Tag: globalism

National populists surge around the world — spelling doom for the global elite

Democrats are flummoxed that President Donald Trump can keep winning when they find his views so despicable.

Recent elections from around the world, though, provide the answer: People want conservative populism.

Argentine President Javier Milei’s recent unexpected win in his country’s congressional midterms is just one example.

His Liberty Advances alliance swept to victory in most of Argentina’s 26 states, crushing the Peronist opposition by 9 percentage points.

Milei’s allies did this the Trumpian way, by winning the blue-collar former Peronist strongholds around Buenos Aires and in rural “flyover country”.

And they did it despite relatively poor economic news: While Milei’s radical reforms did bring inflation down dramatically and usher in an economic recovery, progress had stalled.

The Argentine peso has been in freefall, prompting a $40 billion bailout from Trump shortly before the vote.

Most experts thought voters would signal their impatience with Milei’s reforms by giving the Peronists a win. Instead, they rewarded his boldness.

In recent months conservative populists have won elections in Poland and Czechia, too.

Poland’s June presidential contest was instructive: Historian and political neophyte Karol Nawrocki started the campaign in a poor position, but he won against the odds by unfailingly striking Trumpian themes on nationalism and culture.

In Czechia, October’s parliamentary elections shifted national policy rightward, with a new alliance of conservative populist parties taking the majority in the Chamber of Deputies.

Britain’s Nigel Farage and his Reform Party now leads all national polls, having swept May’s local elections, with the once-dominant Tories languishing at 20% approval.

Even apparent conservative defeats hold good news for populists.

Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party — the main conservative force despite its name — lost its majority in the House of Councillors election this summer, mainly because some of its backers turned instead to two openly populist parties that promised to “Make Japan Great Again”.

In response, the LDP dumped its colorless prime minister and replaced him with Sanae Takaichi, the nation’s first female leader, a noted hawk and nationalist who strikes similar themes to the populist Sanseito and Conservative parties.

And while PVV, The Netherlands’ premier populist party led by Geert Wilders, lost ground in last week’s elections, most of its losses went to other nationalist parties.

Keep reading

Global Cybercrime Treaty Draws Criticism from Rights Groups and Tech Companies Over Surveillance Fears

Sixty-five countries, including the United States and Canada, have signed a United Nations treaty on cybercrime that threatens privacy, online research, and free expression.

The agreement, known as the UN Convention against Cybercrime, was signed in Hanoi and will take effect once 40 member states have ratified it.

Each country must complete its own ratification process. In the United States, a two-thirds Senate vote is required for approval.

The UN Secretary-General António Guterres described the treaty as an essential step in combating cybercrime, saying that “cyberspace has become fertile ground for criminals…every day, sophisticated scams defraud families, steal livelihoods, and drain billions of dollars from our economies.”

He called the Convention “a powerful, legally binding instrument to strengthen our collective defenses against cybercrime” and insisted it “cannot be used for any forms of surveillance or others that could be linked to violations of human rights.”

The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), which directed negotiations, has argued that the treaty includes protections for human rights and legitimate research.

But organizations such as Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) disagree.

Before the signing, both groups urged governments not to endorse the treaty, warning that its vague definitions could allow governments to monitor citizens, prosecute security researchers, and suppress political speech.

Technology companies have also raised concerns. The Cybersecurity Tech Accord, whose members include Meta and Microsoft, described the treaty as a “surveillance treaty” that could promote government data sharing and criminalize ethical hacking.

Keep reading

FDR’s “Four Policemen”: The Globalist Blueprint for Endless War and American Subjugation

It is time to expose the truth about Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s so-called Four Policemen plan — a sinister scheme concocted by the globalist cabal surrounding the 32nd president to permanently shackle the United States to a role of international enforcer in a world government order. Far from being a noble vision for peace, FDR’s “Four Policemen” was the original blueprint for what would become the United Nations — an unelected, unaccountable body of internationalists dedicated not to liberty, but to global control.

In the midst of the Second World War, even before the guns fell silent, Roosevelt and his cadre of globalist advisors — including Soviet sympathizers such as Alger Hiss — were laying the foundation for a postwar “New World Order.” The heart of this plan was what FDR euphemistically called the “Four Policemen”: the United States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and China. These four powers, according to Roosevelt, would act as the guardians of peace, responsible for policing the globe and suppressing any acts of aggression through military might.

Let that sink in: Roosevelt — hailed by modern progressives as a champion of democracy — openly proposed that a small clique of global superpowers should wield exclusive authority to intervene in the affairs of nations, impose sanctions, deploy military force, and determine which conflicts were worthy of attention. Sovereignty? An outdated relic. Consent of the governed? Irrelevant. In FDR’s globalist gospel, only the self-anointed “policemen” mattered.

Keep reading

The Kenyan High Court has also now suspended Bill Gates immunity from Prosecution

Kenyan High Court Suspends Bill Gates’ Immunity: Globalist Agenda Exposed in Africa?

In a monumental judicial blow sending shockwaves through the global community, the Kenyan High Court has suspended Bill Gates’ legal immunity, paving the way for his potential prosecution. This unprecedented decision stems from a lawsuit filed by Kenyan Senator Mithika Linturi, who accuses the Microsoft founder and his allies of engaging in activities that «consume and destroy the sovereignty of Africa.» The ruling is not just a legal victory; it is a battle cry for sovereign nations awakening to the dangerous overreach of unelected global elites operating under the guise of philanthropy and public health. This case unveils the tip of the iceberg of a dark agenda that conservative voices have denounced for years.

The core of the accusation is one of the most alarming revelations of the modern era: the alleged perversion of vaccination campaigns to carry out covert population control experiments. As detailed in court, the World Health Organization (WHO), an entity heavily funded by Gates, launched a tetanus eradication campaign in Kenya between 2014 and 2015. However, Kenyan doctors and researchers discovered that the vaccine used was radically different. It was reportedly a «fertility-regulating vaccine,» which combined the tetanus toxoid with the hormone Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG), essential for sustaining pregnancy. The insidious consequence, as alleged, is that when injected into a woman, her immune system produces antibodies that attack this hormone, effectively resulting in sterilization.

The devastating repercussions for the Kenyan people are already visible and quantifiable. Local healthcare professionals have reported a chilling and inexplicable rise in infertility cases among young, healthy couples. Furthermore, there is a recurring tragedy of women suffering multiple consecutive miscarriages, unable to carry a pregnancy to term. These are not mere coincidences but a horrifying pattern that aligns with Gates-sponsored campaigns. The brave research and subsequent publication of a scientific paper by Kenyan doctors have corroborated these accusations, providing a factual basis for what many had suspected: that the world’s most vulnerable populations are being used as lab rats for a radical social engineering program.

Keep reading

Global push to reshape agriculture, human diets so every nation’s food supply fits within ‘sustainable’ and ‘planetary boundaries’

The global war on food continues to chug along under the radar of all the other problems going on in the world.

Some years ago there was a YouTuber named Christian Westbrook whose channel, The Ice Age Farmer, kept us informed on trends impacting the global food supply. Christian’s channel mysteriously disappeared in November 2022 and we don’t get nearly enough information on this important topic. He was warning back then that the globalists wanted us to eat their unhealthy, ultra-processed bioengineered food and in order to make that happen they needed to reduce our access to healthy whole foods.

Below is a video interview with Christian from five years ago that has aged extremely well.

It’s no accident that food prices keep rising at rates beyond the overall inflation rate.

Now, we have an interesting article posted October 6 at Modernity.news.

Modernity cites an article in The Lancet, titled “The EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy, Sustainable, and Just Food Systems,” which presents what the authors call “a great food transformation.”

Modernity points out that this is part of a coordinated global program (as promoted by the United Nations, Rockefeller and Gates foundations, and World Economic Forum) to reshape agriculture, human diets, and financing so that every nation’s food supply fits within quantified “planetary boundaries.”

Keep reading

Globalist Leaders Pushing Economic Restructuring, The Green Agenda, and Great Reset

King Charles is arguably the highest-placed globalist on Earth. While it is debatable who the world’s biggest globalists are, six of the most prominent, King Charles, Bill Gates, Tony Blair, António Guterres, Ursula von der Leyen, and Klaus Schwab, are working together to promote policies that expand global governance through climate-based economic controls and large-scale financial restructuring that would fundamentally transform free-market capitalism.

King Charles has long been a central figure in the World Economic Forum’s global agenda. In June 2020, he and the WEF co-launched The Great Reset, calling it “a golden opportunity to seize something good from this crisis.” The initiative sought to “rebuild, redesign, reinvigorate, and rebalance our world,” aligning the global economy with climate and sustainability goals.

Through his Sustainable Markets Initiative, Charles called for a complete redesign of economic systems to make them “greener, more inclusive, and sustainable.” His ten “green recovery” actions included creating global carbon markets, directing investment into sustainable infrastructure, and embedding nature-based solutions in corporate strategies.

In 2021, Charles introduced the Terra Carta, a charter placing “nature and the planet at the center of global value creation,” supported by more than 500 CEOs and organizations. He even urged lifestyle restrictions such as going meat- and fish-free two days a week and dairy-free one day a week to reduce carbon footprints.

For these policies to work, they would require heavy government intervention and constant monitoring, backed by fines or punishments to enforce compliance. Since this framework puts “nature and the planet” at the core of “value creation,” free-market capitalism could not survive. A central authority would have to decide what goods could be produced, in what quantities, and at what price, in other words, communism.

Gates has also been outspoken on environmental and food policy, advocating for behavioral and regulatory shifts to reduce emissions. He has argued that “all rich countries should move to 100 percent synthetic beef,” adding that “eventually, that green premium is modest enough that you can sort of change the behavior of people or use regulation to totally shift the demand.”

This represents a fundamental restructuring of food systems, where government regulation would override consumer choice and market forces to impose dietary changes on entire populations in the name of climate goals.

Keep reading

Global Power Grab: 80 Years of Infamy

Eighty years have passed since the United Nations’ founding meeting in San Francisco. It’s time for an assessment. Is the UN’s rosy self-description quoted above accurate? Is the United Nations saving us from the scourge of war, maintaining international peace and security, protecting human rights, etc., etc?

Granted, UN agencies do deliver some humanitarian aid to the world’s needy. Likewise, Al Capone funded soup kitchens; and Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman, the murderous Sinaloa drug lord, built schools and hospitals in Mexico. 

Like Capone and Guzman, the UN practices “philanthropy” with other people’s money, extracted by force, threats, and intimidation — and it does so to cover up a multitude of crimes. Capone, Guzman, and others of their criminal ilk have had their media admen who portray them as noble Robin Hoods. However, none of them could hold a candle to the UN in terms of having a pack of media sycophants who perennially hide their heinous crimes and bathe them in the warm glow of sanctity. For decades, UN “peacekeepers” have gotten away with murder, rape, torture, sex trafficking, and other crimes — with no consequences. The UN regularly denounces “impunity” while practicing it with immunity. The rise in impunity worldwide is “politically indefensible and morally intolerable,” declared UN Secretary-General António Guterres on September 24, 2024. “We see this age of impunity everywhere — in the Middle East, in the heart of Europe, in the Horn of Africa,” the Hypocrite-in-Chief of the global dictators club proclaimed, while pointing his finger everywhere except at himself and the blue-helmeted criminals he has been protecting. 

Keep reading

Could Trump End Up Triggering The Globalist “Great Reset”?

The news feeds were buzzing last week over the recent meeting between Russia, China and India at the Chinese port city of Tianjin. Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi made sure to present a unified front at the event, at least in economic terms, and it’s clear that China and Russia’s military ties are solidifying. The Shanghai Cooperation Gathering is being treated by the media as a warning to the US in the face of accelerating trade tensions.

Western journalists seem rather giddy over the news, suggesting that Donald Trump’s tariff policies are pushing America’s enemies together and forming an anti-US axis. The political left hates Trump so completely that I wouldn’t be surprised to see them cheering for Putin and the BRICS in a year or two.

News flash for those who are unaware: The BRICS have been forming their alliance since the Obama era. It’s nothing new and has nothing to do with Trump.

I’ve been tracking the formation of the BRICS alliance since 2009 and the driving motive behind the economic bloc (on the surface) has always been to break from the dollar as the world reserve currency. BRICS leaders have been calling for the end of the dollar and the introduction of a new global currency system for years. Though, the plan is not as eastern focused as many people assume. That is to say, if you’re hoping the BRICS are going to “end globalism” you are sorely mistaken.

In fact, in 2009 both Russia and China put forward the notion of a global currency managed by the IMF; an organization that many people think is US controlled. The reality is that it is globalist controlled, and globalists have no enduring loyalties to any nation state; they are only loyal to their own agenda.

Some people might argue that the situation has changed dramatically since 2009, but I disagree. China is now inexorably tied to the IMF’s SDR basket and Russia remains an active member of the IMF despite the war in Ukraine. It’s important to understand that there are always two different timelines when it comes to world events – There is the more publicized international theater, and then there are the operations of globalist institutions that exist outside of geopolitics.

In my view, globalists are not necessarily the “engineers” behind every conflict or crisis, but they do position themselves to take advantage whenever possible. And, they do play both sides of every conflagration in order to gain the most benefit. In other words, groups like the IMF, World Bank, the BIS, the WEF, and trillion dollar conglomerates like BlackRock and Vanguard are going to court the BRICS just as much as they court the west when it comes to achieving a centralized one-world economy.

It’s no secret what this “new world order” is intended to look like. The Davos crowd has openly discussed their visions for years and during the pandemic they ripped the mask off and reveled in the “inevitable” implementation of their “Great Reset”. To summarize, this is what the elites want for the future economy:

A global cashless system. A one world digital currency built around a basket of CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies). AI tracking of all financial records. A “sharing economy” in which all private property is abolished. The use of “de-banking” to control civil discourse – Meaning you can say what you want but you might lose access to your accounts, and perhaps even the jobs market. Population control and reduction. Carbon feudalism in which nations pay tribute taxes to globalists in the name of “stopping man-made climate change” (which doesn’t exist).

Keep reading

Professor Warns of ‘Dirty War’-Style Unrest as Britain Fractures Under Mass Migration and Hostile Globalist Elites

A leading academic has sounded the alarm over Britain’s future, warning that unchecked migration, collapsing national unity, precipitously declining social trust, and elite dysfunction could push the country into low-grade civil conflict reminiscent of Northern Ireland’s Troubles or Colombia’s decades-long insurgencies.

David Betts, Professor of War in the Modern World in the Department of War Studies, King’s College London, speaking with Harrison Pitt, a writer, policy advisor to Restore Britain, commentator for The European Conservative and New Culture Forum, described a society he believes is “teetering on the brink,” driven by deep cultural divisions and a political class unwilling—or unable—to defend its own people.

“A generation ago, Western nations were cohesive,” Betts said. “Now they’re fragmented into identity-based tribes, competing violently for dwindling resources. The fractures are obvious, and the tinder is piled high. All that’s missing is a spark.”

Keep reading

Japan Votes Against Globalism And Multiculturalism In Latest National Election

It sounds like a repeat of the US elections in 2016 and 2024; Japan’s long ruling coalition party has suffered a crippling defeat in last week’s national elections, defeated by the rise of the MAGA-inspired “Japanese First” party.   The populist party took enough seats in the House of Councillors to bring the coalition into question and possibly unseat the current globalist-friendly Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba.

Japanese First, also known as “Sanseito”, was launched at the height of the draconian pandemic lockdowns by Sohei Kamiya using web-based organization and a message of anti-globalism and fighting back against forced multiculturalism.  Sanseito now controls 15 seats in the Upper House, and 3 seats in the lower house, making them impossible to ignore in future legislation decisions.

The western media has attacked the movement, demonizing it as dangerous.  Reuters describes the party as “fringe far right:, noting that it: 

“…Gained support with warnings of a “silent invasion” of immigrants, and pledges for tax cuts and welfare spending. Birthed on YouTube during the COVID-19 pandemic spreading conspiracy theories about vaccinations and a cabal of global elites, the party broke into mainstream politics with its “Japanese First” campaign.”

Japan has been targeted by leftists in the west for years as being “fascist” due to their previous refusals to accommodate progressive ideology.  The media also acts as if the globalist agenda and lies about covid lockdowns, mandates and vaccines are not proven realities, but it would seem that the general public in Japan is growing wise to the propaganda. 

Keep reading