Tag: democrats

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz Says Trump to Blame For Killing of National Guardsmen, ‘Pretty Disgusting’ He Won’t Accept Responsibility 

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has said that President Trump is to blame for the assassination of two National Guard members in Washington, D.C.

The two guardsmen were murdered on Wednesday in cold blood just steps away from the White House.

Law enforcement agencies have since confirmed the suspect as 29-year-old Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal.

Lakanwal entered the United States on September 8, 2021, under Biden’s Operation Allies Welcome, following his regime’s disastrous and chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan.

During an interview with CNN on Friday, the Florida Congresswoman said that the president needed to look at the consequences of his own policies rather than

This is a deeply concerning situation, but, you know, it’s one that I think we have to.. it begs the question, would an individual have flown across the country to target law enforcement officers in Washington, D.C.? And, I mean, the answer is likely no.

So why wasn‘t the president‘s first thought, ‘Wow, you know, maybe I should reconsider deploying military troops in the nation‘s capital or in any city?’

Particularly not when they haven‘t coordinated closely with the leadership of these cities and when we have law enforcement that are quite capable of handling the criminal justice issues that are — that we need law enforcement to focus on, and not our military.

I just think, you know, the president looks everywhere except inward to blame his own policies.

We need to make sure that we don‘t have our military deployed in our cities, doing — handling law enforcement responsibilities. And we need to make sure that we address gun violence.

We certainly need to make sure we always have the proper and appropriate and tight, tight vetting processes, and those should be reviewed.

But it‘s never the president‘s fault or his policies when it comes to his reaction, and it’s pretty disgusting.

Keep reading

Pennsylvania Governor Signs Law Banning “Hair Discrimination”

Democrats continue to double down and pander to the woke demographic whenever they see an opportunity.  These gestures are usually designed to virtue signal and rarely have any significance in terms of political change, however, leftists don’t necessarily pass laws or make declarations because a problem actually exists.  Rather, they do these things in order to encourage false perceptions within the populace.

In other words, equality has been a legal fact within the US for decades, but leftists want people to believe racism is a never-ending battle that requires their perpetual activism and government intervention.  The more they demand “equity”, the more division and conflict they end up inciting. 

Democrat Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro insists that racism is an ongoing problem in his state and he has taken bold action to fight back by passing the “CROWN Act”, a law which prohibits discrimination based on a person’s hairstyle, type or texture.

CROWN, which stands for “Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair”, is clearly aimed at placating the black voting base for Democrats in PA and is unlikely to be applied to any other group. 

For example, black female managers wearing wigs and weaves and appropriating white women’s hair styles will never be accused of racism, but a white manager at Taco Bell who fires a black worker for not wearing a hair net properly will probably face civil litigation for discrimination.  Woke laws are meant to create privileges and double standards, not equal protections.  As Shapiro notes:

“Real freedom means being respected for who you are – no matter what you look like, where you come from, who you love, or who you pray to…For too long, many Pennsylvanians have faced discrimination simply for hairstyles that reflect their identity and culture – that ends today…”

“This is going to help people by making sure that, wherever you work, or wherever you’re applying for a job, they can’t look at your hair and size you up – not based on your qualifications and all of the professional development you have and all of your education,” said PA House Speaker Joanna McClinton. “They will not look at your hair and decide you can’t work here. They will not look at your hair and decide you don’t belong in this C-suite. They will not look at your hair and say, ‘you can’t be in the boardroom.’” 

U.S. Rep. La’Tasha D. Mayes, a West Philadelphia native who now represents parts of Pittsburgh, was the lead sponsor on the bill and said the fight will help improve lives across Pennsylvania.  “Hair discrimination has taken confidence from our children, but that ends today,” Mayes said. “Hair discrimination has taken dignity from workers, but that ends today. It has taken access to economic opportunities, hopes and dreams, but that begins to end today.”

Keep reading

Trump’s Afghan Entry Freeze Angers Leftists

President Trump’s immediate freeze on Afghan immigration requests, triggered by an Afghan national’s shooting of two National Guards members in D.C., has ignited anger among leftists decrying it as “collective punishment.”

The move, announced via U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), halts “processing of all immigration requests relating to Afghan nationals… pending further review of security and vetting protocols.”

It comes as a direct response to the attack by a 2021 asylum grantee, underscoring Trump’s push to “reexamine” all Biden-era imports amid zero-fatality hopes for the victims.

Mass immigration advocate Jill Filipovic blasted the move as “collective identity-based punishment and not how any fair processes should work.” 

Keep reading

‘Seditious Six’ Scripted Video Appears To Be Part Of Left’s Broader Color Revolution Against Trump

America could use a breather from the Democratic Party’s billionaire-backed dark-money NGO machine, which has spent years running a rolling color-revolution-style campaign against President Trump and anything aligned with America First (one that we’ve coined “invisible insurrection“). 

The pressure campaign is constant: activist fronts sparking orchestrated unrest in places like Los Angeles through the protest-industrial complex, followed by scripted influence operations like the so-called “Seditious Six,” whose latest messaging pressures military and intelligence personnel to “refuse illegal orders” – without saying what illegal orders. 

The bigger picture is very alarming: It’s all part of a coordinated effort to delegitimize the Trump administration and America First movement and to keep the country in a state of manufactured chaos with aims for regime change. 

Remember weeks ago when Jennica Pounds, also known as “DataRepublican,” peeled back the layers of what appears to be the interworkings of at least one color-revolution-style operation orchestrated by Democrats, nonprofit groups, ex-USAID employees, and leftist billionaires to undermine and destabilize President Trump’s MAGA from within.

Keep reading

Democrats Sue Over Cut to SNAP Benefits for Non-Citizens and Illegals

Nearly half of all households with noncitizen parents are accessing federal benefits, a category that includes both legal and illegal immigrants. The Trump administration is trying to end these programs, but Democrats are pushing back.

Democratic attorneys general from 21 states and Washington, D.C., have filed a federal lawsuit challenging new USDA guidance that they say unlawfully restricts legal immigrants’ access to SNAP benefits. The lawsuit, filed in Eugene, Oregon, argues that USDA misinterpreted President Trump’s July tax-and-spending law, which narrowed eligibility for some immigrants but still allows green-card holders to apply for food aid after a five-year waiting period.

State officials say the guidance issued on October 31 went beyond the statute by declaring lawful permanent residents who previously held refugee, asylum, or humanitarian parole status permanently ineligible for SNAP. They contend the law allows these groups to receive benefits once they adjust to permanent resident status and meet standard program requirements.

The attorneys general are asking the court to block the guidance, saying it reverses long-standing policy without a reasoned explanation and violates administrative law. They warn that states could face severe financial penalties for noncompliance, with some suggesting that their SNAP programs could be forced to shut down. They also note that USDA did not provide the required 120-day transition period, leaving states to overhaul eligibility systems immediately.

A White House spokesperson said the administration is committed to ensuring that illegal aliens do not receive benefits intended for citizens. SNAP, which serves about 42 million low-income Americans, has been at the center of several legal disputes in recent years, including battles following the lapse in benefits during the recent government shutdown. According to USDA data, refugees made up roughly 1 percent of SNAP recipients in 2023, while other non-citizens, including lawful permanent residents, accounted for about 3 percent.

However, those USDA claims severely undercut the actual number of noncitizens receiving SNAP and other benefits. USDA data from fiscal year 2022 shows that 1.465 million noncitizens received SNAP benefits, with an additional 2.2 million children living in households with noncitizens also participating in the program. These recipients include lawful permanent residents, refugees, asylees, individuals granted stays of deportation, and others. They collected a total of $4.2 billion in benefits. USDA notes that illegal aliens are not eligible for SNAP but may reside in households where other family members qualify.

Keep reading

Democratic Senator Appears to Threaten Military Amid Mark Kelly Investigation: ‘There Will Be Consequences’

One wonders: Have the Democrats thought this through? Do they have an endgame?

Either way, their reckless rhetoric can only lead to a dark place — as it has already.

Monday on CNN’s “The Arena with Kasie Hunt,” Democratic Sen. Ruben Gallego of Arizona appeared to threaten “consequences” for military service members who take part in a potential court-martial of his colleague, Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona.

In a clip posted to the social media platform X, host Kasie Hunt asked Gallego about his “level of trust in the U.S. military justice system,” to which the senator, with shocking brazenness, replied that service members need to remember that President Donald Trump will not be around to protect them forever.

“I trust them, actually, a lot,” Gallego began.

That sounded like a compliment, of course. But if you listen closely, you will hear the Democrats’ seditious anti-Trump message embedded in the senator’s response.

“These are professionals,” Gallego said moments later. ‘They are also swearing to the Constitution of the United States. They know that there will be fallout and consequences if they are used in a hard way to basically railroad someone like Senator Kelly, ’cause Donald Trump’s gonna be gone in a couple years.”

What a slimy way to insinuate that Trump either has or will give orders at odds with the Constitution.

“And if you’re part of the military that’s going after sitting senators, sitting members of Congress, and part of the weaponization of government,” Gallego continued, “there will be consequences, without a doubt.”

Incredibly, Gallego then predicted that officers who participate in a potential Kelly tribunal would be “looking over their shoulders because they know that Donald Trump will be gone and they will not have that protection there, and they’re gonna have to do the safest thing possible, which is follow the Constitution of the United States, and you’ll be fine.”

Keep reading

Democrat Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick Surrenders to Authorities After Allegedly Laundering $5 Million in FEMA Funds — Allegedly Bought 3.14-Carat Yellow Diamond Ring

A sitting Democratic member of Congress from Broward County, Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, surrendered to federal authorities Tuesday in Miami amid explosive allegations that she orchestrated a scheme to steal and launder $5 million in FEMA COVID-19 disaster relief funds, and used a portion to bankroll her 2021 congressional campaign and purchase a luxury yellow diamond ring.

The 46-year-old Congresswoman appeared in Miami federal court in handcuffs following a 15-count federal indictment issued last week. She now faces charges including conspiracy, theft of government funds, money laundering, making and receiving straw-donor contributions, and filing false statements on her federal tax return.

According to the Department of Justice, prosecutors allege that Cherfilus-McCormick and her 51-year-old brother, Edwin Cherfilus, siphoned off $5,057,850 FEMA funds.

“The indictment alleges that the defendants conspired to steal that $5 million and routed it through multiple accounts to disguise its source. Prosecutors allege that a substantial portion of the misappropriated funds was used as candidate contributions to Cherfilus-McCormick’s 2021 congressional campaign and for the personal benefit of the defendants.

The indictment further alleges that Cherfilus-McCormick and Nadege Leblanc, 46, of Miramar, arranged additional contributions using straw donors, funneling other monies from the FEMA-funded Covid-19 contract to friends and relatives who then donated to the campaign as if using their own money.

The indictment also charges Cherfilus-McCormick and her 2021 tax preparer David K. Spencer, 41, of Davie, with conspiring to file a false federal tax return. According to the indictment, they falsely claimed political spending and other personal expenses as business deductions and inflated charitable contributions in order to reduce her tax obligations.”

Keep reading

Undermining America’s National Security Is Nothing New For Mark Kelly

Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., has found himself in some pretty hot water — and for good reason.

On Monday, the Department of War announced that Kelly, a retired Navy captain, could be “recall[ed] to active duty for court-martial proceedings or administrative measures” because of his participation in what has now been dubbed the “Seditious Six” video. As The Federalist’s Breccan Thies summarized, the video in question featured Kelly and other “Democrat lawmakers encourag[ing] military members to ignore orders from President Donald Trump, their commander-in-chief.”

“In a spliced video section from Reps. Chris Deluzio, D-Penn., and Jason Crow, D-Colo., they said that ‘threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.’ That was immediately followed by Kelly stating, ‘Our laws are clear: You can refuse illegal orders,’” Thies wrote. “They never specified which orders are illegal.”

According to War Secretary Pete Hegseth, while “[f]ive of the six individuals in that video do not fall under @DeptofWar jurisdiction,” Kelly — a “retired Navy Commander” — “is still subject to UCMJ [the Uniform Code of Military Justice].” Under the UCMJ, the secretaries of military departments are authorized to recall any retired service member to active duty in most cases.

Keep reading

New Jersey Governor’s Special Election Trick Is ‘Blatant Political Corruption’

As legendary Green Bay Packers coach Vince Lombardi was fond of saying, winning isn’t everything; it’s the only thing. Lombardi didn’t invent that declaration of excellence, nor did he believe that everything included rigging the rules to one team’s advantage. 

The Democratic Party on the other hand has taken the mantra to mean doing everything — and anything — to win. Victory at all costs includes rigging primary timelines to benefit the preferred candidates of party bosses, Republicans allege. 

Special Leftists

While most pols have turned the page from this month’s blue state liberal wins to next year’s pivotal midterms, there’s still some electoral business to finish before the close of 2025. 

Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District is in the homestretch of a special election slated for Tuesday. The race pits Republican and military vet Matt Van Epps against state Rep. Aftyn Behn, a Nashville Democrat, to fill the seat vacated by former Rep. Mark Green. 

Van Epps is running with the endorsement of President Donald Trump, who won the sprawling congressional district by more than 22 percentage points last year. Behn, known as the “AOC of Tennessee” in no small part because of her stated belief that men can have babies, has the backing of a long list of big-name leftists.

And then there’s New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District special election to fill the seat vacated by Democrat Rep. Mikie Sherrill by virtue of her victory earlier this month in the Garden State’s gubernatorial race. Following Sherrill’s resignation from the congressional seat she’s held for nearly seven years, outgoing New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy set a rather hasty special election timeline. 

Keep reading

The ‘Seditious Six’ Publicly Beg Rogue Spooks For Another Russia Hoax 

Congressional Democrats may have publicly committed an act of sedition against the United States of America. These politicians, now known as the “Seditious Six,” are encouraging insubordination to intentionally drive a wedge between the military and the commander-in-chief.

The propaganda video, posted by a former CIA officer-turned-senator, hypnotically suggests that military and intelligence officials should “refuse illegal orders.” These Democrats were unable to cite any specific “illegal orders” when pressed by multiple corporate media anchors over the weekend. Their campaign intended to recruit a new wave of lawfare-focused military and intel officials — like the ones who weaponized their agencies against President Trump — to commit congressionally approved sedition. 

In response, the Department of War has launched an investigation into retired Capt. Mark Kelly over allegations of misconduct. Last week, President Trump referred to the lawmakers in the video as “traitors.” This investigation is proof that the Trump administration recognizes this to be a clear and present danger, not just baseless rhetoric. 

It’s no secret that military and intelligence communities have been infiltrated by leftist operatives who prioritize political power over their sworn duty to defend our country. The most egregious examples include former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, former CIA Director John Brennan, and the countless military officials who supported an unlawful order by mandating their fellow service members to take the Covid-19 shot. The “Seditious Six” want this video to inspire more unelected bureaucrats to help undermine President Trump.

Milley, the highest-ranking military official during Trump’s first term, is the exact type of military officer this video is targeting. Milley earned degrees from the liberal institutions of Princeton and Columbia University. He infamously told the House Armed Services Committee he wanted to “understand white rage, and I’m white.” More seriously, he allegedly told Chinese military officials he would undermine President Trump by providing an early warning before an attack from the United States. Many legal scholars agree with Trump that this is an act of treason. Yet Joe Biden rewarded Milley’s treachery with an unconditional, blanket pardon.

This video hopes to target other officials like former CIA Director John Brennan, who weaponized his agency to attack Donald Trump. Brennan is currently under criminal investigation for the Russia-collusion hoax that systematically undermined Trump’s chances of winning the 2016 election. The effects of the hoax were felt through 2017, as it distracted congressional Republicans and nearly halted Trump’s policy agenda. In 2018, Brennan also coincidentally endorsed Elissa Slotkin, his former CIA colleague featured in the video, by saying she “will help derail the Trump train.”

The implementation of the unlawful Covid-19 shot mandate set a frightening precedent; it is proof that the military can be influenced by leftist propaganda. As a former military officer in the Iowa Army National Guard, I felt the effects of this unlawful order. It was shocking to see so many military leaders passionately enforce this mandate. Clearly, the most ruthless implementers were also shamelessly left-wing. Those opportunistic radicals may view this video as a wink and a nod to resist the duly elected president. 

The U.S. military is heavily involved in operations across the globe, from Ukraine to Venezuela. Respecting the president’s role as commander-in-chief is imperative now more than ever as the crisis in Venezuela continues to escalate. Troops in the field can’t succeed amid open calls for defiance. During prior national emergencies, such as at the dawn of World War II or the start of the Civil War, maintaining military order played a key role in operational success. Military structure ensures national survival. 

Congress doesn’t have the authority to tell service members to make personal decisions about the law. Democrats circumvent the rule of law when they argue it is a moral duty to defy orders. They are unqualified to have judicial decisions placed in their hands. Previous administrations ordered morally questionable operations, such as Barack Obama’s airstrikes in Yemen, which killed four American citizens. Despite moral objections, service members carried out the order because it came from their commanding officer.  

Keep reading