REVEALED: Dr. Anthony Fauci confesses he ‘made up’ covid rules including 6 feet social distancing and masking kids

Bombshell testimony from Dr. Anthony Fauci reveals he made up the six foot social distancing rule and other measures to ‘protect’ Americans from covid.

Republicans put out the full transcript of their sit down interview with Fauci from January just days before his highly-anticipated public testimony on Monday. 

They plan to grill him about covid restrictions he put in place, that he admitted didn’t do much to ‘slow the spread’ of the virus. 

Kids’ learning loss and social setbacks have been well documented, with one National Institute of Health (NIH) study calling the impact of mask use on students’ literacy and learning was ‘very negative.’

And the impacts from social distancing caused ‘depression, generalized anxiety, acute stress, and intrusive thoughts,’ another NIH study found. 

Speaking to counsel on behalf of the committee earlier this year, Fauci told Republicans that the six foot social distancing rule ‘sort of just appeared’ and that he did not recall how it came about. 

‘You know, I don’t recall. It sort of just appeared,’ he said according to committee transcripts when pressed on how the rule came about. 

He added he ‘was not aware of studies’ that supported the social distancing, conceding that such studies ‘would be very difficult’ to do. 

In addition to not recalling any evidence supporting social distancing, Fauci also told the committee’s counsel that he didn’t remember reading anything to support that masking kids would prevent COVID.

Keep reading

Dangerous Gene Therapy Covid Shots Likely Tainted Blood Supply — Study

A revised preprint study, posted Wednesday, detailed the proven severe side effects of the Covid gene therapy injections and posited that blood products used for transfusions are tainted by the mutated blood of the vaccinated.

“…there are no methods to reliably remove the pathogenic protein or mRNA; therefore, it might not be prudent to use all such blood products until a definitive solution is found. Some medical facilities might not be able to dispose of blood products immediately; therefore, in such cases, the transfusion consent form provided to the patient should include the possibility of blood products being contaminated with spike protein or other foreign substances,” the study said in section 3 of the ‘Introduction’ section.

Note that the full study text must be obtained via download of the PDF.

The researchers discussed why vaccinated blood is so dangerous.

“Genetic vaccines, such as mRNA vaccines that encode spike proteins, have caused a wide variety of diseases in all organs and systems of the human body, including the nervous system, in addition to thrombosis, which has resulted in cardiovascular disorders in vaccine recipients [14–21],” the study said in section 1 of the ‘Introduction’ section.

Keep reading

National Academies review of harms of covid-19 vaccines is flawed

In January 2023, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) announced it would convene a panel of independent experts to carry out a “consensus study” reviewing the evidence of covid-19 vaccine harms.

The panel would “establish, accept, or reject a causal relationship” between the vaccines and a list of 19 adverse events – including serious conditions like infertility, blood clots, strokes, and nerve damage.

The review – commissioned by the Health Resources and Services Administration – would have huge ramifications because its findings would likely dictate whether people who filed a claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program would receive compensation for their covid-19 vaccine injuries.

An independent panel?

Billed as a review by ‘independent’ experts, I asked NASEM in January 2023 to disclose the names and financial conflicts of interest (COIs) of all panel members.

But NASEM responded saying, “The National Academies do not distribute completed conflict of interest forms.”

NASEM was asked to clarify if this meant that there were no COIs to declare, or if they simply refused to publish the disclosures.

“This project is still in its early stages,” wrote a spokesperson. “At this point the committee is still provisional and any updates to committee or disclosures will be posted online per the National Academies policies and procedures.”

So, I waited for the final report.

Keep reading

Excess Deaths in Cyprus Linked to Covid Injections — Government Data

research article detailing government data out of the Mediterranean island country of Cyprus has documented massive increases in death beginning with the Covid vaccination rollout of 2021.

“Through our study we demonstrate a substantial excess mortality from all causes in the Cyprus population, particularly during 2021 and 2022 even after excluding COVID-19 deaths. This increased mortality is particularly seen as compared to the first pandemic year (2020) and the pre-pandemic period. During the third and fourth quarters of 2021, total deaths represented an increase of +34.1% and +11.8%, respectively, while during the first quarter 2022, total deaths were 2365, an increase of +30.7%,” the research article said in the ‘Methods and Findings’ section.

The research article called for more investigation into the deaths to pinpoint their exact nature and cause.

“Our findings raise serious concerns regarding the potential impact of the vaccination campaign and other causes on mortality. A detailed cause-specific investigation of such a significant excess number of deaths is warranted to explore the potential factors leading to this concerning and unexplained increase in population mortality,” the research article said in the ‘Conclusion’ section.

The mortality numbers the research article used were sourced from data reported by the Cyprus Ministry of Health to the European Statistical Office (Eurostat) from a seven year period between 2016 and 2022, as well as information collected by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control on a weekly basis regarding Covid vaccination doses and related deaths.

Keep reading

Insane & Gross Turbo Cancer Cases From Covid Shots Flooding Social Media

Extremely aggressive fast-acting turbo cancers are being widely discussed on social media site X (formally Twitter).

In a post on X from Tuesday ‘They Keep Saying Its Rare‘, a Covid vaccine adverse event reporting profile, documented a gruesome face cancer on a vaccine victim and linked the related study on the phenomenon.

The case report study detailed the serious Covid shot side effect which began just four days post vaccination.

“We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19,” the study said in the ‘Abstract’ section. “We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer.”

Keep reading

mRNA Vaccines Permanently Alter DNA of the Vaxxed & Their Offspring — Censored Study

Dr. Peter McCullough posted a video to X (formerly Twitter) on Thursday which focused on censorship by LinkedIn of a study which documented how mRNA gene therapy ‘vaccines’ such as the Covid shots permanently alter the genetics of the vaccinated and their progeny via insertion of mRNA into the human DNA.

“The Pfizer and Moderna genetic code is permanently installed into the human genome,” McCullough said. “So as we sit here today we have to reconcile that Pfizer and Moderna potentially could have permanently changed the human genome.”

The doctor went on to say that conclusive research has not yet been conduct to confirm if the entire mRNA sequence is permanently incorporated into DNA, as he hopes the body will edit it out, yet it’s a strong possibility that mankind has forever been fundamentally altered, something he referred to as ‘very disturbing’.

McCullough also discussed the concern that the Pfizer and Moderna genetic code has imbedded itself within sex cells, causing permanent mutations for all offspring of the vaccinated lineage.

Keep reading

Those Who Brought Us Lockdown Are Unrepentant

Readers of the Daily Sceptic may be interested to listen to yesterday’s UnHerd roundtable discussion conducted with Lee Cain (former Director of Communications at 10 Downing Street and a leading member of Boris Johnson’s ‘brain trust’). It is, as academics say, a ‘rich text’, with an awful lot in it to digest. But what really fascinated me about it – and what has really fascinated me about all of the General Election coverage so far – is the shoe that simply hasn’t dropped: namely, the biggest public policy decision since the Second World War, which was the 2020 lockdown.

Cain provides a very interesting diagnosis of what has gone wrong for the Tories since 2019. But it is only two thirds of the way into the conversation that the subject of Covid comes up. And it is discussed almost in isolation as though it took place in a never-never land – as though, indeed, it doesn’t touch upon almost every single thorny issue in which the Government now finds itself entangled: inflation, public borrowing, a self-entitled and unproductive civil service, NHS waiting lists, declining public order and civility, a backlog of criminal cases, excess deaths, huge increases in school truancy and behavioural problems in schools, and so on and so on.

It is almost as though spunking up to £410 billion of public money, deliberately stoking irrational fears amongst the populace, closing schools and universities for almost a year off and on, and telling people not to go to hospital for months on end was a series of actions that were always going to be consequence-free – a no-brainer that was just going to provide a sugar-rush of good opinion polling followed by a happy period of ‘building back better’. And it is painfully evident, listening to the Cain interview, that he remains stuck in that mindset, insisting that failing to have a lockdown in March 2020 would have been “against all the scientific evidence” and even doubling down on the insanity by suggesting that the main problem of Covid policy was trying to open up too quickly in the summer of that year.

Keep reading

Official US government data shows that there is no doubt whatsoever that the COVID vaccines cause Guillain-Barre, Bell’s palsy, and other serious side effects

The medical community, including NASEM (the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine) have determined that the COVID vaccines do NOT cause GBS, Bell’s palsy (and hundreds of other side effects).

In this article, I will show you official government data that simply cannot be explained if that is true.

This new evidence, most of which has been available in plain sight for years, will blow your mind. It has never been shown publicly before, as far as I know, even though it is in plain sight.

The bottom line is that for some reason, nearly all the scientific studies that investigate harms from the COVID vaccine never seem to be able to find any safety signals even when those signals are undeniable.

This means we should never rely on any scientific studies about the safety of the COVID vaccines until these fundamental flaws are discovered, acknowledged, and fixed.

The official US government evidence in plain sight is undeniable

If the COVID vaccines are so safe, why are the rates of adverse event reports for many conditions nearly solely associated with one vaccine: the COVID vaccine?

The charts below are the VAERS data for over 30 years of every vaccine type.

The numbers are not higher for the COVID vaccines because of the number of doses delivered. There have been far more flu vaccines delivered than COVID vaccines since it’s an annual shot.

About 150M flu shots are given every year vs. 680M COVID shots delivered. So in the past 30 years, that’s 4.5B shots. So there should be 6X as many events for any background disease tallied against the flu shots than the COVID shots.

And nearly everyone gets all the childhood vaccines. For some vaccines it’s 4 or 5 doses. So it’s roughly 4*340M = 1.3B shots for each of the vaccines with 4 doses.

Keep reading

UK “disinformation unit” spied on citizens and flagged online speech for removal during pandemic

New documents reveal that authorities in the UK considered placing government employees inside of social media companies to form a type of digital KGB that would control online speech during the pandemic.

This is according to recently released minutes from the governing board of the Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU). They show that, as many people suspected, British authorities were actively involved in monitoring people’s speech online and flagging certain viewpoints for removal.

At one point, they discussed a strategy to “embed” civil servants in various companies that were running social media platforms, and there is nothing in the document to indicate that they did not follow through on this.

The CDU, which has since been rebranded the National Security Online Information Team in response to heavy scrutiny, insists that it is “countering disinformation and hostile state narratives” but the agency, along with government-hired private contractors, was put in charge of surveilling British citizens and silencing those who were deemed to be “COVID measures dissenters.”

Instead of going after foreign adversaries who were spreading misinformation, they were targeting British citizens – from journalists and medical professionals to politicians – who were criticizing the government.

Keep reading

Academic Validation: “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy

Finally, academia weighs in on Technocracy. David A. Hughes has released his massive book, “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy. He says, “Technocracy has been incubated for decades in China with the support of the Rockefellers and various technology transfers, and, with proof of concept having been established, the aim is now to roll it out in the West.”

Catherine Austin Fitts recognized David Hughes on the Solari Report:

Our Hero of the Week, the brilliant David A. Hughes, is a university lecturer on security studies, international relations theory, foreign policy analysis, globalization, and U.S. exceptionalism. With dual doctorates in German Studies and International Relations, his wide-ranging research interests include psychological warfare, 9/11, Covid-19, the deep state, intelligence crime, technocracy, resurgent totalitarianism, and global class relations.

Hughes frequently cites my work on the Trilateral Commission, Technocracy, and Transhumanism, keeping the whole body of thought in proper context.

If successfully implemented, technocracy will be worse than anything imaginable by Hitler or Stalin, because it amounts to the biodigital enslavement of humanity through biometric technologies, the “Internet of Bodies,” constant surveillance and monitoring, central bank digital currencies, and a Chinese-style social credit system. Moreover, if allowed to happen, such a control system could prove irreversible. Technocracy has been incubated for decades in China with the support of the Rockefellers and various technology transfers, and, with proof of concept having been established, the aim is now to roll it out in the West.

Keep reading