Tag: coronavirus

Pfizer Accused of Hiding Deaths in COVID-19 Vaccine Trials, Including ‘Subject 11141050’ in Kansas, Team Research Alleges

A team of researchers analyzing Pfizer’s clinical trial data has accused the pharmaceutical giant of concealing deaths during its COVID-19 vaccine trials.

Among the allegations is the failure to disclose the death of a Kansas participant who was part of the BNT162b2 vaccine trial. The death reportedly occurred 41 days after the participant received their second vaccine dose.

The accusations stem from a detailed report led by Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, an anesthetist and perioperative physician, and a member of the DailyClout research team.

The team alleges that Pfizer’s reporting practices during the critical juncture leading to the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the vaccine were flawed, with significant delays in documenting serious adverse events, including deaths.

“The Polack paper disclosed six deaths — two in the BNT162b2 arm, and four in the Placebo arm. In the journal article and the EUA approval documentation[9], the six deaths covered the period of July 27, 2020, through November 14, 2020,” Dr. Kunadhasan wrote in a letter sent to Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, who filed a lawsuit against Pfizer.

“This letter will demonstrate that Pfizer-BioNTech possessed records showing that eight deaths, four in the BNT162b2 arm and four in the Placebo arm, should have been disclosed by Pfizer to the FDA.  In addition, the two undisclosed deaths presented a cardiac event signal in the clinical trial’s BNT162b2 recipients. One of the undisclosed deaths in the vaccinated arm of the trial occurred in Kansas,” she added.

Subject 11141050, a 63-year-old Kansas woman, participated in Pfizer’s clinical trial at a research site in Newton, Kansas.

Despite her pre-existing conditions, including hypertension and depression, she met the trial’s inclusion criteria and received her second vaccine dose on September 8, 2020. She passed away on October 19, 2020, with the cause of death determined to be sudden cardiac arrest.

Keep reading

Revealed: The Hidden Pfizer Report That Shows Heart Conditions in the Vaccinated Getting Worse Over Time

I told you here about Pfizer’s abstract of its Interim Report 5, showing at least 23-40% higher risk of some heart-related conditions in the vaccinated, but that the MHRA, the U.K. medicines regulator, was withholding publication of the full report. As I said at the time : “In summary, if, as I suspect, MHRA is worried by the results in Pfizer’s ‘Interim Report 5’ then no wonder it is sitting on it.”

Well, MHRA is still sitting on the report but I’ve managed to obtain a copy. It looks like I was right – the detailed results in the full report are even more worrying than the Hazard Ratios in the abstract which I reported last time.

To recap: this is a report of a Post Authorisation Safety Study (PASS) of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine. National regulators routinely require pharmaceutical manufacturers to conduct PASS studies as a condition of authorisation of most new medicines. The regulators provide data to the manufacturer covering millions of patients registered in national healthcare systems. The manufacturer then conducts analysis, matched for things like age and sex, to determine whether the medicine has increased the risk of specified health conditions.

Let’s dive straight in. Below are some heart-related cumulative incidence graphs from Pfizer’s full ‘Interim Report 5’. You will immediately notice that the incidence for each type of condition is significantly greater in the Covid vaccinated (bad) – but we already knew that from the Hazard Ratios in the abstract. What’s worse is that the curves diverge over time, i.e., the relative incidence between vaccinated and unvaccinated increases over the time period of the data in the report (December 8th 2020 – March 21st 2022). I wonder what happened subsequently.

Keep reading

FDA must disclose more COVID-19 vaccine records, US judge rules

A federal judge has ordered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to publicly disclose more information underpinning its authorization of COVID-19 vaccines, after failing to persuade the court to end the public records lawsuit.

In a ruling, opens new tab on Friday, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth, Texas, ordered the agency to produce its “emergency use authorization” file to a group of scientists who wanted to see licensing information that the FDA relied on to approve the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine.

“The COVID-19 pandemic is long passed and so has any legitimate reason for concealing from the American people the information relied upon by the government in approving the Pfizer vaccine,” wrote Pittman, appointed in 2019 by then-President Donald Trump.

The lawsuit, filed in late 2021, attracted attention after the FDA said it could take decades to process and disclose records to Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, the group that brought the case.

The FDA declined to comment.

Attorney Aaron Siri, representing the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, welcomed Pittman’s order.

“The FDA clearly lacks confidence in the review that it conducted to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine because it is doing everything possible to prevent independent scientists from conducting an independent review,” Siri said.

He said the agency was “hiding from the court and the plaintiff one million pages of clinical trial documents from the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.”

Keep reading

Leading doctors sign HOPE Accord calling for the suspension of all covid mRNA “vaccines”

Thousands of doctors and healthcare professionals have signed a petition calling for the immediate suspension of all covid-19 mRNA products because they are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and in excess deaths. 

The online petition, known as the HOPE accord makes 5 calls for the international community concerning the covid mRNA vaccines that were given emergency use authorisation stating that “a growing body of evidence suggests that they are contributing to an alarming rise in disability and in excess deaths.”

The petition calls for “independent investigations to be properly resourced to allow a comprehensive re-evaluation of all covid-19 products. There must be a full exploration of mechanisms of harm to provide insight into their effect on the human body both short and long term.”

There are additional calls for immediate recognition and support for the vaccine injured. “The vaccine injured must be recognised and every effort be made to understand their conditions. Support should include readily accessible multidisciplinary clinics offering investigation and treatment as well as appropriate compensation for all those who have been harmed.” 

It also states, “The medical profession must lead by admitting we lost our way. By drawing attention to these medical and ethical issues surrounding the covid-19 response, we hope to validate and amplify the call to ensure the relevant facts and ensure vital lessons are learned. An honest and thorough investigation is needed, addressing the root cause that has led us to this place, including institutional groupthink, conflicts of interest and the suppression of scientific debate.” 

An open letter to the General Medical Council of the UK written by Consultant Cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra and copies in several leaders in health also refer to the petition of which he is a co-founder.  They include the chief medical officer, Sir Chris Whitty, the Chief scientific adviser to the British government, Patrick Valance and the secretary of state for health, Wes Streeting. 

Dr. Malhotra says that given the level of evidence of unprecedented harm, their position to not suspend the covid mRNA products is now untenable. Re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s original randomised controlled trials on the covid mRNA products by independent experts that included the associate editor of The BMJ revealed a greater risk of serious harm from the vaccine than being hospitalised with covid. This rate of serious harm is 1 in 800 at two months suggesting harms are likely much greater as it does not take into consideration medium to long-term harms that include heart attacks, strokes and cancer. Conversely, the level of benefit in the highest risk group, those over 90, according to UKHSA data for 2024 is 1 in 7,000 to prevent a covid hospitalisation. In other words, at least eight times greater risk of harm than benefit in this group.

Keep reading

Structures found in mRNA injection samples are neither “nanobots” nor contaminants; they are lipid nanostructures

Over the years, Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea and Dr. David Nixon have done a lot of work documenting self-assembly nanotechnology in various injections including those marketed as covid vaccines.  They are not the only ones investigating the unusual microstructures in mRNA injections.  In July 2024, Young Mi Lee and Daniel Broudy published a paper in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research which reported these conspicuous microscopic objects as “nano-robots.”

Dr. Anne Ulrich gives a completely different perspective on what these objects are.   Responding to Lee and Broudy’s paper, Dr. Ulrich published an article in the same journal in September.

Dr, Ulrich, a biochemistry professor at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, has been working for 20 years on lipid bilayers and bio membranes.  She has seen a lot of lipid structures and the shapes they can make.

The “conspicuous microscopic objects in mRNA vaccines” interpreted as “nano-robots” is a misconception, she wrote. “Because the wide range of  different shapes can be readily explained in terms of self-assembling lipids (including cholesterol), as are used for transfection.”  She continued:

As conveyed [by Lee and Broudy] and elsewhere, the angular platelets discovered in the covid-19 injectables have a technical appearance that is reminiscent of microchips, the extended sheets and bubbles have been interpreted as graphene, and some of the soft ribbons and spirals look like parasites. Concerned readers and influencers are rightfully wondering whether well-documented phenomena are responsible for some of the injuries following vaccination? Or, as implied in said article, whether the manufacturer might even have covertly spiked the injections with “nano-robots” that can be “programmed” to spring into action?

Based on our scientific expertise and with full conviction, we would like to give reassurance that the abundant structures found in the mRNA vaccines are neither “nanobots” nor contaminants – but rather maturation and/or degradation products.

Here, we argue that the bizarre structures should not be considered alarming per se, as they are just made up of lipids. They clearly do not represent any allegedly “toxic protein secretions,” “long-lasting silica,” “graphene-coated polymers,” “conductors or semiconductors” or any other “undisclosed additional engineered components” made up of “not-natural/foreign material.”

[In this commentary] we shall look at the structure of lipid nanoparticles and explain their curious rearrangements into sheets, ribbons, filaments, spirals, tubes, chips, beads on a string and much more.No Nanobots in Vaccines – Just Lipids on the Loose: Commentary on Lee and Broudy (2024), Anne S. Ulrich, BA, MA, DPhil(Oxon), 10 September 2024

Joining Doctors for Covid Ethics in October, Dr. Ulrich discussed her article.

“Lipids are amphiphilic molecules,” she explained.  “Amphiphiles are known to self-assemble in many different sizes and shapes.”

The term “amphiphilic” comes from the Greek words “amphi,” meaning “both,” and “philos,” meaning “loving.” This refers to the property of a molecule having both hydrophilic (water-loving) and lipophilic (fat-loving) parts. “But this could [be not only fats but] also be peptides, polymers or any other amphiphilic components,” Dr, Ulrich said.

“Lipid molecules will assemble spontaneously into bilayers … when they are suspended in water.  And these bilayers make up what we call a cellular membrane,” she said.

She explained that pure lipids will close themselves up to form a hollow sphere shape but lipid mixtures or lipids with short chains can form other shapes such as long ribbons, which can grow in length and width and can stack into multilayers.  A Lipid ribbon will begin to coil or twist if it consists of chiral molecules. If a ribbon begins to twist it will give rise to a spiral or helix.  If the ribbon of the spiral grows in width, it can eventually close up into a tube. 

Keep reading

New Study Finds Concerning Evidence of COVID-19 ‘Vaccine’ Shedding

A new study titled, Menstrual Abnormalities Strongly Associated with Proximity to COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals, was just published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research:

In Spring 2021, MyCycleStorySM launched a secure online survey to which 92.3% of 6049 respondents self-reported menstrual irregularities occurring after the rollout of the COVID-19 injectables. Each respondent served as her own control because prior to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination, the vast majority had regular menstrual cycles. A subgroup of 3390 respondents were only indirectly exposed to COVID-19 vaccines or the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This subgroup reported 1) being unvaccinated for COVID-19; 2) having had no COVID-19 symptoms; and 3) no positive test for COVID-19, yet a substantial majority of these women, who were only indirectly exposed to COVID-19 injectables or COVID-19 infections still had many of the same menstrual abnormalities as the 2659 women who were directly exposed to a COVID-19 injection (798), or had COVID-19 symptoms (1347), or tested positive for COVID-19 (514). Generalized linear mixed modeling was used to examine the association (not assuming causation) between abnormal menses experienced after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout by respondents who were only indirectly exposed by some degree of proximity to persons. Chi-Square, Student’s t, Kruskal-Wallis or ANOVA tests were used to assess the statistical significance of the similarities of menstrual irregularities reported by the directly exposed and indirectly exposed groups.

The mean age of the entire cohort was 37.8 ± 0.1 years. The percentage of the indirectly exposed participants who reported being within 6 feet of a COVID-19 vaccinated person was 85.5%. Of these, 71.7% had irregular menstrual symptoms within one week and 50.1% had irregular menstrual symptoms within ≤3 days after exposure. When comparing daily proximity to a vaccinated person, the categories of “daily within 6 feet outside the household” versus “seldom/sometimes/daily outside 6 feet” had the highest relative risk at 1.34 (p<0.01) for heavier menstrual bleeding, early menses at more than 7 days early with a relative risk at 1.28 (p=0.03), and extended bleeding for more than 7 days with relative risk at 1.26 (p=0.04). Indirect exposure to COVID-19 vaccinated persons was significantly associated with the likelihood of the onset of menstrual irregularities. This study provides additional data to complement a growing body of evidence raising concerns regarding the safety of mRNA vaccines.

Keep reading

Rising Death Rates and Health Injuries from Covid Vax Can No Longer Be Covered up

Ireland joins international initiative of 11 States calling for a suspension of mod mRNA vaccines, citing serious health concerns.

Joining Ireland’s call is Dr. Francis Boyle, author of the U.S. ‘Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorist Act of 1989’

Do you remember when myself and a very few others warned you to avoid the Covid “vaccine”?  We were accused of spreading misinformation that would increase the lethality of Covid-19 by discouraging people from protecting themselves with a “safe and effective vaccine,” to use words from the  lying mouths of Tony Fauci and Joe Biden.

Now medical experts and public authorities are calling for a halt to all mRNA vaccination.  The rising deaths and enormous increase in deadly diseases and health conditions following the mass vaccinations can no longer be denied.  

The medical profession is controlled by Big Pharma, and Big Pharma thinks only in terms of its profits, our health be damned.  Perhaps something can be done about it now that Bobby Kennedy has been appointed Trump’s Secretary of Health and Human Services, assuming Big Pharma doesn’t block his confirmation in the Senate, and now that Trump has nominated Jay Bhattacharya to head the NIH. Bhattacharya, a Stanford University School of Medicine professor, was an early critic of pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates. The Big Pharma controlled medical community tried to label Bhattacharya “unscientific” and destroy his career. Big Pharma, a gangster industry, will definitely be out to block Bhattacharya’s confirmation.

Keep reading

Criminality And Financial Incentives Concerning Hospital Covid Deaths

Regardless of a presidential pardon, Dr Anthony Fauci remains subject to possible prosecution for violations of state criminal codes that he (and other named officials) allegedly committed during the Covid-19 pandemic. On behalf of hundreds of aggrieved families of lost loved ones during the pandemic, extensive legal briefs requesting criminal investigations of alleged state crimes have been submitted by the Vires Law Group, West Palm Beach, FL, to attorneys general in Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, and Missouri. View the Texas filing here.

This article identifies some of the huge financial payments (bonuses) paid to hospitals during the pandemic. Further, it is believed that these payments served as motivation to encourage the extensive use of the toxic drug remdesivir as well as end-of-life ventilators for many Covid-19 patients. Additionally, the coercion of attending physicians (and nurses) by hospital administrators and other officials to “go along” with toxic treatments of Covid-19 patients is described.

Regarding remdesivir, the recent testimony of Dr. David Martin before members of the Oklahoma state legislature (view here for short video) is daunting to say the least. His testimony is a strong indictment of those who supported and administered remdesivir, a drug publicly known to be highly toxic, causing kidney and other organ failure contributing to or causing a patient’s ultimate death.

Regarding the use of ventilators for Covid-19 patients, a National Library of Medicine report indicates that “—of 69 studies with more than 57,000 patients showed fatality rates of 45 percent—the fatality rate increased to 84 percent in older patients.” Another report describes how there was a “rush” to put Covid-19 patients onto ventilators causing thousands of needless deaths.

Defendants of their actions in administering remdesivir will undoubtedly claim that their actions were in accord with the October 2020 FDA Emergency Use Approval (EUA) for remdesivir to be used in treating covid patients. But because the toxic effects of the drug were widely known prior to the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, and because there are serious questions about the validity of the EUA, officials supporting and administering the drug to Covid patients who later died may find themselves charged with first and second degree murder and/or involuntary manslaughter at a minimum. Further, these officials will have to explain why they promoted and allowed the continued use of remdesivir when in November 2020, the World Health Organization recommended against the use of remdesivir in treating Covid-19 patients!

Keep reading

Canadian doctor ordered to pay back $600k she earned through mass COVID vaccination

The province of Ontario paid doctors for every experimental COVID shot they administered, with one physician now being told to repay the $600,000 she earned by using medical students to mass vaccinate residents. 

In a November 26 ruling, the Ontario Health Services Board ordered Kingston-based Dr. Elaine Ma to pay back over $600,000 which she had claimed after having undergraduate medical student volunteers mass vaccinate Ontario residents in 2021. 

“The Appeal Board orders the Respondent to reimburse OHIP the amount of $600,962.16,” the board wrote in their decision. 

Beginning in January 2021, Ma had organized drive-in vaccination clinics in several parking lots in the Kingston region to vaccinate thousands of Canadians. She recruited undergraduate medical student volunteers to administer the shots.  

Under Ma’s program, which lasted until January 2022, 27,250 doses of the experimental COVID shot were administered, earning her a total of $606,657.60, according to the General Manager of the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP).  

According to OHIP, Ontario doctors were paid $13 for administrating COVID vaccines, and an additional $5.60 if the patient’s sole reason for their appointment was receiving the shot. 

However, OHIP argued that Ma’s claims did not meet their requirements as she used volunteers to administer the vaccines, explaining, “the persons who administered vaccines at the clinics organized by Dr. Ma during the Review Period were not her employees.”  

As a result, she was ordered to repay the money. However, Ma is arguing that she was acting in Ontario’s best interest, considering the alleged danger of the COVID “pandemic.”

“It’s really still just disbelief that we’ve completely forgotten about COVID,” she told CTV News Ottawa. “We’ve completely forgotten what we were asked to do. We’ve completely forgotten the fact that we were asked to do it in new and different ways, and quickly, and as fast as possible.”

Keep reading

Congressional Committee Condemns (Nearly) Every Feature of the Covid Response

Are there words in the English language that fully describe what happened during the Covid years that are not already overused? Calamity comes to mind. Disaster. Cataclysm. Ruin, devastation, catastrophe, unprecedented debacle, fiasco, and utter wreckage – all fine words and phrases but nothing quite captures it. 

Given that, there is probably no report on the thing that can properly characterize the whole of it. On the other hand, it’s worth trying. 

Meanwhile, the results of Covid commissions of governments around the world have become unbearably predictable. So far they have mostly said their government failed because they didn’t act fast enough, did not enforce lockdowns hard enough, did not communicate and coordinate well enough, and so on. 

Everyone in the corporate world knows that when a committee reduces all problems to “communication and coordination” you are being fed a load of bull. 

So far, it’s been almost entirely bureaucratic blather, and that helps account for the global loss of confidence in political systems. They cannot even be honest about the most catastrophic policies in our lifetimes or several. 

The amount of corruption, waste, and destruction from this period of our lives, lasting from 2020 until 2023 but with remnants of bad policies all around us, is so unspeakable that not one report has yet been fully honest about what happened, why it happened, who really won and lost, and what this period implies for how vast swaths of the public see the world. 

Among other astonishing revelations to come from this period was a full presentation of just how many institutions have been corrupted. It was not just governments and certainly not just the elected leaders and career bureaucrats. The problems are very deep and reach more deeply to intelligence agencies, military-based bioweapons systems, and preparedness agencies that guard their activities under the cloak of what is called classified. 

This is a major reason why so many questions are being left unasked and unanswered. Then we have the ancillary failures in a whole series of additional sectors. The media went along with the nonsense as if they are wholly owned and controlled by government and industry. Industry mostly went along too, at least the highest reaches of it, even as small business was crushed. 

The tech companies cooperated in a massive censorship operation. The retail end of the pharmaceutical companies enforced the government’s edicts, denying people basic medicines, as did the whole of the medical systems, which heavily enforced mandates on an experimental and failed product mistakenly called a vaccine. Academics were largely silent and public intellectuals fell in line. Most mainline religions cooperated in locking worshippers out. Banks were in on it too. And advertisers. 

In fact, it’s hard to think of any institution in society that leaves this period untarnished. It’s probably not possible for a government report on the subject to be fully honest. Maybe it is too soon, plus the hooks that created the whole problem are still embedded too deeply. 

Keep reading