The Alien Autopsy Scandal: this fascinating tale of a bizarre DIY hoax hits Spinal Tap levels of hilarity

If you had to be interviewed on film, how would you hope to come across? Attractive, honest, a good egg? Or pathologically shifty, to the point that audiences want to throw their shoes at the screen? I found myself unlacing my Doc Martens this week, watching a documentary about the biggest hoax of the last century.

In 1995, a grainy film was released that purported to be of an autopsy conducted on a creature recovered from a crash site on military land in Roswell, New Mexico. The incident had long been hallowed in ufology, but no moving footage had ever been uncovered. You’ve seen it. Hazmat figures loom over a bulbous-headed humanoid, spreadeagled on the table. Its dead, oval eyes are black, mouth agape, belly distended. I saw the shocking footage again last night, or thought I did. It was actually my laptop screen going dark, after I fell asleep in front of Netflix.

Globally, news outlets heralded the footage as the most important ever recovered. The Alien Autopsy Scandal (Friday, 9pm, Sky Documentaries) playfully lets us into how it was actually created in a Camden flat in 90s London; the brainchild of two businessmen, Ray Santilli and Gary Shoefield. The pair employed a sculptor who worked on Doctor Who to create the alien, and a magician to shoot the film. Their homegrown ET was filled with a mix of animal organs including a lamb’s brain and pig’s pluck, which is why it all looked convincingly moist.

Keep reading

Legal Marijuana States Are Moving To Increase Possession Limits, Allowing Consumers To Carry More Cannabis Without Fear Of Criminalization

Lawmakers in at least three states have passed legislation this year to significantly increase the amount of marijuana that adults can legally possess.

These expansions of existing state cannabis legalization laws are advancing as part of broader legislation that addresses various aspects of marijuana regulatory programs that will change how licensed businesses operate within their markets.

But for everyday consumers, the possession limit increases mean they will be able to buy more marijuana when they go to the store and will be protected from potential criminal penalties for carrying certain amounts of cannabis.

Illinois lawmakers this month, for example, passed omnibus cannabis legislation that would allow residents of the state who are over 21 years of age to possess up to 60 grams of marijuana flower—double the amount in current law. They will also be able to have up to 10 grams of cannabis concentrates and infused products with up to 1,000 mg of THC—also double the current limit.

Possession amounts for adult non-residents would also be doubled under the bill.

Aside from numerous other proposed changes to rules for marijuana and hemp businesses that are included in the legislation, SB 3222 would also allow people with convictions for possession of up to 60 grams of marijuana to have those records expunged—double the current cutoff allowing only those with convictions for up to 30 grams to be eligible.

The bill cleared the Senate and House of Representatives and now awaits action from Gov. JB Pritzker (D), who in 2019 signed the state’s marijuana legalization policy into law.

Keep reading

James Talarico: ‘Common Sense’ to Lock Up Guns in the Home, Criminalize Private Sales

During an appearance on the Unity Over Division podcast, U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico (D) suggested it was “common sense” to mandate how guns are stored in homes and to ban private sales.

Talarico said, “I am a believer in the Second Amendment. I don’t pick and choose between the Bill of Rights, I believe in the Second Amendment just as much as I believe in the first.”

He went on to state his conviction that you need to get a permit to exercise the First Amendment right to assemble, then outlined gun controls that he described as “common sense.”

Talarico said, “We’ve got to make sure that we’ve got safe storage laws and background checks so that we’re keeping everybody safe.”

On May 29, 2026, Breitbart News reported that on Talarico’s campaign website, under the heading Public Safety & Justice, it is clear that securing universal background checks is one of Talarico’s “priorities.” Such checks criminalize the private gun sales Americans have enjoyed since the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791, and while doing so, they do not prevent determined attackers from getting their hands on guns.

Case in point: California has had universal background checks since the 1990s but they led the nation in “active shooter incidents” from 2020-2024.

Talarico’s campaign website also makes clear that another gun control he plans to pursue is raising the minimum purchase age for AR-15s and other wildly popular semiautomatic rifles.

Keep reading

‘Forever Chemicals’ in Drinking Water? What Is the EPA Up To?

Much controversy has surrounded the May 18 announcement by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of proposed rule changes to Biden administration regulations that direct the cleanup of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, in Americans’ drinking water.

Health & Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., said he strongly supports the EPA’s new tack. “I’ve read a couple of articles in the corporate media that suggest that EPA is trying to roll back PFAS regulations. It’s not true. I’ve met repeatedly with Lee and his staff, and they’re completely committed to end the exposures in a way that’s legal and practical.”

Kennedy continued, “As Lee pointed out, the Biden administration passed a [regulation] very hastily in which they ignored a Clean Water Act mandate for a public comment period . . . I can tell you, that was a fatal flaw.”

The HHS Secretary added that the Biden regulation wouldn’t withstand a court challenge and would be thrown out. “We’re doing it in a way that maintains the … maximum contaminant Safe Drinking Act levels, and gives maximum protection as quickly as possible for the American public.”

Despite widespread criticism from the legacy media and many in the MAHA base, I agree with Secretary Kennedy: the recent EPA policy shift signals an acceleration of PFAS cleanup, not a dangerous step backward.

Keep reading

Abolish the Fed: The Root of Inflation, Debt, and the Destruction of the Dollar

In 1913, the year the Federal Reserve was established, an ice cream cone typically cost about $0.05 (a nickel), while the average American home cost around $2,500 to $3,500 to purchase or build. Today, the national average cost of an ice cream cone is about $4.00 to $5.50 for a single scoop, while the median sale price of an existing single-family home in the United States is approximately $404,300.

In 1970, the year before America went off the gold standard, gold traded at an average price of roughly $35.96 to $38.90 per troy ounce. Today, the live spot price of gold is approximately $4,320 to $4,350 per troy ounce.

The Federal Reserve, through its artificial control of interest rates, credit expansion, and increases in the money supply, is the root cause of inflation and the weakening of the U.S. dollar. In the United States, a capitalist country, we trust the market to set the price of shoes, sandwiches, movie tickets, and cars. Why do we not trust the market to set a market-driven interest rate?

If interest rates were determined by the market, they would never be artificially too high or too low, and America could avoid the cycles of boom and bust fueled by cheap money. Whether during a boom or a bust, both periods ultimately result in a weaker U.S. dollar. Eliminating the Fed would make the dollar stronger and economy more stable.

Before examining how the Fed contributes to inflation, currency devaluation, and economic instability, a few common misconceptions should be addressed.

First, it is not a hidden secret that the Federal Reserve is not a direct agency of the U.S. government. This is publicly available information. The Fed is a federally chartered, operationally independent institution. Its Board of Governors is a federal agency whose members are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, while its 12 regional Reserve Banks are privately owned by member commercial banks. Congress retains the authority to alter or abolish the Fed by legislation.

Second, this arrangement is not unusual. Nearly every country has a central bank, although it may operate under a different name. Central banks exist on a spectrum from fully independent to fully government-controlled, with most operating as hybrids that combine varying degrees of operational independence with government oversight and accountability. The Federal Reserve is simply the American version of a central bank.

The Federal Reserve, created by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, operates through three primary mechanisms: setting the federal funds rate, conducting open market operations, and regulating reserve requirements for commercial banks.

The core of its money-creation power lies in open market operations. The Fed controls the monetary base, currency in circulation plus deposit balances that depository institutions hold at the Fed, by buying or selling securities. When the Fed buys a security, it pays by crediting the bank’s reserve account. No prior savings are required. The reserves are created by accounting entry.

Those reserves flow into the broader economy through fractional reserve banking. When you deposit $1,000 in a bank, the bank keeps a fraction and lends out the rest. That money, spent and redeposited elsewhere, is lent out again. Through this money multiplier effect, banks expand the money supply well beyond the original deposit.

Since March 2020, the reserve requirement floor has been set at zero, meaning US banks face no mandatory reserve floor at all. The only remaining brake on credit expansion is the interest rate the Fed itself sets and can raise or lower at will.

The federal funds rate is the rate at which commercial banks lend and borrow excess reserves overnight. The FOMC meets eight times annually to set this target. This single administered price, set by committee rather than by markets, governs the cost of capital for the world’s largest economy.

Keep reading

Instagram ‘Influencer’ Arrested for Human Trafficking, Money Laundering, and Organized Crime After Police Raid Ritzy ‘OnlyFans House’ Mansion in Washington

A 21-year-old self-proclaimed influencer and “private equity” hustler named Nikita Tyukalo was arrested on Thursday after Bellevue Police executed a search warrant at a luxury rental mansion in Washington.

The raid uncovered what authorities allege was a sophisticated human trafficking and financial exploitation operation tied to adult content platforms like OnlyFans and Chaturbate.

Neighbors described the mansion as the local “Diddy House.” It had been the subject of months of neighbor complaints about massive parties that allegedly drew hundreds of people, including minors, and constant social media promotion.

Tyukalo, who rented the high-end home, promoted himself online as a successful young entrepreneur.

His Instagram account, with over 5,000 followers, featured photos of stacks of cash and luxury sports cars. His bio bragged, “14m profit by 20,” “private equity,” and “sales.”

Multiple women came forward as victims after a months-long investigation by Bellevue Police’s Human Trafficking Unit.

Police say he ran the operation through Nova Talent Management, which recruited young women, primarily ages 18-22, through social media with promises of big money from pornographic content creation.

Once inside the operation, managers, allegedly including Tyukalo and associates, took control of their OnlyFans and Chaturbate accounts, passwords, and finances.

One victim discovered an account created in her name had generated nearly $230,000 in gross revenue over a single year, but she was locked out and never saw the money.

Victims reported being pressured into increasingly explicit content, forced into 10+ hour streaming sessions, and given stimulants like Adderall to stay awake.

Allegations include physical assaults, threats, intimidation, forced work schedules, and tactics designed to prevent them from leaving. Investigators say the scheme involved financial exploitation, coercion, and abuse on an organized scale.

Bellevue Police SWAT executed the warrant early on June 4.

Inside the mansion they discovered a large whiteboard labeled “Content Plan,” notebooks tracking earnings, and financial records showing hundreds of thousands of dollars moving through business accounts linked to Nova Talent Management.

More than 300 cell phones and over 50 laptops, believed to be used for content creation, account management, and social media promotion, were seized, along with more than 30 sex toys and an empty prescription bottle consistent with Adderall.

The sheer volume of devices and financial paperwork led investigators to describe the home as the hub of an organized criminal enterprise.

Tyukalo currently faces four counts of human trafficking, one count of money laundering, and one count of leading organized crime.

Keep reading

Pentagon Names Alibaba, Baidu, And BYD In Updated Chinese Military Companies List As DoD Contracting Bans Loom

The Department of Defense has filed a major update to its official list of “Chinese military companies” operating in the United States, formally naming or reaffirming high-profile firms including Alibaba, Baidu, BYD, BGI Group, and Autel as companies linked to Beijing’s military-civil fusion strategy.

The notice, filed on Monday and scheduled for Federal Register publication on June 10, comes just weeks before new restrictions on Department of Defense contracting with listed entities take effect on June 30. The companies are alleged to have ownership or ties to SASAC (State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission), affiliations with MIIT (Ministry of Industry and Information Technology), PLA connections, support from China’s “Little Giant” industrial program, or a presence in military-civil fusion zones.

Section 1260H requires the Pentagon to identify Chinese companies that conduct commercial business while also supporting or being affiliated with the People’s Liberation Army or China’s defense-industrial base. The list has existed for years, but the consequences are now becoming more significant. Effective June 30, the DoD will be barred from entering into, renewing, or extending contracts directly with listed companies or entities they control. A broader indirect ban – covering goods or services that incorporate products from these firms – follows in June 2027. Additional rules restrict DoD contractors from working with entities that lobby on behalf of listed companies.

In short, the Pentagon is putting major Chinese companies on notice that it views them as potential extensions of China’s military and defense ecosystem, even if those companies are better known globally for consumer products, cloud services, electric vehicles, drones, or biotech.

Keep reading

Trump DOJ Announces Largest-Ever Effort to Denaturalize U.S. Citizens Accused of Immigration Fraud or Concealing Serious Crimes

The Trump DOJ is dramatically expanding its campaign to revoke US citizenship from naturalized Americans accused of hiding terrorism ties, violent crimes, immigration fraud, and other serious misconduct during the naturalization process.

The new push, according to reports, marks one of the most aggressive uses of denaturalization in modern American history and reflects President Donald Trump’s broader America First effort to restore consequences inside an immigration system that has been abused for decades.

The Department of Justice announced cases against roughly a dozen foreign-born US citizens, with targets originally from countries including Iraq, Somalia, China, India, Colombia, Uzbekistan, Morocco, Gambia, Kenya, Nigeria, and Bolivia.

Officials said the cases involve allegations ranging from concealed terror affiliations and war crimes to child sexual abuse, sham marriages, false identities, and immigration fraud.

The message is quite clear: American citizenship is not a shield for foreign criminals who lied to obtain it. Naturalization, they argue, is a privilege granted by the United States—not a loophole for people who concealed dangerous pasts.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the Justice Department would pursue those who misrepresented themselves to become Americans.

Anyone “who intentionally concealed their criminal histories or misrepresented themselves during the naturalization process will face the fullest extent of the law,” Blanche said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

One of the most serious cases involves Ali Yousif Ahmed, who obtained citizenship after claiming he fled Iraq in 2009 because al Qaeda terrorists had attacked his family. Authorities now say Iraq sought his extradition in 2019 after he allegedly murdered two Iraqi police officers while serving as an al Qaeda leader.

Federal officials allege Ahmed omitted that information from the U.S. government. The case has become a stark example of why Trump officials say deeper scrutiny is needed before and after citizenship is granted.

Another case involves Salah Osman Ahmed of Somalia, who naturalized in 2007 and later pleaded guilty in 2009 to providing material support for terrorists and belonging to al Shabaab, a U.S.-designated terrorist group.

The Justice Department argues that joining a terrorist organization within five years of naturalization can be grounds for revoking citizenship. For immigration hawks, the case underscores the danger of treating citizenship as irreversible even when national-security issues emerge.

The crackdown also includes Oscar Alberto Pelaez, a Colombian-born Catholic priest convicted in the United States of 13 counts of sexual abuse of a minor, including sodomy. Authorities allege he lied about the crimes during the naturalization process.

Another target, Abduvosit Razikov of Uzbekistan, allegedly entered into a sham marriage to obtain citizenship. Other cases include individuals accused of using false identities, concealing serious crimes, or committing immigration fraud.

In a separate announcement, the Justice Department said it is seeking to denaturalize Manuel Rocha, a former American diplomat who admitted in a criminal case to acting as a Cuban spy.

The Rocha case points to a broader concern: the United States must be willing to revoke citizenship when people obtain it through deceit and then use American status against American interests.

Denaturalization has historically been rare. Between 1990 and 2017, the federal government filed just over 300 such cases, averaging roughly 11 per year.

Keep reading

US Army preparing for first executions in 65 years – ABC News

The US Army is preparing to carry out its first executions of death-row service members since 1961 if President Donald Trump orders them, ABC News reports, citing an internal planning document.

Trump has advocated wider application of the death penalty as a deterrent against violent crime.

ABC News reported on Saturday that the plan – known as Operation Resolute Justice – was circulated internally in February and requires the military to be ready to carry out executions “no later than 150 days from the date of presidential approval of the death sentences.”

The preparations reportedly include reviewing execution procedures and transferring the four death-row inmates from the US Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas to the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana in coordination with the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Army spokesperson Cynthia Smith downplayed the preparations as a “standard component of our continued planning,” noting that Trump has yet to issue a specific order, as quoted by the publication.

Keep reading

Signal, DuckDuckGo, and NordVPN threaten to exit Canada if metadata surveillance law passes

Another day, another government attempt to force tech companies to build backdoors. This time, Canada is proposing legislation that would require companies to retain certain metadata and provide law enforcement with access to it. Predictably, many tech players have sharply criticized the proposal, with some saying they would rather leave the Canadian market than comply.

The latest version of Canada’s Bill C-22 would require digital services such as internet service providers, messaging platforms, email providers, and potentially hardware companies to retain up to one year of user metadata. In addition, tech companies would have to implement mechanisms that allow authorities to obtain “lawful access” to that information for criminal investigations. Critics argue the proposal amounts to another government-mandated backdoor.

During his testimony before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, Signal executive Udbhav Tiwari said Bill C-22 would turn everyday digital tools into a surveillance network. He argued that requiring companies to retain metadata about users’ communications runs counter to Signal’s privacy practices.

A spokesperson for DuckDuckGo also confirmed that the company would remove its VPN service from Canada if Bill C-22 passes. NordVPN and other VPN providers have made similar statements.

Apple and Google have also joined industry warnings that the legislation could force them to weaken encryption. Last year, Apple successfully opposed a similar proposal in the United Kingdom that would have required it to build a backdoor into iCloud. The incident was the latest in a series of conflicts between the Cupertino-based company and government regulators over security and user privacy.

The primary concern is that malicious actors would inevitably discover and exploit any digital backdoor, regardless of whether it was designed exclusively for law enforcement or domestic government agencies. OpenMedia, which has described C-22 as an attempt to create a surveillance state, pointed to a late-2024 incident in which Chinese state-backed hackers compromised government-mandated police wiretap systems to steal sensitive data from AT&T, Verizon, Lumen Technologies, and other telecom providers.

Keep reading