Tag: pandemic

Rogan Torches Zuckerberg To His Face Over COVID Vaccines

While Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is going out of his way to frame himself as having gone through some sort of MAGA awakening, a section of his appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast this past weekend has many believing its all an act.

Zuckerberg spoke at length about regretting bowing to censorship requests from Biden Administration officials, who he claimed would “scream” and “curse” at Meta employees to remove accurate information from its platforms.

As we highlighted last week, Zuckerberg has also ditched so called ‘fact checkers’ in favour of an X-like community notes system, sending the establishment censorship industry into a panic.

Yet, when Zuckerberg’s conversation with Rogan turned to COVID vaccines, he reverted to his old self again.

Zuckerberg claimed that while he disagrees with the methods the Biden regime used to push mass vaccination, it was all for the greater good.

“I think…they (the Biden regime) were doing something. Their goal to get everyone vaccinated was actually a good goal,” he declared.

Rogan wasn’t having it.

“Yeah, it was a good goal if it worked…if it really did prevent people from getting COVID, from infecting others,” Rogan responded, emphasising that “it didn’t, so it wasn’t a good deal.”

Zuckerberg responded, “Still, on balance, I still think it’s good for more people to get the vaccine.”

“I’m not sure in that case how much of it was like a personal political gain that they were going for. I think that they had a kind of goal that they thought was in the interests of the country,” Zuckerberg continued.

Keep reading

TURBO-CANCER, HEARTBREAK & TOXIC SPIKE. Lethal Risks from Covid mRNA Vaccines

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a widespread use of vaccines, whose adverse and/or unwanted effects have been deliberately ignored, and at best underestimated by those doctors who have amnesia have forgotten the oath of Hippocrates.

In this article we summarize the scientific evidence on adverse effects and how much have influenced in our lives the COVID vaccines, research carried out by doctors and researchers published in PEER REVIEW on international medical journals, and finding out whether or not these effects are significant.

Three different studies leading to one result.

Oncologist Gentilini: “Turbo-Cancer Alarm from Vaccines”

The first of these studies that we will observe, is that of Dr Patrizia Gentilini, an oncologist who for over 30 years worked in the oncology department in Forlì (Emilia-Romagna).
In a passage of his work, the former Chief of Oncology states:

“The use of mRNA vaccines in the context of infectious diseases is unprecedented and many are still unknown in this regard, since it is not clear from which cells of the body, after inoculation, the protein Spike is produced, how much it is produced, how long and where it is distributed”.

So, the Spike protein could represent a danger to those who have accepted the vaccination requirement imposed by law.

Keep reading

Novak Djokovic claims he was ‘poisoned’ during COVID detention before Australian Open

Novak Djokovic has said he was “poisoned” by the food he ingested while detained during his 2022 Australian Open visa saga, the former world number one told GQ in an interview released on Thursday.

The Serbian 24-times major winner had his visa cancelled ahead of the tournament following days of drama over Australia’s COVID-19 entry rules and his unvaccinated status, and was detained in a Melbourne hotel shared with asylum-seekers.

He was initially granted a visa exemption but it was revoked by the Australian Border Force, which led to the Serbian star being held in hotel detention.

“I realised that in that hotel in Melbourne, I was fed with some food that poisoned me,” Djokovic told GQ.

“I had some discoveries when I came back to Serbia. I never told this to anybody publicly, but discoveries that I was, I had a really high level of heavy metal. Heavy metal.

“I had the lead, very high level of lead and mercury.”

Keep reading

8 Bombshell Findings In Florida’s Grand Jury Report On Big Pharma’s Covid Shots

On Tuesday, a Florida grand jury released its final report on potential “criminal or wrongful activity” regarding the creation and promotion of the Covid jabs.

Requested by Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., and authorized by the Florida Supreme Court in December 2022, the grand jury was tasked with looking into whether individuals and entities, “including, but not limited to, pharmaceutical manufacturers (and their executive officers) and other medical associations or organizations” possibly violated state law related to the development, clinical testing, and marketing of the mRNA shots. The jury previously released interim reports in February and May 2024, respectively, which undercut much of the pseudo-science pushed by government “experts” on subjects such as masking, lockdowns, and natural immunity.

Following its investigation, the grand jury ultimately declined to charge any individual or entity in the case after the jurors “did not find any statute that [they] believed would be an appropriate vehicle for a criminal indictment based on the facts” in its final report. The grand jury did, however, note that such a conclusion does not absolve entities of engaging in unethical behavior.

“We want to be abundantly clear that this does not mean we believe the actions of these sponsors were always appropriate, or that the statements they made turned out to be factually correct,” the report reads. “It just means that those actions and statements are not sufficient bases to support criminal prosecutions.”

Despite the lack of criminal charges, the jury did unearth numerous major findings in its report that shine a light on deceptive behavior and actions surrounding the development and promotion of the Covid shots. Here are some of the biggest takeaways from the analysis.

Keep reading

L.A. Officials Complain There Aren’t Enough Firefighters – After Firing Hundreds Who Refused to Take COVID Vaccine

As fires rage across Los Angeles, city officials are complaining there are not enough firefighters to manage the situation.

Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, Los Angeles County Fire Chief Anthony Marrone said that the department was incapable of managing such a massive natural disaster.

“There are not enough firefighters in all of Los Angeles County to address four separate fires of this magnitude,” he said.

“The LA County Fire Department was prepared for one or two major wildfires, but not the four. This is not a normal red flag alert.”

While their lack of manpower is completely understandable given the incredible ferocity of the fires, it is worth noting that many firefighters were fired for their refusal to take the COVID vaccine.

As pointed out by the popular End Wokeness account X, local news media even ran reports back in 2021 about how firefighters had their employment terminated after refusing to provide proof of vaccination or requesting an exemption.

Keep reading

Pfizer’s secret documents reveal that their COVID vaccine actually made you 8.7% more likely to get COVID

Pfizer tested all participants in their Phase 3 trial for N-antibodies. The results were kept hidden from the public. It was only through court order that we finally know what the results were.

Do you think they would have kept this data secret from the public if it showed good news? Heck no!

The table showed that Pfizer only had around 50% protection if you just take the table at face value. But if you interpret the table correctly, it shows Pfizer had negative efficacy.

In this article, I’ll show you how to properly interpret that data and get the truth.

The method was first disclosed by Jikkyleaks on May 24, 2022.

I recently became aware of it after independently replicating his work. I believe his numbers are slightly off, so I’ll show you the proper calculation for the correct estimate of the case counts.

No doubt about it; those who took the shots were more likely to be infected by COVID by 8.7%.

There is just no other way to interpret the Pfizer data. It’s “gold standard” clinical trial data.

The overall counts are too small for the result to be statistically significant. But the FDA should NEVER be approving a vaccine where the primary endpoint efficacy (reducing cases vs. the unvaccinated group) is so small to be statistically insignificant.

In plain English, the best estimates are that there were actually more infections in the vaccine group than the placebo group. Whoops!

This is a major failing of the FDA to recognize this.

It won’t be long before Senator Ron Johnson brings this to their attention.

Keep reading

DNA Contamination Study — Conducted at FDA Lab by Students Supervised by FDA Scientists — ‘Doesn’t Belong to FDA’ Agency Says

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has responded to a peer-reviewed study conducted within its own laboratory, which uncovered excessively high levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

The study revealed that residual DNA levels exceeded regulatory limits by six to 470 times, validating earlier studies from independent researchers that the FDA had previously disregarded.

Published by students in the Journal of High School Science, the study has garnered significant attention since the story broke, with its altimetric score rivaling those of major studies in leading medical journals.

Despite the study being conducted at the FDA’s White Oak campus in Maryland, the agency has sought to distance itself from the findings.

A spokesperson stated that the study “does not belong to the FDA” and is therefore not theirs to disclose.

“The FDA does not comment on individual studies,” the spokesperson added, declining to acknowledge the new scientific findings.

The agency also refused to address the involvement of three of its own scientists — Shuliang Liu, Ph.D., Tony Wang, M.D., and Prabhuanand Selvaraj, Ph.D. — who supervised the students conducting the study.

When questioned about potential regulatory actions, such as issuing a public alert, recalling affected vaccine batches, or notifying other agencies, the FDA stood firm in its defense of mRNA vaccine safety.

Keep reading

Predicting 2025: The Bird Flu out the window

Our third prediction for 2025 isn’t exactly a crazy left-field pick: Bird Flu. It’s going to happen. The question is when, and how much.

The second half of 2024 was full of dire warnings that H5N1 was “just one mutation away” from human-to-human transmission or articles bemoaning how little we learned from “Covid” and how unprepared we are.

It very much felt like, after over two years of talking it up as the next big disease, Bird Flu was coming to a head.

Then, just yesterday the press reported “the first official bird flu death”, the patient was over 65 with “other pre-existing health conditions” (sound familiar?).

Does that mean we’re about to get the “next pandemic” they’ve been talking about for so long?

Maybe, maybe not. It’s noteworthy that, despite the reported death, the hysteria still seems low-grade.

There’s no real commitment to the story. The WHO is still describing H5N1 as “very, very low risk” to humans. This is obviously true, but the truth only ever appears in WHO press releases by coincidence.

It’s starting to feel like “Bird Flu” might have missed its window. They think they may have fizzled all the H5N1 momentum to the point that letting it die is the best option.

That means a change in narrative architecture. A redirect is required. Instead of Bird Flu being “the next pandemic”, it may be about to become a “near-miss pandemic”, perhaps one that is artfully avoided by advancements in vaccine technology or thorough screening. Well done us.

It could be that two years of hype has smothered the bird flu brand in the cradle (nest?), so the “next pandemic” will actually be some surprise newcomer – like whatever made-up nonsense is allegedly hitting China right now.

…or maybe the black death.

Or maybe I’m wrong, this is the calm before the storm, and the Bird Flu waves are about to break on the shores of 2025.

Whatever direction it ends up taking, 2025 will be the climax of the Bird Flu narrative. If it hasn’t become a full-blown thing by March, it likely never will.

Keep reading

Over 160,000 Skin Issues Reported to V-Safe After COVID-19 Vaccination

When the COVID-19 vaccines rolled out, CDC provided a V-safe app where people could record their symptoms. The attorneys who represent ICAN sued CDC to release this data. The V-safe data revealed over 124,000 reports of rashes; 22,000 reports of hives; 11,000 reports of blisters; 3,000 reports of eczema; 2,500 reports of psoriasis; and 1,500 reports of lesions. Some examples in the vaccine recipients’ own words:

  • “Severe hives. Started the morning of 1/11 went to urgent care 1/12 at 3am. Raised and red hives. Started on thighs and arms. Eventually covered 90% of my body.”
  • “Bullous lesions on hands. Slow healing process. Had a biopsy of one of the lesions.”
  • “6 silver dollar sized psoriasis like patches on my chest and ive [sic] never had any skin issues in my life”
  • “Had very unusual rapid growing lesion, biopsy done 1/15/21. Suspecting autoimmune process. Requires topical and systemic pain meds.”
  • “Painful blisters on my hands, feet, wrists and elbows as well as in my nostril.”
  • “Ulcers on roof of mouth and down throat (not something that has ever happened to me before)”
  • “Rash all over, hive like bumps on palms of feet and hands, back, stomach, legs, arms, its every where [sic] and very itchy.”

Scientific literature includes many reports of cutaneous (skin) reactions after COVID-19 vaccination. Most skin reactions to drugs are considered to be a hypersensitive immune response involving mast cells, and the preferred treatment is to discontinue the drug.

Keep reading

The Pandemic Planners Come for Hoof and Hen…and Us Again

On December 31, 2024, the world received a year-end parting gift from the good folks at NIAID, Anthony Fauci’s old fiefdom at the National Institutes of Health. NIAID – the same unaccountable and secretive agency that Fauci used to fund the gain-of-function research of Ralph Baric at UNC Chapel Hill and the Bat Lady in Wuhan that resulted in Covid – has a new director, one Dr. Jeanne Marrazzo. 

Marrazzo and another NIAID colleague, Dr. Michael G. Ison, wrote a year-end editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine that accompanies a research paper on recent H5N1 Bird flu cases in the United States, as well as a case report of a lone case of severe illness associated with Bird flu in British Columbia.

Marrazzo and Ison summarize the findings of the research paper and case report as follows:

Investigators now report in the Journal a series of human cases from the United States and Canada. The former series involves 46 case patients with generally mild, self-limited infection with [Influenza type] A(H5N1): 20 with exposure to poultry, 25 with exposure to dairy cows, and 1 with undefined exposure.…Most case patients presented with conjunctivitis, almost half with fever, and a minority with mild respiratory symptoms, and all recovered. The only hospitalization occurred in the case patient with undefined exposure, although hospitalization was not for respiratory illness.

Keep reading