Governments Are Parasites, They Produce No Value, Just Consume It

The war in Ukraine is an example of this: It is to the advantage of the major players on both “sides” to keep the war going on for as long as possible, while keeping the heads of the mafias (Obama, Putin) in their places of power. Biden, and now Harris (both obvious puppets, whose puppeteer is Obama) have always talked about keeping Ukraine “in the fight” – but not winning the war. Doing the latter means the game ends and the opportunities for both mafias to suck money out of the populations on which they are parasites ends as well – in Russia, by outright theft (Shoigu just won top honors in this competition), and in America/the “West” by fraud (those $1000 toilet seats and trillion dollar “defense” budgets – with “national security” to cover up the crime ). War is the ultimate consumer economy – materiel and troops are consumed and destroyed, producing a need to supply more, which is a way to increase profits, and decrease the number of people in the lower classes who can suck up government money – or keep their own. As General Smedley Butler (USMC – Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children) once said, “War is a racket” – https://ratical.org/ratville/CAH/warisaracket.pdf – nearly a century ago, and it’s still true. Putin does still have competent generals to head things up that he hasn’t outright killed like Prigozhin and Utkin – Popov and Strelkov are in jail, someplace, and Surovikin is wandering around in the wilds of Africa – but they’d finish the war and the carnival of greed, theft, and fraud, and that just can’t be allowed to happen… He did shitcan Gerasimov, the incompetence just became too blatant and out in the open – and so Putin is anxiously casting about for “generals” whose incompetence isn’t at the star level of Gerasimov… the idea is to keep the game going, because that’s where the money is, as Willie Sutton, the famous bank robber, put it so long ago.

The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were kept going for twenty years, but never won, even though that was fully possible in both places – and quickly. If you look at Sun Tzu, it’s obvious that sending over 150,000 troops would never win the war – it would have taken ten times that number – and that’s obvious to me and Niall Ferguson, as I said in a conversation with a friend 15 years ago. “Mission creep” just means that the usual games are being played, the goal is to keep the game going for as long as the host populations ( the populations that feed the parasitical governments) can be convinced to stand for it.

Keep reading

The TRUTH About the UK’s “Two Tier Justice System”

The recent public outcry about authoritarianism in Britain, ignited by the authorities’ response to the Southport and mass immigration protests, has raised significant questions about two-tier policing and sentencing.

These concerns strike at the heart of the justice system, where police enforcement and the judiciary are supposed to defend the citizenry by dispensing justice fairly and without prejudice. Yet, the public’s apparent increasing loss of faith in these institutions suggests that this is dissipating, and quickly.

Here’s a look at some specific examples to help shed light on whether these claims of two-tier justice hold any merit.

Keep reading

61-Year-Old Brit Gets 18 Month Prison Sentence For Chanting “Who The F**k Is Allah”

A 61-year-old man in the UK was jailed for 18 months for chanting “who the fuck is Allah” and telling police officers “you’re not English anymore” during a protest outside Downing Street.

Yes really.

The sentence handed out to David Spring is the latest shocking example of how low the bar has now been set in terms of free speech in response to rioting that occurred after the murder of three girls in Southport last month.

Spring attended a demonstration of around 700 people in London on July 31 which turned disorderly.

Police bodycam footage that was played in court showed Spring calling police officers “cunts,” making “hostile gestures” and joining in with chants of “who the fuck is Allah” and “you’re not English anymore.”

While Spring’s behavior could be described as offensive and unruly, the fact that he will spend the next year and a half behind bars for saying mean words exemplifies how the UK has slipped into extreme authoritarianism in the space of just two weeks.

Keep reading

US Court Reimposes “Disinformation” Device Monitoring on January 6 Defendant

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has issued an order in the United States v. Daniel Goodwyn case reimposing the computer monitoring measure against Goodwyn, a January 6 defendant.

We obtained a copy of the order for you here.

Goodwyn was charged and convicted for briefly entering the US Capitol during the January 6 events, and although he stayed inside the building for just over half a minute, left when he was asked to, was not involved in violence nor did he cause any damage – it was his social media posts (among others, screenshot of public documents that show names of government employees) that were seen as a threat.

In initial proceedings in 2023, Goodwyn pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count of trespassing. As legal experts noted, normally a first-time offender isn’t sent to jail for this, but the US District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Reggie Walton sentenced him to two months in prison.

This was accompanied by probation conditions that included unusually harsh and ongoing restrictions on Goodwyn’s online speech and access to information. Walton – a vocal critic of Donald Trump decided that Goodwyn’s computer must be “monitored and inspected” to make sure he was not “spreading disinformation.”

The appellate court then found that the district court “plainly erred” by imposing these surveillance measures. Judge Walton next decided that now, “on the heels of [sic] another election,” he was worried Goodwyn was spreading “false narratives” and therefore affirmed his original sentencing.

Keep reading

Sellafield worker jailed after sharing ‘offensive’ Facebook posts

A FIFTY-one-year-old Egremont man has become the latest person in the county to be jailed for posting racially aggravated online social media posts linked to national civil unrest.

Sellafield worker Lee Joseph Dunn, of Church Street, appeared at Carlisle Magistrates’ Court this afternoon (Monday).

Dunn pleaded guilty to one offence. He admitted sending, by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character.

His crime occurred on July 30 and 31 and involved three shared Facebook posts.

Prosecutor George Shelley said Dunn had posted three separate images. The first one showed a group of men, Asian in appearance, at Egremont crab fair 2025, with the caption: “Coming to a town near you.”

The second also showed a group of men, Asian in appearance leaving a boat on to Whitehaven beach. This, said Mr Shelley, had the caption: “When it’s on your turf, then what?”

A final image showed a group of men, again Asian in appearance, wielding knives in front of the Palace of Westminster. There was also a crying white child in a Union flag T-shirt. This was also captioned, said Mr Shelley, with the wording: “Coming to a town near you.”

Cumbria Police had confirmed before the hearing that Dunn had been charged with posting offensive and racially aggravated content online.

Keep reading

Tim Walz’s Covid Tyranny Included Shooting Citizens on Porches with Paintball Guns Before Shooting Them with Covid Shots 

A resurfaced video from the Covid lockdown tyranny of 2020 depicts police officers marching on the streets of Minneapolis, Minnesota in the evening of May 30, 2020 yelling at their fellow residents to get inside now, due to the Covid pandemic.

The police then aimed paintball guns at the residents who were standing on their own porches and opened fire, a potentially lethal act used in the name of preventing deaths during the plandemic.

Being hit by a paintball can kill a person, although the weapon is largely considered non-lethal as fatalities are exceedingly rare. The device is most often shot at people in sport, however those individuals wear protective gear, unlike the residents on their porches, greatly increasing the lethality of the device.

“In 2001, a 39-year-old man in the UK got hit by a paintball in the neck, which triggered a cardiovascular arrest, leading to his death. Another unfortunate incident occurred in 2007 when a valve on a paintball gun got detached accidentally, releasing a CO2 cylinder that struck a woman in the head. She died later,” The Paintball Hub said.

“Governor Tim Walz ordered police to shoot residents on their porches with paint balls during the COVID pandemic,” The Gateway Pundit reported.

Keep reading

Lawsuit Claims Indiana Unconstitutionally Seizes Millions in Cash From FedEx Packages Every Year

A new class action lawsuit accuses Indiana law enforcement of seizing millions of dollars a year in cash from FedEx packages without ever informing owners of what crime they’re suspected of violating.

Henry and Minh Cheng, who run a small California jewelry wholesaler business, allege in a class action countersuit filed in Indiana state court that police seized over $42,000 in cash from a FedEx package en route to them from a client in Virginia. County prosecutors then filed a lawsuit to forfeit their money through civil asset forfeiture, claiming the Chengs’ money was connected to a violation of a criminal statute, but the complaint never stated which statute.

The Chengs’ suit, though, says they’re not the only victims. The lawsuit says Indiana law enforcement officials “exploit Indianapolis’s location at the Crossroads of America to forfeit millions of dollars in currency being shipped from one side of the nation to the other.”

The Chengs’ countersuit against the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office and the State of Indiana was filed on their behalf by the Institute for Justice (I.J.), a libertarian public interest law firm that has challenged civil asset forfeiture laws in several states.

According to I.J., the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office has sued to forfeit $2.5 million in currency from at least 130 FedEx parcels in transit from one non-Indiana state to another over the past two years.

“This scheme is one of the most predatory we have seen, and it’s past time to put a stop to it,” I.J. senior attorney Sam Gedge said in a press release. “It’s illegal and unconstitutional for Indiana to forfeit in-transit money whose only connection to Indiana is the happenstance of FedEx’s shipping practices.”

Keep reading

On habeas corpus, probable cause, warrants, detention and extrajudicial state killing under declared public health emergencies.

Below are excerpts from email exchanges about HHS-CDC’s demonstrated use of quarantine authorities under 42 USC 264, 42 CFR 70 and 42 CFR 71, to arrest and detain 3,000 cruise ship passengers at US military bases in March 2020, killing at least 10 people while they were held in detention.

Sasha Latypova is working on a second report about this. Her first report was published in June 2024 in video (Jane Ruby interview) and written format:

The information below is from my replies to readers seeking more information about federal quarantine law.

Keep reading

Whistleblowers Reveal Homeland Security’s Sinister Plot to Drive Them to Suicide for Exposing Border Agency’s Federal DNA Collection Failures

In a bombshell revelation, whistleblowers within Homeland Security have accused the agency of actively retaliating against them for exposing a systemic failure to comply with a federal DNA collection law.

The whistleblowers have risked their careers to reveal that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a division of DHS, has systematically failed to collect the DNA of illegal immigrants as mandated by the DNA Fingerprint Act. This law, passed in 2005 with bipartisan support, mandates the collection of DNA samples from non-U.S. persons detained for immigration violations.

This failure has allowed violent criminals to evade detection and commit further crimes on American soil.

In an exclusive interview with Catherine Herridge, the whistleblowers detailed a chilling campaign of retaliation, including demotions, the stripping of law enforcement credentials, and the creation of a hostile work environment. According to the whistleblowers, the agency’s intent was clear: to silence them at any cost.

The whistleblowers, who collectively have over seven decades of law enforcement experience and held TOP SECRET clearances—Mark Jones (20 years), Fred Wynn (18 years), and Michael Taylor (31 years)—assert that the agency’s non-compliance has directly endangered American lives.

In their letter to the DHS Inspector General, they stated that out of nearly 1.7 million encounters with illegal immigrants in FY 2022, only about 37% resulted in DNA collection. Alarmingly, this figure dropped to just over 31% in Q2 FY23.

The hierarchical arguments against the Covid interventions

The hierarchical arguments against the Covid interventions.

(1) NO EMERGENCY

The data showed it was a nothing burger even in early March 2020.

(2) CONFUSION JUSTIFIES NOTHING

Even if the data were unclear, uncertainty doesn’t justify overturning society.

(3) PRONE TO SEE THE APOCALYPSE

Even if the data about a perceived pandemic appeared certain, one must doubt it, as people have an instinctual fear of the mythical pandemic, and are prone to seeing one where there is not.

(4) INTERVENTIONS DON’T WORK

The interventions didn’t slow the spread, were recommended against as of 2019, and were only done out of panic, looking to be doing something, and copycatting other nations.

(5) INTERVENTION HARMS

Even if the interventions had narrowly slowed the spread, no cost-benefit analysis was done demonstrating that the benefits outweighed the harms. Instead, the one thing — infections — received infinite weight to all else. The interventions in fact had epic harms.

(6) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Even if the interventions had narrowly slowed the spread and cost-benefit analyses were in its favor (and we could trust the analysis wasn’t biased), such analyses never consider the inevitable creation of an “unclean” out group, those skeptical of the interventions thrust upon society, who can easily become the victims of democide, and if that happens the mainstream community will only say to themselves, “Good riddance.”

(7) VOLUNTARY

Even if the interventions worked and had no harms of any kind, people would do them voluntarily.

Keep reading