Tag: birth defects

Infant Mortality Surged 37% and Birth Defect Deaths Jumped 46% After COVID-19 “Vaccine” Rollout

A major new peer-reviewed study we just published in Medical Research Archives has uncovered a shocking reversal: after two decades of steady progress, infant mortality surged 37% since 2020, congenital abnormality deaths jumped 46%, and registered live births collapsed by 24% — all coinciding with expanded vaccination campaigns in the Philippines.

The study is titled Global Implications of Vaccination and Rising Infant Mortality in the Philippines, authored by Sally A. Clark, Claire Rogers, Mila Radetich, Nicolas Hulscher (myself), Kirstin Cosgrove, Breanne Craven, M. Nathaniel Mead, and James A. Thorp.

Using official Philippine Statistics Authority data on 41.7 million births and over 546,000 infant deaths from 2000–2024, plus Department of Health vaccination records, we documented a sharp turnaround after two decades of steady progress.

Infant mortality rate fell to a historic low of 11.05 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2020. Then it rose 37% to 15.11 by 2024 — a statistically significant jump (p < 0.0001) that erased more than 20 years of gains in just five years.

Keep reading

Birth Defects in US Military is Congressionally Directed Medical Research

I became aware of the US Military concern over Uranium from exploded so-called “Depleted Uranium” shells and tank armour decades ago.

My friend was exposed in Kosovo and Gaza while working for the UN investigating War Crimes and Human Trafficking.

I told people that we can expect Cancer Clusters and Birth Defects as a result of Jets with Uranium Stabilizers hitting the Twin Towers of New York and anywhere else where the radioactive dust is spread.

I was interested in a recent post by Mathew Crawford where he recounted a conversation with a recently married young soldier concerned about having children in a world like the one that we live in.1

Mathew said:

For any readers who are still unaware, the DMED does NOT contain data representing any form of injury or illness among babies born to military personnel. Why not? Because babies aren’t soldiers (true). The DMED is intended to track the health of soldiers. And while we might be interested in the health of the children born to soldiers, we would have to locate that data elsewhere.

I am surprised that Mathew did not refer the young soldier to the extensive Birth Defects Registry set up for descendants of US Military personnel as Congressionally Directed Medical Medical Research.2

For descendants, baseline data may be collected at birth or after enrollment in the HMRP. For parents who are not active-duty service members or veterans, baseline data may be collected when they enter the program or when they (if women) become pregnant.

Looking back in time.

Study designs that have particular relevance for the HMRP include perinatal and birth cohorts such as the National Collaborative Perinatal Project conducted by NIH between 1959–1974, which obtained information on pre- and postnatal child health for 58,000 pregnancies in the United States

They have looked at Uranium, Burn Pits, Hexavalent Chromium and Sarin.

Keep reading