Trump Admin Sues California Over 20,000 Suspected Ineligible Voters Ahead Of Midterms

The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against California and two election officials, seeking to prevent approximately 20,000 potentially ineligible voters from having their ballots counted in November’s midterm elections until their citizenship status can be verified.

The Justice Department alleges that California is knowingly allowing noncitizens to participate in federal elections, raising concerns about election integrity just weeks before voters head to the polls.

“State-facilitated voter fraud is unacceptable in the United States of America,” Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement.

“If found responsible in a court of law, the State of California will have seriously undermined confidence in our electoral system and violated laws that protect our nation’s representative system of government,” Blanche added.

According to the lawsuit, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigators identified potentially ineligible voters using federal immigration records and information from the Social Security Administration and State Department.

The Justice Department previously sent Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Dean Logan a password-protected drive containing more than 20,000 voter records, demanding citizenship verification within 48 hours.

Logan responded that his office would follow applicable federal and state election laws while maintaining accurate voter registration records.

The administration is now asking a federal court to prevent ballots associated with those voters from being counted until their eligibility is established.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, condemned the lawsuit, accusing President Donald Trump of attempting to suppress voters ahead of the election.

“This is a sad, desperate attempt by Trump to use his politicized Justice Department to try to suppress California voters just three weeks before Election Day,” Newsom said.

Similar federal efforts to identify noncitizens on voter rolls in Nevada, Pennsylvania and New Jersey have previously raised questions about the accuracy of government data.

Keep reading

In Rare Move, DOJ Files Statement of Interest in Michigan Trial Court — Tells Judge Poll Book Data Are Federal Election Records Jocelyn Benson Must Preserve

The U.S. Department of Justice has taken the highly unusual step of filing a Statement of Interest in a Michigan trial-court case — telling the Court of Claims that electronic poll book data, including all metadata, are federal election records and that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is responsible for preserving them.

Statements of Interest from the Justice Department in pure state-court cases are rare. It is even rarer for DOJ to intervene at the trial-court level rather than on appeal. It is rare for the department to appear in a state trial court at all. The only recent election example is a 2022 Wisconsin circuit court case over absentee ballot witness addresses.

The filing lands in the middle of Bridgewater Township Clerk Michelle McQueer’s lawsuit challenging Benson’s rule that forces clerks to delete electronic poll book files just seven days after an election is certified.

Keep reading

Talafreakout: Should There Be a Mental-Health Requirement for Lawmakers?

Since the Second World War, the left has done its very best to pathologize being right-wing: not just explicit identification with parties of the right, but also the basic attitudes, beliefs, and stances associated with being of a conservative temperament. The goal of that endeavor is to discourage and even punish right-wing affiliation, to the social and electoral benefit of the left.

Theodor Adorno, of the Frankfurt School, landed some heavy early blows with his 1950 book, The Authoritarian Personality. Rooted in Freudian ideas of repression and the Oedipus complex, the book argued for the existence of a specific personality structure that predisposes people to undemocratic and fascist beliefs. The book produced a special tool called the F-Scale—literally, the “Fascism Scale”—that measured nine key components of the authoritarian personality. These included “conventionalism” (rigid adherence to middle-class values), “anti-intraception” (opposition to the subjective, imaginative, and sentimental), and “authoritarian submission” (uncritical acceptance of authority figures within the in-group).

Critics pointed out that The Authoritarian Personality had nothing to say about the traits shared by, say, Stalinists. Didn’t they also worship power, persecute dissent, believe hysterical conspiracies about their enemies, and lapse into terrifying pogroms and bouts of mass murder? The historian Christopher Lasch, author of The Culture of Narcissism and The Revolt of the Elites, said the book effectively made leftism the sole bastion of true mental health and risked defining large swathes of American society as a kind of open-air “insane asylum.”

But these criticisms are moot, really: Adorno wanted to obfuscate leftist terror, and he hated the average American and his entire way of life.

That pathologization, inspired by Adorno and others, continues. A couple of weeks ago, for example, I saw a new scientific study that claims “people who favor group-based inequality”—read: conservatives—have lower levels of gray matter in a region of the brain linked to empathy. Literally: if you’re a conservative, you have a shrunken empathy center in your brain. The other way of framing it, of course, would be to say liberals have an enlarged empathy center, too big perhaps, since it makes them believe countries are just lines on a map and goat herders from the Middle East and tribesmen from Papua New Guinea have an equal moral claim on their time and resources as their own children. But the default—the idea of the conservative as mentally, morally, even physically defective—is now powerfully enshrined, and so we naturally think of things that way. Or many of us do.

The funny thing is, though, there’s a considerable body of credible work in the social sciences that tells the opposite story. It’s leftism that’s a pathology. Or, rather, leftists tend to be more mentally ill, unhappier, more neurotic, and emotionally unstable than right-wingers. Narcissism and psychopathy have also been associated with “anti-hierarchical aggression”—the desire to destroy society—and Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy predict “virtuous victimhood signalling,” the claims to moral superiority that accrue to the persecuted in today’s leftist worldview. Whether, a fortiori, that means leftism itself is a mental disease, we can leave to some other time. I certainly know what I believe, and I elaborate on this theme at length in my new book The Last Men: Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity.

Which brings me to the real subject of this missive: James Talarico. Or, as President Trump likes to call him, James Talafreako. Talarico, a Democrat, is currently running in the U.S. Senate race in Texas. If you’ve been following the news, you’ll know he’s been mysteriously absent from the campaign trail—nine days in total. He appeared virtually at a campaign event on September 30 and told supporters he was feeling unwell. He didn’t reappear until last Friday. So conspicuous was his absence that his opponent, state attorney general Ken Paxton, demanded “proof of life,” which is the kind of thing you do during hostage negotiations with Hezbollah or FARC (there was a bad Russell Crowe film with that very title and premise). Talarico said he’d “had the flu.” Then, on Sunday, came a stunning revelation. Talarico had, in fact, been in a mental institution in Ohio. On X, independent journalist Nick Sortor posted a short clip of a conversation in which a female employee at the Lindner Center of Hope said Talarico had “just been discharged this evening.”

“While I sympathize with those dealing with mental health crises, this man is CLEARLY not suited to become a U.S. Senator representing over 30 MILLION TEXANS,” Sortor wrote.

“The job doesn’t get easier after being elected—it only gets MORE stressful. And Talarico clearly can’t handle it. I pray he gets the help he needs, but Texans need a real representative they can rely on.”

The speculation that Talarico was actually in a padded room rather than “in bed and, you know, drinking lots of liquids” (his words) had begun well before Sortor posted the clip on X. Given the kind of ridiculous stuff Talarico regularly says in public—there are six biological sexes, “God is non-binary,” it’s “abusive” to deny a child’s gender identity, “White skin gives me and every white American immunity from the virus [of racism]”—it seemed only natural that an unexplained absence would lead to such speculation. I mean, where else would he go? The beach?

Needless to say, the Talafreakout story went mega-viral. Elon Musk boosted it on X, and President Trump even alluded to it. “I don’t think it was the flu,” he told reporters.

The Lindner Center of Hope has since issued a denial. A longer clip of the conversation with the employee was obtained by The Bulwark and reveals the woman actually denied Talarico had ever stayed there, full stop. The short clip posted by Sortor was taken out of context. There’s also a chronological clash. Sortor claimed Talarico had been discharged the day before—the Saturday evening—but he was at a Katy Musgraves concert in Dallas that day, as his social media confirms.

Talarico has called the claim “a lie designed to promote a pathetic conspiracy theory” and attempted to turn things around by accusing Paxton of being the one with a medical condition.

Keep reading

DOJ Gives California 48 Hours to Check Noncitizen Names on Voter Rolls or Face Emergency Action Before Midterms

The Justice Department has given California 48 hours to review a federal list of people it believes are noncitizens who were mailed ballots for the November 3 midterms, or face emergency legal action.

Acting Deputy Attorney General R. Trent McCotter sent letters Tuesday to Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan.

The department handed over a password-protected thumb drive listing individuals federal officials “believe are likely noncitizens” who received vote-by-mail ballots.

California began mailing ballots to more than 20 million registered voters on October 5.

The letters demand that officials review the list within 48 hours.

For anyone whose citizenship cannot be independently confirmed, the DOJ wants the state and county to segregate returned ballots, not cancel them, and refrain from verifying signatures or tabulating them until citizenship is determined.

Officials are told to withhold ballots for anyone on the list who has not yet been sent one.

Keep reading

The Picture They Won’t Keep

I have spent years asking Florida counties for the records that prove they counted your vote correctly. What I got back was fee estimates, exemption letters, a script written by a private lobbying corporation, and, in one hearing, a claim that it would take 18,000 hours to hand over a file that takes under a minute to export.

This is a long one. It has to be, because the officials who run our elections are counting on you not reading the manuals. I read them. Here is what they say, with the receipts.

Your vote is counted from a picture. Not from the paper.

Start with what the vendors say about their own machines, because the whole argument ends right there.

There is not one scanner in use in Florida or California today that reads a mark off the paper. The old machines did. The ES&S Model 100 and the old Diebold and Sequoia units shined infrared light at fixed spots on the sheet and registered whether it bounced back. No picture was ever made. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission’s own glossary draws the line: “Most older optical scan systems use Infrared (IR) scanning technology and ballots with timing marks to accurately scan the ballot. Newer (digital) optical scan systems can also capture images of ballots as they are tabulated.”

Every machine in both states is the newer kind. Florida’s 67 counties run two vendors. The Division of Elections’ own December 2025 map shows 49 counties on ES&S and 18 on Democracy Suite, whose maker the map now lists as “Liberty Vote USA” with a footnote: “formerly Dominion Voting Systems, Inc.” California’s 58 counties, per the Secretary of State’s April 30, 2026 list, run 39 on Liberty Vote (Dominion) ImageCast Central, 13 on Hart Verity, 5 on ES&S, and Los Angeles on its own VSAP Tally system. Every single one is a digital image scanner.

Here is the sequence, and it is the same on all of them. The read head is a contact image sensor, or on Dominion’s central scanner an off-the-shelf Canon document scanner. It photographs both sides of your ballot as the paper moves through. The software then goes to work on the photograph. It finds the timing marks, locates every oval from the election definition, counts the dark pixels inside each oval, and records a vote when the count crosses a threshold that the county set for that election. The vote is derived from the image. There is no second sensor reading the paper.

Keep reading

Biden-Appointed Activist Judge Sparkle Sooknanan Blocks Trump DOJ’s Nationwide Voter Roll Cleanup Effort — Even in States That Voluntarily Cooperated

A Biden-appointed federal judge has once again stepped in to shield dirty voter rolls from federal scrutiny, striking down the Justice Department’s nationwide effort to collect registration records and identify suspected non-U.S. citizens on the rolls.

U.S. District Judge Sparkle Sooknanan, who was born in Trinidad and Tobago, ruled that the Department of Justice overstepped its bounds by demanding unredacted voter registration lists and cross-referencing them using federal databases.

According to the 78-page ruling, the DOJ began requesting complete, unredacted statewide voter registration lists (including names, dates of birth, addresses, and driver’s license or partial Social Security numbers) from 49 states and the District of Columbia starting in May 2025. At least 18 states fully cooperated.

The department then shared the data with DHS for runs through the expanded Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system and urged states to remove voters flagged as potentially ineligible.

The Justice Department maintained that its actions were authorized by federal laws governing voter registration and election administration.

Sooknanan rejected that argument.

Sooknanan concluded that the Justice Department’s policy violated the Privacy Act and the Paperwork Reduction Act, exceeded the agency’s statutory authority, and was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Keep reading

Gov. Spanberger admits scheme to restore voting rights included … the dead!

In a blunder that likely will leave Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger the butt of jokes for years to come, her leftist agenda to make voting for everyone possible included a scheme to restore voting rights to convicts.

She did. Including the dead.

She now says her state is “looking into it.”

A report posted online by the Washington Examiner said Spanberger admitted it was possible that she “restored the voting rights of deceased individuals.”

She had announced her requirement that the state restore the voting rights for 66,085 previous felons in the state.

“The commonwealth’s constitution automatically and permanently strips voting rights of all convicted felons, but it leaves the power to restore them individually after a person completes their prison sentence to the sitting governor,” the report said.

As part of the process she launched, “she automatically restored voting rights for previous felons who had already died,” the report said.

“Spanberger did not deny the reports and said her office is ‘digging into’ the case to investigate instances where that ‘appears to be the case,'” the report said.

“We’re certainly looking into that possibility and recognizing that there has been a focus on a number of cases where that appears to be the case,” Spanberger said.

She did complain that the databases that list people who do not have voting rights might not include the pertinent information that they have died.

The report noted, “Spanberger also added that it’s a felony to cast a ballot on behalf of someone else, living or dead.”

Fox News reported Virginia resident Howard “Skip” Lambert posted online a notice signed by Spanberger and a later notification telling the recipient her voting rights had been restored and she should re-register to vote.

The problem was the recipient was his daughter, who passed away two years ago.

He explained, “Interesting this letter arrives as early-voting begins… yet the provided official order is dated July 1,” he said on Sept. 24. “Just because cash doesn’t change hands doesn’t mean the governor isn’t trying to buy votes.”

Keep reading

‘Out of their ever-loving minds?’: Judge rules on leftist demand to be allowed to cast 2 ballots in midterms

A judge in Wisconsin has rejected a demand by the leftists in the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin to be allowed to vote by mail, and then vote again by appearing and voting on Election Day.

A commentary at RedState ripped into the people who demanded the court give them that very permission.

“Now, we have Democrats pushing to flood our system with as many hard-to-track mail-in ballots as possible, seeking to do away with voter IDs, advocating for non-citizens to potentially vote in elections, hiding their dirty voter rolls, and then claiming it’s perfectly normal for people to cast a mail-in ballot and show up to ‘vote’ again on Election Day. Are these people out of their ever-loving minds? Let me spare you the suspense: Yes, yes they are.”

A report at WisPolitics revealed the LWV had sued the Wisconsin Elections Commission demanding the court block enforcement of state rules that say “an elector who mails or personally delivers an absentee ballot to the municipal clerk is not permitted to vote in person at the same election on Election Day.”

The League wanted voters who mailed their ballots to be allowed to vote on Election Day … just in case the mail service didn’t deliver their ballots on time.

The judge in Dane County refused to suspend election rules for that.

Rep. Calvin Callahan, a Republican in the Wisconsin Assembly, had intervened in the case in opposition to the double-voting plan.

“I got into this case to defend the law the Legislature wrote,” Callahan said. “If you mail your absentee ballot back to your clerk, you do not get another vote at the polls. The League of Women Voters asked a Dane County judge to suspend guidance that simply reiterated that law weeks before a statewide election. The court said no. One person, one ballot. That is a foundation of our election system, and it should not be rewritten in the middle of an election through a court action.”

The League had insisted the judge give them a temporary injunction allowing their plan to move forward. The fight still remains in the court, but the injunction demand was rejected, meaning double-voting likely is not being allowed in this election.

Keep reading

The Left Doesn’t Count Votes. It Finds Them.

f you saw a recent NYT report on Brazil’s election between incumbent socialist president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and conservative Flávio Bolsonaro, you may have noticed that the Left’s “paper of record” made an astounding, if unintended, admission in the headline: it reveals its conception of elections. In its words, “Flávio Bolsonaro’s first round lead leaves President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva three weeks to find the votes to stop Brazil’s rightward shift” (italics mine). It doesn’t say “prevail in the election by voter turnout,” but it casts the election as an implied political obligation to manufacture ballots to block voter will and engineer an imposed social order against it. This is clearly the Left’s intention in November.

While this may read as routine journalism, or perhaps just wishful thinking on the writers’ part, it may strike some readers as more of a Freudian slip about how the Left’s mental worldview works: leftist parties operate under a duty to manufacture enough ballots to overcome an election deficit. If your candidate falls behind, you intervene on the sidelines to close the gap. This is now their “normalized” concept of an election.

More than that, progressives have inverted the structure of an election from one that sets two opponents in passive receipt of votes to an actively managed, planned event that aids one side during the election. What was traditionally an arm’s-length contest becomes a pre-existing agreement.

Rather than preserving a quiet period after the close of campaigning to measure the public result of candidate marketing through voluntary voter turnout, the election becomes merely part of their total political campaign operation. It turns votes into indicators, and the indicators into corrective ballot measures.

This obviously goes by other names, such as rigging, stealing, cheating, and fraud, but the extraordinary aspect of this language in the NYT is how it reveals a shift in political psychology and a determination to make that abnormal psychology generally accepted behavior. It resembles the Left’s efforts to make people think that transgender athletes are legitimate contestants among biological females: it asks you to accept a fraud as a right, and, more than that, that you are wrong for questioning it. That is how election fraud works: objections violate a higher moral standing claimed by the victor, even though the victor obtained it through deception.

To use an analogy, it is like two horses in a race where the spectators rush the racetrack on the losing horse, inject him with amphetamines, block the other rider, and the racing judge looks the other way, while the crowd is asked to keep quiet out of fairness to the horse.

To use a good legal analogy, it would be like two legal opponents in a trial, along with their lawyers, actually accompanying the jury into the deliberation room and trying to measure which way they’re leaning and “tip” the scales. Jurors privately deliberate after closing arguments because they weigh what they heard and reach a protected verdict based only on the evidence presented in open court.

Elections are the same: voters effectively go into private deliberation after hearing both sides, cast their ballots in private, and the verdict is then announced in the open “public court.” We have certain appeal processes for election irregularity (e.g., Florida in 2000 and Bush v. Gore), or for an election “mistrial,” as in a deadlock (a runoff or recount), including the discretion to count state electors (e.g., Pence, 2021). In all cases, the counting or verdict is subject to a quiet period, and campaigning of any kind must stand down.

The other key factor in Brazil that is reframing the Left’s vision of elections is based on its paranoia that any conservative candidate is a Trump candidate and ally and part of a larger plan to aid and abet President Trump’s mandates (“Brazil Is a Sign of Things to Come,” NYT, 10.5.26). But South America (and Cuba as well) has been dragging behind the West economically for decades because of its leftist political corruption and because it swings in the extreme between Left populists and Right militarists. Rarely has an actual business conservative, or even a moderate leader, emerged.

Keep reading

Candidate Named ‘Hitler Mussolini Flores’ Wins Mayoral Election in Peru on Left-Wing Ticket

A Peruvian politician named Hitler Mussolini is on course to become mayor of a small town after winning a local election.

Hitler Mussolini Simeón Flores, a candidate for the left-wing Ahora Nación party, finished first in the mayoral race in Queropalca, a district in Peru’s central Huánuco region.

According to results published by Peru’s electoral authorities, Flores received 229 votes, securing 34.54 percent of the valid ballots cast.

His nearest challenger, Gaspar Benilde Osorio Zambrano of the Renovación Popular party, received 204 votes, while third-place candidate Itala Yovana Santillan Vara secured 187.

Keep reading