Tag: vaccines

Dr. Dean Patterson: There could be as many as 50,000 people in the UK who have developed myocarditis post-vaccination

The UK’s People’s Vaccine Inquiry was launched on Monday.  “Fed up by the UK Government kicking the issues around the covid “vaccines” into the long grass, a bunch of us have come together with our own initiative, loosely modelled on the Canadian version,” Jonathan Engler said and recommended, in particular, Doctors For Patients UK’s submission to the Inquiry.

You can follow the People’s Vaccine Inquiry (“the Inquiry”) on Twitter HERE and you can watch or read all the testimonials on its website HERE. The organisers of the Inquiry encourage other experts to come forward and provide additional testimonials by submitting them via THIS email link.

Established in September 2022, Doctors for Patients UK (“DfPUK”) was formed by a group of doctors alarmed by the disregard of medical ethics. The group serves as a platform for sharing and voicing concerns and discussing critical health issues which have been appropriated by global interests.

Because the risks of mRNA and other covid-19 injections outweigh their benefits, DfPUK has launched the ‘The Hope Accord’, a petition that calls for an immediate halt and re-evaluation of these products.

DfPUK submitted their statement to the Inquiry as part of a moral and public duty to address several concerns, among them the risks associated with covid “vaccines” as demonstrated in the numerous adverse reaction reports submitted through the UK’s Yellow Card scheme that are still not being addressed by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”).  Its submission to the Inquiry aligns with General Medical Council (“GMC”) mandates that require doctors to act when patient safety is at risk, DfPUK said.

Within its 77-page written statement submitted to the Inquiry are testimonies from several doctors: consultant cardiologist and general physician Dr. Dean Patterson; oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish; surgeons Mr. T James Royle, Mr. Ian McDermott and Mr. Tony Hintonon; psychiatrist Dr. Ali Ajaz; emergency department doctor Dr. Scott Mitchell; general practitioners Dr. Kathy Grieg, Dr. Caroline Lapworth, Dr. Ayiesha Malik and Dr. Tim Kelly.

Keep reading

WHO director-general wants to intensify SMEAR CAMPAIGN against anti-vaccine movements

World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has called for a more aggressive approach to counteract anti-vaccine movements.

Tedros made this remark during a WHO celebration honoring so-called achievements in the 50 years since the organization launched the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI). During the celebration in Geneva, Switzerland, Tedros declared that “vaccines are among the most powerful inventions in history.”

“Thanks to vaccines, the smallpox has been eradicated, polio is on the brink and many one-sphere diseases can now be easily prevented, including measles, cervical cancer, yellow fever, pneumonia and diarrhea. With the recent development of vaccines against diseases like malaria, millions more lives can be saved,” said Tedros.

“In 1974 fewer than five percent of infants globally were vaccinated. Millions died of diseases such as measles, polio and diphtheria. That was the year WHO launched the expanded program on immunization, or EPI as we all know. Today, about 84 percent of the world’s children have received three doses of the vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, and diseases which were once a death sentence: smallpox,” he continued.

“EPI supported countries to establish standardized vaccination programs [on] smallpox and six other diseases, diphtheria, measles, pertussis, polio, tetanus and tuberculosis. These programs do far more than ever imagined,” said Tedros. “Fifty years ago, the EPI program helped millions of children, adolescents and adults access vaccines against 30 diseases, [now,] a new study led by WHO estimates that the EPI has saved at least 154 million lives since 1974 an average of more than 8000 lives a day for the past 50 years. Thanks to immunization, a child born today is 40 percent more likely to see their first birthday than a child born 50 years ago.”

Keep reading

Vaccine injuries in the Canadian Armed Forces rose by over 800 per cent in 2021

According to Access to Information documents, Canadian Armed Forces vaccine injuries skyrocketed from 14 in 2020 to 128 in 2021, an 800% increase, with over 100 injuries being attributed to Moderna’s experimental covid injection.

The documents also show that in 2022, the vaccine injury figures swelled even higher to 223 cases, LifeSiteNews reported last week.

Beginning in November 2021, Prime Minster Justin Trudeau’s government mandated 275,983 employees from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, military and main federal departments provide proof of vaccination.  Those who failed to do so risked dismissal or suspension without pay. While there were provisions for medical and religious exemptions, these were rarely granted.

By the time the policy ended in October 2022, 299 people had been released from the military and another 108 left on their own, according to Global News.

Documents obtained by LifeSiteNews reveal a significant increase in vaccine adverse events and injuries within the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) after the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out, with an over 800 per cent rise largely attributed to Moderna’s COVID-19 shot.

According to Access to Information (ATIP) documents obtained by LifeSiteNews, the number of COVID vaccine-related injuries in the CAF surged from 14 cases in 2020 to 128 in 2021, marking an increase of over 800 per cent. The documents indicate that the majority of these incidents occurred following the administration of Moderna’s COVID shot.

The records show the number of injuries reported each year as follows: 6 in 2010, 7 in 2011, 5 in 2012, 9 in 2013, 8 in 2014, 8 in 2015, 4 in 2016, 4 in 2017, 8 in 2018, 7 in 2019, 14 in 2020, then a massive jump to 128 cases in 2021, and 223 in 2022.

The types of COVID-19 vaccine adverse events and injuries that were reported included deep vein thrombosis, tachycardia, anaphylaxis, seizures, excessive menstrual bleeding, shingles reactivation, spontaneous abortion, myocarditis, pericarditis, menstrual cycle issues, Guillain-Barré syndrome, rhabdomyolysis, Bell’s palsy, hemochromatosis, thyroid mass, heart palpitations, transverse myelitis, perimyocarditis, and many others.

Keep reading

2 million Americans dead from covid vaccines and it all started with the Department of Defence

Dr. James Thorp is an obstetrician-gynaecologist with over 20 years of experience, Dr. Peter Breggin is a psychiatrist and the author of more than 20 medical and scientific texts, as well as popular books including his 2021 book ‘COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey’.  He publishes articles on a Substack page titled ‘Breggin Alerts! Exposing Global Predators’.

Their discussion with Brannon House from Worldview Tube began with the two different manufacturing processes that were used for the Pfizer covid vaccine.  What is being referred to as Process 1 was used to make the vaccine for trials before emergency use authorisation was given.  What is being referred to as Process 2 was the process used to make the vaccines administered to the public.

According to pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole, Process 1 was trialled on 40,000 trial participants and Process 2 was tested in only 252 people before it was given to billions of people who were told it was “safe and effective.”

This was confirmed in a criminal complaint filed in Switzerland in February 2024. The complaint stated: “The manufacturing process for the mRNA products actually administered (“manufacturing process 2” with plasmid DNA) differed fundamentally from the manufacturing process used for the products authorised by Swissmedic (“manufacturing process 1”).”

“It’s 100% true,” Dr. Thorpe told Howse. “[There were/are] completely two different processes … There was absolutely a bait and switch.  Not only with the production process but also with the precautions they gave to protect their participants in the phase 2/phase 3 trials.”

Dr. Thorpe is referring to the advice given to trial participants not to have intimate relations with someone who is not vaccinated because of the risk of shedding.  However, the public has not been warned of shedding risks either before, during or since the mass covid vaccine campaigns.

Keep reading

Under intense pressure from pro-pharma shills, Stockholm University retracts “controversial” study linking COVID jabs to CANCER

External pressure from “concerned” scientists and members of the public reportedly resulted in a major study about Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” and cancer being retracted by Stockholm University in Sweden.

Research by Dr. Hui Jiang and Dr. Ya-Fang Mei linking COVID injections to cancer had to be pulled, authorities say, because it upset some people, including one scientist who questioned the “social relevance” of the paper. This same scientist claimed the science contained in the paper was “hacked by anti-vaccinationists.”

The research team from Umeå University, also in Sweden, published their findings in the peer-reviewed journal MDPI Viruses back in October 2021 at the height of the Trump regime’s Operation Warp Speed mass injection scheme. A video about the study that was posted to YouTube not even a month later quickly amassed more than 1.4 million views.

“Any cell that has spike protein in it, if it needs its DNA repaired … then spike protein can reduce the DNA repair,” explained Dr. Mobeen “Been” Syed, the medical educator who put together the YouTube video.

“Cancer cells are the cells where the DNA has escaped the repair.”

(Related: Croatian pathologist Ivana Pavic recently discovered that cancer risk among fully vaccinated patients aged 15 through 59 is 52 percent higher compared to unvaccinated cancer risk.)

Keep reading

Researchers Claim Covid Vax ‘Safe’ Despite Kids Getting Epilepsy, Allergic Shock, Myocarditis & Appendicitis — Study

A recent peer reviewed study, claimed Covid vaccines are safe for children despite also listing several serious side effects from the shots affecting the brain and heart.

“In the sex-stratified analysis, the increased risk of myocarditis after the first dose of BNT162b2 was only observed in females (IRR 4.01, 95%CI 1.33–12.09; excess events per million: 3, 95%CI 1–4), while the increased risk following the second dose was observed in males only (IRR 2.87, 95%CI 1.50–5.51; excess events per million: 9, 95%CI 4–11) (Supplementary Figs. 1 & 2, Supplementary Tables 4 & 5). We additionally observed an increased risk of demyelinating disease, restricted to females (IRR 2.41, 95%CI 1.06-5.48; excess events per million: 4, 95%CI 0–6) following the second dose of BNT162b2. Of the eight female adolescents who experienced demyelinating disease in the 1–42 days following a second dose of BNT162b2, five were coded as optic neuritis,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section.

While the researchers admitted that life threatening neurological and cardiovascular issues with critical bodily systems arose post-injection, they still declared the gene therapy injections to be safe, despite only looking at side effect data 42 days post-vaccination.

This is especially suspect as some health agencies only consider people vaccinated two weeks post-injection and many deaths of the vaccinated are being counted as non-vaccinated.

“In 5-11-year-olds, we found no increased risks of adverse events 1–42 days following vaccination with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 or ChAdOX1. In 12-17-year-olds, we estimated 3 (95%CI 0–5) and 5 (95%CI 3–6) additional cases of myocarditis per million following a first and second dose with BNT162b2, respectively,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section.

Keep reading

The Beginning of Accountability for the Death-Dealing Covid “Vaccine”?

US Rep. Dr. Rich McCormick (R , GA) is far from perfect. He is misguided on many issues and has, like the rest of them, imbibed many of the kool-aid narratives.

But on the coercively imposed Covid protocols, he is superb. Here he is holding Anthony Fauci, in my considered opinion one of the major mass murders in human history, accountable.

I find it extraordinary that the American people fall for every orchestration the government and its whore media present to them. It is the gullibility of Americans that has enabled the government to define truth-tellers as conspiracy theorists.McCarthy, KenBest Price: $19.07Buy New $17.80(as of 06:52 UTC – Details)

For democracy to work, people have to be intelligent, informed, and committed to the defense of their rights. I don’t see any sign of this anywhere in the Western world. Insouciant populations allow governments, ruling elites, and the presstitutes to control the explanations. The truth can’t make you free when you are too indoctrinated to be able to recognize truth.

The America-hating Democrats, who especially hate white people and intend to replace them with unhindered mass immigration from the third world, gushed over Fauci, calling him a ‘hero’ and praised his efforts to replacing the doctor-patient relationship with coercion against “vaccine deniers.”

In contrast, US Rep. Brad Wenstrup (D, OH) told Fauci: “you oversaw one of the most invasive regimes of domestic policy the US has ever seen.”

The squirming Fauci was shut down when an audio clip was played in which Fauci said, “It’s been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological bullshit, and they get vaccinated.” Getting fired for not being vaccinated made it difficult for people in their lives. This is what Fauci advocated. “Take the death shot or be fired.”

Keep reading

After 3 Years of Censorship: Mainstream Media Now Confirms that “COVID Jabs May be to Blame for Increase in Excess Deaths”

If this report by The Telegraph had been published in early 2021, several million lives would have been saved.

But in 2021, censorship was imposed. Honest journalism was silenced. The media was supportive of the fear campaign.

The Telegraph report by Science Editor Sara Knapton, 5 June 2024 pertains to:

Researchers from The Netherlands analysed data from 47 Western countries and discovered there had been more than three million excess deaths since 2020, with the trend continuing despite the rollout of vaccines and containment measures.

They said the “unprecedented” figures “raised serious concerns” and called on governments to fully investigate the underlying causes, including possible vaccine harms.

Writing in the BMJ Public Health, the authors from Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, said: “Although Covid-19 vaccines were provided to guard civilians from suffering morbidity and mortality by the Covid-19 virus, suspected adverse events have been documented as well.

“Both medical professionals and citizens have reported serious injuries and deaths following vaccination to various official databases in the Western World.”

Click here to read the full article on The Telegraph.

Keep reading

The Government Wants us to “Get Back to the Vax” Because the COVID jab lies have put parents off of all vaccines

Childhood vaccination rates down by 20% in Australia. Time to celebrate folks! The government has jumped the shark and there is no putting that particular genie back in the bottle.

I will just highlight a few of what I consider to be the outright lies in this piece of rubbish masquerading as a news article.

Australian Medical Association councillor Dr Kenneth McCroary said he was “really disappointed” about the national decrease, warning there is a real risk of it “wreakinghavoc in the future”.

“One in 50 kids used to die from measles, people don’t realise how serious it is,” he said.

“There’s a syndrome — panencephalitis — where the kids get measles, and they’re ok, and then five or 10 years later, their brain essentially turns to mush, and they die within 12months.

Keep reading

9th Circuit and COVID Jabs

A lot is going around on social media related to the 9th Circuit ruling on Health Freedom Defense Fund v. Alberto Carvalho. There is discussion online that this means mandates are done. Unfortunately – that is untrue. This very short substack is to clarify the meaning of this case.

The case is related whether the mRNA jab mandates were allowed under the law. The important point that people are discussing is the part of the case referencing Jacob v. Massachusetts – the case that is relied on to impose vaccine mandates nationally. In the current case the court essentially held that there is a plausible argument that the COVID jabs do not fall under the definition of “vaccine” as it applies in Jacobson.

In Jacobson, the court allowed a small civil penalty to be imposed if someone refused a vaccine in certain circumstances. The definition of vaccine in Jacobson recognized that to be a vaccine an intervention would necessarily prevent the spread of smallpox. In the current case the argument is that, since the COVID jabs do not prevent the transmission of COVID it is not a vaccine but rather a medical intervention. I agree with that argument but this ruling does not mean that argument was won in court.

Keep reading