Kamala Harris has been accused of bussing in people by the thousands to fill seats at a rally, this time in Charlotte, North Carolina on Thursday.
There were buses as far as the eye could see outside the Bojangles Coliseum.
There is a debate over whether these buses brought people from outside the city, or if they were merely shuttle buses ferrying people from the city centre to the venue, a distance of around 4 miles.
Daily Mail political reporter Charlie Spiering has unearthed a speech of Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris, vowing to have the Department of Justice(DOJ) move against “misinformation” and “hate” on social media platforms.
During a 2019 speech at the NAACP Fight for Freedom Dinner in Detroit, Michigan, Harris promised that, if given the power, she would hold social media companies responsible for spreading what she termed “misinformation” using the DOJ as a key tool.
The resurfacing of the said video on X, formerly Twitter, came amid a growing number of free speech advocates raising the alarm over what the vice president would do to censor social media platforms if she wins the election.
“We will hold social media platforms accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy,” Harris said, emphasizing the DOJ’s role in enforcing accountability. “We’ll put the Department of Justice of the United States back in the business of justice. We will hold social media platforms accountable for the hate infiltrating their platforms because they have a responsibility to help fight against this threat to our democracy.”
She told technocrats that she would double the Civil Rights Division and direct law enforcement to address the spread of extremist ideologies and misinformation. “If you profit off of hate, if you act as a megaphone for misinformation or cyber warfare, if you don’t police your platforms we are going to hold you accountable as a community,” Harris added.
It is being claimed that an insider at ABC News is going to come forward with proof that Kamala Harris was provided Tuesday’s debate questions ahead of time, allowing her team a distinct advantage in preparing to go head to head with Donald Trump.
The whistleblower will reportedly release a signed affidavit via a lawyer with details of how the Harris team got hold of the questions before the debate and details of communications between her team and ABC News.
Throughout the debate and afterwards many people suggested Harris knew what the questions were going to be judging from the way she reacted to them compared to when she had to answer off the cuff.
A former top adviser to Bill and Hillary Clinton says ABC News should hire an external law firm to conduct an internal investigation into whether the network was involved in “rigging the outcome” of the presidential debate.
The demand was made by political strategist and pollster Mark Penn, who was a chief strategist for Hillary Clinton during her 2008 presidential campaign.
“I actually think they should do a full internal investigation, hire an outside law firm. I don’t know how much of this was planned in advance,” Penn told the John Solomon Reports podcast.
“I don’t know what they told the Harris campaign. I think the day after, suspicion here is really quite high, and I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done by an independent party to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate. I think the situation demands nothing less than that,” he added.
Vice President Kamala Harris has finally released a policy platform on her official campaign website.
The policy platform, titled “New Way Forward,” seeks to align her campaign more closely with the mainstream political views while addressing key issues that have defined her tenure and political identity. (Related: Kamala Harris working with Tim Walz to create federal Department of GROCERIES – food price controls and empty shelves won’t be far behind.)
In a section labeled “safeguard[ing] our fundamental freedoms,” Harris declared her opposition to a national abortion ban, pledging to sign any bill that restores reproductive freedom nationwide.
She also disclosed her commitment to pushing for the passage of the “Equality Act,” a controversial measure that mandates legal protections for LGBTQ+ individuals across various sectors, including business, education and public spaces. The act would also require employers and educators to use the preferred pronouns of every person, allow transgender athletes to compete in sports based on their gender identity and obligate health care providers to offer so-called “gender-affirming” care, even for minors.
Harris’ platform also endorses the “John Lewis Voting Rights Act” and the “Freedom to Vote Act,” which seeks to strengthen voting rights protections, expand vote-by-mail options and increase early voting opportunities.
The Democratic presidential nominee also proposes a range of economic measures under the theme of creating an “opportunity economy.” These include expanding child tax credits, increasing government spending on affordable housing, providing direct payments to first-time homebuyers and taking legal action against corporations for price gouging. She also calls for supporting the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), strengthening Social Security and Medicare through higher taxes on the wealthy and investing in infrastructure, education, child care and clean energy.
Moreover, the Harris campaign agenda outlines plans to “ensure safety and justice for all,” advocating for stronger gun control measures, immigration reform through a “bipartisan” border security bill and the elimination of presidential immunity. The platform also supports “common-sense Supreme Court reforms,” including imposing term limits on justices and requiring them to adhere to ethics rules that govern other federal judges.
On foreign policy, Harris promises to maintain the strength and security of America by standing firm against dictators, pursuing peace efforts in conflict zones such as Gaza and investing in future-facing industries like semiconductors, so-called “clean” renewable energy and artificial intelligence.
It’s a fair question. Why? Because it’s happened before. It’s not some tin foil hat, pie-in-the-sky conspiracy theory: Democrats hired by major news networks have fed debate questions to their party’s presidential nominees. While many analyses and polls are being discussed about the ABC News debate on Tuesday, what about the possibility that Harris got the questions in advance?
To tee this up, let’s not forget that Donna Brazile gave the Clinton campaign the questions before the CNN debate:
Former Democratic National Committee interim chair Donna Brazile acknowledged sending town hall topics to Hillary Clinton’s campaign, calling it a “mistake I will forever regret.”
Brazile wrote in an essay for Time magazine that she shared potential topics for a CNN town hall with the Clinton campaign in her role as a Democratic operative and the DNC vice chair.
“My job was to make all our Democratic candidates look good, and I worked closely with both campaigns to make that happen,” she wrote. “But sending those emails was a mistake I will forever regret.”
WikiLeaks posted emails from Brazile to the Clinton campaign that tipped it off that a woman from Flint, Michigan, would ask Clinton about the situation there for a town hall. Brazile also told the campaign that Clinton would be asked about the death penalty at a separate town hall.
CNN dropped Brazile as a contributor after the revelations. When the email alerting the Clinton campaign about the death penalty question was released, Brazile suggested the documents were “misinformation.”
CNN’s Jake Tapper unusually criticized Kamala Harris’ debate performance, pointing out a number of examples where she dodged actual question being asked.
The presidential debate was noteworthy for its clear bias towards Harris, who received zero fact checks from the moderators despite making a number of false claims.
On the other hand, Trump was fact checked at least four times and faced numerous ‘follow up’ confrontations with the moderators compared to Harris who faced barely any.
CNN also noted Kamala’s repeated prevarications when questions were lobbed her way.
When Harris was asked, “Do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago?” she responded by saying, “I was raised as a middle class kid.”
CLAIM: Vice President Kamala Harris delivered only one false statement during Tuesday night’s debate on ABC News, CNN Senior Reporter Daniel Dale alleged.
VERDICT: False. Harris delivered at least 21 false statements and hoaxes, according to Breitbart News’s Alana Mastrangelo:
1. “Very fine people” hoax
2. Project 2025 hoax
3. False claims on Trump trade deficit
4. Putin can “do whatever the hell he wants”
5. “Dictator on day one” hoax
6. Blaming botched Afghanistan withdrawal on Trump
7. Putin “would be sitting in Kyiv”
8. “Bloodbath” hoax
9. Abortion “monitor” hoax
10. Rental property hoax
11. Central Park Five “execution” hoax
12. “Suckers and losers” hoax
13. False fracking claims
14. False oil production claims
15. National Sales Tax
16. Distorting unemployment figures
17. “I was raised middle-class”
18. “Terminating” the Constitution
19. “Sold us out” to China
20. “Not one” troop in any war zone
21. Taking guns away
Read more specifics on Harris’s false statements and hoaxes here.
Dale alleged that the only false statement Harris delivered was a claim that former President Donald Trump left the Biden-Harris administration the worst employment since the Great Depression.
“So, the Biden-Harris administration was not actually left the worst unemployment since the Great Depression,” Dale reported Tuesday evening:
They were left a 6.4 percent unemployment rate in January 2020, one that was certainly elevated, by recent standards — pretty high — but it was significantly down from the 14.18 percent level it reached early in the pandemic, so, it was already improving at the time the Biden-Harris administration took office, and that 6.4 percent level was the highest since the Great Recession, so, in the last 20 years, not going back decades.
Democrat allies in the establishment media widely applauded ABC News debate moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis for their performance.
Muir and Davis attempted to “fact-check” Trump at least seven times but never did so with Harris, according to an analysis by Breitbart News’s Joel Pollak. Harris regurgitated many hoaxes, notably the Charlottesville “very fine people” hoax, but the moderators turned a blind eye. The “fact-checking” was in one direction, Pollak found.
At one point in the debate, Muir even fact-checked Trump’s claim that he was sarcastic when discussing the results of the 2020 election in a recent interview.
The Trump campaign is taking matters into its own hands after a blatantly biased performance by the debate moderators, who failed to hold Kamala Harris accountable for her numerous lies.
Last night’s debate featured Kamala Harris dodging responsibility for her failed policies while a complicit moderator allowed her to escape scrutiny in yet another display of blatant media bias.
Despite the stacked odds, President Donald Trump emerged victorious, offering clear solutions while exposing Kamala Harris’s disastrous record and long list of lies.
The debate was a glaring example of how far the radical left is willing to go to distort the truth. Kamala Harris, with the full support of a biased moderator, attempted to rewrite history while pushing dangerous, far-left policies. But the facts speak for themselves.
Trump campaign officials immediately issued a point-by-point fact-check of Harris’s lies.
The 2024 election is already shaping up to feel a lot like 2020. There are a lot of familiar red flags popping up, especially with all the warnings and alarm bells going off. Let’s be real—at this point, most Americans believe there was plenty of “funny business” surrounding 2020. From the free-for-all with mail-in ballots to unmanned drop boxes, late-night suitcases, “busted pipes,” and those private “ballot counting” sessions, the entire election felt off—especially the so-called “winner.”
Here we are again, dealing with the same concerns, thanks to the Deep State, who tore open Pandora’s Box back in 2020 when they tampered with our sacred elections. They made it clear to the American people that their voice and their vote didn’t matter.
Now, Bret Weinstein, a biologist and podcaster, is taking things a step further with a chilling prediction he made while chatting with media heavy hitter Glenn Beck. Bret says Kamala’s “Team Blue” will take a major hit, losing both the electoral and popular vote, which doesn’t sound all that bold, right? But here’s where things get interesting—Bret claims none of Harris’s losses will actually be reported by the media.
A new level of cheating: gaslighting.”
Hellbound and Down 
You must be logged in to post a comment.