Tag: trump derangement syndrome

Holocaust Survivor Absolutely Wrecks Kamala Harris for Pretending Donald Trump Is Hitler

The Democrats’ billionth attempt to paint former President Donald Trump as the second coming of Adolf Hitler may have backfired in a big way. In a powerful video clip circulating on social media, Jerry Wartski, a Holocaust survivor, blasted Vice President Kamala Harris and her fellow Democrats for constantly comparing Trump to Hitler and his supporters to Nazis.

Harris and others, in recent days, have ramped up their rhetoric about Trump and his supporters being fascists seeking to take over the country and oppress marginalized communities. Wartski, a 94-year-old Jewish man who was imprisoned in the Auschwitz concentration camp during World War II, explained why this rhetoric is an insult to those who experienced Nazi Germany.

“Adolf Hitler invaded Poland when I was nine years old. He murdered my parents and most of our family. I know more about Hitler than Kamala will ever know in a thousand lifetimes,” he stated, rolling up his sleeve to show his prisoner number tattooed on his arm. “For [Harris] to accuse President Trump of being like Hitler is the worst thing I’ve ever heard in my 75 years living in the United States.”

Wartski continued, saying Harris “owes my parents and everybody else who was murdered by Hitler an apology for repeating this lie.”

When asked why Jewish people should support Trump, he replied, “Because he’s a mensch. I believe that President Trump is definitely going to be good for Israel because everything that he’s done up to now was in favor.”

He concluded: “He has always stood with the Jewish people and the State of Israel.”

Keep reading

Trump As Hitler–Setting Us Up For A Coup?

I want to briefly draw attention to two articles at The Federalist today. What they both attempt is to draw attention to the bigger agenda behind the desperate Trump as Hitler hoax that has come out in the open during the past week. The articles point to the motives behind this cynical ploy:

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

The hit piece in The Atlantic is part of a psy-op designed to provoke a third assassination attempt and justify mass post-election violence.

In light of the two assassination attempts on Trump that have followed on the unhinged rhetoric from the Establishment, I believe that it’s actually fair to assert that a third assassination attempt is hoped for. The Establishment attempt to deny any connection between the rhetoric and the acts and insistence on a continuation of the rhetoric amounts to a backhanded admission of that. However, the author, John Daniel Davidson, goes further:

The outlandish hit piece on Donald Trump published this week by Jeffery Goldberg at The Atlantic, which was immediately denied on the record by all the people who were in the room with Trump, isn’t just a shoddy smear that would never have passed muster in a newsroom 20 years ago.

It’s more than that. It’s part of a larger psy-op to justify mass post-election violence if Trump wins in November, to signal activists to reject the results of the election, to divide the military, and to coax an insurgency out of the radical left-wing base of the Democratic Party and unleash it on American cities.

Looking back to the violence in the Imperial City on the Potomac at the time of Trump’s inauguration as well as the violence leading up to the 2020 election—all tolerated by the Establishment—it’s difficult to argue against this scenario. Looking back, too, to the months long military occupation of the Imperial City after the 2020 election—as well as the wokeness of the military—one is also tempted to see this statement by Kama Sutra as a Freudian type statement of intent by the Establishment itself:

“He does not want a military that is loyal to the United States Constitution, he wants a military that is loyal to him,” she said. “He wants a military that is loyal to him personally. One that will obey his orders even when he tells them to break the law or abandon their oath to the Constitution of the United States.”

Why am I bothering with this? Davidson focuses on what could happen if Trump wins, but I think it’s worth considering what could happen if the Establishment manages to once again install its preferred regime. The Left has pretty much cast aside any pretense of loyalty to the Constitution as written. I can see drastic steps being taken that could require military force. Never say never. And, of course, with economic disarray threatening …

Keep reading

Hillary Clinton Claims Trump Is “Reenacting 1939 Madison Square Garden Nazi Rally”

Bitter presidential loser Hillary Clinton has claimed that Donald Trump is purposefully reenacting a 1939 Nazi rally at Madison Square Garden.

Appearing on CNN, Hillary stated “One other thing that you‘ll see next week is Trump actually re-enacting the Madison Square Garden rally in 1939.”

“I write about this in my book,” she added, hawking her turgid scribe.

“President Franklin Roosevelt was appalled that neo-Nazi fascists in America were lining up to essentially pledge their support for the kind of government that they were seeing in Germany,” Hillary declared.

So basically she’s saying that everyone who goes to Trump rallies is a nazi because she disagrees with their politics.

Keep reading

Ridiculous ‘Trump Groped Me’ Story Backfires, Causes  #KamalaGropedMe To Trend

The left attempted to amplify a claim by an Obama activist that she hung out with Jeffrey Epstein 30 years ago and they visited Donald Trump, who then groped her.

She chose to keep this information secret for over three decades and only decided to reveal it a few days before the election.

Funny that.

It is so ridiculous and unbelievable that it has ended up with the phrase #KamalaGropedMe trending instead.

The whole thing reeks of complete desperation and absolutely no one believes it.

Keep reading

Groping Guardian Hit Piece Against Trump Debunked by Social Media Users Within Hours

A hit piece against Donald Trump published in the Guardian Wednesday alleging that the real estate mogul groped former professional model Stacey Williams in 1993 was debunked within hours.

“A former model who says she met Donald Trump through the late sexual abuser Jeffrey Epstein has accused the former president of groping and sexually touching her in an incident in Trump Tower in 1993, in what she believed was a ‘twisted game’ between the two men,” the Guardian said Wednesday. “Williams claimed that Trump groped her breasts and buttocks.”

The claims, lobbed against the GOP candidate less than two weeks before the election, were quickly picked apart by social media users within hours.

A number of social media users pointed out that Epstein moved into the Wexler Mansion in New York City in 1996, three years after Williams claimed to be there.

Keep reading

Kamala Harris Projects The Left’s Military Takeover On Trump

After spending four years spearheading an administration that’s injected Marxist ideology into the military, Kamala Harris is now accusing Donald Trump of wanting to hijack the U.S. armed forces for his own political gain.

In an impromptu speech at the Naval Observatory on Wednesday, the vice president outlandishly claimed that Trump once “said he wanted generals like Adolf Hitler had.” She also baselessly contended the former president “does not want a military that is loyal to the United States Constitution,” but one “that is loyal to him.”

The unfounded assertions seemingly stem from a recently published Atlantic piece authored by misinformation trafficker Jeffrey Goldberg. Known for deploying the debunked “suckers” and “losers” hoax against Trump before the 2020 election, Goldberg’s new article cites anonymous sources who supposedly claim Trump disparaged a deceased service member and that he said he “need[s] the kind of generals that Hitler had” during his time as president.

Numerous former Trump administration officials and the deceased soldier’s sister — who said she voted for Trump this week — have since publicly denounced Goldberg’s smear job as completely false. But truth is of little concern to Harris, who gleefully weaponized the obvious pre-Election Day hit piece to paint Trump as a wannabe-dictator seeking to overthrow the military for personal gain.

Trump “wants a military who will be loyal to him personally, one that will obey his orders even when he tells them to break the law or abandon their oath to the Constitution of the United States,” Harris said.

As is the case with her ominous claims that Trump will use lawfare to target his political opponents if elected, Harris is projecting the Democrat Party’s authoritarian agenda onto the former president. Throughout the past four years, the Biden-Harris administration has been steadily “reimagining” America’s military into a force that prioritizes the institution-wide adoption neo-Marxist ideology.

Shortly after taking power, the administration implemented an executive order mandating all federal agencies — including the Defense Department — adopt discriminatory “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) policies throughout their respective workforces. Military branches such as the Navy issued their own directives that year requiring officials to “develop a strategy to advance DEI across the enterprise.”

Keep reading

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

The outlandish hit piece on Donald Trump published this week by Jeffery Goldberg at The Atlantic, which was immediately denied on the record by all the people who were in the room with Trump, isn’t just a shoddy smear that would never have passed muster in a newsroom 20 years ago.

It’s more than that. It’s part of a larger psy-op to justify mass post-election violence if Trump wins in November, to signal activists to reject the results of the election, to divide the military, and to coax an insurgency out of the radical left-wing base of the Democratic Party and unleash it on American cities.

Vice President Kamala Harris’ shocking remarks Wednesday on the steps of the Naval Observatory should be understood in this light. Citing comments quoted in The Atlantic from former Trump chief of staff John Kelly, Harris explicitly compared Trump to Hitler and claimed that if elected he will rule as a dictator and unleash the military on his domestic political opponents.

“He does not want a military that is loyal to the United States Constitution, he wants a military that is loyal to him,” she said. “He wants a military that is loyal to him personally. One that will obey his orders even when he tells them to break the law or abandon their oath to the Constitution of the United States.”

Harris went on to call Trump a fascist, claim he would be a dictator on day one, and repeat a line she’s been using often lately, that Trump will use the military to go after American citizens, using it as “his personal militia to carry out his personal and political vendettas.” She closed by saying Trump is “increasing unhinged and unstable” and that he “wants unchecked power.”

Keep reading

‘The Atlantic’ Immediately Debunked After Attempting Yet Another Trump Military Hit Piece

The sister of slain soldier Vanessa Guillén slammed The Atlantic after it used anonymous sources to allege that President Donald Trump disparaged her after discovering the funeral expenses. 

Guillén’s death at the hands of a fellow soldier and his girlfriend became national news in 2020, with Trump comforting the grief-stricken family and extending death benefits. He also offered to cover the costs personally if the Army did not pay for the funeral expenses. 

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, however, attempted to rewrite history on Tuesday, claiming that Trump was outraged when he learned that Guillén’s funeral, which included heightened security and closed streets, cost $60,000. 

According to the magazine—relying on an anonymous source—Trump allegedly said, “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a fucking Mexican!” and ordered then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to deny payment. 

Guillén’s sister, Mayra, issued a viral statement on X, condemning The Atlantic’s distorted portrayal of her experience with Trump. 

“I don’t appreciate how you are exploiting my sister’s death for politics- hurtful & disrespectful to the important changes she made for service members,” Mayra wrote on X, garnering over 3 million views. 

“President Donald Trump did nothing but show respect to my family & Vanessa. In fact, I voted for President Trump today,” Mayra added.

Keep reading

Biden On Trump: ‘We Gotta Lock Him Up’

During a Tuesday visit to a Democrat Party campaign office in Concord, New Hampshire, Sleepy Joe Biden told Americans, “We gotta lock him up,” when referring to GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.

The recently replaced Democrat candidate claimed Trump would send the government to “shoot” and “kill” his political opposition, adding, “I know this sounds bizarre. If I said this five years ago, you’d lock me up. We gotta lock him up!”

After the crowd loudly cheered on the notion of arresting Trump, Biden realized his mistake and added, “Politically, lock him up.”

The wild assertion that Trump would have his political enemies shot by armed forces comes as dozens of other prominent Democrats have pushed a similar narrative over the past few months.

Democrat Party strategist James Carville on Monday told MSNBC viewers Trump has publicly stated he will “use the military to arrest political enemies” and wants “to get rid of the Constitution.”

The Trump quote being misinterpreted came from a Fox News interview over the weekend where Maria Bartiromo asked if he’s worried about foreign nations causing a disruption in the U.S. if he’s elected.

He responded, saying “in terms of election day,” illegal immigrants rioting or sleeper cells being activated are less likely scenarios than far-left citizens who previously freaked out when he took office being activated by their Deep State controllers.

Speaking about the “radical left lunatics,” Trump explained, “I think the bigger problem is the enemy from within. Not even the people who have come in and are destroying our country… I don’t think they’re the problem in terms of election day, I think the bigger problem are the people from within. We have some bad people. We have some sick people, radical left lunatics and it should be very easily handled by, if necessary National Guard, or if really necessary by the military because they can’t let that happen.”

Keep reading

Kamala Says Her ‘Team of Experts’ is Prepared if Trump Declares Victory Early, as Election Tabulation Could Drag On for Days, if Not Weeks

Once again, Election Night might not give Americans the answers they’re waiting for, as Democrats seem to be paving the way for weeks of ballot counting.

Kamala Harris seems ready to exploit this uncertainty, warning that her “teams of experts” are preparing for a scenario where President Donald Trump declares victory early, well before every last mail-in ballot is counted.

In Pennsylvania, Secretary of State Al Schmidt has essentially admitted that his state is woefully unprepared. According to Schmidt, Pennsylvania will once again take days, if not weeks, to count ballots due to outdated laws preventing officials from processing mail-in ballots until Election Day itself.

Meanwhile, in Georgia, the controversial Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger is extending the timeline, announcing that overseas ballots won’t be fully collected until three days after the election.

Arizona is now calling for “patience” that could stretch for nearly two weeks, according to election officials in Maricopa County, Phoenix.

If this all sounds familiar, it’s because it’s a replay of 2020—just with more delays, more excuses, and more opportunities for questionable late-night ballot dumps.

In an NBC interview, Harris sounded the alarm, saying she’s prepared for the possibility that Trump will declare victory before all the votes are counted.

Hallie Jackson: We are sitting here two weeks away from election night. Last election, the former President came out on election night and declared victory before all the votes were counted. What is your plan if he does that again in two weeks?

Kamala Harris: Well, let me say this. We’ve got two weeks to go, and I’m very much grounded in the present in terms of the task at hand. We will deal with election night and the days after as they come, and we have the resources, the expertise, and the focus on that as well.

Hallie Jackson: So your team is ready to go? Is that what you’re saying? Are you thinking about that as a possibility?

Kamala Harris: Of course. This is a person, Donald Trump, who tried to undo a free and fair election, who still denies the will of the people, who incited a violent mob to attack the United States Capitol, and 140 law enforcement officers were attacked. Some were killed. This is a serious matter. The American people are, at this point, two weeks out, being presented with a very, very serious decision about what will be the future of our country.

And it includes whether we are a country that values a president who respects their duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States,” she said. “Donald Trump has said he would terminate the Constitution of the United States. The American people are being presented with a choice here about whether we want a president who understands that America must stand strong as a leader around the globe or an individual in Donald Trump who openly admires dictators.

Keep reading