Tag: vaccines

Vaccine Advisory Committee Dismissed By HHS Had Close Ties To Big Pharma, Donated To Democrats

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) just dismissed every voting member from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a group made up entirely of Biden appointees, many of whom have seemingly major conflicts of interest because of ties to large pharmaceutical corporations and histories of donating to Democrats.

ACIP, an arm of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), has a history of rubber-stamping everything it comes across, with some members even voting in favor of major changes like recommending that children ages 5 to 11 receive a coronavirus “vaccine” booster shot without any data to support that intervention.

Other members have taken consulting fees and related payments from Big Pharma, donated to far-left Democrats, and appear to look uncritically at any item regarding vaccines.

“Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda,” Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in a press release. “The public must know that unbiased science — evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest — guides the recommendations of our health agencies.”

“A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science,” he continued. “ACIP’s new members will prioritize public health and evidence-based medicine. The Committee will no longer function as a rubber stamp for industry profit-taking agendas. The entire world once looked to American health regulators for guidance, inspiration, scientific impartiality, and unimpeachable integrity. Public trust has eroded. Only through radical transparency and gold standard science, will we earn it back.”

HHS plans to rebuild the advisory committee from scratch.

Keep reading

Vaxxed Army pilot facing separation from military after denied promotion over COVID vaccine mandate

Avaccinated Army pilot, who was reprimanded after his initial hesitation to receive the COVID-19 shot, is still being denied promotion and could be separated from the military in September.

Chief Warrant Officer 3 Brandon Budge in the 7th Infantry Division’s 16th Combat Aviation Brigade, who has served in the military for over 20 years, may be forced out of the Army for adverse actions in his file that prevented him from receiving promotions. 

The brigade to which he belongs was formed in battle in January 1968 and first activated at Marble Mountain, Danang in the northernmost part of South Vietnam. The unit uses the moniker “Raptors” and consists of approximately 2,500 soldiers, and is the largest Aviation Brigade in the Army.

Wants to continue his service

Budge is now asking the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to remove the adverse actions from his record so that he may receive his promotion and remain in the service.

While Budge never said he wouldn’t get the COVID vaccine, he was initially hesitant to receive it, asking questions about the lawfulness of the mandate, inquiring about religious accommodation requests, and hoping to wait until at least 90 days had passed since he contracted the virus before getting the shot, Budge’s attorney, R. Davis Younts, previously told Just the News in October 2022.

Budge came down with COVID in March 2021 and was supposed to deploy to South Korea that September. However, if he wasn’t vaccinated, he was told, he would have to be quarantined for two weeks. His wife was pregnant at the time with their seventh child, so he wanted to avoid quarantining so he wouldn’t miss the birth of their son. 

The adverse actions affecting his continued service are centered on claims his records were falsified without his knowledge to show that he had received the COVID vaccine before he actually got the shot.

Towards the end of summer 2021, Budge went to a clinic for another matter, but the medic, thinking she was helping him, falsified his record without his knowledge to show that he received the COVID vaccine, Younts said. Budge got the shot soon after and learned that his records showed he had already received it.

Keep reading

White fibrous clots found in 3-year-old child born to mother who was covid vaccinated while pregnant

Examination of a 3-year-old child’s blood reveals the alarming discovery of fibrous clots in the blood of young children born to mothers who received covid mRNA “vaccines” during pregnancy.

Also, a provisionally accepted paper shows that covid-vaccinated women receiving IVF treatment are less likely to have a live birth compared to unvaccinated women.

Yet, with possibly the exception of the USA, health “experts,” medical organisations and corporate media around the world continue to assert that covid vaccines are safe for pregnant women and their unborn children.

Dr. Kevin McCairn is a systems neuroscientist who has been researching the effects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and its potential to cause prion-like conditions.

In April, Health Alliance Australia hosted a webinar where Dr. McCairn detailed his ongoing research and its implications for public health.  He discussed the presence of amyloidogenic peptides (peptides are the building blocks of proteins) and prion-like particles in blood clots associated with the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein bioweapon found in the virus and the covid “vaccines.”

Dr. McCairn’s analysis of the unusual fibrous white clots, retrieved from the deceased, shows them to be diseased, proteinaceous tissue, primarily misfolded fibrin that is highly amyloidogenic.  His research indicates a potential global health crisis due to these misfolded proteins causing multi-organ dysfunction, neurodegeneration, cancer, heart disease and other health issues.

Ninety per cent of blood samples sent to Dr. McCairn contain these amyloidogenic peptides.   He warned that these prions remain active even months after removal from the body, raising significant concerns about blood transfusions and other medical procedures.

As Health Alliance Australia’s Jeanee Rose Andrewartha said, “We have a global amyloidogenic health crisis. These amyloidogenic prion-triggering epitopes [part of an antigen, eliciting an immune response to an invading pathogen] and peptides are also seated in the environment as well as in living organisms. They are highly resistant with the potential to cause multiorgan dysfunction, neurodegeneration, cancer, heart disease, sudden death, strokes, etc.”

Keep reading

‘Clean Sweep’: RFK Jr. Boots Entire CDC ‘Rubber-Stamp’ Vax Panel

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has fired every member of the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel in a sweeping move he says is meant to restore public trust, but critics are calling it reckless and radical.

In an op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal, Kennedy said the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) had been plagued by conflicts of interest, rubber-stamp behavior, and opaque decision-making for decades – and that only a “clean sweep” could fix it.

The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine. It has never recommended against a vaccine—even those later withdrawn for safety reasons. It has failed to scrutinize vaccine products given to babies and pregnant women. To make matters worse, the groups that inform ACIP meet behind closed doors, violating the legal and ethical principle of transparency crucial to maintaining public trust. -RFK Jr.

The 17-member ACIP panel – made up of independent scientists, doctors, and public health professionals – was scheduled to meet later this month to review recommendations, including those involving COVID-19 vaccinations for children. That meeting will still go ahead, but without the current panelists, some of whom Kennedy said were ‘last-minute Biden appointees’ whose terms would have otherwise extended until 2028.

“Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028,” Kennedy wrote. 

Kennedy’s defenders say this is exactly the kind of bold move needed to break the credibility crisis surrounding vaccine science and government health agencies. The new appointees, he pledged, “won’t directly work for the vaccine industry” and will “refuse to serve as a rubber stamp,” instead fostering “a culture of critical inquiry”.

But critics say the move reeks of ideology and raises fears that Kennedy will stack the committee with vaccine skeptics or unqualified appointees, further eroding trust.

“Firing experts that have spent their entire lives protecting kids from deadly disease is not reform — it’s reckless, radical, and rooted in conspiracy, not science,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) in a scathing statement.

Keep reading

RED ALERT: Doctors Sound the Alarm After Fibrous Clots Discovered in Young Children Born to COVID-Vaxxed Mothers

Top medical experts are raising alarm bells over the discovery of fibrous, prion-like clots in the blood of young children born to mothers who received the COVID-19 mRNA injections during pregnancy.

Dr. Kevin McCairn, PhD – a respected systems neuroscientist with over 25 years of experience in neurodegenerative disease modeling – has published explosive findings that could shatter the mainstream narrative surrounding the so-called “safe and effective” COVID vaccines, Slay News reported.

His new sentinel report contains what is believed to be the first-ever documented case of amyloid fibrils—a misfolded, prion-like protein—in the blood of a chronically ill 3-year-old child exposed in utero to Pfizer’s mRNA shot.

According to PubMed, amyloid fibrils are insoluble protein aggregates associated with deadly neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.

These fibrils were detected in the child’s blood using Thioflavin T staining, a specialized fluorescent dye. The structures showed alarming signs of misfolded fibrin — a pathological variant linked to abnormal blood clotting and systemic inflammation.

Keep reading

ORWELLIAN CONTROL MACHINE: Again, CDC screaming for everyone to mask up on flights to flatten new Covid curve and push clot-shot VACCINATIONS

The CDC, Centers for Disease Continuance, will push propaganda to the limits in order to coerce the populace into getting jabbed up with any toxic concoction they dream up. It’s lab to jab, with no science to back up the “safe and effective” claims they’ve been spewing for 75 years. Now they want everybody wearing face diapers on all flights so that we’ll all believe that deadly Covid variants are floating on those aerosol particles and infecting the world, again, so we’ll all dash to the doc-in-tha-box and get stuck in the arm with the deadliest jabs ever created. Rinse and repeat.

  • No Return to Mask Mandates Expected: Despite purported rising COVID-19 hospitalizations, public health experts and airlines confirm that mask requirements for air travel are unlikely to return, even as colder weather increases respiratory virus risks and the CDC pushes their propaganda again
  • CDC’s Authority and Industry Pushback: The CDC’s 2021 mask mandate for transportation was struck down by a federal judge for overreach, and airlines have since maintained optional policies. Industry leaders oppose reinstating mandates, calling them ineffective and burdensome.
  • Current CDC Guidance Focuses on Localized Risks: The CDC now ties mask recommendations to regional hospitalization levels — currently low in 92% of the U.S. — and denies rumors of impending federal mandates, emphasizing voluntary precautions instead.
  • Public Sentiment and Pandemic Shifts Make Mandates Unlikely: Experts cite reduced pandemic severity and widespread resistance to masking as barriers to renewed mandates, though some high-risk settings (e.g., hospitals, schools) may still enforce them locally.

Keep reading

mRNA Shots Induce Cancer-Linked Bone Marrow Reprogramming Within Weeks

The study titled, Metabolomic Profiling of Leukemic Hematopoiesis: Effects of BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Administration, was just published in Current Molecular Medicine.

Researchers analyzed bone marrow samples from three groups using untargeted metabolomics, a powerful technique that detects thousands of small molecules reflecting real-time cellular activity:

  1. Vaccinated leukemia patients (n=7) — all of whom developed leukemia within 15 to 63 days after receiving Pfizer’s BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA injection
  2. Unvaccinated leukemia patients with no history of COVID-19 (n=2)
  3. Healthy, unvaccinated individuals (n=7)

Here’s what they found:

As expected, the metabolic profiles of both leukemia groups were markedly different from healthy controls—showing classic cancer-linked changes like:

  • ↑ Glycolysis (sugar breakdown)
  • ↑ Pentose phosphate pathway (nucleotide synthesis and redox balance)
  • Altered tryptophan metabolism, known to create an immunosuppressive tumor environment
  • Disrupted heme metabolism, involved in red blood cell formation and oxidative stress

However, the vaccinated leukemia group showed additional, distinct metabolic alterations that were not present in unvaccinated leukemia patients, including:

  • ↑ Tetrahydrofolic acid — vital for DNA synthesis, repair, and methylation. Uniquely elevated in vaccinated leukemia patients, possibly reflecting folate cycle modulation or compensatory changes in nucleotide metabolism.
  • ↑ Phosphorylcholine — a marker of altered membrane metabolism, linked to tumor progression, lipid signaling, and immune activation. Elevated only in vaccinated leukemia patients, contrasting with a decrease in unvaccinated leukemia cases.
  • ↑ N-Formyl-L-glutamic acid / N-Acetyl-L-aspartic acid — involved in amino acid and mitochondrial metabolism. Significantly elevated in vaccinated leukemia patients, not seen in unvaccinated leukemia individuals.
  • ↑ Delta 8.14-Sterol — a sterol lipid involved in membrane structure and cellular signaling. Increased only in the vaccinated leukemia group, potentially indicating vaccine-induced disruption of lipid regulation.

All seven vaccinated leukemia patients developed cancer within two months of mRNA injection.

Keep reading

The Nuremberg Code And The Vaccine Mandate For Service Members

The Nuremberg Trials were an attempt to bring justice to the Nazis for some of the most reprehensible criminal acts of World War II. One subset of those trials was known as “The Doctors’ Trial,” so named because it prosecuted some 23 distinguished medical scientists and physicians charged with murder and unspeakable torture through medical experimentation on concentration camp prisoners.

One of the most important outcomes of that trial—aside from meting out justice to the medical monsters—was the establishment of the Nuremberg Code, which offered a 10-point statement outlining proper limits on human experimentation moving forward. It proclaimed that such experimentation is justified only when the participation is voluntary, when the results benefit society, and when it is conducted in accord with basic principles that “satisfy moral, ethical, and legal concepts.” It memorialized what most decent people would have thought was already common sense and practice for a civilized society.

Notwithstanding the proscriptions of the Nuremberg Code, the Department of Defense authorized the use of unlicensed medications in the first Gulf War. Specifically, DoD obtained informed consent waivers from the FDA to allow the involuntary administration of unlicensed medications as a prophylactic against potential Iraqi chemical and biological weapons.

These medications were postulated by some medical professionals as a cause of so-called Gulf War Syndrome. In light of this, Congress passed a specific prohibition on the use of unlicensed medications on Service Members without their informed consent. The statute, codified at 10 USC §1107, requires informed consent from a Service Member before the administration of an unlicensed medication. Only the president can waive this requirement by ordering a waiver of informed consent in certain exigencies.

The statute got its first test when a federal court shut down DoD’s involuntary anthrax vaccination program in 2004 after a judge determined the anthrax vaccine had not been properly licensed by the FDA for use in a military context.

But nearly 20 years later, our country again flirted with violation of this statute and the Code as it mandated experimental COVID-19 vaccines for our Service Members. That injustice has yet to be fully addressed. Over 8,000 active-duty Service Members were involuntarily separated after failing to receive a religious exemption or other accommodation from the vaccine mandate and then refused to get vaccinated after being ordered to do so.

Keep reading

An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination??

‘An Evidence-Based Approach to Covid-19 Vaccination’ is the misleading title of an extraordinary publication by Vinay Prasad and Marty Makary in the New England Journal of Medicine, 20th May 2025. It describes the FDA’s new approach, but if you were hoping for ‘Evidence-Based’ you’ll be sorely disappointed. One could argue that this is a start, in that it does involve withdrawing FDA recommendations for regular boosters for ‘healthy 6 months- to 64 year-olds’ but the state of ‘health’ in the US is so poor that apparently two thirds of Americans are still eligible for the shots. (‘Underlying medical conditions’ include pregnancy, obesity, physical inactivity and smoking, current and former),

The article goes on to describe a requirement for gold standard randomised controlled trials for further vaccines for a healthy population of say 50-64 years with a saline placebo and a 6 month follow-up but again using an end-point related to covid alone rather than all-cause mortality or morbidity. For over-65s or those with comorbidities, only evidence of antibody production is required.

Then on 27th May, a week after the NEJM article, Robert Kennedy, flanked by Jay Battacharia and Marty Makary, announced the changes to the CDC schedule, stating that the vaccines would be withdrawn for healthy under 65s and healthy pregnant women. The statement was somewhat underwhelming, especially Jay Battacharya’s rather wooden performance – another example of the 3-word or 3-phrase mantra: “That ends today. It’s common sense and it’s good science”.

Some cynics were quick to point out that the CDC guidance had not changed, but by 29th May the website was updated though not in quite the way I had anticipated from RFK’s words. The covid vaccine for children now states ‘See notes’ and then outlines a system of ‘shared clinical decision-making’ as follows: “Shared clinical decision-making vaccinations are individually based and informed by a decision process between the health care provider and the patient or parent/guardian. Where the parent presents with a desire for their child to be vaccinated, children 6 months and older may receive COVID-19 vaccination, informed by the clinical judgment of a healthcare provider and personal preference and circumstances.” Only for children with moderate or severe immunocompromise does the CDC actively advise a booster. So for children this actually goes further than the Prasad and Makary article, leaving only immunocompromise as a co-morbidity for recommended covid boosters in under 18s, in line with the current UK guidelines. The Children’s Health Defence have tried to explain the very opaque guidelines – one plus would be that paediatricians would no longer be obliged to recommend the vaccines – at present they risk losing their tenure if they speak out against the jabs. But for adults, there appears to be no change with covid vaccines still recommended as routine including during pregnancy.

Keep reading

Meet the Bureaucrats Who Hid Data About Heart Damage from the mRNA COVID Vaccines

One hundred and eleven people, including 100 U.S. government employees, were involved in the Biden Administration’s myocarditis cover-up that attorney Ed Berkovich uncovered through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) email productions. Those emails and the cover-up were the subject of Senator Ron Johnson’s May 22, 2025, “The Corruption of Science and Federal Health Agencies: How Health Officials Downplayed and Hid Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Associated with the COVID-19 Vaccines” hearing and the associated “Failure to Warn: How Federal Health Agencies Downplayed the Risk of Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination” report.

Mr. Berkovich submitted a FOIA request to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stating, “I request emails sent by and received by Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky, Sherri A. Berger, and Kevin Griffis (all of whom are CDC personnel) on dates beginning February 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021, containing the word myocarditis.” DailyClout reported on the subsequent FOIA productions, which first revealed the CDC’s delayed action:

This WarRoom/DailyClout reporting revealed publicly for the first time:

  • CDC Internal Awareness of Myocarditis: The FOIA-obtained emails show that CDC officials knew about COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-associated myocarditis as early as February 19, 2021, less than three months after the vaccines became publicly available.
  • Health Alert Not Issued: The CDC had internal deliberations regarding issuing a health advisory alert via its Health Alert Network (HAN) and ultimately did not issue one.
  • Public Communication Delay: Despite months of internal discussions about cases of myocarditis associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, the CDC’s public acknowledgment of myocarditis risk occurred on May 27, 2021, three months after the CDC first became aware of it.

For the first time, the full list of the 111 people, including the 100 government employees, involved in the communications related to the myocarditis cover-up, is publicly available. The job titles and hyperlinks included were all accurate and active as of November 2024.

Keep reading