Lancet Study Funded by Bill Gates Lays Bare Failure of Lockdowns and Vaccines

A new study published in the Lancet and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation on the “Global Burden of Disease” has laid bare the failure of pandemic interventions such as lockdowns and vaccines.

Published on April 3rd, the study included global age standardised mortality data during the pandemic. This Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, as the name suggests, is a massive global disease impact assessment. The report includes age-stratified mortality data from the first two years of the pandemic and therefore provides an indication of the global effectiveness of the measures implemented. The methods used for determining pandemic mortality incorporate excess death data combined with infection rates and COVID-19 specific deaths. The data within this report paint a concerning picture and demonstrate a substantial increase in global mortality across all age groups between 2020 and 2021.

Keep reading

FDA Says ‘No Safety Signals’ Linking White Blood Clots To COVID Shots, Despite Embalmer Survey Suggesting Otherwise

White clots in people’s arteries are “really happening” — so why isn’t the phenomena being openly discussed in the public sphere? political commentator Russell Brand asked during a recent episode of his “Stay Free” podcast.

Brand showed viewers a clip of prominent medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., interviewing former Air Force Major Thomas Haviland.

Haviland conducted a 2023 survey of 269 embalmers across four major countries and three continents.

According to the survey, more than 70% of embalmers found strange fibrous white blood clots — clots they were not finding pre-pandemic — in significant percentages of corpses in 2023.

Haviland also conducted a similar survey in late 2022 that revealed 66% of embalmers began finding the unusual clots in mid-2021, suggesting a temporal link to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, which began earlier that year.

The topic is largely going undiscussed by mainstream news outlets, Brand said, although at least GB News interviewed Campbell to talk about the “white stringy rubbery clots.”

“You’re not really hearing it discussed to the degree that it perhaps ought,” Brand said, “if it is as prevalent as is suggested.”

For instance, Brand cited a Feb. 21 BNN Breaking article that reported Thai neurologist Dr. Thiravat Hemachudha had initially discussed the topic in a Facebook post — but swiftly chose to “cease public discussions on the topic.”

Thiravat is chief of the Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre and a proponent of COVID-19 vaccines.

Keep reading

Other researchers who have compiled evidence that US military-public health-vaccination programs injure and kill people.

In studying American legal history, scientific fraud, drug manufacturing deregulation/non-regulation, and military/vaccination/public health/communicable disease/emergency management programs these last few years, I’ve found the work of other researchers who have traveled similar paths.

Some of these investigators are listed below, with examples of their work reporting on US government chemical and biological warfare, vaccination, communicable disease and population control programs; smallpox; polio; swine flu; avian flu; AIDS; brucellosis; anthrax; immune system disorders; cancer; public health emergency law, and related topics.

I’m posting the list for readers who may be interested in it.

It’s not a complete list of authors who have studied and written about these issues, and the listed researchers have not reached identical historical or scientific conclusions.

I haven’t read all of the works listed and I don’t find all of the conclusions I have read, to be equally plausible, credible or actionable.

I’ve read enough of their work to conclude that each researcher has studied some of the same things I’ve studied.

What do they have in common?

Each researcher has compiled evidence that US government statements about military, public health, and vaccination program objectives, historical events and scientific, regulatory data, have been demonstrably false for a very long time, and each researcher’s work has been suppressed and maligned, to prevent widespread public interest in it and access to it.

Some of the listed investigators have concluded that documented injuries and deaths caused by chemical and biological agents, including vaccines, deployed against foreign and domestic human targets, have been unintentional, unexpected effects of willed acts undertaken with benevolent intent.

Others have concluded that injuries and deaths have been intentional, planned, anticipated effects of willed acts undertaken with malicious intent.

Keep reading

mRNA COVID jabs caused one in four Saudis to suffer heart issues, “bombshell” study finds

New research out of Saudi Arabia has found that a shocking 27.11 percent of, or a little more than one in four, people who got “vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) suffered heart-related complications within a month to more than a year after injection.

Microbiologist and immunologist Muazzam M. Sheriff and colleagues at Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies and King Faisal General Hospital noted that more than a quarter of COVID jab recipients suffered some kind of cardiac complication after getting the mRNA variety of shot, made by either Pfizer and BioNTech or Moderna.

Nearly 15 percent of mRNA jab recipients reported experiencing heart-related symptoms within one month of injection, while others reported heart problems upwards of a year or more after doing the deed.

TrialSite News is calling Sheriff’s study a “bombshell,” with founder Daniel O’Connor telling The Defender that “the rate of hospitalized cases was certainly notable, especially given the existing cardiac myocarditis and pericarditis signal associated with the vaccines.”

Keep reading

Why are so many Children Dying Suddenly all across Europe?

Data quietly published by a host of countries across Europe reveals that excess deaths among children are still occurring at an alarming rate as we enter the spring of 2024.

The deaths cannot be blamed on COVID-19 because the data has proven the alleged virus and disease rarely harms children, if at all.

And the terrible trend only began when the European Medicines Agency extended Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) of the COVID-19 vaccines to children in the middle of Spring of 2021.

Before this. excess deaths among children among children were in negative figures. With the year 2020, the height of the alleged pandemic, seeing 726 fewer deaths than expected among children aged 0 to 14 in a host of countries across Europe, including the UK, Germany, Spain, France, Italy etc. according to EuroMOMO.

Keep reading

The era of long vax has quietly arrived as Yale researchers detail the symptoms

While “long covid” has been making the media rounds for years, the term “long vax,” which describes an array of symptoms caused by covid injections, is finally getting some much-deserved recognition.

Many argue that long covid as publicised by Covidians does not exist.  But whatever your thoughts on whether long covid exists, this article by Dr. Joseph Mercola is an informative read.

Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik are trying to get the word out that long vax is not only real but has disabled many Americans who were at the peak of health before getting a covid injection.

At Dr. Kory’s long covid clinic, 70% of the patients actually have long vax and reported their symptoms began “minutes, hours, days or several weeks” after receiving a covid injection.

Long vax symptoms are nearly identical to those of long covid – the difference being that the long vax patients tend to be sicker, with more frequent small fibre neuropathy and dysautonomia.

A study by Yale scientists detailed long vax, which they called chronic post-vaccination syndrome, in 241 people.

Top reported symptoms include exercise intolerance, excessive fatigue, numbness, brain fog and neuropathy.

Keep reading

Data Analyst Reveals Shocking Increase In Cancer Deaths Following COVID-19 Injection Rollout

Edward Dowd, a data analyst, revealed shocking data on the Dr. Drew show Wednesday, indicating a significant and troubling increase in cancer deaths, particularly in the 75 to 84 age group, following the rollout of COVID-19 injections.

Carlos Alegria and Yuri Nunes of Phinace Technologies unveil the concerning trend in cancer deaths among elderly individuals in their latest report.

Dowd informed Dr. Kelly Victory, a board-certified trauma and emergency specialist with over 30 years of clinical experience, that “there was no signal in 2020.” However, he noted a “clear deviation” in 2021 and 2022.

“We found something interesting,” he said.

There was a historical decrease in underlying cancer deaths from 2010 to 2019 per 100,000 people, which was primarily attributed to cancer itself, Vigilant News highlights.

Underlying cancer deaths maintained the trend in 2020 and decreased to approximately 1,021 deaths per 100,000 people. However, cancer deaths increased to 1,049 per 100,000 in 2021 and further rose to 1,091 per 100,000 in 2022.

The data from 2022 reveals a 6.85% increase in underlying cancer mortality rates per 100,000 people compared to 2020. This increase marks a reversal of the longstanding trend of declining cancer death rates. 

Keep reading

FDA Not Interested In Reports Of Unusual Blood Clots In Cadavers Around The World Since Covid Pandemic

“Full Measure” host Sharyl Attkisson looks into reports of unknown blood clots being found in cadavers around the world since the COVID-19 pandemic.

“No matter what’s causing this, whether it’s the virus, the vaccine, or whether it’s Cheerios or a bad box of Cracker Jacks, something has to be farmed out what’s causing it, because it’s obviously a change in the blood,” said former Air Force major Tom Haviland.

“The FDA did offer a response to Full Measure,” reported Sharyl Attkisson. “The FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) place a high priority on vaccine safety and are committed to our vaccine safety monitoring program. The FDA has not identified any safety signals for fibrous blood clots with COVID-19 vaccines.”

She added: “They also stated that since the observations were made on cadavers, it ‘falls outside of the FDA’s regulatory purview.'”

Keep reading

Years of Government Censorship Called ‘Potential Health Danger’

There’s a real danger coming for Americans should there be another pandemic, which in all probability will happen at some time.

And it’s not necessarily from the actual health danger, it stems from the censorship and misinformation campaigns that the American government launched during the COVID-19 threat.

That’s according to Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University.

Long considered a constitutional expert, he’s testified before Congress on a variety of constitutional disputes, and even represented members in court.

He cited the misinformation delivered by the government during COVID, its crackdown on alternative views about treatments, the mandatory shots, the masks and much, much more.

That all has produced in the American public a distrust of government, as many of the views mandated by the government have since proven wrong, and many of the perspectives censored for being wrong have been documented as being right.

Keep reading

New survey confirms that vaccines are, by far, the #1 cause of chronic disease in America

I recently asked my readers to tell me about their chronic health conditions.

The single most important conclusion is this

In all 58 conditions we asked about where we had sufficient data to compute an odds ratio, the vaccine always made the condition worse.

In other words, the medical community has gotten it backwards for decades. When you combine this with the realization that vaccines provide a benefit that is too small to measure as described here for the highly acclaimed COVID and flu vaccines, it’s clear that we should be stopping most, if not all, vaccines.

In fact, for the COVID vaccines, we have FOIA data showing that the vaccines make things worse and over a dozen attempts to ask the Santa Clara County of Public Health for comment have been ignored.

This is fundamentally why the NIH will never do a study comparing the highly vaccinated to the completely unvaccinated: it would blow the narrative and destroy their credibility.

Other important results of the survey include:

  1. 3.3X higher likelihood you’ll have 1 or more chronic diseases (OR 3.45 [95% CI: 3.02-3.96]). The one-sided p-value was 1.6e-78, something you don’t see very often. It basically means that this was not caused by random chance.
  2. 7X higher likelihood you’ll have 5 or more chronic conditions requiring treatment (drugs or therapies) (OR 7.03 [95% CI: 4.24-12.32]).
  3. 4X higher likelihood of a birth defect if the mother was vaccinated during the pregnancy (OR 4.31 [95% CI: 2.39-7.51]). That’s a huge effect. Nearly 80% of the birth defects are caused by the mother being vaccinated during pregnancy (actual value is 76.8%).
  4. 14.5X higher likelihood of sexual orientation/gender dysphoria issues in people under age 60 (OR 14.49 [95% CI: 2.33- 598.86]). This is a stunning result that isn’t discussed. Basically, 93% of the cases of sexual orientation issues are caused by vaccines.

The good news is that we can reduce chronic diseases in America by 70% with one simple change: tell people to stop taking the vaccines that are making them sick. That’s it. No new medications are needed. Just one policy change communicated from the CDC. It could literally happen tomorrow. It costs nothing.

And there needs to be full data transparency about all these vaccines so people can see how badly they were fooled.

The efficacy data for all vaccines is easy to gather, but we aren’t allowed to access the data to do the studies. This article shows how easy it is to expose the fraud. This research can be replicated for every disease if the government made the data available.

Keep reading