Tag: safety

Nothing says ‘Safe and Effective’ like destroying all the data from Australia’s giant abandoned vaccine study

“Follow the science” they say, right up until they destroy it

In August 2021, as the masses were being coerced and cajoled into vaccinations, the government announced a gigantic long term study with 10,000 Australians that would run for five years. They promised they would include the vaccinated and unvaccinated, and generate 100,000 samples, and 11 million datapoints. No stone would be left unturned to make sure the vaccines were safe and effective. “The Science” was being used to reassure the people.

Less than two years later the data must have looked terrible, because they suddenly stopped the study. They muttered something about archiving the data until more funding was available. (Sure, sure). Now, they want to quietly destroy the data and make sure no one can ever use it, or find out the secrets it hides with an FOI application. The cost of the entire project was $20 million, a pitifully small fraction of the $18 billion we spent on Australia’s Covid 19 treatment experiments, and it’s nothing compared to the human cost of suffering involved. Now, we’re trying to save a few dollars because the National Archives can’t afford to buy another 8 Tb hard drive from Officeworks or spend 0.1% of the Covid budget renting a cool room in a warehouse. Does anyone believe these excuses any more?

Tell the children, “Government ScienceTM” is nothing more than a tool of persuasion and marketing. It’s just a brand-name abused for profit and power.

A cynic might say those who set this study up did it purely for the purpose of “radiating confidence” in vaccines, and they never intended to finish it. But we know that if a miracle happened and the results had turned out well, they’d be running adverts, going on talkshows and sending a star recruit with a QoVax badge on a spaceflight with Katy Perry.

Keep reading

Senator Johnson: Did a Top CDC Official Destroy Covid Vaccine Files?

Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is asking federal police agencies to investigate whether a top CDC official destroyed records containing data about the safety of Covid-19 “vaccines.”

Johnson, who is chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, sent a letter on April 9 to the Department of Justice (DOJ), the FBI, and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS OIG), about Dr. Tom Shimabukuro. Johnson wrote:

I recently learned that a top official at the [CDC] who led the effort to identify COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, may have deleted or destroyed agency records and communications. If true, these actions would be a clear obstruction of my oversight efforts and a violation of federal record-keeping requirements.… HHS officials recently informed me that Dr. Shimabukuro’s records remain lost and, potentially, removed from HHS’s email system altogether.

Investigation Needed

The Wisconsin senator calls Shimabukuro’s potential misdeeds “highly concerning,” especially since his job includes monitoring harmful side effects of the Covid-19 injection. He is now asking the DOJ and FBI to investigate “the extent to which officials with HHS and its sub-agencies, including Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, deleted or destroyed official agency records,” and if they did this to avoid compliance with the investigation.  

On November 19, Johnson told officials at the CDC, HHS, and Food and Drug Administration to preserve all records “referring or relating to the development, safety, and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines.” He has long been on the hunt for accurate information regarding the controversial injections. He believes the world has yet to learn the true destruction they have, and continue, to bring about.

Part of a Pattern

This isn’t the first piece of evidence suggesting that CDC employees destroyed vital public records regarding the Covid injection. In November 2023, Congress learned that National Institutes of Health (NIH) senior adviser Dr. David Morens kept very few emails or documents that detailed the government’s response to the COVID-19. Morens told his colleagues to send communications about sensitive issues directly to his Gmail address. Johnson mentioned this in his letter to FBI and DOJ officials:

I had always suspected that Dr. Morens was not the sole evader of federal record-keeping requirements at HHS. The extent to which HHS officials systemically mishandled, deleted, or destroyed their communications, data, and other information relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and the vaccines must be thoroughly investigated.

Covid Vax History

The U.S. government began its coercive Covid-19 injection campaign in early 2021. The stated goal was to inject as many people as possible. Some experts warned right away that the shots weren’t all they were cracked up to be. In April 2021, internationally renowned doctor Peter McCullough told The New American that early data were already indicating the shot was causing thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of hospitalizations. That same month, microbiologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi warned that the injection would lead to clotting as well as immune system problems.

In November 2021, Dr. Robert Malone, an inventor of mRNA technology, called the shot “the largest experiment performed on human beings in the history of the world.” By then, Malone had become one of the most respected figures to protest the irrational approaches of the vaccination campaign. He especially had a problem with the “experts” not taking natural immunity into account and that they were pushing the injection on low-risk populations comprising young, healthy people.

It just so happens that Shimabukuro has downplayed the consequences of the jab. As noted by The Defender, in an April 2023 presentation to the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Shimabukuro said international regulatory and public-health partners did not detect concerns “for ischemic stroke following bivalent COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination.” But a peer-reviewed study published in November 2024 found that mRNA Covid-19 vaccines pose a 112,000-percent greater risk of brain clots and strokes than flu vaccines, and a 20,700-percent greater risk of those symptoms than all other vaccines combined. The study called for a worldwide moratorium on mRNA vaccines.

Keep reading

Synthetic milk from Bored Cow and Perfect Day contains 92 unidentified molecules, including fungicides

In an era where food technology is rapidly advancing, the line between natural and synthetic is becoming increasingly blurred. The recent controversy surrounding Bored Cow’s “synthetic” milk, made with Perfect Day’s ProFerm, has raised serious concerns about the safety, nutritional value, and ethical implications of these new products. The Health Research Institute’s (HRI) findings, which revealed 92 unidentified molecules and a fungicide in Bored Cow’s milk, have sparked a legal battle and a broader debate about the regulatory framework governing food additives.

The rise of synthetic milk and the Perfect Day controversy

Perfect Day, a biotech company, has been at the forefront of developing synthetic milk proteins using genetically modified microflora. The company claims that its product, ProFerm, is “identical” to cow’s milk and offers a more sustainable alternative. However, the Organic Consumers Association (OCA) and GMO/Toxin Free USA have filed a lawsuit against Perfect Day, alleging that the company’s marketing is false and misleading.

According to the lawsuit, ProFerm is not identical to cow’s milk. HRI’s testing revealed that ProFerm is only 13.4% cow’s whey protein, with the remaining 86.6% consisting of fungal proteins. These fungal proteins and compounds are not found in cow’s milk and have never been part of the human diet. John Fagan, Ph.D., HRI’s chief scientist and CEO, emphasized the nutritional deficiencies in synthetic milk:

  • 69 important nutrients present in natural milk were either absent or present in trace amounts in ProFerm.
  • Vitamins B2, B5, and E, as well as omega-3 fatty acids, were either missing or present in negligible amounts.
  • Carnitine, essential for energy metabolism, was either absent or present in trace amounts.

Fagan’s findings highlight the stark differences between synthetic and natural milk, challenging Perfect Day’s claims of nutritional equivalence. The presence of a fungicide, Benthiavalicarb-isopropyl, in Bored Cow’s milk further raises concerns about the safety of these products.

The ethical and regulatory implications

The lawsuit against Perfect Day also highlights the shortcomings of the FDA’s “GRAS” (Generally Recognized as Safe) process. Under current regulations, companies can self-affirm that their products are GRAS without thorough safety testing. This loophole has allowed Perfect Day to market ProFerm for the past five years, despite the lack of comprehensive safety data.

Alexis Baden-Mayer, political director for the OCA, stated, “Perfect Day markets the ‘milk’ as ‘identical’ to cow’s milk. That’s what we’re going after them for. That kind of false advertising is illegal, and it’s something we can take direct legal action against.” The OCA and GMO/Toxin Free USA are demanding a jury trial and an injunction to halt the deceptive marketing of ProFerm.

Diana Reeves, founder and executive director of GMO/Toxin Free USA, described ProFerm as a “nutritionally-devoid substance composed primarily of fungal proteins never before consumed by humans.” She added, “It is deeply concerning that this potentially harmful food-like product could be labeled cow’s whey or be advertised as ‘identical to traditional milk.’”

The FDA’s “GRAS” process has come under scrutiny, with calls for reform. On March 10, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. directed the FDA to address the GRAS loophole. However, the lawsuit against Perfect Day focuses on the company’s misrepresentation to consumers, not the FDA’s regulatory framework.

Keep reading

Trucking Has an Immigrant Problem—and Trump Can Fix It

Alegislative battle has been taking place recently in Little Rock, Arkansas, between two organizations in the same industry over an issue that has ramifications for all of North America, and President Donald Trump’s commitment to Make America Great Again.

On one side are representatives of small- and medium-sized trucking companies and the drivers they employ, and on the other, a state-level affiliate of one of America’s most powerful lobbying organizations, whose name doesn’t really tell the full tale of whose interests they represent. Though the fight in Little Rock is over a piece of state legislation, the issue being fought over has international ramifications, and is likewise of extreme import to the safety of the motoring public everywhere, as well as the wages of one of America’s largest groups of workers.

A recent tragedy in Austin, Texas, has brought the debate over these competing pieces of legislation in Arkansas into sharp relief.

On the night of Thursday, March 13, 2025, along interstate 35 in Austin, Texas, five people were killed and 11 sent to hospital when Solomun Weldekeal-Araya crashed the tractor trailer unit he was driving into stopped traffic. Amongst the dead were the entire López family—mother Natalia, father Sergio, and the children Lylah and little Diego, an infant. Araya was working for a subcontractor to Amazon, and, according to eyewitnesses, he did not slow down at all, and it took him colliding with 17 vehicles before the semi he was driving came to a stop.

Investigations into Araya reveal some disturbing resonances with many other incidents that have been taking place all across American (and Canadian) roads. Araya is a recent migrant from Ethiopia, only had his license for four months, and in that time had racked up a serious speeding ticket and a number of Hours of Service Violations. A viral video of Araya exiting his rig immediately after the crash suggested intoxication; although he was later cleared of being drunk or on drugs, the HOS violations indicate he may have been delirious from fatigue.

Though investigations are ongoing, there’s enough evidence here to suggest yet another in a pattern of horrific crashes we have seen in America—a recent migrant or refugee, legal or illegal, is involved in a collision which kills one or many people. It is later found that they either didn’t speak English, were not trained properly, had no work authorization, were involved in some kind of indentured servitude arrangement, or had already been deported multiple times.

Take the case of Ignacio Cruz-Mendoza, who crashed his truck in Colorado and, in losing the load of steel tubing from the flatbed he was pulling, instantly killed Scott Miller, 64, who coincidentally enough was a truck driver on his way home from work. Cruz-Mendoza was in the country illegally from Mexico, and had already been deported 16 times.

He has since been taken into custody by ICE after release from a very short 364 day sentence for this incident.

Keep reading

Why Are There So Many Aviation Accidents?

While the latest aviation safety issues and accidents over the last few months scare some, to seasoned professionals the aviation tragedies and near misses do not come as a surprise. The only question is: Why did it take so long?

There’s a long list of safety failures in the airline industry. United Airlines B777 plunged to the Pacific during climb in 2023, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), United, and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) didn’t investigate it for months. A 265-pound main tire fell off a B777 taking off out of Los Angeles; it fell from over 200 feet — still spinning — into an airport parking lot. The nose tire came off a taxiing B757. Two mechanics were killed when an incorrectly pressurized tire exploded in Atlanta. Most memorable were the Endeavour regional jet that flipped in Toronto, the mid-air collision between a PSA Airlines regional plane and a military helicopter, and an Endeavour regional aircraft that struck a wing during a go-around at La Guardia airport. More such events never made the news or were easily forgotten.

Boeing’s 737-Max was a failure on so many levels. But it wasn’t Boeing’s failure, as people were led to believe. Boeing makes products. Airlines buy these aircraft for technological improvements. It’s solely the airline’s responsibility to properly train their pilots and technicians to operate and maintain the aircraft — not the manufacturer’s.

The Alaska Airlines flight 1282 door plug loss was Boeing’s fault; but Boeing didn’t own it alone. Blame for that failure was shared with the FAA, the contract fuselage producer, Spirit AeroSystems, and the NTSB. All missed the important cues. They permitted breakdowns in quality control; both internal and external quality evaluations were ignored and almost cost a plane full of people their lives. It’s impossible to analyze these multiple facts in so short a space, but Alaska flight 1282 was never recognized for what it was: a symptom.

Keep reading

Toxic Threads: Allegations that Federal Law Pushes Infertility Chemicals Into Children’s Pajamas

When you buy pajamas for your children, you’re probably not thinking about federal regulations or hormone-disrupting chemicals.

But thanks to a little-known fire safety law, millions of American kids are sleeping in potentially toxic fabrics every night, and parents have no idea.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) requires under 16 CFR Part 1615 and 1616, that children’s sleepwear either be made with fire-retardant chemicals or be “snug fitting” to reduce the risk of catching fire. On the surface, that may sound like a reasonable safety precaution.

But mounting evidence shows these fabrics and chemicals may pose serious health and fertility risks.

To meet these regulations, most children’s sleepwear is made not from natural, breathable fabrics like cotton or wool—but from polyester, a synthetic material derived from petrochemicals. Even worse, when flame retardants are used to treat cotton, they introduce an entirely different health risk.

Pharmacist and Hormone Specialist Layne Kilpatrick discusses how polyester acts as an endocrine disrupter in a recent Reel.

Keep reading

Yet Another Study Links Water Fluoridation to Developmental Issues in Kids

Children exposed to fluoridated water before the age of ten have a higher risk of a number of serious neurodevelopmental issues, a new study suggests.

The paper, published in BMC Pediatrics, shows that autism-spectrum disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, intellectual disability and other delays in development were all visible at higher rates among children exposed to fluoridated water before their tenth birthday.

The researchers behind the study, David and Mark Geier, are warning that the risks of water fluoridation must be carefully reassessed.

They analyzed data from the Independent Healthcare Research Database, taken from de-identified healthcare records from the Florida Medicaid System during the period 1990-2012.

Since some counties in Florida have municipal fluoridation and others don’t, they were able to compare the health of children exposed to water fluoridation for their whole lives—over 25,000 children—with the health of around 2,500 children who weren’t.

The researchers examined fluoride exposure and health outcomes during the first year and the first ten years of life.

The results showed that in the first year of life, there was a statistically significant decrease in the risk of tooth decay with exposure to fluoridated water, as well as a statistically significant increase in the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.

The ten-year results were much more striking. After ten years of fluoride exposure, the risk of tooth decay was nearly four times lower in exposed children, but the children had a significantly higher risk of developmental disorders—nearly seven times greater for autism and two times greater for intellectual disability, most notably.

Keep reading

US Peanut Allergy Epidemic Sprang From Experts’ Exactly-Wrong Guidance

In the 1980s, peanut allergies were almost entirely unheard-of. Today, the United States has one of the highest peanut-allergy rates in the world. Disturbingly, this epidemic was precipitated by institutions that exist to promote public health. The story of their malpractice illuminates the fallibility of respected institutions, and confirms that public health’s catastrophically incorrect guidance during the Covid-19 pandemic wasn’t an isolated anomaly.

The roots of this particular example of expert-inflicted mass suffering can be found in the early 1990s, when the existence of peanut allergies — still a very rare and mostly low-risk phenomenon at the time — first came to public notice. Their entry into public consciousness began with studies published by medical researchers. By the mid-1990s, however, major media outlets were running attention-grabbing stories of hospitalized children and terrified parents. The Great Parental Peanut Panic was on.

As fear and dread mounted, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), a professional association of tens of thousands of US pediatricians, felt compelled to tell parents how to prevent their children from becoming the latest victims. “There was just one problem: They didn’t know what precautions, if any, parents should take,” wrote then-Johns Hopkins surgeon and now-FDA Commissioner Marty Makary in his 2024 book, Blind Spots: When Medicine Gets It Wrong, and What It Means for Our Health.

Ignorance proved no obstacle. Lacking humility and seeking to bolster its reputation as an authoritative organization, the AAP in 2000 handed down definitive instructions: Parents should avoid feeding any peanut product to children under 3 years old who were believed to have a high risk of developing a peanut allergy; pregnant and lactating mothers were likewise cautioned against consuming peanuts.

The AAP noted that “the ability to determine which infants are at high risk is imperfect.” Indeed, simply having a relative with any kind of allergy could land a child or mother in the “high risk” category. Believing they were erring on the side of caution, pediatricians across the country started giving blanket instructions that children shouldn’t be fed any peanut food until age 3; pregnant and breastfeeding mothers were told to steer clear too.

What was the basis of the AAP’s pronouncement? The organization was simply parroting guidance that the UK Department of Health had put forth in 1998. Makary scoured that guidance for a scientific rationale, and found a declaration that mothers who eat peanuts were more likely to have children with allergies, with the claim attributed to a 1996 study. When he checked the study, however, he was shocked to find the data demonstrated no such correlation. The study’s author, Irish pediatric professor Jonathan Hourihane, was himself shocked to see his study used to justify the policy. “It’s ridiculous,” he told Makary. “It’s not what I wanted people to believe.”

Despite the policy’s lack of scientific foundation, the US government’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) fully endorsed the AAP guidance. In time, it would be all too apparent that — as with public health’s later response to Covid-19 — the experts weren’t erring on the side of caution, they were erring on the side of catastrophe.

Keep reading

Biden Handed Out CDLs Like Candy… Now US Highways Are A Public Safety & National Security Nightmare

Several major highway collisions across the U.S. have raised serious red flags about public safety and national security threats.

American motorists remain entirely unaware that tens of thousands—if not hundreds of thousands of migrant truck drivers, some of whom cannot read English- are operating fully loaded 80,000-pound big rigs on the nation’s highways.

The latest big rig crash occurred just weeks ago in Austin, Texas, involving a migrant driver who spoke little English but held a non-domicile commercial driver’s license (CDL). The horrific crash left five people dead and 11 injured.

There is growing suspicion that a network of shady NGOs may have supported so-called “refugees” brought into the country under the Biden administration in obtaining CDLs. One such organization based in Texas is the Global Impact Initiative.

Who is involved with the Global Impact Initiative?

Keep reading

Repeal Government Regulators. Improve Safety and Quality, End Inflation

Voluntary cooperation is robust, multiply-protected, and loss-limiting, and brings healthy deflation. A government regulator makes a system fragile, fraught with a single point of failure, and loss-compounding, and brings sickening inflation.

Donald Trump and his unity team members Robert Kennedy and Elon Musk promise to limit cronyism and slash waste.

Both approaches deny that state-government and national-government administrative states are themselves peak cronyism. If government people stop hosting business-crony socialists but still host activist-crony socialists, that’s still tyranny. Also, it’s unconstitutional.Thomas J. DiLorenzoBuy New $11.57(as of 10:36 UTC – Details)

The only adequate approaches are to fully executively close and legislatively repeal.

When there are no government regulators, that doesn’t mean that there’s a vacuum. Instead, people naturally take care of themselves and one another.

Voluntary Cooperation Increases Safety and Quality

Many people take advantage of the considerable information they have available and use it to make the choices that they expect to be the best for them. In doing so, they self-regulate.

Their choices affect others, creating a network of interactions. In this network, people’s interactions with others regulate the others.

So then when people are free, they increase safety and quality by taking decentralized, interdependent actions:

  • Product raters compete to find and play up even small advantages and disadvantages.
  • Media people spread bad news very quickly.
  • Customers stop buying harmful products very quickly.
  • Retailers and distributors stop carrying harmful products.
  • Civil complainants can eliminate product lines and companies.
  • Insurers work to prevent and limit losses.
  • Producers anticipate problems and prevent them.

The resulting system is robust and resilient, and the people in it select naturally for improved performance. This is why freeing people to take care of themselves in the Dutch Republic, England, and the USA enabled people to create dramatic gains in how much value they added, bringing modern material comforts to the world.

Keep reading