Tag: corruption

Report: Dozens of Democrats Silent on Alaska Election Rigging While Calling GOP a ‘Threat to Democracy’

Dozens of leading Democrats — many of whom have railed for years about the GOP and the Trump administration as a “threat to democracy” — are universally silent when asked to respond to a cynical attempt to confuse Republican voters on Alaska’s senatorial ballot.

All were asked by Fox News about the subversive tactic of placing another candidate named Dan Sullivan against incumbent Sen Dan Sullivan (R-AK), which could potentially cost the U.S senator his seat.

The complete radio silence by Democrats was revealed in a report Saturday by the cable news outlet, which reached out to 42 leading Democratic lawmakers and governors who endorsed Sullivan’s opponent Mary Peltola, asking if they would denounce the alleged effort to confuse Alaska voters.

None of the 42 responded, Fox reported.

The New York Times reported earlier this week that that aides to candidate Peltola helped recruit the man named Dan Sullivan to run in an alleged effort to draw votes from the Republican incumbent.

Peltola’s campaign has denied any involvement.

The lack of responses presents a striking contrast to the incessant Democratic talking point of “threats to Democracy” levied against not only President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement, but his administration and other Republican lawmakers and candidates as well.

Fox reported:

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, for instance, stated that “voter suppression is poisonous, it is toxic to our democracy,” in 2022. His colleague, Sen. Chris Murphy, meanwhile, argued in April 2025 that “those of us who believe that the threat to democracy is urgent” need to “act like it.” And Sen. Cory Booker said in December 2016 that “protecting American democracy is a calling far higher than party politics.”

Neither responded to Fox’s query, according to the outlet.

Somewhat surprisingly, Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA), who has emerged as a maverick in his party on some issues, also remained mum on the controversy, Fox reported.

Last week, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a lawsuit against Alaska election officials that seeks to delay the certification of the senate election results if incumbent Sullivan loses because votes cast for the decoy Dan Sullivan could have changed the outcome.

However, legal experts have told Fox news that the lawsuit faces serious challenges because it infers voter intent from anonymous ballots and threatens the sovereignty of states over their elections.

The Fox report contained a long list of everyone contacted.

Among the other most outspoken, but now silent, Democratic senators reached by Fox News Digital were Adam Schiff (D-CA), minority leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Elisa Slotkin (D-MI).

Among the more than a dozen House members reached by the outlet were Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), George Whitesides (D-CA), and Chris Pappas (D-NH), the latter of whom is also running for the Senate against New Hampshire incumbent John E. Sununu.

Fox also received no response from former senator Sherrod Brown who is trying to retake his senate seat against John Husted in Ohio.

Democratic governors contacted by Fox were Wes Moore of Maryland, Gavin Newsom of California, and Roy Cooper of North Carolina, the latter of whom is also running for the senate.

The Alaska Democrat candidate at the center of the controversy, Mary Peltola, also did not respond to Fox’s query.

Previously, only one Democrat had publicly condemned the alleged tactic in Alaska, according to Fox.

Iowa’s Democratic candidate for governor Rob Sand told Fox News last Sunday that “both parties are doing it and neither party should be doing it,” calling such efforts “manipulating the political system.”

Keep reading

Americans Have Lost Confidence in Congress Ahead of the 2026 Midterms

Americans are heading into the November 3 midterm elections with confidence in Congress at historic lows. A new Gallup poll found that only 14% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing, the lowest approval rating recorded immediately before a midterm election since Gallup began tracking the measure in 1974. Only 15% of registered voters believe most members of Congress deserve reelection, while just 43% believe their own representative should remain in office. That is the lowest reading for support of one’s own representative in Gallup’s final pre-midterm surveys dating back to 1994. Americans have traditionally criticized Congress while maintaining a more favorable opinion of their own representatives. Now even that distinction is deteriorating. The dissatisfaction extends across party lines, with congressional approval at 29% among Republicans, 13% among independents, and only 4% among Democrats.

The economy remains central to this discontent. Gallup found that 38% of Americans identified an economic issue as the nation’s most important problem, including inflation, the general economy, and gasoline prices. Another 26% specifically cited government or poor leadership. These concerns are closely connected. Households are paying substantially more for food, insurance, housing, energy, and everyday necessities than before the pandemic. Politicians continually speak about inflation as though the problem disappears when the annual percentage declines. The average family does not experience the economy through a government statistical release. They see the price of groceries, their mortgage payment, the cost of automobile insurance, and whatever money remains after taxes. Slower inflation does not reverse years of lost purchasing power.

Housing affordability has become another major economic dividing line. Younger Americans who did not purchase property before the enormous increase in prices and mortgage rates face a completely different financial environment from those who already own homes. Families with accumulated assets can help their children with down payments or even purchase homes outright, while those dependent entirely upon wages struggle to enter the market. The result is an economy increasingly divided between those who own appreciating assets and those attempting to acquire them. Washington can celebrate economic growth and employment statistics, but those figures do not necessarily reflect the financial circumstances of ordinary households.

The national debt is another issue that cannot be separated from the broader loss of confidence in government. Washington continues financing substantial expenditures through borrowing while interest payments consume an increasing share of federal resources. Both political parties have contributed to the accumulation of debt over successive administrations. The consequences do not disappear when control of Congress changes. The federal government must continually refinance its obligations while funding entitlement programs, defense expenditures, and countless other commitments. Politicians debate how to distribute additional spending while rarely confronting the long-term financial consequences of the obligations they have already created.

Keep reading

PBS Lays the Groundwork for the Midterms by Saying We May Not Know Results on Election Night and That’s ‘Normal’

The liberal media thinks the American people are so stupid.

PBS has a new report out today explaining how it will be completely ‘normal’ if we don’t know the results of the midterms on election night.

That is not normal, but the left wants to make it the new normal.

Just look at one race as an example, say the Los Angeles mayoral race. On election night, far left nutjob Nithya Raman was in a distant third place, but over the course of a few days and then a couple of weeks, they completely flipped the race. Nithya Raman bumped conservative alternative Spencer Pratt of the ballot and now it’s a contest between Karen Bass and Raman. Far left vs. really far left.

That is what PBS wants you to think of as normal.

Take a look at their report:

When will we know 2026 midterm election results? It may take some time, but that’s normal

If you go to bed on election night and don’t know who won a midterm congressional race, that’s normal. And if you wake up the next morning and find that a candidate who was behind hours earlier has since pulled ahead, that’s normal, too.

That won’t stop some politicians and their allies from spreading misinformation during vote counting.

In past elections, elected leaders, candidates and social media users have spread falsehoods that “late night” arrivals of “ballot dumps” or “suitcases” of ballots are signs of fraud, or that only Democratic-led cities take days to count votes.

Some states such as Florida often complete the majority of their unofficial counts in fewer hours or days than elsewhere. But it is not a sign of fraud if other places need more time.

“States are neither fast or slow, they all count and certify the results in accordance with the laws passed by their state legislature,” said Ryan Macias, an election technology and cybersecurity expert. “What is fast or slow is how quickly the media can collect sufficient evidence to confidently predict the winner, which is typically based on the margin of victory.”…

No state is required to complete the official count on election night. State laws set deadlines to certify final results, often weeks later.

We all know what this is.

It’s PBS trying to plant a seed in the minds of voters, to explain away the abnormalities that are sure to follow.

This is how the left wins elections.

Keep reading

DOJ Flags Nearly 831,000 Student Aid IDs In Nationwide ‘Ghost Student’ Fraud Probe

Federal investigators say overseas-linked fraud rings used stolen American identities to claim college aid, while new safeguards could affect legitimate applicants.

Federal investigators have identified 830,840 potentially fraudulent student aid IDs associated with nearly $130 million as the Justice Department pursues an alleged international scheme that used stolen Americans’ identities to obtain federal college assistance.

The department announced Operation Ghostbusters on October 29, unveiling charges against five defendants across Virginia, New Jersey, and Nebraska and a seizure of more than $750,000 in cryptocurrency connected to the suspected network. Prosecutors say individuals in Kenya worked with accomplices in the United States to collect aid refunds for people who never attended classes.

The government has not established that every flagged ID was fraudulent or that all $130 million reached criminals. The FBI separately reports more than $32 million in identified losses in similar ghost-student schemes, with additional losses suspected. Those figures describe different categories and should not be added together.

Keep reading

Why Is the Media Ignoring the Stunning New Trump-Epstein Allegations?

The president of the United States of America has been accused of rape. Again. The president of the United States has been accused of rape in a report issued by the Democrats of the House Judiciary Committee, as part of their ongoing investigation of Donald Trump’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein. The president has been accused of raping two women, one when she was as young as 13, and sexually assaulting three more. They are among 11 women who provided evidence or testimony that Trump “abused, assaulted, and even raped numerous women alongside, and in coordination with, the most infamous sex trafficker in history.”

I have been made to understand that many people do not know about the Judiciary Comittee report—and the fact that five women have accused Trump of sexual assault while in or near the presence of noted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. I have been made to understand that this is because the mainstream media finds former president Barack Obama’s comments about the [checks notes] Cheesecake Factory more worthy of their attention than the current president’s abuse of multiple women.

If asked, mainstream media types would no doubt argue that the lack of coverage of these latest rape allegations stems from the fact that previous rape allegations failed to “move the needle.” Trump’s sexual misconduct (both alleged and litigated) is “baked in” to people’s understanding of the man. People either won’t believe the charges or won’t care—or else they do believe the women and do care and vote accordingly—but everybody knows what he’s been accused of, generally speaking at least.

I find this line of argument unadulterated bollocks that reveals the deep failure of our mainstream media. It is news when the president is credibly accused of rape. It is important news. While I, too, don’t think these latest sexual assault accusations will materially change the national conversation about Trump or his presidency, that is not an excuse for ignoring, downplaying, or skipping over brutal allegations that he repeatedly assaulted women, including minors.

Keep reading

Brazil’s Lula Regime Orders Sweeping Social Media Crackdown Against ‘Electoral Harassment’ After His Disputed Election Victory

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s socialist regime has launched a fresh crackdown on social media and freedom of speech.

On Thursday, his government announced new measures to force social media companies to remove content deemed to constitute “electoral harassment.”

The crackdown comes just days after Lula narrowly defeated conservative challenger Flávio Bolsonaro in a disputed presidential runoff.

Bolsonaro has since been forced to seek refuge in the U.S. to avoid being imprisoned by the socialist authorities.

The government claims to have complaints from workers who were threatened with dismissal or pressured over their political preferences.

“These measures aim to protect workers’ freedom of political choice and hold employers accountable for discriminatory practices,” the government declared.

Keep reading

Virginia Family Receives Voting Paperwork for Their Dead Dog ‘Biscuit’ Due to Spanberger Voting Rights ‘Restoration’ Program

Imagine receiving an official notification from your state informing you that your dead dog has had their voting rights restored.

That’s just what happened to one family in Virginia. Thanks to a ‘voter rights restoration program’ under Governor Abigail Spanberger and the Virginia Democrats.

If this is a restoration program, does that mean that ‘Biscuit’ had voted in the past?

FOX News reports:

‘Biscuit’ the dog is latest dead felon to get their voting rights back from Spanberger, confused owner says

A Southside Virginia lawmaker is demanding an investigation after a constituent received an official rights-restoration certificate for his dog, Biscuit, a beagle-hound mix from Goochland County that died about five years ago.

The discovery follows the “Betty No Last Name” controversy in Chesapeake — where a purported convict lacking a surname had “her” rights restored — and raises fresh questions about the governor’s vetting process just days before voters decide whether to make felons’ voting-rights restoration automatic via an Election Day ballot measure supported by Richmond Democrats.

Del. Tom Garrett, R-Buckingham — who received the letter from the constituent who owned the pet — is now calling for an investigation into how Gov. Abigail Spanberger could have restored voting and jury-service rights to a deceased animal.

“This is not a question of whether people who have served their sentences deserve a second chance. This is a question of whether the Commonwealth is exercising one of the Governor’s constitutional powers with even the most basic level of review,” Garrett said.

“Biscuit was a dog. Biscuit has been dead for five years. Yet an official document bearing the governor’s signature says the executive reviewed the particulars of Biscuit’s criminal case and determined her rights should be restored. Virginians deserve an explanation for how that is possible.”

You couldn’t make this up.

Keep reading

Justice Canada commits $752,000 to Atira, the non-profit in BC Housing’s conflict-of-interest audit

The Department of Justice Canada has committed $752,000 to Atira Women’s Resource Society, the Vancouver non-profit whose chief executive was married to the head of BC Housing when a 2023 forensic investigation found a conflict of interest, Rebel News can reveal.

The contribution appears in the federal government’s proactive disclosure of grants and contributions, published by Justice Canada under its Youth Justice Fund, dated July 15 and running to March 31, 2029. No other outlet has reported it.

The record, titled “Restorative Justice Pathways for Youth”, says the project “adapts Atira’s Early Resolution Program (ERP) into a dedicated youth-focused stream designed to serve Indigenous, Black, and racialized young women (ages 12-17) who are currently involved in the criminal justice system”.

Atira is not an ordinary recipient. On May 8, 2023, the B.C. government released an Ernst & Young forensic investigation of BC Housing, the provincial housing agency. The release states: “A new forensic investigation of BC Housing tabled in the legislature has found mismanagement related to a conflict of interest between the former CEO of BC Housing and his spouse, the CEO of Atira Women’s Resource Society.” The investigation “found no evidence of public funds being dispersed outside of their intended purpose”, but BC Housing responded by “restricting any new funding to AWRS and ADS until the operational review is complete”.

The Tyee reported that Atira’s BC Housing funding rose from $17 million in 2016 to $74 million in 2022, and that former BC Housing CEO Shayne Ramsay “has been married to Janice Abbott, Atira’s CEO, since 2010”. Abbott “resigned effective immediately” a week after the audit, the Globe and Mail reported.

Ottawa kept funding Atira. Women and Gender Equality Canada holds a $1.5 million agreement with Atira begun in July 2024, and Justice Canada agreed to a $250,000 contribution in December 2024. The Atira agreement is one of 16 Youth Justice Fund contributions dated July 15 in the disclosure, worth $8.9 million together.

The fund is the responsibility of Justice Minister Sean Fraser. The deputy minister, Marie-Josée Hogue, a former Quebec Court of Appeal judge, was appointed on February 2. The record does not say who signed the agreement. No political donations by Fraser or Hogue were found in a web search of the Elections Canada contributions database, and none is alleged.

British Columbia announced in 2023 that it was restricting new money to Atira. Ottawa has now committed another $752,000.

Keep reading

NY’s Top Prosecutors Go Silent When Asked by a Reporter if They Ordered Lighter Charges for Illegal Aliens to Avoid Deportation

New York Attorney General Letitia James, Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz, and Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez went silent when a New York Post reporter asked them at a Thursday gun-seizure press conference whether they had ordered prosecutors to downgrade charges against illegal aliens so they could avoid deportation, as detailed in a recent House Judiciary Committee report.

The reporter specifically asked, “Did any of you order prosecutors to downgrade gun charges to keep illegal immigrants in the US, per the Judiciary Committee report?”

“This is a gun-safety question,” the Post reporter pressed. “Any response from any of you?”

James smiled and said nothing, Katz shrugged with her hands up, and staff quickly moved the event along after Katz muttered, “Our answer couldn’t help it.”

After the presser, the attorneys again refused to address the House investigation, with James smiling without a word and Katz deferring to a spokesperson, according to a report from the New York Post.

Keep reading

EXPOSED: The Scale of Corruption In The Vaccine Industrial Complex

For decades, the public was told that pharmaceutical products undergo the gold standard of scientific scrutiny: randomized, inert-placebo-controlled clinical trials.

But as Bret Weinstein and Brownstone Institute’s Jeffrey Tucker expose, the reality behind vaccine approval is pure regulatory sleight of hand. New shots are routinely tested not against a true, inert saline control, but against earlier vaccine versions or active adjuvant concoctions, falsely labeling them as “placebos.”

Under this rigged framework, as long as a new shot causes no more immediate harm than the last hazardous formulation, regulators stamp it “safe.”

Combine this rigged safety baseline with statistical tricks that inflate tiny, meaningless results into “95% effectiveness,” and the entire corporate narrative falls apart.

The system was never designed to uncover true harm; it was designed to hide it in plain sight.

You will not believe how corrupt the FDA’s process for vaccine safety testing is.

“It’s just smoke and mirrors.”

Send this to someone who still believes Pharma’s “safe and effective” narrative.

New vaccines are never tested against a placebo.

Bret Weinstein: “That’s jaw-dropping in and of itself.”

But it gets worse.

“They test it against something that they claim is a placebo… the last version of the shot.”

“If the last version of the shot was demonstrated to be safe, and the new version of the shot doesn’t do any more harm than the last version, then it’s safe, right?”

Jeffrey Tucker: “If it’s slightly better, then you report the relative efficacy.”

“It’s a tenth of a percent, and that’s where you get your 95% effectiveness.”

Keep reading