Did the COVID vaccines really save 20M lives worldwide?

paper published in The Lancet in 2022 entitled Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study, estimated that COVID vaccinations prevented nearly 20 million excess deaths.

Here’s what I and others I respect think of this modeling study.

My take

Modeling studies can be very inaccurate and misleading.

The study shows that for every 10,000 people vaccinated, 36 deaths from COVID are averted!

Over 5.5 billion people have taken the shot, so the paper calculates the benefit at 5.5e9*36/10000 = 19.8M lives saved.

That’s how they get the number. It’s that simple.

So did they do a reality check on this? No, of course not. Otherwise the paper wouldn’t be accepted.

In the Pfizer trial, there were 22,030 who got the shot. So that means the drug averted 2.2*36 deaths = 79 COVID deaths.

It’s pretty well accepted that the vaccine only lasts 6 months which is why they tell you to get a booster every 6 months.

So how many net COVID deaths were “saved” in the Pfizer clinical trial? Per the supplementary appendix it was just 1.

Randomized clinical trials are among the highest quality scientific evidence available.

1 isn’t anywhere close to 79.

So we have to reject the Lancet COVID lives saved modeling study as wildly inaccurate.

And yet, the paper isn’t retracted!?! Which of course causes us to be very suspicious of anything published in medical journals nowadays that is COVID vaccine related.

Keep reading

American Board Of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Punishes Top Doctors Who Advocated For Early COVID Treatment

The FLCCC Alliance categorically disagrees with the recent decision by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) regarding the revocation of board certifications of FLCCC Chief Scientific Officer Dr. Paul Marik, and FLCCC Alliance President Emeritus Dr. Pierre Kory. We believe this decision represents a dangerous shift away from the foundational principles of medical discourse and scientific debate that have historically been the bedrock of medical education associations.

Since May 2022, when the ABIM first issued a Notice of Potential Disciplinary Action, Drs. Marik and Kory have tirelessly defended their positions, providing substantial medical and scientific evidence to support their recommendations for early COVID-19 treatment and their critiques of vaccine risks. Despite presenting over 170 references in a detailed 60-page response submitted in January 2023, the ABIM has chosen to dismiss these robust scientific contributions in favor of a narrow, “consensus-driven” narrative.

“This fight is about more than just our right to speak—it’s about protecting the future of healthcare. When doctors are silenced for questioning the prevailing narrative, we all lose,” said Dr. Pierre Kory. “We must ensure that medical decisions are guided by expertise and evidence, not by fear of reprisal. Our commitment is to every physician’s freedom to practice medicine based on what they know is right.”

Keep reading

The Twisted Psychology of Covid Mask-Wearing and Why So Many Democrats and Liberals Still Wear Them Everywhere

The proof is everywhere you turn and look. You will see these folks alone, in their car, wearing their Covid mask. You can witness these sheeple jogging down the sidewalk, alone, wearing their Fauci Flu face diaper. These mysophobia clones believed every single word that came out of Fauci’s mouth, because he is a “disease expert.” Follow the science, as they say.

Do everything the Centers for Disease Continuation instructs you to do, after all, that’s the U.S. government talking. Wear your mask. Social distance. Shelter in place. Wash hands with antibacterial stuff every time you touch anything, well, except your mask, which you can adjust a thousand times a day and it always remains germ free. Right?

Keep reading

Scientists: Real-Time Self-Assembly Structures Revealed In 2-Year Study Of Pfizer And Moderna Covid-19 Shots

This is a first-of-its-kind, pivotal study on the self-assembly structures occasionally observed by others since 2021. It blows the top off of the “Safe and Effective” narrative, exposing it not just as a lie but also as an intentional deception to hide the real contents of the shots. After all, the shots were billed as containing mRNA, which is considered to be synonymous with gene therapy. Indeed, mRNA was found to be present, but not one word was ever mentioned about artificial, non-biological, self-assembling structures.

So much for Informed Consent.

Both Pfizer and Moderna injections contained similar structures, suggesting that a race was on to test the technology. This means that scientists at both companies were pursuing the same goals in a similar way as AI companies compete for AGI. That they would think to test it, secretly, on the whole human race is a blatant and heinous crime against humanity. Every executive and scientist in these companies should be arrested and held to account.

AstraZeneca and Novavax apparently had significantly different observations.

Click here to download the entire study.

Keep reading

The Kafkaesque Phaseout of the Pandemic Penal Colony

Every so often, a narrative plays out on the national or international stage that can only be described as “Kafkaesque”—a term, according to Merriam-Webster, that refers to anything that might be “suggestive of Franz Kafka or his writings; especially, having a nightmarishly complex, bizarre, or illogical quality.” 

A quite recent echo of one of the iconic early 20th-century writer’s more bizarre literary creations can be found, I believe, in the experiences of two of the top participants in this summer’s Paris Olympics. Rather than evoking one of his more celebrated works, like The Trial or the sci-fi-style short story, “The Metamorphosis,” what they brought to mind was a somewhat lesser-known tale of his called “In the Penal Colony,” which describes the final episode of a sadistic practice carried out on an island used for that purpose overseen by bureaucrats involving an elaborate execution device that slowly tortures its subjects to death by inscribing the name of their capital offense—in this case, disobeying and disrespecting a superior—on their body over a 12-hour period, during which the victim has ample time to decipher and understand the nature of his crime.  

As the story unfolds, a traveler who has been invited to witness such a procedure and even offer an opinion about it becomes aware of just how far out of favor it has fallen with both the island’s administrator, who inherited it, and its population that as he watches, the officer charged with overseeing it frees the condemned man and takes his place, substituting the inscription with one that says, “Be just,” at which point the now-defective machine immediately kills him.  

But it is in Kafka’s description of how this devilish device and its being used to make examples of rulebreakers goes from mesmerizing the island’s inhabitants to ostensibly losing its hold on them, culminating in the officer’s decision to sacrifice himself, that it becomes applicable to contemporary events, as reflected in the separate yet related sagas of those two aforementioned champion athletes.

“This process and execution, which you now have an opportunity to admire, have no more open supporters in our colony,” he confides to the traveler. “I am its only defender…When the Old Commandant was alive, the colony was full of his supporters. I have something of the Old Commandant’s persuasiveness, but I completely lack his power, and as a result, the supporters have gone into hiding. There are still a lot of them, but no one admits to it.”

So what, you might ask, is the correlation between this strange century-old morality tale and the separate trials and triumphs of those two aforementioned competitors?

Keep reading

Fatal Myocarditis following COVID-19 mRNA Immunization: A Case Report and Differential Diagnosis Review

Carditis in childhood is a rare disease with several etiologies. We report a case of infant death due to pericarditis and myocarditis after the mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 (COVIDmRNAV). A 7-year-old male child received the first dose of the COVIDmRNAV and presented with monoarthritis and a fever non-responsive to oral antibiotics. The laboratory investigation showed signs of infection (leukocytosis, high levels of c-reactive protein). His condition rapidly deteriorated, and the patient died. The autopsy identified pericardial fibrin deposits, hemorrhagic areas in the myocardium, and normal valves. A diffuse intermyocardial inflammatory infiltrate composed of T CD8+ lymphocytes and histiocytes was identified. An antistreptolysin O (ASO) dosage showed high titers. The presence of arthritis, elevated ASO, and carditis fulfills the criteria for rheumatic fever. However, valve disease and Aschoff’s nodules, present in 90% of rheumatic carditis cases, were absent in this case. The temporal correlation with mRNA vaccination prompted its inclusion as one of the etiologies. In cases of myocardial damage related to COVID-19mRNAV, it appears to be related to the expression of exosomes and lipid nanoparticles, leading to a cytokine storm. The potential effects of the COVID-19mRNAV must be considered in the pathogenesis of this disease, whether as an etiology or a contributing factor to a previously initiated myocardial injury.

Keep reading

Tim Walz’s Covid Tyranny Included Shooting Citizens on Porches with Paintball Guns Before Shooting Them with Covid Shots 

A resurfaced video from the Covid lockdown tyranny of 2020 depicts police officers marching on the streets of Minneapolis, Minnesota in the evening of May 30, 2020 yelling at their fellow residents to get inside now, due to the Covid pandemic.

The police then aimed paintball guns at the residents who were standing on their own porches and opened fire, a potentially lethal act used in the name of preventing deaths during the plandemic.

Being hit by a paintball can kill a person, although the weapon is largely considered non-lethal as fatalities are exceedingly rare. The device is most often shot at people in sport, however those individuals wear protective gear, unlike the residents on their porches, greatly increasing the lethality of the device.

“In 2001, a 39-year-old man in the UK got hit by a paintball in the neck, which triggered a cardiovascular arrest, leading to his death. Another unfortunate incident occurred in 2007 when a valve on a paintball gun got detached accidentally, releasing a CO2 cylinder that struck a woman in the head. She died later,” The Paintball Hub said.

“Governor Tim Walz ordered police to shoot residents on their porches with paint balls during the COVID pandemic,” The Gateway Pundit reported.

Keep reading

The hierarchical arguments against the Covid interventions

The hierarchical arguments against the Covid interventions.

(1) NO EMERGENCY

The data showed it was a nothing burger even in early March 2020.

(2) CONFUSION JUSTIFIES NOTHING

Even if the data were unclear, uncertainty doesn’t justify overturning society.

(3) PRONE TO SEE THE APOCALYPSE

Even if the data about a perceived pandemic appeared certain, one must doubt it, as people have an instinctual fear of the mythical pandemic, and are prone to seeing one where there is not.

(4) INTERVENTIONS DON’T WORK

The interventions didn’t slow the spread, were recommended against as of 2019, and were only done out of panic, looking to be doing something, and copycatting other nations.

(5) INTERVENTION HARMS

Even if the interventions had narrowly slowed the spread, no cost-benefit analysis was done demonstrating that the benefits outweighed the harms. Instead, the one thing — infections — received infinite weight to all else. The interventions in fact had epic harms.

(6) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY

Even if the interventions had narrowly slowed the spread and cost-benefit analyses were in its favor (and we could trust the analysis wasn’t biased), such analyses never consider the inevitable creation of an “unclean” out group, those skeptical of the interventions thrust upon society, who can easily become the victims of democide, and if that happens the mainstream community will only say to themselves, “Good riddance.”

(7) VOLUNTARY

Even if the interventions worked and had no harms of any kind, people would do them voluntarily.

Keep reading

Dr. Fauci Reveals He’s Infected With COVID For Third Time After Being “Vaccinated and Boosted Six Times”

Dr. Anthony Fauci revealed that he’s been infected with COVID for a third time despite having been “vaccinated and boosted six times.”

Yes, really.

The former chief medical advisor to the president, who became the face of the COVID vaccination drive from late 2020 onwards, reacted to catching COVID-19 yet again by thanking the vaccine.

“I got infected about two weeks ago, it was my third infection, and I have been vaccinated and boosted a total of six times,” said Fauci.

Fauci, who back in 2021 said, “If you get vaccinated, you are protected,” seemingly hasn’t been protected from catching the virus despite receiving half a dozen vaccines.

He also separately asserted during the same year, “When people get vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected.”

Keep reading

Big Pharma Funds COVID Fact Checkers

FactCheck.org, the organization that flags “misleading” COVID-19 content for Facebook, is supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a philanthropic organization funded by pharmaceutical giant and vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson (J&J), YouTube commentator Jimmy Dore reported.

Dore said his own shows have often been slapped with a “misleading” label when he covered issues related to COVID-19 or vaccines.

“These fact check organizations aren’t there to check facts,” Dore said. “They’re there to push a political point of view and an agenda and to discredit people.”

Dore said when the organization “fact-checked” his work in the past, its claims were always “bogus.” He said FactCheck.org never reached out to consult him about his content, it twisted his words and it never even pointed to any erroneous facts.

Instead, he said, “They didn’t like my headlines,” and they would say they were misleading.

Johnson & Johnson’s viral vector COVID-19 vaccine received emergency use authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in February 2021. After the shot was linked to dangerous blood clots, its use was suspended a couple of months later and it was eventually completely pulled from the market in May 2023.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation was established in 1952 by Robert Wood Johnson II, who ran J&J with a bequest of shares from the pharmaceutical giant. Today, although the foundation says it has diversified its holdings, it holds nearly $2 billion in J&J stock.

Keep reading