‘Reckless’: Virginia Recommends MMR Vaccine for Infants as Young as 6 Months

Virginia’s Department of Health is recommending infants ages 6 to 11 months receive a MMR vaccine — earlier than the age recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

Doctors and other vaccine experts told The Defender that Virginia’s guidance is “reckless” and “not grounded in science.”

The state’s recommendations also include an accelerated measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination schedule, advising that infants get the second dose in the two-dose MMR series 28 days after the first.

Virginia’s recommendation comes in response to a recent measles outbreak in Buckingham County, which as of Tuesday had reached 54 cases.

The state’s MMR vaccine guidance was included in a May 13 letter from Virginia State Health Commissioner Cameron Webb. The recommendations call for infants ages 6 to 11 months to “get an early dose of the MMR vaccine,” and two more doses at the AAP’s recommended ages, at least 28 days apart.

The CDC and AAP recommend a minimum age of 12 months for MMR vaccination, except in “special situations,” such as international travel.

Keep reading

Consultants Push HPV Vaccines for Infants, as Merck Tests Gardasil in Kids as Young as 4

Consultants paid by Merck and the Gates Foundation are publicly advocating to administer HPV vaccines to children as young as 12-24 months — an age group in which the vaccine has never been tested and for which no safety data exist.

Mark Kane and Eduardo Franco laid out the campaign to extend HPV vaccination to toddlers in an opinion piece published in Clinical Infectious Diseases — an official journal of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA).

Merck, a “Silver” level industry partner, donates tens of thousands of dollars annually to the IDSA foundation.

The push to vaccinate younger children comes as Merck — maker of Gardasil, the only HPV vaccine marketed in the U.S. — partners with major universities to run clinical trials of its HPV vaccine in children ages 4-8 in the U.S. and Gambia.

Merck’s Gardasil vaccine is designed to protect against human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted disease. In the U.S., the drug is approved for children starting at age 9 — well before children are sexually active.

Conflicts of interest ‘so thick’ they obscure the science

In the conflict-of-interest statement at the end of the IDSA op-ed, Franco disclosed that he is a vaccine consultant who also holds a patent on a cervical cancer test.

Kane reported no conflicts of interest. However, that claim omits these significant financial and professional credentials:

“The conflicts are so thick it’s impossible to tell if this is a serious immunization policy suggestion, or a fact-pattern of Merck publishing Merck recommendations to use more Merck products,” said Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

Keep reading

RFK Jr. Faces Backlash After Hantavirus PREP Act Declaration

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is facing backlash from some in the medical freedom movement after he announced last week that he signed a “targeted PREP Act” declaration to develop and deploy medical countermeasures for hantavirus.

In a post on X, Kennedy said the declaration “helps remove barriers to research and response efforts” for the recent outbreak that has garnered significant media attention during recent weeks.

“HHS is taking this situation seriously and will continue working to protect public health and support the safe development of potential treatments and countermeasures,” he said.

Critics accused Kennedy of contradicting his previous strong stance against the use of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or PREP Act, during the COVID-19 pandemic, and betraying the values of the medical freedom movement.

Defenders argued that the declaration is narrow in scope and timing — it covers only one generic drug, favipiravir, and lasts only until July 18, 2026.

The PREP Act authorizes the health secretary to issue a declaration that exempts manufacturers and distributors of a vaccine or treatment that addresses a public health emergency from legal liability for injuries caused by those products.

The PREP Act became extremely controversial during the COVID-19 pandemic, because it granted blanket liability protection to COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers — including Moderna, Pfizer and Novavax — for nearly every type of injury caused by the vaccines.

As a result, vaccine-injured people have struggled to be recognized, cared for and compensated for their injuries. Vaccine-injured people and the groups representing them have challenged the act’s constitutionality in multiple lawsuits, but have failed to get it overturned.

The Biden administration extended the COVID-19 countermeasures PREP Act declaration through the end of 2029, even though the administration declared the pandemic over.

Kennedy has not rescinded that declaration, despite calls for him to do so.

Keep reading

Inside The FDA’s “Cover-Up” Of Child Deaths Linked To Covid Vaccines

In September 2025, then-US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Dr Marty Makary publicly acknowledged that the agency was investigating reports of child deaths following Covid-19 vaccination.

We do know at the FDA…that there had been children who have died from the COVID vaccine,” Makary said during a CNN interview.

By that stage, however, a fierce internal dispute had already emerged inside the FDA over what investigators believed the evidence showed – and whether the public should ever see the full findings.

“It really did feel like there was some sort of cover-up going on about the Covid-19 vaccines,” said one individual familiar with the discussions.

MD Reports spoke with several current/former agency officials, advisers, and individuals briefed on the discussions, all of whom requested anonymity because they were not authorised to publicly discuss internal FDA deliberations.

At the centre of the controversy was an internal FDA review led by Dr Tracy Beth Høeg, a physician-scientist who was working as a senior scientist inside the FDA’s vaccine division at the time.

FDA officials examined roughly 96 paediatric death reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the government database used to detect potential vaccine-related adverse events.

The review included medical records, autopsy reports, pathology findings, and follow-up investigations conducted by agency staff.

About 25 deaths following Covid vaccination were ultimately considered serious enough for high-level internal discussion inside the agency.

The findings were expected to be presented at a September 2025 meeting of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP), the federal panel that shapes US vaccine recommendations.

But before that could happen, details of the review leaked to the New York Times and the Washington Post.

Høeg quickly became the focus of intense media scrutiny and criticism from vaccine advocates and unnamed FDA officials who argued she was relying too heavily on VAERS reports and overstating preliminary findings.

People familiar with the fallout said some FDA staff strongly objected to Høeg’s methods and conclusions and allegedly sought to undermine her credibility by leaking details of the review.

The leak effectively ended plans for a public ACIP discussion and deepened divisions within the FDA over how the findings should be handled.

Some officials believed the findings warranted stronger warnings and greater transparency. Others feared public acknowledgement of vaccine-linked child deaths would damage confidence in the Covid vaccines.

“We know that there are these deaths that are due to the vaccine,” said one source, referring to myocarditis cases and published reports from countries including Korea and Israel.

The controversy intensified after then-FDA vaccine chief Dr Vinay Prasad ordered additional investigation into the deaths identified in Høeg’s review.

Months later, another leak brought the issue back into public view.

In November 2025, an internal memo circulated by Prasad became public. In it, Prasad acknowledged that “at least 10” children had died “after and because of receiving Covid-19 vaccination.”

He described the findings as “a profound revelation.”

“COVID-19 vaccines did result in the death of children,” Prasad wrote. “Dr. Hoeg was correct in her assessment.”

The memo triggered another round of backlash from media outlets and vaccine advocates, many of whom accused Prasad of overstating the evidence before the agency’s analysis had been finalised.

Inside Medicine reported on a Dec 5 memo about a subsequent FDA analysis using a World Health Organization causality framework, which classified zero deaths as “certain,” two as “probable/likely,” and five as “possible.”

But individuals involved in the discussions said pressure steadily mounted inside the agency to “downgrade” the findings with each successive review.

It seemed like there was a lot of pressure to keep decreasing the number of deaths,” said one source.

Keep reading

New website unmasks the VAERS safety data exposed by Senator Johnson

There are only two things you need to know about the documents released by Senator Johnson relating to the VAERS safety signals:

  1. The safety signals were real and serious
  2. The people at the FDA and CDC ignored them

You have to realize that on all these emails, they ALL knew it would be subject to FOIA. So they can’t write “she’s right, but we need to silence her.” They all are aware that the conversations are being recorded.

There is now a new website that organizes all the data.

This took just 4 days to create by one person, Marjorie Roswell. It is absolutely amazing.

Keep reading

Metallic nanoparticles in vaccines can be activated by frequencies, and then they could say there is an Ebola outbreak

In June 2025, Dolores Cahillformerly Professor of Translational Science at the University College Dublin School of Medicine, Principal Investigator at the Conway Institute of Biomolecular & Biomedical Research and vice chair of the Scientific Committee of the Innovative Medicines Initiative, and founding member of World Doctors Alliance, participated in the ‘Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International’ webinar moderated by Charles Kovess.

Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International (“MD4CE International”), founded by UK medical whistle-blower Dr. Stephen Frost, is a global organisation composed of doctors, scientists, lawyers, journalists, economists, historians, politicians, philosophers, data analysts, bankers, military/intelligence experts and other professionals from across the world who advocate for medical ethics, patient safety and human rights in the context of the covid pandemic.

“[There are] … titanium, steel, barium nanoparticles [in vaccines]. And … those nanoparticles get into our organs [and] can be affected by radiation … they can modulate the frequency … [to cause] nosebleeds …[and] say there is an Ebola outbreak,” Prof. Cahill said.

You can watch the full webinar on Rumble HERE.

Note: We can’t be certain of the specific 2017 Italian study Prof. Cahill was referring to in the video clip (also see below), but there is THIS one, which is relevant.  Read: All tested vaccines reveal toxic substances linked to autoimmune disease, Natural Health 365, 6 April 2018

In the clip above, Prof. Cahill said:

Because the nanoparticle and the radiation. I did publications on nanoparticles when I was researching. And there’s a publication from 2017, with an Italian professor showing that there were, she tested 40 different vaccines, 39 vaccines for human babies, adults and one for cats. And she showed all these metal or titanium, steel, barium nanoparticles. And it is those nanoparticles that get into our organs that can be affected by radiation.  Exactly what you’re saying. 

Now, when I gave evidence after 9-11 [in] 2001, right. I ran one of the so-called biosafety labs deliberately to get access to the information. And I gave evidence about the threats to people in Congress in October 2001. I was going through what was going to happen in the injections with fertility, with the peptides. And then I mentioned the nanoparticles, and the military said shut up and sit down. Right. Because obviously they didn’t want to. So, I was saying the threat isn’t these things flying into, it’s what’s going to be in the food and the vaccine, but particularly the nanoparticles.

I’m only mentioning that because within the system, everybody knew. But one of the major detoxes is it is possible to detox from the nano. It’s, you know, mainly not all of them, but what I was studying 20 years ago is that they can just modulate the frequency and that say if 40-year-olds or 20-year-olds have a specific metal in their organ, that can be, you know, in a university campus or it can be in a school, and there could be like where people have nosebleeds. Right? Because that’s why they rolled out the injections in different batches and different age groups.

And literally they could do that all across one or two countries and then wake up in the morning, you could have nosebleeds or serious deaths of teenagers. But then they could say there is an Ebola outbreak. Do you get it? Because there are different nanoparticles that resonate. So, it’s very specific. And I think some of the people that are being targeted to be seriously ill can be easily targeted so that they just die. You know, we die in our sleep or we drop dead or whatever. And I think it’s that kind of technology. So, it is a huge threat.

This is reminiscent of what American attorney Todd Callender and the late Dr. Rashid Buttar had previously warned about nanoparticles in vaccines, once inside the body, causing harm at a time that they will determine.

Keep reading

‘Everybody was complicit in it’: Top U.S. senator sounds alarm on ‘most egregious’ government scandal in his lifetime

The chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee is calling the cover-up of the adverse impacts of the COVID shots “the most egregious government scandal in my lifetime.”

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., recently released a report titled: “Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals,” and will hold a hearing on Biden officials’ failure to detect problems with the shots.

Appearing on “Sunday Morning Futures” with Jackie DeAngelis on the Fox News Channel, Johnson lashed out at Dr. Peter Marks, the former top vaccine regulator at the Food and Drug Administration, saying the physician purposely concealed information in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, or VAERS.

“He was shown 25 adverse events where there were safety signals including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, different types of strokes, and he hid it,” Johnson said. “They are lying about it to this day. They continue to use the old algorithm.”

“Hundreds of thousands of people that experienced adverse events, the tens of thousands that died, reported on VAERS associated with this vaccine, these people ought to have a cause to action against those government officials that hid what the American people had a right to know. But they lied bald-faced to the American public.

Keep reading

UK Scientists Rushing to Create Ebola Vaccine Using COVID Jab Technology

UK researchers are rushing to develop a new Ebola vaccine based on the exact same viral vector platform used in the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 jab.

The effort comes as a new outbreak of the Bundibugyo strain of Ebola continues to spread in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

The Oxford Vaccine Group (OVG) announced it is urgently producing its candidate vaccine, ChAdOx1 BDBV, which could enter human clinical trials in as little as two to three months if animal testing succeeds.

The Bundibugyo Ebolavirus is one of the less common but still highly lethal strains of Ebola.

Unlike the more frequently seen Zaire strain, there are currently no licensed vaccines or specific treatments approved for Bundibugyo virus disease.

The WHO and local authorities have described the situation as “spreading rapidly,” with contact tracing and quarantine efforts underway. However, the risk to the UK and broader Europe remains low, according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

The candidate vaccine is a monovalent (single-strain) ChAdOx1 BDBV vaccine specifically targeting the Bundibugyo Ebolavirus.

It uses the ChAdOx1 viral vector platform, the same chimpanzee adenovirus-based technology used for the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

Keep reading

As many as 2M Americans were seriously disabled by the COVID vaccine

I recently did two surveys (your family and your medical practice if you work in a medical practice).

The full live results can be viewed here: family and medical practice. The Notes column is available as well. Only the emails were removed for privacy reasons. The records count at the time of this article were 2908 and 107.

I had Claude Opus 4.7 co-work evaluate the survey solicitations, the survey questions, the survey results, the notes column, my reader base and gave it unrestricted use of publicly available data (CDC, Insurance industry, FRED data, etc) to reconcile everything. This allowed Claude to give me a more objective answer because my reader base is not representative (e.g., half of the respondents had no vaccinated family members) and because my reader base are more likely to attribute disability and deaths to the vaccine.

The key results:

  • As many as 1M Americans killed by the COVID vaccine
  • As many as 1.5M working-age Americans disabled for 6 months or more
  • Silence from health authorities worldwide on this issue. Not a single national public-health authority, anywhere in the world, has produced an estimate of the type constructed in this article — a comprehensive, all-cause, all-ages, attributable-deaths-plus-disabilities total for the COVID-19 vaccines.

Keep reading

Every unvaccinated child is evidence of a crime

The vaccine narrative has been deliberately engineered to obscure reality. Manipulated data, corrupted science and silencing dissent are all part of a larger medical architecture designed to create chronic illness while maintaining plausible deniability.

However, unvaccinated children thrive. They are the living proof that the chronic disease epidemic isn’t genetic, it isn’t mysterious, it isn’t inevitable. Instead, it’s iatrogenic. It is caused by the very medical interventions claimed to prevent it – vaccines.

The First Betrayal

The midwife’s words hang in the delivery room air like a casual afterthought: “We’ll just give baby the vitamin K shot now.” Just a vitamin. Nothing more than what you’d find in your morning orange juice. The language itself is the first deception – calling a synthetic blood-clotting agent manufactured by Pfizer’s subsidiary Hospira a “vitamin” transforms an industrial pharmaceutical intervention into something as wholesome as sunshine.

In those first raw hours after birth, when parents are overwhelmed by the miracle of new life, the medical system strikes with practised precision. The entire infrastructure – from the delivery nurse to the paediatrician, from the hospital protocols to the documentation systems – has been calibrated for this moment. Every medical professional in that room has been trained, not in the science of whether a newborn needs synthetic phytonadione, but in the art of securing compliance. They’ve learned to frame it as routine, to present it as universal, to make refusal seem like dangerous eccentricity.

Murphy’s father, one of the few who came prepared, discovered what awaits those who dare say no. After his daughter was delivered using vacuum extraction five times – creating a visible blood-filled sac on her head – the red-shirted paediatrician entered within three minutes. Not to examine the baby. Not to celebrate the birth. But to begin the assault. When Murphy’s father cited the Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit study showing only six deaths from vitamin K deficiency bleeding in five million babies over 25 years, with none occurring in hospital births where vitamin K was refused, the doctor didn’t engage with the data. Instead, he turned to the mother: “Do you feel differently?”

The pattern revealed itself through escalation. First, the doctor. Then the nurse lecturing about irresponsibility. Then the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (“NICU”) admission – not for medical necessity, but for “monitoring” a baby whose parents had refused the injection. Then the failed attempts to insert cannulas, the repeated heel pricks for blood tests. Strange behaviour for medical professionals who claim the baby cannot clot blood properly. If she truly couldn’t clot, why were they so eager to make her bleed?

The ingredients tell their own story. In one millilitre of this “vitamin,” there are 70 milligrams of polyoxyl 35 castor oil – a known irritant that causes skin, eye and respiratory irritation according to the NIH’s own safety data. There are 37.5 milligrams of dextrose monohydrate and 9 milligrams of benzyl alcohol, which the manufacturer admits has “no evidence” it doesn’t cause toxicity – not because they’ve proven it safe, but because they’ve never looked. The actual vitamin K? Just 2 milligrams. The “inactive” ingredients outweigh the “active” one by a factor of 39.5 to 1.

This elaborate performance isn’t about preventing bleeding. Natural vitamin K levels are low at birth because they’re meant to be low. Evolution didn’t make a mistake that Pfizer needs to correct. The rise to normal levels happens naturally over eight days – which is why Jewish and Muslim traditions wait until day eight for circumcision. The entire vitamin K narrative exists to solve a problem created by another unnecessary intervention: immediate circumcision for the 80.5% of American baby boys whose foreskins will be harvested and sold to cosmetic companies.

Sixty per cent of babies develop jaundice after receiving their vitamin K shot. The medical establishment calls this “idiopathic” – of unknown origin – while the product insert plainly states that synthetic vitamin K causes jaundice and hyperbilirubinemia. They inject the cause, observe the effect, and declare it a mystery.

The Control Group Survey found that exposure to just the vitamin K shot alone, without any vaccines, increased a child’s risk of developing at least one chronic condition from 2.64% to 11.73% – a 344% increase. When combined with maternal vaccines during pregnancy, that risk jumps to 30%. Yet parents are told it’s “just a vitamin,” as harmless as a prenatal supplement.

The genius of starting with vitamin K is that it establishes the precedent. Once parents have agreed to that first injection, once they’ve surrendered their newborn’s bodily sovereignty in those vulnerable first hours, the pattern is set. The baby has been enrolled in the system. The medical records will forever show “vitamin K administered,” marking this child as one who receives injections. The psychological barrier has been broken. If you said yes to the first one, why would you say no to the rest?

Those who refuse face the full weight of institutional pressure. Police have knocked on doors in Illinois because parents declined the vitamin K shot. Child Protective Services has been weaponised as a threat. Parents are told their babies will die, that they’re irresponsible, that they’re endangering their child. All for refusing an injection that even the manufacturer admits hasn’t been studied for carcinogenic or mutagenic effects, or for its impact on fertility.

The first hours after birth are a carefully orchestrated vulnerability. Parents are exhausted, emotional, overwhelmed. They’re in an unfamiliar environment, surrounded by medical authority. They’ve just been through one of life’s most intense experiences. And in that moment of maximum vulnerability, when they should be bonding with their newborn, the system demands its first tribute.

This is where the battle for your child’s health is won or lost. Not at the two-month vaccines. Not at the measles, mumps, and rubella (“MMR”) vaccine. But in those first moments when someone in scrubs approaches with a syringe and says it’s “just a vitamin.” Because once you’ve said yes to injecting your hours-old baby with synthetic chemicals that have never been tested for cancer, mutation or fertility effects, you’ve already agreed that strangers in white coats have more authority over your child’s body than you do.

The parents who successfully refuse have done their homework months in advance. They’ve printed the safety data sheets. They’ve read the product inserts. They’ve studied the actual rates of vitamin K deficiency bleeding. They’ve prepared their responses to each wave of pressure. They know they’re not preventing an epidemic of bleeding babies – they’re refusing to participate in a ritual of submission that marks their child as property of the medical system from the moment of birth.

Keep reading