Confirmed: Researchers Reveal COVID mRNA Vaccines Contain Component that Suppresses Immune Response and Stimulates Cancer Growth

A comprehensive review by an international consortium of scientists has raised serious concerns about the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines’ safety profile.

Review articles are summaries of current research on a particular topic. They are also sometimes called literature reviews or secondary sources.

The review, “N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer?” published on Science Direct, delves into the potential implications of a vaccine ingredient—N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ)—that may play a role in immune suppression and cancer proliferation.

m1Ψ was incorporated into Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine to enhance its efficacy.

This component was introduced in the mRNA vaccine as a means to produce a significant amount of modified SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA through in vitro transcription (IVT). This modification was crucial in the rapid development and deployment of the vaccine during the height of the pandemic.

However, the review article calls into question the long-term impacts of this modification, especially concerning the vaccine’s interaction with the body’s immune response and potential carcinogenic effects.

According to the review’s abstract, evidence suggests that while mRNA vaccines may have been “effective” in reducing severe disease outcomes, they might not provide sterilizing immunity, leaving individuals susceptible to recurring infections.

More critically, the review highlights that the inclusion of m1Ψ in mRNA vaccines appears to inhibit key immunological pathways, impairing the body’s early interferon signaling.

Keep reading

WHO Official Testifies That Advice Against Vaccine Passports Was Ignored To Continue Digital Rollout

Dr. Hanna Nohynek, a World Health Organization (WHO) official, has told a court that her recommendation to Finland’s government during the pandemic was that the so-called “vaccine passport” was not necessary.

Nohynek, who is also the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare’s chief physician, testified that as the controversial schemes were being announced, her stance was that Covid vaccines were not effective in stopping the transmission of the virus, and therefore “vaccine passports,” designed to prove somebody’s vaccination status and create a checkpoint society, were superfluous.

Worse still, they provided people with “a false sense of security,” is how the doctor put it, referring to her advice dating back to the end of 2021. As for the awareness that the vaccines did not stop Covid transmission, reports quoting Nohynek’s testimony say the Institute knew this in the summer of that year, and possibly earlier.

But despite Nohynek’s stance and her role at WHO – where she chairs the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE), and is also a member of the Vaccines Together and the International Vaccine Institute boards – the government ignored her.

At about the same time, the UN health agency was going ahead with plans to set up its Global Digital Health Certification Network, enabling the proliferation of digital vaccine passports, while the EU came out with its Digital COVID Certificate Regulation.

Keep reading

Alberta updates mRNA booster guidance to every three months, starting with six-month-old babies

As of Monday, Alberta Health Services (AHS) has updated its guidance on mRNA COVID-19 booster shots to every three months, beginning with six-month-old babies. 

That works out to about 320 doses for the average lifespan. 

“Starting April 15, 2024, select groups of Albertans at high risk of severe outcomes from COVID-19 will be eligible for an additional dose,” AHS wrote on its website. 

According to Alberta health officials, “All vaccines are safe, effective and save lives,” and it doesn’t matter if a patient takes a COVID-19 booster before, after, or at the same time as a flu shot. 

That goes for babies as young as six months old. 

Keep reading

COVID Vaccines have caused at least 14,000% increase in Cancer Cases in the USA according to CDC

Figures published by the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have confirmed that the COVID-19 vaccines have caused at least a 14,000% increase in cancer cases in the USA up to the end of March 2024. With data revealing a minimum 6,113% increase in cancer cases among children and young adults.

The figures have been surmised by comparing cancer cases caused by the COVID-19 vaccines to the Influenza vaccines due to the lack of data published by the CDC that allows us to surmise the number of cancer cases via other methods.

According to the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) just 8 cancer cases were linked to the many influenza vaccines on offer between the 1st January 2021 and 29th March 2024. Whereas 497 cancer cases were connected to the few COVID-19 vaccines on offer during the same time frame. This equates to a 6,113% increase in cancer cases due to COVID-19 vaccination.

Keep reading

WHO Official Admits Vaccine Passports May Have Been A Scam

The World Health Organization’s Dr. Hanna Nohynek testified in court that she advised her government that vaccine passports were not needed but was ignored, despite explaining that the COVID vaccines did not stop virus transmission and the passports gave a false sense of security. The stunning revelations came to light in a Helsinki courtroom where Finnish citizen Mika Vauhkala is suing after he was denied entry to a café for not having a vaccine passport.

Dr. Nohynek is chief physician at the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare and serves as the WHO’s chair of Strategic Group of Experts on immunization. Testifying yesterday, she stated that the Finnish Institute for Health knew by the summer of 2021 that the COVID-19 vaccines did not stop virus transmission

During that same 2021 time period, the WHO said it was working to “create an international trusted framework” for safe travel while EU members states began rolling out COVID passports. The EU Digital COVID Certificate Regulation passed in July 2021 and more than 2.3 billion certificates were later issued. Visitors to France were banned if they did not have a valid vaccine passport which citizens had to carry to buy food at stores or to use public transport.

But Dr. Nohynek testified yesterday that her institute advised the Finnish government in late 2021 that COVID passports no longer made sense, yet certificates continued to be required. Finnish journalist Ike Novikoff reported the news yesterday after leaving the Helsinki courtroom where Dr. Nohynek spoke.

Keep reading

CDC Study Doesn’t ‘Debunk’ Link Between COVID-19 Vaccines & Sudden-Deaths

A new U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) study does not disprove a link between COVID-19 vaccines and sudden deaths among young people, contrary to claims.

The study, published by the CDC’s quasi-journal on April 11, analyzed death certificates from Oregon for people aged 16 to 30 who died between June 2021 and December 2022.

Among people who died with evidence of vaccination, three died within 100 days of a shot, Drs. Juventila Liko and Paul Cieslak with the Oregon Health Authority found.

None of those three deaths could be attributed to messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccination, or shots from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, according to the doctors. Two of the deaths were attributed to underlying conditions while the cause of death for the third was “undetermined.”

“These data do not support an association between receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and sudden cardiac death among previously healthy young persons,” the doctors wrote.

The authors failed to note that a much larger, peer-reviewed study from South Korea confirmed vaccine-induced myocarditis caused eight sudden cardiac deaths (SCDs), all among people younger than 45. Myocarditis is a form of heart inflammation.

Keep reading

Novel Robust Methodology for VAERS Analysis Reveals Very High Risk of Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following Dose 2 and Dose 3: #PathogenicPriming

A new study published in the Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine by Daoyuan Lai and colleagues, a team of researchers from the University of Hong Kong, has made significant strides in understanding the safety of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, particularly in relation to myocarditis risk after vaccination. The study may also represent a watershed moment in the methodology used to assess causality using VAERS data.

The study, which focuses on the rare but concerning risk of myocarditis following the administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, introduces a novel approach to analyzing vaccine safety data that could transform how we monitor vaccine adverse events.

The study analyzed data from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a resource that has been used to monitor post-vaccination adverse events. Recognizing the limitations of data in VAERS, including potential underreporting and the absence of a control group, the team employed a modified version of the Self-Controlled Case Series (SCCS) method. This innovative approach allowed for more accurate detection and quantification of myocarditis risk following the second and third doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Keep reading

Lancet Study Funded by Bill Gates Lays Bare Failure of Lockdowns and Vaccines

A new study published in the Lancet and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation on the “Global Burden of Disease” has laid bare the failure of pandemic interventions such as lockdowns and vaccines.

Published on April 3rd, the study included global age standardised mortality data during the pandemic. This Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, as the name suggests, is a massive global disease impact assessment. The report includes age-stratified mortality data from the first two years of the pandemic and therefore provides an indication of the global effectiveness of the measures implemented. The methods used for determining pandemic mortality incorporate excess death data combined with infection rates and COVID-19 specific deaths. The data within this report paint a concerning picture and demonstrate a substantial increase in global mortality across all age groups between 2020 and 2021.

Keep reading

FDA Says ‘No Safety Signals’ Linking White Blood Clots To COVID Shots, Despite Embalmer Survey Suggesting Otherwise

White clots in people’s arteries are “really happening” — so why isn’t the phenomena being openly discussed in the public sphere? political commentator Russell Brand asked during a recent episode of his “Stay Free” podcast.

Brand showed viewers a clip of prominent medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., interviewing former Air Force Major Thomas Haviland.

Haviland conducted a 2023 survey of 269 embalmers across four major countries and three continents.

According to the survey, more than 70% of embalmers found strange fibrous white blood clots — clots they were not finding pre-pandemic — in significant percentages of corpses in 2023.

Haviland also conducted a similar survey in late 2022 that revealed 66% of embalmers began finding the unusual clots in mid-2021, suggesting a temporal link to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, which began earlier that year.

The topic is largely going undiscussed by mainstream news outlets, Brand said, although at least GB News interviewed Campbell to talk about the “white stringy rubbery clots.”

“You’re not really hearing it discussed to the degree that it perhaps ought,” Brand said, “if it is as prevalent as is suggested.”

For instance, Brand cited a Feb. 21 BNN Breaking article that reported Thai neurologist Dr. Thiravat Hemachudha had initially discussed the topic in a Facebook post — but swiftly chose to “cease public discussions on the topic.”

Thiravat is chief of the Thai Red Cross Emerging Infectious Diseases Health Science Centre and a proponent of COVID-19 vaccines.

Keep reading

Other researchers who have compiled evidence that US military-public health-vaccination programs injure and kill people.

In studying American legal history, scientific fraud, drug manufacturing deregulation/non-regulation, and military/vaccination/public health/communicable disease/emergency management programs these last few years, I’ve found the work of other researchers who have traveled similar paths.

Some of these investigators are listed below, with examples of their work reporting on US government chemical and biological warfare, vaccination, communicable disease and population control programs; smallpox; polio; swine flu; avian flu; AIDS; brucellosis; anthrax; immune system disorders; cancer; public health emergency law, and related topics.

I’m posting the list for readers who may be interested in it.

It’s not a complete list of authors who have studied and written about these issues, and the listed researchers have not reached identical historical or scientific conclusions.

I haven’t read all of the works listed and I don’t find all of the conclusions I have read, to be equally plausible, credible or actionable.

I’ve read enough of their work to conclude that each researcher has studied some of the same things I’ve studied.

What do they have in common?

Each researcher has compiled evidence that US government statements about military, public health, and vaccination program objectives, historical events and scientific, regulatory data, have been demonstrably false for a very long time, and each researcher’s work has been suppressed and maligned, to prevent widespread public interest in it and access to it.

Some of the listed investigators have concluded that documented injuries and deaths caused by chemical and biological agents, including vaccines, deployed against foreign and domestic human targets, have been unintentional, unexpected effects of willed acts undertaken with benevolent intent.

Others have concluded that injuries and deaths have been intentional, planned, anticipated effects of willed acts undertaken with malicious intent.

Keep reading