Tag: vaccines

Unlawful Discrimination

In the wake of governmental actions during the pandemic, much of the public discourse has focused on individuals who suffered physical or financial injury due to vaccine-related mandates. However, a lesser-explored but equally significant group is those who resisted these mandates for personal, medical, or ethical reasons. As highlighted in the article, “Government Negligence in Pandemic Response,” there were potential breaches of duty by the government in rolling out unproven or harmful treatments, but there are additional implications for those who were indirectly harmed by resisting pandemic policies. This article explores the legal avenues these individuals might pursue, focusing on unlawful discrimination, economic losses, and the broader concept of public authority misuse.

The Legal Foundation for Claims

While individuals who experienced vaccine-related injuries may have clearer paths to compensation, those who resisted mandates may also have endured substantial harm—such as loss of income, restrictions on freedom of movement, and social exclusion. Their legal recourse could vary significantly based on the context, jurisdiction, and the specific nature of their resistance. Below, we explore key areas where legal claims may arise.

1. Loss of Income

One of the most direct and widespread effects of resisting pandemic mandates was loss of income. Many individuals faced termination, suspension, or reduced employment opportunities due to their refusal to comply with vaccine mandates. Employment-related claims often center around wrongful dismissal, constructive dismissal, or discrimination in the workplace. However, the pandemic created a new legal frontier, raising questions such as whether vaccine mandates violated constitutional rights or unfairly discriminated against those who refused compliance.

Potential Violations of Constitutional Rights

In many jurisdictions, the right to work and the right to make personal medical decisions are fundamental legal principles. Mandates requiring medical interventions, such as vaccination, could be challenged as potential violations of bodily autonomy or personal choice. For example, individuals who refused vaccination for personal or religious reasons may argue that they were coerced into choosing between their job and their bodily autonomy. This argument could gain traction in contexts where courts have recognized an individual’s right to refuse medical treatment, provided that such refusal does not pose a direct and imminent threat to others.

Possible Discrimination Based on Medical Choice

A particularly contentious issue is whether being terminated for refusing vaccination constitutes discrimination. While personal medical choices are not universally recognized as a protected category under anti-discrimination laws, some legal arguments might focus on whether pandemic mandates created new grounds for exclusion or inequality. This could be compared to other forms of discrimination, such as those based on religious beliefs or personal health conditions. Some individuals may explore claims arguing that vaccine mandates disproportionately impacted them based on philosophical beliefs, religious values, or even pre-existing medical conditions that precluded vaccination.

Keep reading

Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study

In the early days of the push to her dearth’s population into the COVID-19 global “vaccine”experiment, a small number of medical doctors and independent researchers began raising concerns about the observed ineffectiveness, even negative impact,of the modified-RNA injectables(Beattie, 2021; Hughes, 2022; Santiago, 2022; Nyström and Hammarström, 2022).In addition to questions raised about their ingredients, the irreported mode of defending the body focused on inducing serum-neutralizing antibody IgG production instead of generating more effective secretory antibodies (IgA). The latter in the respiratory mucosa have always served as the principal line of natural defense against viral respiratory infections. Given the possibility that new variants of SARS-CoV-2 could be rapidly induced by billions of injections being promoted by authorities worldwide, increasing numbers of deaths were attributed to strains of SARS-CoV-2and severe sequelae (Lyons-Weiler, 2020; Vojdani & Kharrazian, 2020; Vojdani et al., 2021)leading to many deaths in population centers around the world(Beattie, 2021). Official Korean Government reports as of December 2022, for example, showed approximately 2,600 deaths and more than 18,000 other acute sequelae from the COVID-19 injectables. The contradiction between claims of efficacy and material evidence of harm is inescapable: South Korea could claim one of the highest vaccination rates in the world (88% jabbed at least 3 times) while effectively, thereafter, also exhibiting the highest infection rate (89%) in April 2022when flu season and respiratory colds are at a minimum. These facts alone are signs that the injectables provided no protection and were not preventing COVID-19. The reverse was the case. The injectables were neither safe nor effective. These figures alone should motivate physicians and medical researchers to reconsider the maxim that “correlation does not equal causation”. In some instances, it does (Beattie, 2021, 2024).Here,we show observable real-time correlations between causes and effects in the living cells of human beings as they react to the toxicity of COVID-19 injectables.We also show microscopic evidence of self-assembling structures appearing in various media in which the fluid from COVID-19 injectables, particularly, Pfizer and Moderna products, were incubated for up to 12months or more.In the wake of the mass vaccination program,by as early as March 2021and over the following months, significant increases in excess deaths of “unknown” causes and severe sequelae —blood clots, inexplicable haemorrhaging, multiple organ damage (and failure), sudden spikes (cardiotoxins) in heart disease, blood cancers including leukemia and lymphoma, a range of other “turbo” cancers, miscarriages, neurological and autoimmune disorders, to name a few, have appeared in patients(Nyström and Hammarström, 2022; Santiago & Oller, 2023; Perez et al., 2023; Mead et al., 2024a1).These observations spurred our interest in examining the larger picture both in society and in the laboratory where clearer images of the injectable contents themselves could be subjected to careful analysis under the microscope. This report of our results was aided by the independent research of a cohort known as Korea Veritas Doctors (KoVeDoc) with whom we shared injectables manufactured by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca,and Novavax. All of these were widely used throughout South Korea. These products appeared to cause a range of negative health effects in patients: advanced stages of aggressive breast cancer,dysfunctional uterine bleeding, spontaneous abortion, sudden increases in heart disease (dyspnea and palpitations), pneumothorax disease, multiple skin diseases, and rapid onset of aggravated autoimmune conditions.

Keep reading

VA whistleblower exposes the official VA medical claims data showing the COVID shots are a healthcare disaster

Yesterday, I received the official VA health claims data for the last 20 years from Sonny Fleeman, a signatory of the Declaration of Military Accountability and a member of Feds For Freedom.

In this video, Sonny explains how Veterans can get compensated for their injuries.

In this article, I’ll be releasing the data for the very first time so you can see for yourself whether you think the shots were helpful or harmful.

I’ll also show you conditions that were elevated by 50% or more from 2020 rates and I’ll go into detail on a few of them.

The VA is ignoring all these safety signals and not warning veterans about the possibility the shots could be unsafe. Instead, the VA is blindly trusting the CDC and ignoring their own data. They should be held accountable because by refusing to look at their own data, they are killing people. Too bad nobody in Congress will bring this data to their attention.

Keep reading

‘We Get Paid to Vaccinate Your Children’: Pediatrician Reveals Details of Big Pharma Payola Scheme

Can pediatricians afford to run their medical practices without the generous kickbacks they receive for vaccinating every child?

Dr. Paul Thomas, a Dartmouth-trained pediatrician, discussed this dilemma during an April 16 interview with Polly Tommey on Children’s Health Defense’s “Vax-Unvax: The People’s Study” bus tour.

“You cannot stay in business if you’re not giving pretty close to the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] [childhood vaccine] schedule,” said Thomas, who ran a general pediatrics practice with 15,000 patients and 33 staff members.

Thomas also addressed the risks and harms of vaccines — including COVID-19 mRNA vaccines — and the importance of boosting our immune systems naturally.

‘We were losing … over a million dollars’

Thomas, author of “The Vaccine-Friendly Plan: Dr. Paul’s Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health-from Pregnancy Through Your Child’s Teen Year,” gave parents in his practice a choice: vaccinate their children on the CDC schedule, vaccinate more slowly by waiting for the child’s immune system to develop or not vaccinate at all.

As more patients refused vaccines, Thomas began to notice the financial impact on his practice.

He and his staff conducted a thorough analysis of their billing records, examining the income generated from vaccine administration fees, markups and quality bonuses tied to vaccination rates.

Keep reading

7 Cover Stories Big Pharma Forced on MSM to Hide Disastrous Health Consequences of mRNA Clot Shots

If you are wondering why mainstream media is finally publishing some science-based facts about the health detriment caused by commonly used products, that is because MSM is engaged in multi-faceted cover stories while they continue to pretend the Covid-19 mRNA jabs aren’t so bad. Remember, Covid-19 did not kill any more folks than the seasonal flu ever did, it’s just that hospitals across the globe reported anyone and everyone that died during the plandemic as “died with Covid.” This was for the money.

Plus, it was all about co-morbidity “factors,” meaning people with cancer, dementia, diabetes, heart disease and who had heart attacks and strokes were all chalked up to have died from Fauci Flu, while millions of those same folks died from the Covid clot shots.

Though the mad vaccination rush for Covid-19 is fizzling out some, billions of vaxxed people around the globe are suffering and dying from Spike Protein Syndrome, where the billions (trillions with boosters) of spike prion nanoparticles clog and clot their vascular system, causing nearly every system to malfunction, collapse and quit working, including the heart, liver, kidneys, pancreas and ovaries.

So now, as real news of the Clot Shot Pandemic spreads to the naïve naysayers and pro-vax zealots and their loved ones, mainstream media must run cover to protect the vaccine industrial complex, the “holy grail” of medicine and for the next plandemic where Big Pharma and Big Government will certainly push just as hard, if not harder, for every human to commit suicide via vaccination.

Keep reading

Mark Zuckerberg Apologizes for Biden Administration Censorship, Sending Liberal Elites Into Denial

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sent a letter last week to the House Judiciary Committee saying he regrets not being more outspoken about “government pressure” from the Biden administration to “censor” COVID-19 content, causing liberal pundits and media outlets who have denied this censorship to panic and deny what Zuckerberg wrote. The Meta CEO also admitted that his company demoted a story critical of Biden’s son—the Hunter Biden laptop scandal—right before the 2020 election.

In 2021, senior officials in the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn’t agree …. I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it …. and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.

Journalist Kara Swisher began lying about the matter in a CNN interview, alleging that the Supreme Court had found there had been no censorship and that the Biden administration had not pressured Meta. Both claims are false.

In the recent Supreme Court ruling, judges skipped over claims of whether the Biden administration had actually censored Americans, arguing that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue the White House. Swisher could have learned this by reading an article on the decision in the New York Times, the very publication where she was a contributor.

As for the Biden administration pressure to censor—something that Swisher denies—the evidence of this was made clear from Meta internal communications released by the House Judiciary Committee last May.

Zuckerberg texted three Meta officials—Sheryl Sandberg, Nick Clegg, and Joel Kaplan—on July 16, 2021, “Can we include that the [White House] put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory?”

Keep reading

What harm will Bill Gates’ anti-methane vaccine cause to animals and the environment?

A US start-up, ArkeaBio, has created a prototype vaccine that it claims cuts methane emissions by 13% in a first trial involving 10 cows. The vaccine targets methane-producing bacteria in a cow’s digestive system.

“When it comes to climate change, a simple vaccine can be a powerful tool,” ArkeaBio says.

Climate cultists praise the development as significant because methane is a potent greenhouse gas, with a global warming potential much higher than carbon dioxide.

However, the very process they are trying to stop – the production of methane from methanogens in animals’ gut biome – is also the same microorganisms and process that has the potential to capture carbon dioxide and produce a renewable energy source – methane.

As usual, the climate change cultists are making no sense.  Perhaps it is because it is Bill Gates backing the project and it has nothing to do with “climate change mitigation” and everything to do with vaccines.  So how safe are these vaccines?

Keep reading

There Are No Licensed COVID Vaccines for Kids Under 12 — But CDC Wants Babies to Get 3 Pfizer Shots by Age 9 Months

Nine-month-old babies must receive multiple doses of an unlicensed mRNA COVID-19 vaccine to be considered “up to date” with their COVID-19 vaccination, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The CDC’s updated guidance, issued Aug. 30, states that children — as young as 6 months old — should get either two doses of the 2024-2025 Moderna vaccine or three doses of the 2024-2025 Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

If getting the new Pfizer shot, the baby is supposed to receive the first dose at 6 months, the second dose three weeks later and the third dose at least eight weeks after the second dose — meaning, that by 9 months old, babies are supposed to have received three Pfizer shots.

If getting the latest Moderna shot, the CDC recommends babies get the first dose at age 6 months and the second dose a month later.

The latest Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots for children under 12 are unlicensed in the U.S. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted only emergency use authorization (EUA) for the vaccines.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) CEO Mary Holland told The Defender, “The earlier COVID shots have been proven unsafe and ineffective. Now we’re asked to believe that newer versions are miraculously safe and effective?”

“This is an insult to people’s intelligence,” she said, “I pray that parents will have the good sense to say no to these dangerous and unnecessary shots for babies.”

As of July 28, 37,814 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination had been reported to VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, run by the FDA and CDC.

Of those, 187 reports were for children and teens under 18. Nearly 13,000 reports listed the age as “unknown.”

VAERS analyst and expert Albert Benavides recently told The Defender he believes VAERS is “throttling” and underreporting deaths of all ages following COVID-19 vaccination.

Meanwhile, the CDC continues to tell the public that COVID-19 vaccines are “safe and effective.”

Keep reading

The Propaganda of ‘Safety Testing’

Be on alert for Propaganda in the news cycle, as we are in a S-election year.

In the article, Curb Your Enthusiasm, the propaganda of “Safety Testing” for toxic metals in vaccines is featured:

…to challenge the use of “toxic metals” in vaccines…. at a time where vaccine science has finally advanced enough that said metals – used as “adjuvants” to stimulate a stronger immune response – are no longer required.

By focusing only on the use of “toxic metals” in vaccines…  ensures ultimately the integrity the vaccine programme remains in tact.

But look at the timing: the damage has already been done.

The establishment now has little to lose by allowing the whistle to be formally blown, now the aims of the vaccination programme (to subdue fertility, to lower IQ, to create lifelong customers for Big Pharma) have been completed for so many millions – and now that they have an alternative that doesn’t require these adjuvants.

Under the subject heading vaccine Safety Testing, the concept of “safe vaccines” is propaganda.

Why? Because there is no such thing as a “safe vaccine.”

Moreover, the technology of mercury and aluminum in childhood CDC-approved injections has been long superseded by mRNA technology, i.e., nanotechnology, which was developed in the 1970s.

The development of vaccines and the lack of safety testing is tied to politics.

Keep reading

How many participants in v-safe had serious adverse events?

  • This is the first analysis (that I am aware of) which properly categorizes the severity of outcomes in v-safe
    • Using the “Most Severe Outcome” for each registrant boils down the analysis to one unique value per registrant and makes it much easier to discuss v-safe outcomes
  • The v-safe statistic that is usually cited by Dr Peter McCullough and ICAN folks is incorrect
    • However, the v-safe statistic cited by CDC, and parroted by the vaccine pushers, is even worse – it is wrong by an order of magnitude!
  • ICAN sued the CDC to publish the v-safe free text entries (they initially refused, claiming the MedDRA codes were sufficient). This analysis also directly refutes Dr Dan “Debunk the Funk” Wilson’s video explaining why the ICAN lawsuit is a “scam”
    • Most v-safe events do not occur within the first 7 days, so limiting the analysis to the first week makes no sense at all
    • The “Other” category for Most Severe Outcome can only be properly analyzed by performing text analytics on the v-safe free text entries, while Dan Wilson thinks these entries are not important

Dr Peter McCullough seems to be having a hard time keeping his v-safe numbers straight.

Remember, these were the five choices provided in the v-safe app if someone checked the “Get care from a doctor or other healthcare professional” box.

Keep reading