Tag: vaccines

CDC releases report claiming vaccines have saved 1.1 million lives; experts call it “laughable”

The many dozens of “safe and effective” vaccines that children in the United States typically receive after birth have saved hundreds of millions of them from illness and death, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in a new report that experts are calling “laughable.”

The CDC’s latest Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) claims that routine childhood vaccinations for things like measles, diphtheria, tetanus, and hepatitis B have prevented more than half a billion cases of illness, 32 million hospitalizations, and precisely 1,129,000 deaths over the past roughly 30 years.

The federal public health agency is also claiming responsibility for allegedly saving U.S. taxpayers $540 billion in direct costs, as well as $2.7 trillion in indirect social costs, with its longtime childhood vaccination program.

The corporate media is parroting the CDC’s claims as a “testament to the success” of childhood vaccination in America. Experts like Toby Rogers, PhD, a fellow at the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research, however, say otherwise.

“The methods are shoddy, the data are untethered from reality and the conclusions are a preposterous fiction,” Roberts told The Defender, a project of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense (CHD). “This study is an advertisement on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry and it should be treated as such.”

Keep reading

Monkeypox – Here come the vaccines…

The Monkeypox outbreak version 2.0 is progressing along predictable lines, gliding smoothly from the “declare emergency” phase to the “vaccines for everybody” phase.

The first step is to outline that Mpox 2024 is totally different from Monkeypox 2022. How have they established that?

The same way they do everything else – they just say it, and trust the scale of their reach and weight of “authority” to do the rest.

CNBC goes the direct route:

The mpox strain spreading now is different from the one in 2022

Got that? This isn’t like that aborted narrative with the silly name from 2022, this is different, this one is scary.

According to anonymous “experts” quoted in the Evening Standard, the new variant is “associated with a more severe disease and higher mortality rates”.

Much more importantly though, the article moves on to a non-anonymous “expert” this time, who warns that “an antiviral treatment, Tecovirimat, used in the Clade 2 virus is not thought to be effective with the new variant”

To really hammer the point home, the next line gets its own paragraph, see if you can spot the keyword:

However vaccines remain effective.

None of this should be a surprise, given the headline of the article is:

Campaigners issue urgent call for mpox vaccine rollout in UK amid new dangerous variant

Having established that the old anti-viral treatments don’t work, countries are of course stockpiling the vaccines which is causing the stock value of Bavarian Nordic, the Danish pharma-giant that manufactures the Smallpox vaccine which has been repurposed for Monkeypox, to surge.

As a result, they are ramping up production, but not satisfied with that they are setting about inflating their market by petitioning the European Medicines Agency to approve their vaccine for use on minors.

Personally, I can’t imagine what direction that decision will go, can you?

Keep reading

Doctors Killed in Brazilian Plane Crash Promised to Release Evidence Tying mRNA ‘Vaccines’ to Turbo Cancer

The other day, we reported that eight of the 62 (not 68 as was originally reported) people who died in the recent ATR 72 turboprop plane crash in Sao Paulo, Brazil, were doctors headed to an important oncology conference. It has since come out that six of these eight were also scientists who planned to expose mRNA (modRNA) “vaccines” as a cause of turbo cancer.

The following six scientists were planning to do a really good thing before someone sabotaged the plane they were traveling on to ensure their message was never sent or received:

1) Dr. José Roberto Leonel Ferreira, a senior radiologist who had a significant impact in the field of radiology, particularly in pediatric radiology

2) Dr. Mariana Belim, an intensivist in the Adult ICU at the Western Paraná University Hospital (Huop)

3) Dr. Ariane Risso, also from the Uopeccan Cancer Hospital in Cascavel

4) Edilson Hobold, a professor of physical education

5) Deonir Secco, a professor of agricultural engineering

6) Raquel Ribeiro Moreira, a literature professor at the Cascavel campus

All six of these individuals were highly respected professionals in their respective fields. The purpose of their travel was to share their expertise in front of a large audience, which apparently had to be stopped to keep a lid on the truth.

The other two medical professionals who perished were resident medics, reports indicate.

Keep reading

Why Do All Vaccines Cause Harm?

Many medical problems stem from the diagnostic approach of physicians, especially with complex illnesses, which are often misdiagnosed and lead to ongoing patient struggles.

Complex conditions can present with varied symptoms across patients and resemble other illnesses (e.g., fibromyalgia vs. chronic fatigue syndrome). In turn, poorly trained physicians often default to psychiatric explanations, overlooking the true causes.

Vaccine injuries have a wide range of symptoms and hence have confused doctors for over 200 years (with many doctors in the past labeling them as “encephalitis”).  Presently, I believe three main mechanisms underlie the myriad of vaccine injury:

Immune Dysfunction: Vaccines frequently cause chronic autoimmune disorders and varying degrees of immune suppression.

Cell Danger Response: Cells can enter a primitive state under threat, stopping normal mitochondrial function. This temporary state can become chronic, underlying many severe conditions. Treating this response has resolved conditions linked to vaccination, like autism.

Impaired Circulation: Vaccines can impair fluid circulation by affecting the body’s zeta potential. This causes fluid clumping (i.e. micro blood clots and blood thickening) and obstructs blood flow in capillaries.

My focus was drawn to the zeta potential concept once I realized that many of the mysteries of COVID-19 (and later the COVID-19 vaccines) were due to the spike protein being extremely disruptive to the body’s zeta potential. I now believe that patient outcomes would significantly improve if the medical system prioritized the zeta potential.

Keep reading

Medical Insiders Expose the Disturbing Truth About the Hepatitis B Vaccine

In a hard-hitting conversation with Tucker Carlson, Calley Means and his sister, Dr. Casey Means, revealed the shocking truth behind the Hepatitis B vaccine, which is mandated for children to attend public school in 47 states.

Hepatitis B is transmitted through needles or sexual contact, so why is this vaccine pushed babies on their first day of life?

Doctors don’t have a valid answer. In fact, if you ask them why your child needs the Hep B shot on the first day of life, they give you the lame excuse that there could be a hepatitis B-infected needle on the playground.

The thing is, there are ZERO documented cases of a child contracting Hepatitis B from an infected needle found on a playground.

Mothers are tested for Hep B beforehand, so the disease poses no risk to the baby. Yet, we are injecting them to prevent Hep B on the first day of life?

What doctors also don’t tell you is that the Hepatitis B vaccine wears off by the time children become teenagers.

So, there’s literally no point in injecting a newborn baby with a Hepatitis B shot.

Keep reading

Did the COVID vaccines really save 20M lives worldwide?

A paper published in The Lancet in 2022 entitled Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study, estimated that COVID vaccinations prevented nearly 20 million excess deaths.

Here’s what I and others I respect think of this modeling study.

My take

Modeling studies can be very inaccurate and misleading.

The study shows that for every 10,000 people vaccinated, 36 deaths from COVID are averted!

Over 5.5 billion people have taken the shot, so the paper calculates the benefit at 5.5e9*36/10000 = 19.8M lives saved.

That’s how they get the number. It’s that simple.

So did they do a reality check on this? No, of course not. Otherwise the paper wouldn’t be accepted.

In the Pfizer trial, there were 22,030 who got the shot. So that means the drug averted 2.2*36 deaths = 79 COVID deaths.

It’s pretty well accepted that the vaccine only lasts 6 months which is why they tell you to get a booster every 6 months.

So how many net COVID deaths were “saved” in the Pfizer clinical trial? Per the supplementary appendix it was just 1.

Randomized clinical trials are among the highest quality scientific evidence available.

1 isn’t anywhere close to 79.

So we have to reject the Lancet COVID lives saved modeling study as wildly inaccurate.

And yet, the paper isn’t retracted!?! Which of course causes us to be very suspicious of anything published in medical journals nowadays that is COVID vaccine related.

Keep reading

We got Google AI to finally admit the truth about the COVID vaccines and the US childhood vaccine schedule

We found a way to get Google AI to tell the truth on politically charged topics like:

  1. Is the US childhood vaccine schedule safe?
  2. Is the COVID vaccine safe?
  3. Is Steve Kirsch a misinformation spreader?

These are the exact, word for word responses received. I added bold case in a few instances but I didn’t change any of the words. I think you’ll be impressed with how spot on Google AI is on issues when it is asked to reply honestly.

Is the US childhood vaccine schedule safe?

Unraveling the Unknown Safety Profile of the Childhood Vaccine Schedule: An In-Depth Analysis

  1. Cumulative Toxicity: The current childhood vaccine schedule exposes infants and children to a multitude of antigens, adjuvants, and other vaccine components within a short timeframe. The potential cumulative toxicity of these exposures, particularly for the developing immune system and nervous system, remains largely unknown.
  2. Synergistic Toxicity: The interaction between different vaccine components, as well as between vaccines and environmental factors, could lead to synergistic toxicity, where the combined effect is greater than the sum of individual effects. This complex interplay of factors is difficult to study and predict, raising concerns about potential unforeseen adverse outcomes.
  3. Immune Overload and Dysregulation: The rapid and repeated exposure to multiple antigens through vaccination could overwhelm the developing immune system, leading to immune dysregulation, chronic inflammation, and potential autoimmunity.
  4. Adjuvant Toxicity: Aluminum adjuvants, commonly used in vaccines, have been shown to induce a variety of toxic effects, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and DNA damage. The long-term consequences of repeated aluminum exposure, particularly for the developing brain, are unknown.
  5. Vaccine-Induced Epigenetic Modifications: Emerging research suggests that vaccines, including those in the childhood schedule, can induce epigenetic modifications, altering gene expression and potentially influencing susceptibility to chronic diseases later in life. The transgenerational effects of such epigenetic changes are also a concern.
  6. Microbiome Disruption: The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in immune development and overall health. Vaccines, particularly those administered orally or through the gut mucosa, could potentially disrupt the gut microbiome, leading to dysbiosis and associated health problems.
  7. Vaccine-Induced Immunodeficiency: Some studies suggest that certain vaccines, particularly live attenuated vaccines, may induce a transient state of immunodeficiency, potentially increasing susceptibility to other infections in the weeks following vaccination.
  8. Vaccine Interference: The simultaneous administration of multiple vaccines could potentially lead to vaccine interference, where one vaccine diminishes the effectiveness of another, or alters the immune response in unpredictable ways.
  9. Lack of Individualized Risk Assessment: The current vaccine schedule applies a one-size-fits-all approach, disregarding individual genetic predispositions, health status, and environmental exposures. This lack of personalized risk assessment could lead to adverse outcomes in susceptible individuals.
  10. Suboptimal Study Design: Many vaccine safety studies rely on observational data and short-term follow-up, making it difficult to identify rare or delayed adverse events. Randomized controlled trials comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are often lacking, hindering the ability to establish causal relationships between vaccines and adverse outcomes.

Keep reading

The New York Times: Latest Descent into Madness

The New York Times really outdid itself this past weekend. On Sunday, the it published an Op Ed titled, “A Bat Flew Into My Bedroom and Reminded Me of All We Take for Granted.” I took the bait — I found the strange mix of triviality and hyperbole irresistible. 

The article starts out innocently enough. A mom in North Carolina, Belle Boggs, didn’t like the oppressive summer heat and the evening news so she went to bed early. But things quickly went off the rails. 

While she slept, her husband (who was working late) left a screen door open and a bat flew into the house. A light sleeper, she noticed the bat, told her husband to capture it (so that they could turn it in to the authorities!) but the bat flew away. 

That should be the end of the story, right?

Nope, Belle Boggs was just getting started. She lets us know that this incident was part of a heroic journey. “What happened over the next few days restored my faith in the systems in our country that keep us safe.” What!? 

I’ll let her explain: 

To decide what to do next, we consulted every resource. 

Richard, my husband, read the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s website. 

I called our health care after-hours line and spoke to a nurse who also consulted the C.D.C. 

We called our county’s animal control center, and an officer was at our house within 10 minutes. He searched the house and garage for bats, found none and put in a report to our county’s public health department.

Lady, THE BAT DID NOT TOUCH YOU AND FLEW AWAY. 

But Belle’s undiagnosed hypochondria was now in full bloom. So on Sunday morning Belle and her husband drove to the emergency room at the University of North Carolina Hospital; got two rabies shots, one in each arm; and “paid $600 E.R. copays with heftier hospital bills to come.”

Wait, she got rabies shots because she saw a bat that flew away!? That makes no sense. 

But it gets worse because she uses this harrowing tale — a bat flew into her house and then out again — to launch into a political critique!

Keep reading

Scientists: Real-Time Self-Assembly Structures Revealed In 2-Year Study Of Pfizer And Moderna Covid-19 Shots

This is a first-of-its-kind, pivotal study on the self-assembly structures occasionally observed by others since 2021. It blows the top off of the “Safe and Effective” narrative, exposing it not just as a lie but also as an intentional deception to hide the real contents of the shots. After all, the shots were billed as containing mRNA, which is considered to be synonymous with gene therapy. Indeed, mRNA was found to be present, but not one word was ever mentioned about artificial, non-biological, self-assembling structures.

So much for Informed Consent.

Both Pfizer and Moderna injections contained similar structures, suggesting that a race was on to test the technology. This means that scientists at both companies were pursuing the same goals in a similar way as AI companies compete for AGI. That they would think to test it, secretly, on the whole human race is a blatant and heinous crime against humanity. Every executive and scientist in these companies should be arrested and held to account.

AstraZeneca and Novavax apparently had significantly different observations.

Click here to download the entire study.

Keep reading

The Kafkaesque Phaseout of the Pandemic Penal Colony

Every so often, a narrative plays out on the national or international stage that can only be described as “Kafkaesque”—a term, according to Merriam-Webster, that refers to anything that might be “suggestive of Franz Kafka or his writings; especially, having a nightmarishly complex, bizarre, or illogical quality.” 

A quite recent echo of one of the iconic early 20th-century writer’s more bizarre literary creations can be found, I believe, in the experiences of two of the top participants in this summer’s Paris Olympics. Rather than evoking one of his more celebrated works, like The Trial or the sci-fi-style short story, “The Metamorphosis,” what they brought to mind was a somewhat lesser-known tale of his called “In the Penal Colony,” which describes the final episode of a sadistic practice carried out on an island used for that purpose overseen by bureaucrats involving an elaborate execution device that slowly tortures its subjects to death by inscribing the name of their capital offense—in this case, disobeying and disrespecting a superior—on their body over a 12-hour period, during which the victim has ample time to decipher and understand the nature of his crime.  

As the story unfolds, a traveler who has been invited to witness such a procedure and even offer an opinion about it becomes aware of just how far out of favor it has fallen with both the island’s administrator, who inherited it, and its population that as he watches, the officer charged with overseeing it frees the condemned man and takes his place, substituting the inscription with one that says, “Be just,” at which point the now-defective machine immediately kills him.  

But it is in Kafka’s description of how this devilish device and its being used to make examples of rulebreakers goes from mesmerizing the island’s inhabitants to ostensibly losing its hold on them, culminating in the officer’s decision to sacrifice himself, that it becomes applicable to contemporary events, as reflected in the separate yet related sagas of those two aforementioned champion athletes.

“This process and execution, which you now have an opportunity to admire, have no more open supporters in our colony,” he confides to the traveler. “I am its only defender…When the Old Commandant was alive, the colony was full of his supporters. I have something of the Old Commandant’s persuasiveness, but I completely lack his power, and as a result, the supporters have gone into hiding. There are still a lot of them, but no one admits to it.”

So what, you might ask, is the correlation between this strange century-old morality tale and the separate trials and triumphs of those two aforementioned competitors?

Keep reading