Tag: vaccines

Senate panel probes whether federal scientist destroyed COVID records sought by Congress

Step aside Dr. Anthony Fauci, another senior government public health official is in the crosshairs of the most aggressive COVID-19 investigator in Congress.

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., the chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, is investigating whether the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Tom Shimabukuro scrubbed his own emails that lawmakers believe could reveal why the feds delayed telling doctors for months about heart-inflammation risks from COVID vaccines.

Shimabukuro, the director of the Immunization Safety Office, “probably destroyed documents” subpoenaed by the subcommittee, Johnson told the Just the News, No Noise TV show.

Shimabukuro has served as team lead for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and Vaccine Safety Datalink and safety team lead on the COVID-19 Vaccine Task Force.

While cautioning “maybe I’m going too far,” Johnson noted feds denied they had any relevant communications from Shimabukuro, who prominently briefed the CDC and Food and Drug Administration’s outside advisors before votes on key policy decisions.

“He was central to safety surveillance” for COVID vaccines, Johnson said, but the Senate panel “couldn’t even find out whether he was still working.

The CDC and HHS did not respond to requests for comment on the status of Shimabukuro.

Keep reading

OB-GYN Expert Tells Congress That the Covid Shots ‘Mirrored’ Effects of Chemical Abortion Drugs

A respected obstetrician/gynecologist began his testimony before a Senate hearing on COVID-19 shot adverse events yesterday by announcing that it would be “difficult to conceive of a more egregious breach of medical ethics by the government-controlled medical-industrial complex than the promotion of COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women.”

“This campaign was not accidental,” said Dr. James Thorp. “It was calculated. Pregnant women were targeted deliberately.” 

He explained that this was done in order to influence the American public’s perception of the COVID-19 shot as safe, because if pregnant women “could be convinced that the vaccine was safe and effective, it would imply that it was safe and effective for everyone.”

“From the outset of the pandemic, this vaccine campaign was never grounded in biological science, but rather in behavioral science, specifically the manipulation of public perception through influence, fear, and persuasion,” said Thorp.

“The federal government outsourced much of this psychological operation to NGOs which disseminated emotionally-charged and misleading messaging,” noted Thorp. “These entities falsely assured pregnant women that the vaccines were proven safe and essential for maternal and fetal newborn health despite the fact that early evidence indicated quite the opposite.”

The government’s vaccine marketing approach was to “go for the low-hanging fruit, those easiest to pick and harvest,” according to Dr. Jay Winston, an initiative director at Harvard’s School of Public Health in a 2020 CBS News interview.

“And the ‘fruit,’ tragically, were pregnant women,” he said.

Thorp cited a misleading study published in April 2021 in the New England Journal of Medicine that claimed the miscarriage rate was 12.6 percent, “but the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester.”

“This figure mirrors the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU486,” Thorp shockingly noted.

Keep reading

Japan Rides The Censorship Bandwagon

The manufacturer of the replicon mRNA Covid “vaccine” in Japan, Meiji Seika Pharma, has brought a lawsuit against a member of the Japanese parliament, Kazuhiro Haraguchi. Haraguchi had commented that the Covid injections are “akin to a biological weapon,” a statement which the Meiji Pharma president claimed was beyond the bounds of acceptable expression.

However, statements like Haraguchi’s about the dangers of the Covid mRNA injections are now commonplace in many nations, and drug companies do not seem to be suing people for making them, at least in the US. Instead, state attorneys general in Kansas and Texas have been suing Pfizer for misrepresenting its Covid injections.

In general, Japan has been gradually evolving into a place where it is difficult to publicly express ideas unapproved by powerful business interests and officialdom. In addition to government and mainstream news media collusion to keep Covid medical realities from the Japanese public, the government passed a law to squelch nonconforming messaging online.

The intentions behind this measure are clear: Prominent government figures have openly declared their conviction that “misinformation” is a major problem in Japan. In December 2024, Prime Minister Ishiba stated that he was considering more regulations concerning Internet discourse that he considers problematic, and a prominent LDP (Liberal Democratic Party) politician named Noda commented recently that Japan was being influenced more and more by “fake” information.

In May 2024, Japan’s parliament passed a law to enable the quick elimination of defamatory posts from social media platforms like Facebook and X. By this law, such platforms would have to make explicit sites for taking requests to delete posts and also make clear their criteria for taking down posts. The new law went into effect on April 1, 2025.

Unsurprisingly, some Japanese YouTube vloggers are expressing concerns that, under the new set of regulations, their vlogs may soon be targeted as purveyors of “misinformation,” especially when they criticize government policy.

Only online media platforms are targeted in this development, even though Japanese print communications and TV programs have also often been guilty of spreading harmful disinformation. Ironically, in many instances, this is not because they are unregulated but precisely because they are under the thumb of government agencies.

For example, the Japanese National Police Agency has deliberately leaked information about people under investigation in order to pressure them into confessing to crimes. Since the Japanese public often naively believes that suspicion equals guilt, this tactic results in terrible consequences for the unjustly accused.

In 1996, after an unsuccessful attempt by the Aum Shinrikyo cult to assassinate three Japanese judges, police leaked to news media outlets some details of their investigation of Yoshiyuki Kono, an innocent man whose family was also severely injured in the attack.

Kono’s experience of being hounded by both the authorities and the mainstream news media mirrors that of Richard Jewell, the heroic security guard who became a suspect after the 1996 Atlanta Olympics bombing. The FBI deliberately leaked details of their investigation to American mainstream news outlets, which proceeded to harass and condemn Jewell along with the investigating FBI agents, though the case eventually unraveled.

Even before the social media platform law, Japanese news media outlets were effectively controlled by the government. As a result, Japan was ranked lowest among all Group of Seven nations for freedom of the press in the World Press Freedom Index. Japan’s overall ranking dropped from 68th to 70th after the 2024 social media law was passed. 

The reasons for this are the press club system and the self-censorship of most Japanese reporters. Each government ministry has a press club consisting of representatives from prominent news media outlets, and they receive official briefings from government officials. However, these members of the press can be banned from these briefings if they do anything that reflects badly on the government.

Keep reading

Amyloidogenic Fibrin Microclotting Following Prenatal mRNA Vaccination Exposure

Scientific investigations involving emerging and potentially paradigm-shifting findings often walk a difficult line between the need for caution and the imperative to inform. While early publication of case studies carries inherent risks—such as overinterpretation of individual data points or lack of statistical power—it also provides critical, time-sensitive insight that can drive new lines of inquiry and inform ongoing clinical and public health decisions.

This report forms part of a rolling, real-time investigation into the proteopathic and vascular consequences of prenatal exposure to mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The intention is not to draw definitive epidemiological conclusions at this stage, but to publicly document the emergence of novel findings as they occur. This transparent approach is particularly important in areas where existing safety literature has not yet integrated proteomic misfolding or amyloidogenic biomarker screening into its framework.

This investigative format mirrors the best practices seen in real-time pathogen tracking and pharmacovigilance. In such contexts, timeliness and transparency are essential for mitigating long-term risk and prompting refinement of public health frameworks.

Keep reading

Former Japanese Minister of Internal Affairs proves he has developed cancer from the covid “vaccines”

Kazuhiro Haraguchi gained international attention a year ago when he gave a rousing speech at a protest against the World Health Organisation held in Tokyo, Japan. During his speech, he recounted his own battle with cancer shortly after receiving the mRNA injections. “Two out of the three supposed vaccines I received were lethal batches,” he stated. 

He then apologised for the Japanese government’s covid “vaccine” campaign and expressed his grief for those who succumbed to vaccine-related deaths.  “I apologise to all of you. So many have died, and they shouldn’t have,” he said.

“When I travel around to different areas, I see those who can’t stand, can’t walk, can’t go to school, can’t go to work. We could have prevented these injuries from happening, but we did not,” he added.

On Monday, he tweeted the following:

This is an analysis of my cancer cells. It was determined that the malignant lymphoma had metastasised to the tonsils, but the lesions were removed and sent to a research facility.

Even two years after receiving the covid-19 vaccine, spike proteins were found in the malignant lymphoma. Conversely, N proteins were not detected. This indicates that I had not been infected with covid-19.

We must put an end to the tragedies caused by the covid-19 vaccine as soon as possible.

This data is planned to undergo further detailed analysis and will be used for a research paper.

Keep reading

Twin Babies Die a Week After Receiving 3 Vaccines, Police Interrogate Parents

When Andrea Shaw brought her 18-month-old twins in for their wellness visit on April 23, she told the pediatrician she had concerns about the twins receiving the flu shot because her husband’s family had a history of adverse reactions to the vaccine.

The pediatrician told her the babies would be OK and had nurses give the twins the shot. The twins also received the Hepatitis A vaccine and the DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) vaccine.

Roughly one week later, on May 1, Andrea found the babies — a girl named Dallas and a boy named Tyson — dead in their bed after apparently passing away in their sleep. Her husband, Nathaniel, the twins’ father, was at work at the time.

Police in Payette, Idaho, where the twins lived with their parents, launched a homicide investigation, which they said was standard procedure when a death from an unknown cause occurs.

On May 7, the local police chief told the media the deaths hadn’t been “definitively” ruled as homicides, and that the autopsy reports would provide more information. The investigation is still ongoing.

A spokesperson for the parents today said the lead detective is still waiting on toxicology reports and has not yet ruled out the parents as suspects. The parents, who are “beyond devastated,” the spokesperson said, have filed a report with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS.

In an interview with Children’s Health Defense’s (CHD) Polly Tommey, Andrea and Nathaniel walked through the timeline of what happened in the days leading up to their children’s tragic deaths.

Before starting the interview, Tommey, CHD.TV program director, told viewers she was speaking with the twins’ parents only three days after the children passed.

“This is really, really raw,” Tommey said. “This has just happened.”

Keep reading

Moderna Pulls Application for FDA Approval of Flu-COVID Shot After FDA Calls for New Clinical Trials

Moderna is withdrawing its application for U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of its mRNA-1083 combination flu and COVID-19 vaccine, the company announced today — just one day after the FDA said it would require new clinical trials to approve COVID-19 boosters for healthy people under 65.

According to Fierce Biotech, the company will resubmit its application when data from a Phase 3 trial of its mRNA-1010 flu vaccine, which is a component of the combined shot, are available later this year. The company expects to have interim data from the trial available this summer.

Markets reacted negatively to the news, with Moderna’s shares falling 1.4% in premarket trading on Wednesday, The Guardian reported.

According to Reuters, Moderna’s decision to withdraw its application at this time “is the latest sign of increased regulatory scrutiny of the vaccine approval process since Robert F. Kennedy Jr. took the top U.S. health job earlier this year.”

Last week, for instance, the FDA approved Novavax’s new COVID-19 vaccine, but limited its approval to groups that are considered high-risk.

Sayer Ji, co-founder of Stand for Health Freedom and founder and director of GreenMedInfo, said Moderna’s decision to withdraw its application is “telling” and “appears to reflect not only concerns over efficacy but also a growing public skepticism toward hastily developed, multi-antigen formulations that lack sufficient long-term safety data.”

Ji said:

“The withdrawal may be a preemptive move to avoid public scrutiny or regulatory resistance tied to unresolved questions in their clinical data. Combination shots, especially those involving mRNA platforms, introduce compounded risks due to the simultaneous delivery of multiple immunogenic agents.

“These risks are poorly understood and grossly under-evaluated, particularly in vulnerable populations. The immunological complexity of such a vaccine also raises questions about long-term impacts on immune regulation, potential autoimmunity and unintended synergistic effects that could compromise health rather than protect it.”

Keep reading

FDA Forces Moderna and Pfizer to Admit Covid “Vaccines” Cause Lasting Heart Damage in Young Males

For years, parents and medical professionals have sounded the alarm about the dangerous link between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and heart inflammation in young males—only to be dismissed as “anti-vaxxers” or conspiracy theorists. Now, in a stunning reversal, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ordered Pfizer and Moderna to strengthen their warning labels, finally admitting that these shots can cause long-lasting heart damage, particularly in adolescent boys and young men.

But this admission comes far too late—after millions of doses were administered under false pretenses, after countless young lives were altered by myocarditis, and after public health agencies actively suppressed the truth. The FDA’s belated action raises a critical question: How many more injuries could have been prevented if the government had prioritized transparency over blind vaccine promotion?

Key points:

  • The FDA has mandated that Pfizer and Moderna update their COVID-19 vaccine labels to include stronger warnings about myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in males aged 16 to 25.
  • New data reveals that myocardial injury is often long-lasting, contradicting earlier CDC claims that heart inflammation “tends to resolve quickly.”
  • The highest incidence of myocarditis occurs in young males, with 38 cases per million doses—far higher than previously acknowledged.
  • Internal government emails show that health officials deliberately avoided warning the public about these risks, even after detecting safety signals in 2021.
  • The FDA’s action follows a Senate investigation exposing how federal agencies downplayed and hid vaccine injuries.

A long-overdue admission of harm

For years, independent researchers and medical professionals warned that mRNA vaccines posed a disproportionate risk to young, healthy individuals—especially males. Yet, public health agencies dismissed these concerns, insisting that the benefits outweighed the risks. Now, the FDA has been forced to acknowledge what health freedom fighters have said all along: These vaccines can cause serious, sometimes permanent, heart damage.

The updated labels must now state that myocardial injury is common among those who develop post-vaccination myocarditis, with data showing persistent damage five months after vaccination. This directly contradicts the CDC’s previous assurances that cases were “mild” and “resolved quickly.”

Why did it take so long? Internal documents obtained through FOIA requests reveal that as early as May 2021, the CDC and FDA considered issuing a public warning but ultimately chose silence over transparency.

The suppression of truth and the cost of deception

The Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations recently released a damning report exposing how federal health agencies systematically concealed the myocarditis risk linked to COVID-19 vaccines. Internal emails reveal that officials engaged in a coordinated cover-up by refusing to update the V-safe reporting system to include cardiac symptoms, ensuring countless cases were never documented. Additionally, they blocked a planned Health Alert Network warning that would have alerted doctors and the public to the dangers, prioritizing public perception over transparency.

Keep reading

Trump DOJ stings conservatives with positions on abortion pill regulation, vaccine trial integrity

The Trump Justice Department is continuing its predecessor’s legal arguments against lawsuits by red states against abortion pills by mail and a whistleblower’s case against the drugmaker Pfizer, creating two unexpected setbacks for causes championed by conservatives.

The Food and Drug Administration is at the center of both disputes.

Idaho, Missouri and Kansas argue the FDA’s deregulation of the abortion pill mifepristone violated those states’ abortion restrictions. Meanwhile, the clinical trial whistleblower Brook Jackson’s lawsuit alleges fraudulent data was used to grant emergency use authorization to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

The government first stayed out of the False Claims Act case filed four years ago by Jackson, who oversaw Pfizer’s outsourced Phase 3 trials in Texas, even though it had the power to dismiss because Jackson is a “relator” suing on the federal government’s behalf.

It then supported Pfizer’s motion to dismiss, arguing the FDA would have approved the vaccine even if 3% of data were fraudulent, as Jackson claims from her test sites.

The FDA unsuccessfully asked a court for 55 years to fully release its Pfizer vaccine approval documents. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention admitted three years ago hiding the vast majority of its COVID data in part to protect the reputation of vaccines.

“We’re simply asking DOJ to step aside and let us handle Pfizer,” Jackson wrote on X in explaining the Trump DOJ’s continuation of its predecessor’s posture. “We don’t need their help—we just need them out of the way.”

Keep reading

Dr. McCullough Drops the Hammer in the Senate — FDA Concedes with Expanded Myocarditis Warning

“When a product causes death, that demands a black box warning — immediately.”

That was the clear and urgent message from Dr. Peter McCullough, testifying before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee this week at a hearing titled: “The Corruption of Science and Federal Health Agencies: How Health Officials Downplayed and Hid Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Associated with the COVID-19 Vaccines.”

Dr. McCullough presented data from both his clinical experience and the peer-reviewed literature, exposing the widespread risks of COVID-19 mRNA injections — particularly myocarditis in young men and fatal vaccine outcomes confirmed by autopsy.

“I’ve examined thousands of patients with this problem,” he told the Senate. “Before the pandemic, I had seen just two cases in my entire career.”

Just one day before the hearing, likely for preemptive damage control purposes, the FDA quietly updated its myocarditis warning on Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines, expanding the risk category to males aged 16 to 25 and citing an incidence of 8 cases per million doses for the 2023–2024 formulations. Unfortunately, no mention of death was added — despite robust, peer-reviewed autopsy evidence confirming fatal vaccine-induced myocarditis.

Dr. McCullough referenced multiple such cases, including the tragic findings of Gill et al, who documented two teenage boys (ages 16 and 17) found dead at home just days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. Autopsies confirmed unequivocal myocarditis as the cause of death.

Keep reading