Men who correct women over any disagreement could be hauled before disciplinarians under plans being weighed up by the Green Party.
Leaders are considering broadening the party’s definition of misogyny to the point that ‘any disagreement’ could lead to men facing sanction.
The proposals are set out in a leaked 53-page dossier on legal and reputational risk prepared by its own lawyers.
The report reveals deep internal concern about the Greens’ approach to misogyny, transgender policy and LGBT rights, warning that current guidance could expose the party to serious legal and financial risk.
It says the Green Party Council was ‘very close’ to adopting a document titled Guidance on Identifying Misogyny and Sexism as part of its ethics framework.
According to the report, seen by the Telegraph, the draft guidance listed ‘being corrected’ as an example of misogynistic behaviour experienced by women, a definition the lawyers warned was so expansive it could ‘justify any disagreement between a man and a woman as a sanctionable disciplinary offence’.
The dossier also cautions that internal rules on identifying transphobia and ‘queerphobia’ risk unlawfully discriminating against members who question contested gender theory.
The authors stress that the party cannot legally penalise members for holding gender-critical views, which are protected under the Equality Act 2010.
The warning follows a costly legal defeat for the Greens last year, when the party paid £9,100 to former spokesman and deputy leader Dr Shahrar Ali after a court ruled he had been improperly dismissed over his belief that ‘biology is real and immutable’.
The report says the process used to remove him was ‘procedurally unfair’.
Dr Ali is now suing the party for a second time, alleging ‘procedural abuse’ and continued discrimination over his views on biological sex.
The Greens have since admitted to ‘procedural shortfalls’ in his dismissal.

You must be logged in to post a comment.