Apple says it’s fixing an issue after users noticed their iPhones temporarily showed the name “Trump” when they attempted to type the word “racist” by using the voice-to-text feature.
The issue was reported and replicated by Infowars host Alex Jones Tuesday morning after his daughter saw it on TikTok and duplicated it on several phones.
Jones was then able to replicate the issue on several other iPhones, warning it could be a “subliminal attack on President Trump.”
A week after the long-awaited ceasefire between Hamas and Israel brought a rare moment of quiet skies for Palestinians, President Donald Trump announced his plan to “clean out” Gaza, proposing to relocate its remaining population to neighboring countries like Jordan and Egypt. He has since reiterated this stance, claiming that the U.S. aims to “take over” Gaza, in order to rebuild and develop the area into a “riviera of the Middle East”. Is it, one may ask, truly a Trump presidency without the permanent furrowing of one’s brow?
Palestinians were quick to react to Trump: while some do have fears about the uncertainty of their safety and future in the shadow of 15 months of non-stop bombardment that left the strip decimated of both human life and infrastructure, many others expressed their steadfast resolve to remain.
“We will remain here – staying above the rubble, stones and iron. We will remain in our homeland, in Gaza”, said Manar Hamo of the Bureij camp.
But some of the most fervent pushback to Trump’s plan to takeover Gaza has come from the very same people, institutions, and newsrooms that spent fifteen months either remaining quiet on the extermination of Palestinians or supporting and building the case for it to continue. What we find is that there is a manufacturing of a moral hysteria around Trump’s proposal that seeks to – either intentionally or by way of liberal anti-Trump muscle memory – erase the direct culpability of the Biden-Harris administration and the Democrats in the genocide of Palestinians.
And so we have been ambushed by their discovery of the words “war crime”, “ethnic cleansing”, “dastardly deed” and “morally indefensible”. Even The New York Times’ made the very novel discovery of what international law may have to say about forced displacement. What we are seeing, again and again, is the introduction of language that not only offers the criminality of a Trump administration policy that has yet to be put in place but also explicitly moralizes about violence against Palestinians, a moralizing that was markedly absent as U.S-funded and made bombs were ripping apart Palestinian families for fifteen months straight.
For weeks, politicians and pundits have engaged in a ghoulish effort to blame every plane accident on the Trump Administration, even accidents that occurred within the first weeks of the Trump Administration.
Hillary Clinton led the effort by bizarrely suggesting that the collision of the airliner and the helicopter over the Potomac was due to the changes in Trump’s policies.
The spin showed utter contempt for the intelligence of the public since there was no evidence that the Trump Administration policies had any impact on the accidents.
Nevertheless, the press and pundits fueled the false narrative by citing various accidents in January. That narrative then collapsed after CNN and other media outlets acknowledged that there were actually fewer accidents in January than average and that the Biden Administration saw more accidents during the same period.
The attempt to use these tragedies for raw political advantage is appalling. However, it also shows the complete disregard for the intelligence of voters in suggesting the nexus between the change of Administration and airplane accidents shortly after the inauguration.
It does not matter that Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy was not confirmed until January 28, 2025, less than 24 hours before the accident over the Potomac.
Nevertheless, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and others immediately weaponized that and later tragedies.
Schumer was joined by media figures like former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan, who later was compelled to delete a tweet on Sunday, Feb. 16 in which he wrote “Make American Plane Crash Again.”
Like others, Hasan was connecting a small plane crash in Georgia to the start of the Trump Administration.
Then there was Rep. Eric Swalwell. We have previously discussed the bottomless pit of Swalwellian logic, such as shutting down the government to prevent government shutdowns.
The logic tree was felled again by Swalwell in blaming the Trump Administration for the crash in Georgia: “Trump is President. President Trump is in charge of air safety. All crashes are Trump’s fault.”
A new Supreme Court petition filed by political activist Warren Balogh sheds light on what he calls the ‘intentional dereliction of duty’ by Charlottesville officials during the infamous 2017 “Unite the Right” rally. The petition, appealing a lower court decision from the Fourth Circuit, raises serious constitutional questions about whether local governments can deliberately allow chaos and violence as a means of suppressing speech they dislike.
Balogh is a self-described ‘pro-white’ activist. Far-left groups use a variety of labels to describe him as a ‘white nationalist’ and other such defamatory terms. Balogh says he was at the Charlottesville rally for only one purpose: to oppose the destruction of a historical monument. The Lee monument was destroyed in 2023, despite promises by officials it would be relocated.
Balogh is appealing the Fourth Circuit’s dismissal of his claims, as part of Balogh v. Virginia, 120 F.4th 127. That appeal was decided by Chief Judge Albert Diaz, an Obama appointee. That court said that because the participants engaged in violence, they were not entitled to protection from the police, a ruling at odds with the evidence in the case.
You can read the request for Supreme Court review here.
Charlottesville’s supposed right-wing violence is the reason Joe Biden gave for running against Donald Trump in the 2020 election.
In yet another case of activist judges undermining the will of the American people, a Biden-appointed federal judge has issued a sweeping injunction blocking President Donald Trump’s executive orders aimed at ending taxpayer-funded diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) schemes.
U.S. District Judge Adam Abelson, a left-wing operative placed on the bench by Joe Biden, ruled on Friday that the Trump administration cannot immediately revoke federal contracts and grants that promote divisive DEI initiatives, claiming such actions may violate “free speech rights,” according to far-left AP.
In other words, the judge believes that forcing taxpayers to fund radical leftist ideology is a constitutional right.
On his first day back in office, President Trump moved swiftly to dismantle the race-obsessed, Marxist bureaucracy embedded within the federal government by issuing executive orders that directed agencies to eliminate DEI-related funding and contracts.
He further required federal contractors to certify that they do not promote discriminatory DEI policies, a move that sent leftist institutions into a panic.
The City of Baltimore, along with a coalition of liberal academia and DEI profiteers, rushed to sue the Trump administration, desperately trying to keep the federal gravy train flowing.
The lawsuit whines that Trump’s orders will cause “irreparable harm” to DEI bureaucrats and the institutions that rely on billions in taxpayer funding to push radical race and gender policies.
In the summer of 2016, a cascade of political maneuvers and covert operations began that would forever alter the landscape of American politics. At the epicenter of this storm was former Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director James Comey, who launched an investigation into then-candidate Donald Trump, despite the absence of credible evidence.
This probe, labeled a “counterintelligence matter,” set the stage for a two-year saga involving the FBI, U.S. intelligence agencies, the mainstream media and the Democratic Party, all of whom were convinced that Trump’s victory could only have been achieved through a nefarious conspiracy with Russia.
Author Gregg Jarrett, in his book “The Russia Hoax: The Illicit Scheme to Clear Hillary Clinton and Frame Donald Trump,” meticulously dissects this intricate web of events, revealing a story of abuse of power, misinformation and political machinations.
Jarrett argues that the investigation was not just a misguided effort but a deliberate attempt to undermine Trump’s presidency and protect Hillary Clinton from legal repercussions for her email scandal.
Central to Jarrett’s narrative is the role of the Clinton campaign in funding the Steele Dossier, a compilation of unverified and salacious allegations against Trump, which was used to justify the surveillance of a Trump campaign associate. The dossier, compiled by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, became the linchpin of the FBI’s investigation. However, the FBI actively concealed the fact that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee had underwritten this document, a revelation that Jarrett argues was crucial to the legitimacy of the probe.
“This dossier was the pretext for a covert operation that turned the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into a political witch hunt,” Jarrett writes. The FBI’s decision to use an undercover informant to infiltrate the Trump campaign, hoping to entrap associates, further underscores the lengths to which the agency was willing to go to find a crime that did not exist.
Do you remember when Democrats accused former President Trump of incitement for telling his supporters to “peacefully and patriotically” march to the Capitol to make their voices heard? Well, fast forward to today, and we have a sitting senator engaging in rhetoric that does far more than make a call for peaceful assembly. Earlier this week, Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) advocated for “revolution” while standing outside in snow-covered Boston, a site steeped in revolutionary history.
“Massachusetts is where revolutions are born,” Markey began. “And the revolution against Donald Trump and Elon Musk starts here.”
“This is the city of revolutionaries from the American Revolution to create checks and balances in the United States Constitution so that we did not have a dictator — a king — the way those colonists were living under it. And they fought all along Massachusetts Avenue. All coming out, the men and women to say, ‘no taxation without representation.’ We want to have a balance, we cannot have a king.”
Markey’s choice of words raises an important question: is “revolution” just a dog whistle for “insurrection”? His post on X proudly calls for this upheaval, and he pinned it to his account to make sure people see it. Perhaps he believes this kind of incendiary language is acceptable when those on the left wield it.
For the decades I’ve been in the news biz, especially on radio and TV, where sound and pictures are paramount, and a reporter must not be afraid to ask the simple — some might say dumb — questions. A reporter usually gets the best answers by asking the simplest of questions. Follow-up questions are where the reporter gets crucial information and builds out a news story.
And then there’s CNN host Brianna Keilar.
Keilar remains afflicted with TDS, an offshoot of the woke mind virus that she highlights for her viewers for hours every week. She doesn’t try to hide her biases but instead sallies forth to get a gotcha moment against every GOP person who bothers to go on CNN. Her motives can’t be trusted, of course, because she’s not fair. Her worldview is woke, and everything else emanates from there. In her mind, people to the right of center are Nazis. Her questions begin with that assumption.
But Trump advisor Stephen Miller may have cracked the code.
Indeed, every person who’s to the right of center should respond to Keilar’s questions in the same manner as Miller. Instead of sputtering, Miller answered the question in the simplest way, assuming that the woke CNN host really needed the answer to her rudimentary question.
The net effect was that viewers became witnesses to a clash that left the CNN host wrecked by the time it was all over. Officer, I’d like to report a hit and run of a news anchor. And it was all because she couldn’t get out of her own head to realize that not everyone with an R after their name is a Nazi.
Keilar’s question was about how that rich African American meanie Elon Musk really has no right to save Americans money and fire people.
As our colleagues at Townhall put it, “Stephen Miller has to whip out the crayons” to explain that there’s this thing called the Constitution. Blink twice if you understand what that means, Brianna, he seemed to say.
The globalist media is wailing and gnashing their teeth over Trump’s comments and actions over the Ukraine War and those of its President, Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Trump criticized Zelensky’s and the EU’s demand for a seat at the peace talks over the country’s future: “But today I heard, ‘Oh, we weren’t invited.’ Well, you’ve been there for three years. You should have ended it three years. You should have never started it. You could have made a deal.”
Trump he said he could have made a deal on Ukraine where no one would have been killed, and would have kept most of their land. But no, Europe, and the Biden regime wanted war.
The globalist media is wailing and gnashing their teeth over Trump’s comments and actions over the Ukraine War and those of its President, Volodymyr Zelenskiy.
Trump criticized Zelensky’s and the EU’s demand for a seat at the peace talks over the country’s future: “But today I heard, ‘Oh, we weren’t invited.’ Well, you’ve been there for three years. You should have ended it three years. You should have never started it. You could have made a deal.”
Trump he said he could have made a deal on Ukraine where no one would have been killed, and would have kept most of their land. But no, Europe, and the Biden regime wanted war
Trump envoy Keith Kellogg, arriving in Kyiv today, for talks with President Zelenskiy and other officials. “We will listen. We are prepared to provide what is needed. We understand the need for security guarantees. Part of my mission is to listen.”
This is all classic Trump negotiations style.
Zelenskiy himself is making ridiculous demands, and immature statements, like those of a globalist puppet who must keep the war going for his paymasters at all cost.
I’ll open with the punchline, but be forewarned — there’s nothing funny about it: The Far Left will betray Ukraine because they hate Trump more than they care about the Ukrainian people.
Those poor, suffering civilians in Ukraine? They’re abstractions — mere cannon fodder for a greater cause. Been that way since the beginning of the conflict, and although the Biden administration never formally admitted it, slaughtering Russians and Ukrainians in a long, protracted bloodbath was America’s objective all along.
Sure, we “dolled up” the policy with high-minded speeches about protecting liberty and Russia being evil and/or Ukraine being pure and good, and vowing that Putin “cannot remain in power,” but we never sought any sort of resolution. Not really. Instead, we armed Ukraine with just enough equipment, weapons, technology, and artillery to maintain the status quo.
It was a bloodbath we wanted, and a bloodbath we got.
From the Far Left’s viewpoint, the plan made sense: Russia was our “enemy” — especially after they interfered in the 2016 election and cheated poor Hillary out of the presidency. And then, in 2022, they invaded a neighboring country. Y’know who else invaded their neighbors? That’s right: HITLER! Clearly, it’s in our strategic interest to weaken the next Hitler.
And when you strip away all the high-minded rhetoric, that’s been Biden’s true objective all along. Let the war continue. Let Russia hemorrhage. Let the Red Army bleed itself dry.
A healthy, intact Russian military is a threat. Therefore, let’s weaken it as much as possible, depleting it of its weaponry, equipment, and manpower.
Hellbound and Down 
You must be logged in to post a comment.