ICE refuses to disclose records on Ilhan Omar fraud probe, cites ongoing ‘enforcement proceedings’

The federal government is refusing to turn over records related to an investigation conducted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement into allegations of immigration fraud by Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., citing a legal exemption for ongoing investigations. 

Just the News filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the records in January, seeking the records pertaining to any investigations conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement into the allegations that Rep. Omar, who represents Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District, married a relative in order to help him remain in the country. 

Omar has denied the allegations. No court records, DNA evidence, or other documentary proof has ever substantiated that Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, Omar’s legal husband from 2009–2017, was her biological brother.

“ICE has determined that the information you requested is being withheld in full pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A). Disclosure of any responsive records at this time could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings,” ICE told Just the News in response to the FOIA in May. 

The FOIA exemption cited by the agency “applies to records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes when their release could disrupt such proceedings,” the reply reads. 

You can read the letter below: 

Final Response 2026-ICFO-11295 3 (1).pdf

The Department of Justice guidelines for invoking exemption 7(A) say that doing so requires a two-step assessment. “First, there must be a ‘reasonable likelihood’ of a pending or contemplated law enforcement proceeding,” the guidance says. “Second, release of the information must be reasonably expected to cause some articulable harm to that proceeding.” 

Harm includes things such as exposing the case to witness tampering or tipping off suspects, according to the guidance. The exemption makes no distinction between criminal, civil, and administrative cases. 

Omar’s office did not respond to a request for comment. 

Keep reading

N.C.: Father sues over schools’ alleged refusal to disclose if members of opposite sex use same facilities as his children

A North Carolina father is suing the Cabarrus County school board over its refusal to disclose if members of the opposite biological sex are able to use his children’s bathrooms or locker rooms at their respective schools.

On Friday, Brandon Matthews filed a suit against the county’s education board, the superintendent of the county schools, as well as the principals of his children’s schools.

“Because of his sincerely held religious beliefs and his convictions about what is best for his children’s safety and well-being, Mr. Matthews seeks to ensure that his children are not required or expected to undress or use the restroom in the presence of members of the opposite sex,” read the court document, which Fox News provided.

Matthews is the father of a fourth-grade daughter, who attends Mount Pleasant Elementary School, and a son, who is a high school senior at Mount Pleasant High School. In May, he asked the principals of both schools to inform him if a member of the opposite sex was permitted to use the same facilities as his children.

“But both principals refused to answer his questions, instead telling Mr. Matthews that he could contact them if and when one of his children found himself or herself in an uncomfortable situation,” the court filing read. “But the Constitution does not require Mr. Matthews to wait.”

The suit pulls on the 2025 U.S. Supreme Court ruling Mahmoud v. Taylor, in which the court found that schools must inform parents and give them an opportunity to excuse their children from instruction involving “LGBTQ+-inclusive” storybooks when it goes against their religious beliefs.

“If the Constitution requires notice and an opportunity to opt out before exposing children to certain storybooks, it necessarily protects a parent’s right to receive notice and an opportunity to protect his children before they are expected or required to undress or use the restroom in the presence of members of the opposite sex,” the suit read.

The document also asserted that Matthews is not seeking the identification of any student, but rather he wishes to know whether his children may be expected to share such facilities with a member of the opposite sex.

Keep reading

In-N-Out Burger Shooter: Why Has No Motive Been Reported?

It’s now been eight days since 24-year-old Chad Williams walked up to a brand-new In-N-Out Burger in Twin Falls, Idaho — the place had barely finished its grand opening, having only cracked its doors on July 24 — and turned a fast-food parking lot into a crime scene. He killed three people, including employee Ashley Garibay, and wounded seven more before putting a bullet in himself after roughly 90 minutes of chaos. Wikipedia has assembled the fullest timeline so far, and it’s worth reading in full if you can stomach it.

Here’s what we actually know, stripped of the speculation everyone’s been layering on top of it:

Williams pulled up to the drive-thru payment window and shot Garibay first. He then pulled forward, parked, got out, and shot Christopher Claunch, who was sitting in another car, minding his own business, ordering a burger like everyone else that day. Former Twin Falls police officer and former Idaho state trooper Austin James Scott ran toward the gunfire to confront him — Williams shot and wounded Scott too, forcing him to retreat. Williams then doubled back to the payment window and opened fire on employees who were trying to keep Garibay alive. His handgun jammed at some point in all this, so he calmly walked back to his own car, grabbed a rifle, and picked up right where he left off. It took an armed bystander named Lane Koehn, along with return fire from other citizens, to finally drive him off. He shot himself before police ever got a hand on him.

What we still don’t have, eight days later, is the “why.” And that gap is where everyone’s imagination has gone to work overtime.

Police Chief Matthew Hicks says detectives are confident Williams acted alone and that his family is cooperating fully with the investigation. Beyond that, the well runs dry. 

Williams attended the College of Southern Idaho from 2022 to 2023 and left without a credential — he’d also held a student government position there, one from which he was booted in February 2023, roughly 10 months before he stopped showing up at CSI altogether. Nobody’s saying why he got the boot, and nobody’s saying why he left. Funny how that particular detail hasn’t made it into any official statement yet. A former dorm hallmate who considered Williams a genuine friend, one Elijah Moseley, called him “an introvert” and “a pretty chill guy” who never once seemed alarming. Which tells us exactly nothing, as I dug into a few days back — plenty of perfectly ordinary introverts never shoot up a drive-thru, and plenty of people who eventually do exactly that spend years looking completely unremarkable right up until the moment they don’t.

In the lack of information, I have a couple theories that are admittedly as thin as the data is, but I’ll toss ’em out anyway:

The timing — going from handgun to jammed handgun to full rifle, mid-attack, without hesitation — makes me wonder if this started as something absurdly small. The place had only been open a matter of days. New staff, new systems, plenty of room for a botched order. 

Thing is, if Williams snapped over something as petty as a screwed-up burger from a crew that hadn’t found its rhythm yet, that alone doesn’t explain a man showing up already armed and ready to escalate to a rifle. Something else had to be sitting underneath that, whether it was medication, a breakdown building for weeks, or some other pressure nobody’s disclosed. Call it a hunch, and weigh it accordingly.

I’ll also cop to my own first instinct, which came up before any of all that, since I try not to pretend I didn’t have one. 

Given the run of recent shooters where the shooter was trans and on meds, and where that detail eventually surfaced days into coverage, my gut went there initially, too. At this point, I’m not ruling it out entirely, but nothing in the reporting on Williams points that direction, and the longer this drags on without that detail surfacing, the less I’m inclined to keep leaning on it. 

At this point, I find myself circling a different, equally unproven idea instead: that Williams may have known his first victim, Ashley Garibay. If the pictures do her justice, she was a rather pretty girl, I must say.  The idea here is that she was specifically targeted rather than randomly chosen. That’s speculation and nothing more, and I’ll say so plainly, rather than dress it up as something sturdier.

Finally, I observe that In-N-Out opened a new place in Colorado as well, back in 2020, which prompted lines of 12 to 14 hours. In-N-Out has been going through a fairly large expansion over the last few years. In-N-Out opened its first two Colorado locations — one in Aurora, one in Colorado Springs — on Friday, November 20, 2020. The Aurora location, near a shopping mall, saw demand so extreme that the drive-thru line stretched 1.5 to 2 miles, wrapped around the mall property twice, and backed up nearby highways. Aurora police initially estimated a 12-hour wait, then revised it up to 14 hours. I’ve seen that phenom myself during a local opening of a Chick-fil-A, which was so huge it required three local police cars to keep traffic moving off the main road the place was on. Estimates in that case were a couple of hours. Which leads me here: The In-N-Out in Twin Falls had just opened a few days before the incident, which makes me wonder if the situation there wasn’t similar in its drive-thru. Interesting that this didn’t get mentioned.

Keep reading

UK government launches legal action to stop the release of data showing crimes committed by migrants

The Labour government is heading to court to block the publication of migrant crime statistics.

Following a year-long battle at the Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”), it was ruled that the Ministry of Justice must provide the Centre for Migration Control with the most comprehensive dataset on migrant crime in British history.

The Labour government is now trying to stop the public from learning the truth.

The Daily Telegraph has run this story: ‘David Lammy fighting to ‘cover up’ foreigners’ crimes’.

The Centre for Migration Control today announces a campaign to fight back against this cover-up. The public deserves to know the truth; the country requires that this information be published.

Help the Centre for Migration Control fight back against the Labour government by supporting our Crowdfunder: End the Migrant Crime Cover-Up.

Background

For the last year, the Centre for Migration Control (“CMC”) has been locked in a battle at the Information Commissioner’s Office (“ICO”) – a non-department government body tasked with upholding public access to government data – with the Ministry of Justice.

In June 2025 the CMC requested via the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (“FoI”) that the Ministry of Justice produce statistics on the total number of convictions between 2018 and 2024 ( broken down by nationality) for detailed offences within the following headline offence categories: “violence against the person,” “sexual offences,” “drug offences,” “criminal damage and arson,” “possession of weapons,” “theft offences” and “robbery.”

This information would have been the single biggest release of migrant crime statistics in British history and, for the first time, told us how many migrants are convicted every year of murder, rape, arson, the importation and supply of class A drugs, the sale of weapons, along with hundreds of other offences.

Unlike other European nations – including Denmark, Germany, and Sweden – the British government does not publish this information. This is despite the information being readily available on the Police National Computer.

The Ministry of Justice refused this FoI request and, on 10 July 2025, the CMC requested that the ICO make a ruling on whether it was appropriate for the data to be withheld.

On 22 June 2026, over 12 months after the initial FoI request, the ICO ruled unambiguously that the Ministry of Justicemust “disclose the requested information” to the CMC.

Keep reading

Bill Gates Held A Top Secret ‘Q’ Clearance For Seven Years – And The DOE Won’t Say Why

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates held a top-tier “Q” security clearance at the Department of Energy from 2014 to 2021 – though the DOE didn’t grant it. Another federal agency vetted him first, and the letter confirming the clearance doesn’t say which one.

The detail comes from a DOE letter entered into the Congressional record by Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY). The letter emerged as Fauci faced fierce Republican blowback during his Senate hearing last week, where the longtime face of COVID policy pleaded the Fifth more than 100 times.

“Q” clearance is the Energy Department’s highest classification level, the kind normally reserved for people working on nuclear weapons design, national labs, critical energy infrastructure, and highly classified scientific research. Gates kept that clearance for seven years, starting under President Obama and running through the entirety of the COVID-19 pandemic.

One explanation as to why; Gates founded and chairs TerraPower, the advanced nuclear reactor company that has spent years working alongside DOE national laboratories and won Nuclear Regulatory Commission construction approval in March. A nuclear executive holding a nuclear clearance is not, on its own, a scandal.

But the letter doesn’t mention TerraPower – or why he had it at all. What it does say is that the clearance was granted reciprocally on June 11, 2014 – meaning it originated at another federal agency, and DOE simply honored it – before terminating on December 6, 2021. The letter does not name the agency that vetted him in the first place.

Keep reading

Allegations, Secrecy, and the Fight for Justice in the Wisconsin Air National Guard

A colonel in the Air National Guard (ANG), who had nearly 35 years of service, was relieved of her command in 2021, coincidentally at a time when one of her subordinates was disseminating nude, explicit photographs.

Colonel Leslie Zyzda-Martin is the former commander of Wisconsin’s Volk Field Air National Guard Base. Her story highlights a troubling intersection of military culture, accountability, and the challenges faced by those who dare to stand against misconduct. Unable to clear her record amid suspicious circumstances, Zyzda-Martin was forced into retirement in October 2024. Three years later, she is still struggling to clear her name under dubious circumstances.

It is essential to recall the context leading up to this incident: Major General Donald Dunbar resigned in 2019 at the urging of Governor Tony Evers (D-WI). His resignation followed a federal investigation that uncovered a decade’s worth of mismanagement of sexual assault complaints by Wisconsin National Guard leaders. The Guard not only failed to follow military procedures by neglecting to track cases or guarantee that both victims and accused individuals were afforded due process, but they also attempted to conceal the situation.

The National Guard Bureau’s (NGB) Office of Complex Investigations (OCI) found that the “programs and systems for handling allegations of sexual assault, sexual harassment, and other workplace or service-related misconduct (emphasis mine) were non-compliant with federal law and regulation, and in various respects, deficient or failing.”

Zyzda-Martin was interviewed on at least two occasions by Inspector General personnel concerning allegations of wrongdoing committed by then-NGB Brigadier General Chad Parker. Little did she know, this would likely play a significant factor in her removal from command two years later.

In 2020, Zyzda-Martin stepped into a challenging environment, finding herself ensnared in a web of unsubstantiated allegations and a lack of transparency from superiors. At the time, the ANG colonel was serving at the Pentagon on a Title 10 tour at the National Guard Bureau in the Intelligence Directorate when she was offered the opportunity to apply for a command position with the Wisconsin Air National Guard.

“I took that job and found a base that was not within standards and ill-equipped,” Zyzda-Martin told The Gateway Pundit. She characterized the military installation as “a sleepy base,” and, on the heels of the 2019 scandal, her goal was to restore U.S. Air Force (USAF) standards to the base. However, her earnest efforts were met with resistance, culminating in four complaints against her, all of which were later found to be unsubstantiated.

Keep reading

FDA Continues Its Legacy of Radical Delays on FOIA Requests

We fund the government. We pay the salaries of its employees. They work for us—though they often seem to forget that. One of the ways we keep tabs on what they are doing is a tool called the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Congress passed this law specifically so that anyone can request emails, documents, records, etc., regarding the work our government is doing.

For years now, FDA has been dragging its feet when it comes to producing documents in response to FOIA requests. And not just dragging its feet—burying them in concrete. So much so that my firm has brought over 100 lawsuits against the federal government, on behalf of ICAN, just to get documents that should clearly have been produced. And even then, the government still drags its feet, wasting taxpayer money fighting us in court to generate more delay.

The 21-year FOIA request

Many of you are likely familiar with the FOIA case we filed for the Covid-19 vaccine licensure documents in which FDA wanted 75 years to produce the documents! Sadly, that was not an outlier. It was business as usual for the government in responding to FOIA requests.

Here is just one other example of FDA’s FOIA behavior. In a court filing on January 30, 2026, FDA told a federal judge that the FOIA request at issue, which was originally submitted on January 26, 2024, was “currently positioned 471” in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Complex Track. Meaning, it was behind 470 other requests. FDA then conceded it “cannot reasonably estimate” when that request will reach the top of the track. Let that sink in. It cannot even estimate when it will comply with the law.

It gets worse. FDA then asked the Court to pause the litigation for “at least eighteen months, through and including June 25, 2027.” By then, FDA explained, it “anticipates” that it “will be in a better position to evaluate when it might be able to respond” to the FOIA request. Read that again. It doesn’t even commit to producing the documents by 2027—instead that’s the date it will evaluate the request’s status. That is not a commitment. That is a dodge.

While FDA pretends it cannot provide an estimate, we can reasonably estimate when it will produce these documents based on recent movement in the queue. In a 6-month period, the request at issue advanced just 11 positions in the queue—from number 482 to 471. If that rate continues, it will take more than 21 years before this request reaches the top of CBER’s Complex Track.

So much for transparency. And this is a FOIA request under the jurisdiction of a federal court. Imagine those requests that are stuck at the administrative levels.

Keep reading

Long-hidden UFO information at center of Trump push to free former officials

President Donald Trump has directed federal agencies to waive prior nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) for former government employees and contractors cooperating with unidentified anomalous phenomena investigations, Fox News Digital has learned.

“President Trump recently directed the Department of War and the intelligence community to allow former government employees or contractors, that have relevant information about the disclosure of UAP, to come forward to meet with designated government representatives — AARO or the President’s UAP taskforce, ‘PURSUE’ — and have their prior NDAs abrogated,” a senior administration official said, with AARO referring to the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, the Pentagon office established to investigate UFOs and other unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs).

Another senior administration official emphasized the move was not a “declassification directive” and only allowed employees to come forward through government channels.

Officials say years of congressional inquiries, whistleblower allegations and newly declassified records have raised questions about whether additional witnesses have remained silent because they believed prior nondisclosure agreements prevented them from cooperating with government investigations.

Keep reading

Democrats Are Panicking and Scrambling to Hide Something Big

Things just keep getting worse for the Democratic Party, and at this rate, they may need a new metaphor because “keeps getting worse” barely covers it anymore. We already told you the polls are tightening heading into the midterms in November, which was bad enough on its own. Now it turns out the party’s situation is so much worse than we already know, and the people running the show apparently don’t want you to know just how bad it really is

In a bizarre move, the Democratic National Committee required its senior leadership to sign non-disclosure agreements before a private meeting on the party’s finances, according to two people familiar with the conversations who spoke to Axios. That alone is a break from past practice. DNC officers are high-ranking members of chair Ken Martin’s team, not entry-level staffers. Officers at that level don’t typically get handed a confidentiality agreement before they can hear how much money they have in their piggy bank and what they plan to do about it.

Make no mistake about it, you don’t slap NDAs on your own leadership team unless you’re worried about what might leak. And boy, it’s gotta be something really juicy.

The private senior officers’ meeting happened on June 25, five days before the Supreme Court issued a ruling that reshaped party fundraising rules. Martin has been fending off a crisis of confidence among Democrat donors, operatives, and even DNC members over how he’s managing the party, especially with the Republican National Committee sitting on a huge fundraising advantage without any debt.

And the numbers justify the panic. Through the end of May, the DNC had nearly $15 million on hand but $18 million in debt. The RNC, meanwhile, had $125 million on hand and zero debt. In other words, the Democrat Party is running on fumes, and they know it.

Keep reading

New Heavily Redacted FBI Records Obtained by Judicial Watch Reveal Hillary’s Late Brother Tony Rodham Was Under Federal Investigation for Wire and Mail Fraud While Hillary Clinton was First Lady

Judicial Watch has dropped another bombshell.

After years of stonewalling and a FOIA lawsuit, the conservative watchdog obtained 77 pages of heavily redacted FBI records confirming that the late Tony Rodham, Hillary Clinton’s brother, was the subject of a 1996 FBI criminal investigation into potential wire and mail fraud.

The probe, opened by the FBI’s Miami Field Office under case number 196D-MM-79121 (the “196” designation is reserved for wire fraud cases), focused on Rodham’s involvement with East European Imports, Inc. (EEI) in Coral Gables, Florida.

According to the documents, associates operating through East European Imports, Inc. (EEI) in Coral Gables, Florida, claimed exclusive U.S. rights to import Romanian ARO four-wheel-drive vehicles. They aggressively solicited $30,000+ deposits from auto dealers across the country for “exclusive franchises” and “Parts, Special Tools and Sign Packages,” with the balance due upon acceptance.

No vehicles were ever imported. The FBI concluded there was “very little likelihood” any ARO vehicles would ever arrive in America from EEI.

Worse, the subjects had already run a nearly identical scam years earlier (1986–1987) under the name Roman Motors Corporation. This was happening while Hillary Clinton was First Lady of the United States.

Keep reading