election?”

Maybe it’s because the legacy media told fragile leftists that it would literally be the end of the country and the world if Trump won?

The article then lists 11 ways to avoid seeing Trump take the oath, consulting “experts to share their favorite science-backed suggestions.”

OK, this should be funny.

Keep reading

Dirty Democrat Dick Durbin Demands U.S. Agencies Dig Up Kompromat on Trump’s FBI Nominee Kash Patel

Senator Dick Durbin is going all out to try and derail the nomination of Kash Patel as director of the FBI.

In letters to the Justice Department, Department of Defense and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), Durbin accuses Patel of working to undermine the transition process between Donald Trump and Joe Biden following the widespread fraud that tainted the 2020 presidential election.

He wrote:

Mr. Patel was appointed Chief of Staff [for the Secretary of Defense] on November 10, 2020, after then-President Trump lost the 2020 election.

During his tenure, Mr. Patel was accused of impeding the incoming Biden Administration’s transition work with the Defense Department, injecting himself and another political appointee into processes normally handled by nonpartisan career civilian and military officials, and ignoring requests from the Biden Administration’s transition.

…

As you know, the FBI is the principal federal law enforcement investigative agency, tasked with protecting all Americans.

The Director must be able to execute the FBI’s mission in a nonpartisan, impartial manner that is above reproach.

The credible allegations against Mr. Patel outlined above are deeply troubling, and the Committee is unable to properly consider his nomination without more information on his underlying conduct.

Lawmakers such as Durbin are particularly troubled by Patel’s nomination because of his longstanding record of working to hold Democrats and deep state actors accountable for their countless crimes and misdemeanors.

Keep reading

Hilarity Ensues When Former Dem. Gov Says He Can Define What a Woman Is, Then Tries and Utterly Fails

Republican Rep. Nancy Mace of South Carolina has established herself as a flawed-yet-principled advocate for women.

Meanwhile, former Democratic Gov. Martin O’Malley of Maryland, who served as Social Security Commissioner for less than a year under President Joe Biden and whom extreme political junkies might remember as an obscure Democratic presidential candidate in 2016, has exposed himself as the latest in a long line of cowardly and spiritually corrupt woke leftists who cannot, or will not, explain the difference between a man and a woman.

On Wednesday, at a hearing of the House Oversight Committee focused on the stay-at-home federal workforce, Mace subjected O’Malley to a lengthy harangue, including a request for the definition of a woman, to which the former governor — true to form for a veteran of that comically dishonest party — offered a reply calculated to appease the woke mob.

“Madam, er, Congresswoman — ” a smiling O’Malley began, at which point Mace set the tone for the exchange by interrupting him.

“Can you define what a woman is?” she asked again.

“Oh, yes.”

“What is a woman?”

“You’re going to ask me to define what a woman is?”

“Yes, I am right now.”

“Well, I’m talking — ”

“You just said you could. Explain it to me.”

“I’m talking to a woman right now — distinguished woman — elected representative.”

Mace then repeated the question several times. O’Malley responded by objecting to her approach, suggesting that she had “denigrated” the hearing.

When the congresswoman started to move on to a different but likely related series of questions, O’Malley returned to his absurd “I’m talking to a woman right now” line of reasoning.

“I’m married to a woman. I have two daughters who are women,” he said.

The exchange continued in that manner for several more minutes. Mace asked about the definition of a man, whether a woman’s fears of rape qualified as irrational, and about the Democratic Party’s attitudes toward gender as a whole, particularly in light of its drubbing in the 2024 election.

Keep reading

Nonprofit Founded By Ex-Georgia State Rep. Stacey Abrams Slapped With Largest Fine In State History Over Election Violations

Failed gubernatorial candidate and former Georgia State Representative Stacey Abrams, a prominent Democrat, is back in the news after a nonprofit she founded was hit with the largest fine in Georgia’s history this week.

Abrams’ “New Georgia Project” spent $3.2 million trying to get her elected as Georgia governor in 2018, but failed to disclose the spending in violation of state law.

Georgia’s ethics commission found the group and its affiliate the “New Georgia Project Action Fund” engaged in 16 instances of illegal election work on behalf of Abrams and others.

The shady group, once headed by current Democrat Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock, was ordered to pay a $300,000 fine.

Both groups failed to register as independent campaign committees before taking electioneering contributions and did not file campaign finance reports of the donations or spending.

If Abrams won her 2018 gubernatorial election against Brian Kemp, it’s likely the illegal activity would have been swept under the rug.

Popular 𝕏 account @amuse questioned why Democrats like Abrams and Hillary Clinton only received fines for finance law violations when President-elect Donald Trump received over 30 felonies for “mischaracterizing” $140k in campaign funds.

Keep reading

Democrat Former New York State Senator Lectures Residents Struggling to Afford New Congestion Pricing: “Get Over it”

Democrat former New York state Senator Alessandra Biaggi doesn’t think much of residents struggling with the economic reality of the city’s congestion toll.

The newly implemented pricing includes a $9 congestion toll on vehicles entering Manhattan, which Democrats claim will reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality by encouraging the use of public transportation.

The toll, which went into effect on January 5, 2025, applies to vehicles entering Manhattan south of 60th Street during peak hours—5 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays and 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekends. Off-peak hours see a reduced toll of $2.25.

The toll is collected electronically via E-ZPass or by billing vehicles based on license plate recognition. Certain routes, such as the FDR Drive and West Side Highway, are exempt from the toll, provided vehicles remain on these roads and do not enter the city street grid.

One NYC resident took to X to explain how the toll is personally impacting him. Biaggi responded by lecturing the man to ‘get over it.’

Keep reading