Tag: vaccines

Desperate Cries for Help the CDC Ignored

A damning review of V-safe data by Brownstone Institute and REACT19 shows desperate cries for help, suicidal thoughts, and reports of death from thousands after being injured by a Covid-19 vaccine—all of which CDC ignored.

The following is a small sample of these pleas for help. If you are one of these people, please reach out to ICAN at info@icandecide.org.

1. TH4-17845-77781 05/14/21 “My wife (b)(6) is in a tremendous amount of pain from her first shot of Phizer. PLEASE help her. No one else is helping her. Put her in touch witb some expert in this vaccine area. Please i am begging you to help (b)(6)”
2. 8U5-27402-70028 04/13/21 “This is ridiculous. Nobody is reading this. She had a reaction within 20 minutes of vaccine and died. Have been reporting her death to you all since beginning of check in — Death”
3. N7P-10593-65876 04/29/21 “She died and clearly no one reads this. Clearly the CDC is just a joke? — She DIED!!!!!!!!”
4. YNF-19085-18961 04/24/21 “My hand numbness/tingling is continuing. No one has any answers except it should have gone away by now. I don’t have insurance and can’t afford a doctor. I NEED HELP!”
5. VP6-27753-73007 05/25/21 “Patient is deceased due to the complications of the Pfizer vaccine, is anyone even reading this as I already mentioned the passing away in the last one?? Kaiser said that they have lodged complaint to CDC, please follow up, thank you”
6. CNN-58498-17589 10/01/22 “Medical examiner declaring [name] dead — (b)(6) died soon after the vacine. I replied 3 times now. CDC is inefficient”
7. 4QG-33889-09489 04/28/21 “I have vertigo since March 18th after second Pfizer dose. I have asked for HELP here and no one responds. My doctor has no advise. Pfizer does not respond. HELP PLEASE!!!”
8. 5VS-90097-00645 01/15/21 “I have been deathly ill since I received the covid vaccine on 12/23. No one knows what happened to me and no one is helping me. I feel like I am going to die.”
9. 5HH-33715-67821 05/15/21 “Everything is the same as the very first one I completed just much worse. I can’t take much more of this. No one is helping and I’m ready to kill myself”
10. K4A-31774-82113 05/16/21 “I need help and I cannot get it — My mental health seems so bad as though I am not taking my meds i am suicidal”
11. QWJ-31177-09174 05/17/21 “I had a frightening allergic reaction. I was so incapacitated I couldnt reach my cellphone for help. Once I did, and tried to report my reaction, nobody seemed to care. I was afraid I was going to die.”
12. RR2-30038-54302 03/26/21 “I feel like Im going to die. I cant get out of be except to pee. And you guys dont care. Why dont you good afternoon lab rat how are you feeling todat”
13. KDR-22243-72993 01/13/21 “I continue to have peripheral neuropathy on my hands and feet, along with joint pain in my hands. I have received 2 calls from people reporting to be from VAERS and each time they say they will call me back, and no one does. This is very concerning”
14. NCN-22385-46012 01/18/21 “Again, heart palpitations and chest pain with squeezing tightness and tachycardia. Went to doctor today for it. Now have to wear heart monitor. Still have not heard from anyone regarding my symptoms. Again, is anyone reading this? This is concerning for me as I do not have a history of this an am an avid outdoors/ active person. monitor”
15. 7EJ-80298-92811 04/20/21 “Bells Palsy and no assistance from this siteIve even called in and no one returns calls. This is a waste of time. I am miserable and cant blink my eye. This vaccine has cause me a lot of issues and I wish someone would help me.”
16. 9T2-27109-51696 05/16/21 “Cant breathe cant sleep constant diarrhea constant headaches urinating in pain. But what do you care because nobody calls me up and asked me whats going on. Im living in a society where nobody gives a shit.”
17. B3A-39378-11603 05/18/21 “I think I have a blood clot and no one will help me! — Chest pain over my heart leg pain Abdamin pain left shoulder pain neck pain face pain up to eye forearm pain and numbness leg numbness from toes up to hip with pain level at a 10 clammy and elbow pain”
18. SBQ-48267-08351 05/18/21 “Please help. It started with the first vaccine. My mind is foggy. I cant think, I cant do what I need to do. Its been months and it wont go away. I feel like Im in a medicated haze and I feel like Im gone from my own body. Please he — Seeing a neurologist”
19. TLV-72107-82752 04/08/21 “Since I got my first dose I’ve had EBV and was subsequently diagnosed with CAEBV. I’m so tired and bedridden. I can’t get anyone to help me from the health dept, or moderna. my own doctor says he doesn’t have any info so Im trying (b)(6)”
20. UE7-20099-12127 04/13/21 “I’m continuing to lose my vision!!! The vaccine began attacking my eyes within minutes after the injection. Within days it began to attack other organs. Pfizer said they haven’t trained any doctors to help people with adverse side effects.I need help”
21. EFB-34394-29376 07/25/22 “Can’t remember-can’t feel legs from knees down, trouble breathing, can’t walk long (can’t walk to back of store) need caretaker/can’t live alone need HELP please call (b)(6) need you/cant afford medicine or food if these prices keep going up!”
22. SSJ-22140-08717 01/13/21 “Feeling electricity pulsing throughout my bady can’t walk. Inna wheelchair. Need help with mu Adls”
23. Q3M-20490-56119 04/20/21 “Massive lower back pain. I can’t leave bed and if I do, need help. I can’t walk by myself”
24. FD3-11429-68175 05/22/21 “Body stiffness,cramping, I feel like Im paralyzed at times from waist down. I need someone to call me (b)(6) and advise me on where to go for help. Ive gone to my physician & ER and they say they cant help me!”
25. LHW-12596-84447 04/28/21 “My fave gets numb on left side all day,afternoon, and evenings. Im afraid of having anotherstroke, anxious about hurting or killing a student whole driving my school bus, and more that you all don’t care about as you are doing nothing to help me as.”
26. ZWL-10153-73969 05/16/21 “I am not sure if anyone reads this. You keep wanting to know how I feel? I keep telling you that I am dizzy after getting my shot but do you really care? Not once has anyone reached out to me with any advice or help. So my symptoms are still the same”
27. SSJ-17957-30619 04/17/21 “Severe dizzyness. Checking in now on my forth week with dizzyness. Is anyone reading my posts? Would appreciate some help or advice. — Mri of brain and bloodwork”
28. 5RL-83717-71050 05/19/21 “Left shoulder still pain 8/10 from first shot. Someone please help. No one has answers.”
29. K2T-27246-93955 01/17/21 “Ive had a severe headache since 1/12/21 no insurance no one would help me not even you”
30. Z4E-55161-40006 04/28/21 “Severe breast and lymph node pain and swelling. Can someone please tell me if this is normal? Why am I taking the time to fill this out if no one will help me?”
31. NNU-57946-51050 05/21/21 “My entire left leg and foot are huge. I’m so swollen in just left leg. No one will help me. — Dr office”
32. JAY-45842-49882 04/10/21 “Ringing in the ears has gotten worse and I need some help. Its constant and extremely bothersome and no one has been able to help.”
33. CSA-15636-44924 04/19/21 “Bruising under the rash, rash on my legs, itching in my shoulders and neck. And I cant get anyone on the line to help me. I need help”
34. JFY-64443-76361 05/16/21 “Im itching again and it makes me miserable. Can someone call me. Ive given u my number and no one calls. If someone doesnt, then quit sending me these texts. (b)(6)”
35. X32-32274-36534 03/27/21 “Still have throat and ear trouble and taking medicine. Have had this since the first shot. Does anyone read this ???!!!”
36. UAZ-61061-88619 04/21/21 “More eye issues…why report when nobody reads these and follows up? Oh never mind…the vaccine negativity cannot be shown to anyone”
37. Q7J-17375-77056 04/22/21 “Flu like symptoms with fever haven’t stopped why don’t you help me please I can’t take it?”

Keep reading

“Very Concerning Safety Issues”: Trump’s mRNA-Skeptic FDA Drug Chief Was Mysteriously Fired – Right Before This Drug Was Approved

Within three months of firing Tracy Beth Høeg, its top drug regulator, the FDA had approved the first mRNA flu shot, cleared a Sanofi diabetes treatment for children that she had held up, and approved a twice-rejected melanoma drug whose maker went to the White House.

“I’m worried about approvals that we’ve seen recently, like the mRNA influenza vaccine,” Høeg told journalist Paul Thacker in an interview posted Wednesday, citing “very concerning safety issues.“

Of the melanoma drugmaker’s White House meeting, she said: “I guess that’s what you do now if you’re angry that your product is not approved. One has to wonder, is it approved based on the data or do they just know the right people?”

Høeg still doesn’t know who ordered her firing. When agency lawyers came to her office on May 15, three days after Commissioner Marty Makary was pushed out, she refused to resign. The lawyers told her the order came from “someone way above their pay grade.”

The person who supposedly wrote her termination memo denies writing it or ever seeing it, she says. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. only learned of the firing after she was gone, the New York Times reported.

Keep reading

The 200-Year History of Vaccine Disasters That The Government Censors

The first federal vaccine push in the U.S. was the Act to Encourage Vaccination of 1813 – signed by President James Madison, which required free distribution of smallpox vaccine – according to historical accounts. The measure followed lobbying by James Smith, a physician known as the “Jenner of America,” who was appointed federal vaccine agent under the law.

Congress repealed the act in 1822 after safety failures and complaints of profiteering and corruption, the same accounts state. The repeal marked the first federal retreat from vaccine regulation in the nation’s history. The episode set a template that historians and critics say has repeated for more than two centuries: government promotion of vaccination, followed by documented safety failures and followed by public backlash.

Early Setbacks: Tarboro Tragedy and Civil War Vaccination Problems

The 1822 repeal followed what is known as the Tarboro Tragedy, in which Smith sent live smallpox virus instead of cowpox vaccine to North Carolina, causing about 60 infections and 10 deaths, according to the historical account. The incident is cited as an early example of distribution failures under a federal vaccine program.

Historian Terry Reimer wrote that “unfavorable results from vaccination, or spurious vaccinations, were all too common” during the Civil War, according to Brownstone Institute President Jeffrey A. Tucker. Reimer stated that syphilitic scabs and contaminated material spread disease, and that the Confederate Medical Department tried to limit soldier-to-soldier vaccination.

These 19th-century episodes illustrate a recurring theme that later critics of vaccine policy would cite. Safety problems were often documented only after widespread use, and official responses frequently came after public harm had occurred.

Biologics Control Act of 1902: Industry Initiative, Coleman Article Says

The Biologics Control Act of 1902, a foundational federal law governing vaccine and antitoxin production, was an initiative of the large biologics manufacturers, according to Terry S. Coleman’s 2016 article in the Food and Drug Law Journal titled “Early Developments in the Regulation of Biologics.” Coleman wrote that “the 1902 Act was an initiative of the large biologics manufacturers, and it was enacted with the secret cooperation of Public Health Service.”

According to the historical account, Parke-Davis pushed for strict standards and wrote to the Public Health Service, “As you are perhaps aware, the regulations cannot be too stringent for us.” The correspondence is cited as evidence that industry players sought regulation to stabilize markets and disadvantage smaller competitors.

Separately, investigative reporting published by The BMJ has found that regulatory agencies in six countries, including the United States, have seen large proportions of their budgets funded by the industry they are sworn to regulate, raising questions about independence. Maryanne Demasi, the investigative journalist behind the report, documented significant conflicts of interest between drugmakers and the agencies, according to the reporting [1][2][3].

Jacobson v. Massachusetts and the 1986 Liability Shield

In 1905, the Supreme Court decided Jacobson v. Massachusetts, upholding forced vaccination on public health grounds over freedom of conscience, according to the historical account. The ruling remains a foundational precedent for state vaccine mandates.

Eighty-one years later, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 granted liability protection to makers of childhood schedule vaccines and moved injury claims out of civil courts into a specialized federal compensation program, according to the account. The law has been criticized by vaccine-injured families, who describe the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program as “a fortress of opacity and resistance – a system that prioritizes protecting the pharmaceutical industry” over claimants [4].

According to Tucker, the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act enabled the National Institutes of Health to share patents with pharmaceutical companies, a policy shift with reported market value approaching $1 billion to $2 billion. The combination of liability protection, patent sharing and mandatory childhood schedules created what critics describe as a durable framework of industry-favorable regulation.

Keep reading

We Cannot Trust the CDC Estimates of Flu Vaccine Effectiveness

Each year the CDC publishes an estimate of the effectiveness of the flu vaccine in the previous flu season. Recently, the NIH director criticized the test-negative design from which the estimates are derived. He was right. The basic premise of the design is a two-edged sword: on the one hand, restricting the sample to people who sought medical care might reduce confounding by healthcare-seeking behavior; on the other hand, that restriction might add another type of bias — colliding bias — which is not as widely appreciated. The net bias remains unknown.

This, however, is not the only shortcoming of test-negative case-control studies of the flu vaccine. In this post, I will expose the shaky results of a large study of the flu vaccine in 2022–2023, when the vaccine was well-matched to the dominant strain. The study was based on the VISION Vaccine Effectiveness Network, one of several networks that collaborate with the CDC. Below are the published results.

Given a changing risk of infection, a valid comparison of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated requires similar distributions of the two populations over time. This is not the case because vaccination is associated with calendar time (rollout).

[The authors show the vaccination status at the time of seeking care, but most people got vaccinated by the end of December, and the percentage of vaccinated people stabilized in January at about 45% of the encounters.]

As shown below (Table), the share of the vaccinated population in October through December (47%), a period of high background risk, was lower than the comparable share in the unvaccinated population (61%). Of course, the complementary shares in January through March, a period of low risk, were reversed: 53% versus 39%.

Keep reading

Childhood Vaccine Schedules Across Countries

There is a wide disparity across the globe when it comes to childhood vaccination policies. American kids receive up to 75 vaccines; twice as many as kids in other countries. That is why if Dr. Heidi Overton is confirmed as the next director of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), one of her top priorities should be helping to drive President Trump’s mandate to study the safety and comparative outcomes current vaccine schedule to that of other countries. 

High on her list of priorities will surely be the two executive orders President Trump signed this year to promote the health of American children, especially since there doesn’t appear to be any movement on either. 

He issued Executive Order 14407 on May 29, 2026, directing the federal government to realign US childhood vaccine recommendations with best practices from peer nations. Section 3 of the order directs HHS, through the Task Force on Safer Childhood Vaccines, to present plans within 90 days to assess timing and sequencing, as well as “improve vaccine safety monitoring, transparency, and research.” 

Next, on August 10, the president signed Executive Order 14420 to reduce immunization recommendations from 17–18 diseases down to 11, spacing out shots across more doctor visits, and splitting the combined MMR vaccine into three separate injections. 

The president is fulfilling his commitment to vaccination study and reform, but it doesn’t appear that anyone is listening. Ninety days have passed and the task force, chaired by NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, just recently resurrected in August 2025 after 27 years dormant, still hasn’t shared the names of anyone (other than the always present HHS heads) who have been appointed to take charge of designing the study, along with statistical plans, according to a rudimentary internet search. 

To date, there has not been any publicly proposed draft study design, outline, list of experts needed, proposed safety endpoints, request for public comment, or even a single primary or secondary safety or efficacy study objective shared. 

The Task Force does not owe Congress a report until 2027. 

Keep reading

Idaho’s Landmark Medical Freedom Act Survives First Legal Challenge

A federal judge has upheld Idaho’s new medical freedom law, ruling that daycares cannot require children to receive vaccines or other medical interventions as a condition of attendance.

Chief U.S. District Judge Amanda K. Brailsford last week dismissed a lawsuit brought by a Boise-area daycare and three parents who challenged the Idaho Medical Freedom Act. The act, signed into law in April, prohibits most medical mandates, including vaccines.

Brailsford rejected the plaintiffs’ claims that the law is unconstitutionally vague, violates parents’ rights or infringes on the daycare’s First Amendment rights.

Leslie Manookian, president of the Health Freedom Defense Fund and author of the law, said the ruling confirmed what she intended the law to do.

“Medical freedom, the right to make one’s own medical choices, is such a sacred and basic human right it astounds me that anyone could see otherwise,” Manookian told The Defender.

She said the law “protects an individual from public and private actors bullying, coercing and intruding into their personal and private medical choices or punishing them for their choices.”

Manookian also said she was “delighted that the federal court interpreted the law … as a safeguard against overreach” by government and private actors, including daycares.

‘A daycare does not’ make medical decisions

Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador, whose office defended the law, said the ruling confirms that parents — not businesses — are in charge of their children’s health.

“Parents make medical decisions for their children. A daycare does not,” Labrador said in a Sept. 22 statement. “The Legislature protected that choice in the Medical Freedom Act, and the court upheld it.”

Labrador added that daycares can continue telling parents what they believe about vaccines and health, but “they cannot turn a child away because of a parent’s medical decision.”

The attorneys representing Le Soleil Child Care LLC and the parents said they may appeal.

“Our clients are obviously disappointed by the district court’s ruling and the narrow manner in which it interpreted the right at issue,” attorney Andrea Carone said in a statement to the Idaho Statesman.

Carone argued that the law leaves daycares unable to take what the plaintiffs consider “reasonable steps” to protect children from diseases that vaccines can prevent. She called it “a clear public health issue” that the Idaho Legislature must address.

Parents don’t have ‘right to compel a third party to conform’ to their views

The Idaho Medical Freedom Act prohibits businesses, schools and government entities from requiring specified medical interventions as a condition of receiving services, employment or access to certain facilities.

The lawsuit centered in part on what the law means by a “medical intervention.” The law defines the term as a medical procedure, treatment, device, drug injection, medication or medical action used to diagnose, prevent or cure disease, or to alter a person’s health or biological function.

Le Soleil argued that definition was so broad that it could cover routine health and safety practices, including handwashing and sending sick children home. Brailsford rejected that interpretation.

Keep reading

Florida Attorney General files lawsuit against Pfizer for deceptive practices relating to its covid “vaccine”

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced a lawsuit against Pfizer and CEO Albert Bourla, accusing the company of deceptive practices involving the marketing and safety claims surrounding its mRNA covid-19 vaccine.

Uthmeier said Pfizer presented mass vaccination as necessary to stop the spread of covid-19 while assuring the public that there were no significant safety concerns.  “Pfizer told Florida families that mass vaccination with their mRNA covid vaccine was necessary to stop the spread, and that there were no material safety risks,” Uthmeier said.

He specifically pointed to comments from Bourla that, according to Uthmeier, pressured people to take the vaccine by suggesting they would otherwise endanger those closest to them.  “CEO Albert Bourla said, ‘If you didn’t take it, you were putting the people you love the most at risk. He called people who asked questions criminals,” Uthmeier said.

The attorney general also criticised Pfizer’s public statements about potential safety concerns following the widespread distribution of the vaccine. “In January 2023, after billions of doses, he said Pfizer had not seen a single safety signal,” Uthmeier said.

Uthmeier argued that Pfizer had enormous financial incentives surrounding the vaccine and spent heavily on advertising while generating tens of billions of dollars from sales.  “They spent 10 billion dollars on advertising. They brought in more than 80 billion from the vaccine alone,” Uthmeier said.

At the centre of Florida’s allegations is Uthmeier’s claim that the company failed to adequately disclose information about potential risks.  “What they didn’t say was that they knew about myocarditis in teenagers and young adults,” Uthmeier said.

He further claimed that Pfizer had received thousands of reports involving adverse events.  “They had reports of 1,000s of adverse events, including stroke and death, and they had reason to know the shot posed risks to pregnant women and unborn babies in the first trimester,” Uthmeier said.

Uthmeier also referenced information he said was recently revealed by Senators Rand Paul and Ron Johnson involving Dr. Anthony Fauci and concerns about pregnancy.  “Recently, Senators Paul and Johnson revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci texted that the second dose theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the first trimester,” Uthmeier said.

According to Uthmeier, other federal health officials were aware of the discussion while pregnant women continued to be told that vaccination was safe.  “The CDC director and the Surgeon General agreed, but pregnant women, nevertheless, were told it was safe,” Uthmeier said.

The Florida attorney general also alleged that Pfizer had not established whether the vaccine prevented transmission before making claims about the broader public-health benefits of vaccination.  “Pfizer hadn’t even tested whether the vaccine stopped transmission,” Uthmeier said.

He said those allegations form the basis of the state’s lawsuit against Pfizer and Borla.  “That’s why we filed a lawsuit today against Pfizer and Albert Borla for their deceptive practices; what they did was wrong,” Uthmeier said.

Uthmeier framed the legal action as an effort to challenge what he described as a failure to provide Florida families with complete information about the vaccine.  “They assumed Florida families could not be trusted with the truth. Well, we disagree,” Uthmeier said.

He concluded by promising that his office would pursue accountability through the lawsuit.  “My office will hold them accountable. Thank you.”

Keep reading

Retraction of SIDS Paper Based on VAERS Analysis Five Years after Publication

Few individuals can relate as personally as I do to the experience of having peer-reviewed research retracted after it revealed potential safety signals in the VAERS database.

Neil Miller recently had his peer-reviewed published work “removed” from the journal Toxicology Reports. It has been published for 5 years: since June 2021. 

Five years! What’s that now? The smell of a Pubpeer rat? Could be.

The title of the paper is Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990-2019 and review of the medical literature, and you can find the abstract on PubMed.

The reason for the “removal” was that there were claimed “serious methodological flaws” according to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal. What were these methodological flaws, you ask? Well according to the excuse written on the journal’s site where the paper was once readable, these “flaws” revolved around the inability to “infer correlation” – NOT CAUSATION – between vaccination and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

Keep reading

The Disastrous Disability Signal In The UK That Corroborates The US Data!

The Disability Signal Across the Atlantic

On August 11 I wrote US Disabilities Hit an All-Time High of 37 Million In July: UP 23% Since Feb 2021. The BLS Current Population Survey printed 37,029,000 Americans 16 and over reporting a disability. That is seven million more people since February 2021, a 3-to-4 sigma break from the pre-2020 plateau that has not mean-reverted. The inflection is February 2021 with the Covid vaccine rollout not in 2020 when Covid was at its most virulent strain. Alternative explanations fail the timing and the magnitude test. The UK PIP system corroborates that US survey signal with something the American series cannot give you: medically assessed new claims broken down by body system and underlying cause.

If you want to know whether that US survey signal is real, stop arguing about survey design and look at an administrative system that actually diagnoses people.

Go back to the UK Disabilities (PIP) Project we published at Phinance Technologies. The page is still up…use it. It was built so researchers, doctors, and ordinary citizens could see the same thing we saw in 2023. You can look at total body system new claims or by underlying cause new claims (best viewed on desktop) within a body system. You can pick absolute new claims, excess new claims, percent excess new claims and excess new claims z score. We also break it out by monthly and yearly data. Finally you can sort it by age group as well. Play with data and be horrified like we were in 2023. Interactive charts…all done by Phinance Technologies for free.

PIP is not the protagonist from Charles Dickens’s novel Great Expectations. It is the UK’s main working-age disability benefit officially known as the Personal Independence Pension program by the UK Department of Work. Claims are medically assessed. Decisions, “clearances,” as noted above are coded by body system and then by underlying cause. The positive award rate has been stable at around 40 percent, so you are not looking at a sudden collapse in standards. You are looking at more people presenting with more illness…new claims, not just the stock of existing claimants, sorted monthly or yearly and by age band versus a 2016–2019 trend.

That is the advantage over the US survey. The BLS series tells you that disability exploded after early 2021 with the vaccine rollout and not in 2020 with the virus. PIP tells you where in the body it exploded, and it lets you watch the timing against the vaccine rollout curve on the same chart.

Keep reading

Health Canada won’t answer contaminated COVID-19 vaccine questions

This month Ottawa tabled a stack of Order Paper Questions on COVID vaccines: Pfizer payments, residual DNA contamination known as Plasmidgate, approvals, VAERS death reports, and the science (or lack thereof) behind lockdowns.

As then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau sold vaccination as a civic duty and implemented sweeping vaccine mandates, families who were never given proper informed consent recently brought their injuries to Ottawa.

“It really affects the whole family when one person’s injured,” said Carrie Sakamoto, a severely vaccine injured Canadian. She told me at the Allison Inquiry at the beginning of September that “it just devastates everybody.”

Veterans, former elite athletes and parents of children who died testified, and Health Canada stayed silent throughout. Then, a week later, the Public Health Agency of Canada posted a portal update and a backlog number. There was no apology.

As OPQ responses begin rolling in, one is from the MP who spearheaded the inquiry, Dean Allison himself. He asked Health Canada what science proves SV40 promoter fragments in Pfizer’s vaccine are inactive, and when officials first noticed the 2021-22 spike in U.S. VAERS death reports.

The department responded not with a study, but the blanket reassurance that the fragment is inactive, has no functional role and sits below limits. For context: SV40 sequences are used in molecular biology to drive gene expression. They can interact with host DNA, but it all begs the question that if the material is inert and irrelevant, why is it there?

Internal Health Canada emails from July 2023 show officials still asking Pfizer for characterization details while authorizing additional boosters – shots that were still contaminated.

Pfizer had not disclosed the sequence to Health Canada, the FDA or the EMA at the time of submissions, and it was only after genomics expert Kevin McKernan and I made the finding public in April, agencies compared notes.

“At Health Canada, we do not view this as an urgent risk topic,” one email said, as fall booster campaigns loomed. If regulators had already concluded the fragment was harmless and below limit, why were they still seeking basic measurement information from Pifzer?

The same pattern appears in questions on residual DNA bound to lipid nanoparticles, the tiny fat bubbles that carry the modified RNA of the vaccine into cells.

Officials once again offered broad safety assurances while leaving levels, fragment size, batch variability and manufacturing controls unanswered. On deaths, they said vital statistics showed no increase linked to mRNA vaccines, cited VAERS when convenient, then treated the same database as a scare tactic.

Keep reading