Tag: police state

Sellafield worker jailed after sharing ‘offensive’ Facebook posts

A FIFTY-one-year-old Egremont man has become the latest person in the county to be jailed for posting racially aggravated online social media posts linked to national civil unrest.

Sellafield worker Lee Joseph Dunn, of Church Street, appeared at Carlisle Magistrates’ Court this afternoon (Monday).

Dunn pleaded guilty to one offence. He admitted sending, by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character.

His crime occurred on July 30 and 31 and involved three shared Facebook posts.

Prosecutor George Shelley said Dunn had posted three separate images. The first one showed a group of men, Asian in appearance, at Egremont crab fair 2025, with the caption: “Coming to a town near you.”

The second also showed a group of men, Asian in appearance leaving a boat on to Whitehaven beach. This, said Mr Shelley, had the caption: “When it’s on your turf, then what?”

A final image showed a group of men, again Asian in appearance, wielding knives in front of the Palace of Westminster. There was also a crying white child in a Union flag T-shirt. This was also captioned, said Mr Shelley, with the wording: “Coming to a town near you.”

Cumbria Police had confirmed before the hearing that Dunn had been charged with posting offensive and racially aggravated content online.

Keep reading

Tim Walz’s Covid Tyranny Included Shooting Citizens on Porches with Paintball Guns Before Shooting Them with Covid Shots 

A resurfaced video from the Covid lockdown tyranny of 2020 depicts police officers marching on the streets of Minneapolis, Minnesota in the evening of May 30, 2020 yelling at their fellow residents to get inside now, due to the Covid pandemic.

The police then aimed paintball guns at the residents who were standing on their own porches and opened fire, a potentially lethal act used in the name of preventing deaths during the plandemic.

Being hit by a paintball can kill a person, although the weapon is largely considered non-lethal as fatalities are exceedingly rare. The device is most often shot at people in sport, however those individuals wear protective gear, unlike the residents on their porches, greatly increasing the lethality of the device.

“In 2001, a 39-year-old man in the UK got hit by a paintball in the neck, which triggered a cardiovascular arrest, leading to his death. Another unfortunate incident occurred in 2007 when a valve on a paintball gun got detached accidentally, releasing a CO2 cylinder that struck a woman in the head. She died later,” The Paintball Hub said.

“Governor Tim Walz ordered police to shoot residents on their porches with paint balls during the COVID pandemic,” The Gateway Pundit reported.

Keep reading

Lawsuit Claims Indiana Unconstitutionally Seizes Millions in Cash From FedEx Packages Every Year

A new class action lawsuit accuses Indiana law enforcement of seizing millions of dollars a year in cash from FedEx packages without ever informing owners of what crime they’re suspected of violating.

Henry and Minh Cheng, who run a small California jewelry wholesaler business, allege in a class action countersuit filed in Indiana state court that police seized over $42,000 in cash from a FedEx package en route to them from a client in Virginia. County prosecutors then filed a lawsuit to forfeit their money through civil asset forfeiture, claiming the Chengs’ money was connected to a violation of a criminal statute, but the complaint never stated which statute.

The Chengs’ suit, though, says they’re not the only victims. The lawsuit says Indiana law enforcement officials “exploit Indianapolis’s location at the Crossroads of America to forfeit millions of dollars in currency being shipped from one side of the nation to the other.”

The Chengs’ countersuit against the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office and the State of Indiana was filed on their behalf by the Institute for Justice (I.J.), a libertarian public interest law firm that has challenged civil asset forfeiture laws in several states.

According to I.J., the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office has sued to forfeit $2.5 million in currency from at least 130 FedEx parcels in transit from one non-Indiana state to another over the past two years.

“This scheme is one of the most predatory we have seen, and it’s past time to put a stop to it,” I.J. senior attorney Sam Gedge said in a press release. “It’s illegal and unconstitutional for Indiana to forfeit in-transit money whose only connection to Indiana is the happenstance of FedEx’s shipping practices.”

Keep reading

On habeas corpus, probable cause, warrants, detention and extrajudicial state killing under declared public health emergencies.

Below are excerpts from email exchanges about HHS-CDC’s demonstrated use of quarantine authorities under 42 USC 264, 42 CFR 70 and 42 CFR 71, to arrest and detain 3,000 cruise ship passengers at US military bases in March 2020, killing at least 10 people while they were held in detention.

Sasha Latypova is working on a second report about this. Her first report was published in June 2024 in video (Jane Ruby interview) and written format:

The information below is from my replies to readers seeking more information about federal quarantine law.

Keep reading

Whistleblowers Reveal Homeland Security’s Sinister Plot to Drive Them to Suicide for Exposing Border Agency’s Federal DNA Collection Failures

In a bombshell revelation, whistleblowers within Homeland Security have accused the agency of actively retaliating against them for exposing a systemic failure to comply with a federal DNA collection law.

The whistleblowers have risked their careers to reveal that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a division of DHS, has systematically failed to collect the DNA of illegal immigrants as mandated by the DNA Fingerprint Act. This law, passed in 2005 with bipartisan support, mandates the collection of DNA samples from non-U.S. persons detained for immigration violations.

This failure has allowed violent criminals to evade detection and commit further crimes on American soil.

In an exclusive interview with Catherine Herridge, the whistleblowers detailed a chilling campaign of retaliation, including demotions, the stripping of law enforcement credentials, and the creation of a hostile work environment. According to the whistleblowers, the agency’s intent was clear: to silence them at any cost.

The whistleblowers, who collectively have over seven decades of law enforcement experience and held TOP SECRET clearances—Mark Jones (20 years), Fred Wynn (18 years), and Michael Taylor (31 years)—assert that the agency’s non-compliance has directly endangered American lives.

In their letter to the DHS Inspector General, they stated that out of nearly 1.7 million encounters with illegal immigrants in FY 2022, only about 37% resulted in DNA collection. Alarmingly, this figure dropped to just over 31% in Q2 FY23.

The hierarchical arguments against the Covid interventions

The hierarchical arguments against the Covid interventions.

(1) NO EMERGENCY

The data showed it was a nothing burger even in early March 2020.

(2) CONFUSION JUSTIFIES NOTHING

Even if the data were unclear, uncertainty doesn’t justify overturning society.

(3) PRONE TO SEE THE APOCALYPSE

Even if the data about a perceived pandemic appeared certain, one must doubt it, as people have an instinctual fear of the mythical pandemic, and are prone to seeing one where there is not.

(4) INTERVENTIONS DON’T WORK

The interventions didn’t slow the spread, were recommended against as of 2019, and were only done out of panic, looking to be doing something, and copycatting other nations.

(5) INTERVENTION HARMS

Even if the interventions had narrowly slowed the spread, no cost-benefit analysis was done demonstrating that the benefits outweighed the harms. Instead, the one thing — infections — received infinite weight to all else. The interventions in fact had epic harms.

(6) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Even if the interventions had narrowly slowed the spread and cost-benefit analyses were in its favor (and we could trust the analysis wasn’t biased), such analyses never consider the inevitable creation of an “unclean” out group, those skeptical of the interventions thrust upon society, who can easily become the victims of democide, and if that happens the mainstream community will only say to themselves, “Good riddance.”

(7) VOLUNTARY

Even if the interventions worked and had no harms of any kind, people would do them voluntarily.

Keep reading

Tyranny in the UK – Can it Happen Here?

As the UK descends into tyranny, where just re-Tweeting something the government doesn’t like can land a person a multi-year jail sentence, Americans are wondering, “can it happen here?” After all, we have the guarantees of the First Amendment.

But while we shake our heads at UK authorities jailing people for their social media posts this past week, we should not kid ourselves. The answer is that silencing dissent can happen here and it is happening here.

Here are just three recent examples of how the “deep state” or the permanent government is conspiring to restrict political dialogue in the United States.

First is the revelation that former US Representative and former US presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard has been placed under the bizarrely named “Quiet Skies” program. As reported by journalist Matt Taibbi based on revelations by TSA whistleblowers, this July Gabbard was flagged as a terror threat, and every time she travels her boarding pass is marked so that she is pulled aside for extensive screening. According to the whistleblowers, “Gabbard is unaware she has two Explosive Detection Canine Teams, one Transportation Security Specialist (explosives), one plainclothes TSA Supervisor, and three Federal Air Marshals on every flight she boards.”

As Gabbard herself revealed recently on the Laura Ingraham show, “A few weeks ago, I had the audacity to tell the truth: that Kamala Harris would essentially be a mouthpiece and puppet of the Military Industrial Complex and National Security State. The next day, July 23, they retaliated. Sadly this is what we can expect from the ‘Harris Administration.’”

Next we have the attempted assassination of former president Donald Trump. It seems every day brings a new revelation that calls into question whether the massive failure to protect the Republican presidential candidate was just an “honest mistake.” We know from 1963 what can happen to presidents who cross the “deep state” and we know from Trump’s four years in office how “former” deep state officials can conspire to undermine the presidency with lies like “Russiagate.”

Keep reading

Obvious Lies, Subjugation By Government, and The Crucial Goal Of Learned Helplessness

“Analyzing what is happening, the nervous system gets tired. Wherever you look – stupidity, betrayal, professional incompetence, animal thirst for profit at any cost, which is tantamount to betrayal. Official propagandists call the above “the ossification and clumsiness of the system.”

Everything is so rotten that a rational analysis of what is happening gives only one answer: without revolutionary changes in personnel, semantic and management policies – nothing will change. We will continue to rot and be surprised when it breaks in a weak spot like in the Kursk region. And there will be more and more such breaks.

What can I say. The simplest means of transport – a front-line transporter, so necessary in the troops, the Russian Federation has not been able to produce for 2.5 years. And these are just welded metal structures, two tracks, two simple electric motors, a battery and simple electronics. For 2.5 years, a country led by rottenness has not been able to solve such a simple task. What are we even talking about…

It’s painful to look at all this. But the worst thing is that millions of people are happy with it. The Ukrainians invaded the Kursk region? Yes, it’s sad, but it’s far from us, it doesn’t concern us. Petya, come on, pour some beer. This indifference and my hut on the edge, I don’t know anything – this is the main soil on which all our problems grow.”

“One goal is to get people to check out mentally, I suppose. But perhaps if they can’t convince you to believe their lies, they will simply blow a circuit in your brain. I feel like this is some kind of advanced sort psychologist abuse

Most of the population is so checked out that they don’t even care that the country is being invaded. Thats where the system has brought us and the only happy people are Russia’s enemies.”

Keep reading

Starmer’s Push to Police “Fake News” Sparks Major Censorship Concerns

Under proposals currently being considered, the Labour Party, led by the new Prime Minister Keir Starmer, plans to compel tech companies to eliminate “fake news” from their platforms. These measures, initiated in response to recent riots, have sparked controversy over potential infringements on free speech.

Keir Starmer, addressing these concerns last Friday, indicated that the government would reassess social media regulations to deter future disturbances. The Telegraph has reported that part of this reevaluation involves imposing obligations on social media entities to curb “legal but harmful” content. This would obligate platforms to limit or remove content spreading false information about various sensitive subjects, including asylum seekers and self-harm, irrespective of its legality.

Critics, however, have voiced apprehensions that these measures could suppress free expression. They argue that this demonstrates a more authoritarian inclination within Sir Keir’s Labour Party, potentially undermining foundational free speech principles by extensively policing speech that does not necessarily violate laws.

The discord has also touched upon interactions between the Prime Minister and Elon Musk, owner of X, especially regarding the handling of the riots. This proposed regulatory push would likely be incorporated into a broader review of the Online Safety Act enacted last year.

Originally, the Act included provisions to address “legal but harmful” content but was amended due to free speech concerns, eliminating such clauses after pushback. Critics had worried that these provisions might enable future governments to censor contentious viewpoints.

Keep reading

Louisiana’s New Law Sparks First Amendment Showdown

Under Louisiana’s new, recently enacted law (HB 173), journalists and other citizens are limited in their right to film the police.

Anyone who finds themselves within 25 feet of an on-duty officer doing that – after being warned to stop or retreat – could face misdemeanor charges.

Now a group of Louisiana-based media companies is challenging the new legislation by suing the state – Attorney General Liz Murrill and two other officials – on First Amendment grounds, seeking an injunction.

The plaintiffs behind the Deep South Today v. Murrill case, brought before the US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, go into the importance of the media being able to cover police activity to ensure public scrutiny and avoid miscarriage of justice.

HB 173, the filing continues, “has grave implications for the ability of reporters and news organizations, including plaintiffs, to exercise their First Amendment rights.”

Although the lawsuit does not specifically mention the consequence the law could have on speech online, given that a majority of videos showing police at work get posted on the internet, the restrictions imposed by the act could also have indirect implications for that form of freedom of expression.

According to the plaintiffs, the law is unconstitutional and enables the police to prevent both journalists and the public from being close enough to document their work.

At the same time, officers are allowed to stop those filming them from approaching, either providing a reason or not, and that includes public gatherings, arrests, and reporting from the scene of an accident.

Keep reading